No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
What Comes after Rawlsianism? - Katrina Forrester: In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019. Pp. 432.)
Review products
Katrina Forrester: In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019. Pp. 432.)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- A Symposium on Katrina Forrester's In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Notre Dame
References
1 See, e.g., Sandel, Michael, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar.
2 For example, as Adom Getachew and Karuna Mantena argue, anticolonial political thought posed new “concrete universals” that were both “disclosed in the institutional and cultural fabric of the colonized world” and whose realization “depended on the political practices and agency of the colonized.” Getachew and Mantena, “Anticolonialism and the Decolonization of Political Theory,” Critical Times 4, no. 3 (Dec. 2021): 363.
3 Though Forrester is often very careful in her text to refer to her object in specific terms (“liberal egalitarianism,” not political philosophy as such), there is some slippage between the two, particularly when the question arises as to how to move beyond Rawlsianism. See Sophie Smith, “Historicizing Rawls,” Modern Intellectual History 18, no. 4 (2021): 938.
4 Hanchard, Michael, “Contours of Black Political Thought: An Introduction and Perspective,” Political Theory 38, no. 4 (August 2010): 513CrossRefGoogle Scholar.