Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:30:50.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EXPECTED CONTENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

JEFFREY HELZNER*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
*
*DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY E-mail:[email protected]

Abstract

We propose an approach to assigning propositional content to deliberate acts of arbitrary type, as opposed to just speech acts. This approach, which is based on the idea that the content of an act is the decision maker's expectation concerning the change that would take place if the act were to be performed, is shown to be related to the concept of expected utility that has played a central role in various accounts of rationality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Levi, I. (1980). The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levi, I. (1996). For the Sake of the Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1980).Index, context, and content. In Kanger, S., and Ohman, S., editors. Philosophy and Grammar. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar
Mac Lane, S. (1971). Categories for the Working Mathematician. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1972). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Dover Publications (the Dover edition is a republication of the 1954 work).Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1999). Context and Content. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, A. (1950). Statistical Decision Functions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar