Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:50:06.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unexpected Support for European Integration: Memory, Rupture, and Totalitarianism in Arendt's Political Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2014

Peter J. Verovšek
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Collective memory is an important source of social stability, allowing human beings and political communities to integrate new experiences into existing narrative frameworks. In addition to sustaining individual and group identities, remembrance can also maintain cycles of hatred. Building on Arendt's political theory, I present an alternative interpretation of memory as a resource for political change following historical ruptures. This constructive reading focuses on the ability of communities to create new futures out of the shattered pieces of the past. For Arendt, the experience of totalitarianism was a caesura that made nationalist histories, and the nation-state that came with these interpretations of the past, untenable. Following such breaks, communities must reconstruct the past into new narratives. Arendt's unexpected early support for European integration—despite its supranational, technocratic, and economistic qualities—is an example of how memory can function as a resource for political transformation in the aftermath of historical ruptures.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , Summer 2014 , pp. 389 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schacter, Daniel L., The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001)Google Scholar. See also Finney, P., “On Memory, Identity and War,” Rethinking History 6, no. 1 (2002): 1–13Google Scholar; Hirsch, Herbert, Genocide and the Politics of Memory: Studying Death to Preserve Life (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Bechev, Dimitar and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso, Mediterranean Frontiers: Borders, Conflict and Memory in a Transnational Era (New York: Tauris Academic Studies, 2010)Google Scholar; Purcell, Sarah J., “War, Memory and National Identity in the Twentieth Century,” National Identities 2, no. 2 (2000): 187–95Google Scholar; Antoniou, Giorgos, “Commemorando le guerre civili: Memorie pubbliche e politiche del ricordo nell' Europa del Novecento: Introduzione,” Memoria e Ricerca 21, no. 1 (2006): 5–20Google Scholar.

2 Minow, Martha, Breaking the Cycles of Hatred: Memory, Law, and Repair, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy L. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Maier, Charles S., “A Surfeit of Memory? Reflections on History, Melancholy and Denial,” History and Memory 5, no. 2 (1993): 140Google Scholar.

3 For more on these “positive” and “negative” readings of memory, see König, Helmut, Politik und Gedächtnis (Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft, 2008), 23–31Google Scholar.

4 Benhabib, Seyla, “Arendt and Adorno: The Elusiveness of the Particular and the Benjaminian Moment,” in Understanding Political Modernity: Comparative Perspectives on Adorno and Arendt, ed. Rensmann, Lars and Gandesha, Samir (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012), 31–33Google Scholar; Arendt, Hannah, “Walter Benjamin: 1892–1940,” in Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, by Benjamin, Walter, ed. Arendt (New York: Schocken Books, 1977), 51Google Scholar.

5 Arendt, Hannah, Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (New York: Penguin Books, 1977), 5Google Scholar.

6 Owens, Patricia, Between War and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Rensmann, Lars, “Europeanism and Americanism in the Age of Globalization: Hannah Arendt's Reflections on Europe and America and Implications for a Post-National Identity of the EU Polity,” European Journal of Political Theory 5, no. 2 (2006): 140Google Scholar.

7 Burke, Anthony, “Recovering Humanity from Man: Hannah Arendt's Troubled Cosmopolitanism,” International Politics 45, no. 4 (2008): 518Google Scholar; Devetak, Richard, “Between Kant and Pufendorf: Humanitarian Intervention, Statist Anti-Cosmopolitanism and Critical International Theory,” Review of International Studies 33 (2007): 151–74Google Scholar.

8 Rensmann, “Europeanism and Americanism in the Age of Globalization,” 163; Owens, Patricia, “Walking Corpses: Arendt on the Limits and the Possibilities of Cosmopolitan Politics,” in International Relations Theory and Philosophy: Interpretive Dialogues, ed. Moore, Cerwyn and Farrands, Chris (London: Routledge, 2010), 74Google Scholar.

9 Scott, Joanna Vecchiarelli and Stark, Judith Chelius, “Rediscovering Hannah Arendt,” in Love and Saint Augustine, by Arendt, Hannah, ed. Scott, and Stark, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), 116Google Scholar; Benhabib, Seyla, The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), 86–91Google Scholar.

10 McMullin, Irene, “The Amnesia of the Modern: Arendt on the Role of Memory in the Constitution of the Political,” Philosophical Topics 39, no. 2 (2011): 94, 97, 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), 83Google Scholar. Arendt uses the word “man” and the pronoun “he” to refer to the human. I follow Arendt in using masculine pronouns to ensure consistency in the text.

12 Ibid., 176–77, 237–40.

13 Ibid., 8.

14 Arendt, Hannah, The Life of the Mind: Willing (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1978), 11Google Scholar; Beiner, Ronald, “Hannah Arendt on Judging,” in Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy, by Arendt, Hannah, ed. Beiner (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 155Google Scholar; Arendt, The Human Condition, 95. Arendt argues that memory provides the means by which future and past meet in the mental nunc stans (“standing now”). This space represents the nonhistorical eternal present in which thinking operates. It thus “beats . . . a timeless track into the world of space and time” (Arendt, Hannah, The Life of the Mind: Thinking [New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1978], 212Google Scholar).

15 Arendt, The Human Condition, 95.

16 Benjamin, Illuminations, 90.

17 Arendt, Hannah, “The Modern Concept of History,” Review of Politics 20, no. 4 (1958): 570Google Scholar; Herodotus, The Histories, ed. Dewald, Carolyn, trans. Waterfield, Robin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 3Google Scholar. Cf. McMullin, “Amnesia of the Modern,” 93.

18 Arendt, The Human Condition, 194; Kohn, Jerome, “Freedom: The Priority of the Political,” in The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt, ed. Villa, Dana Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 117Google Scholar.

19 Arendt, The Human Condition, 192. Highlighting the importance of primary sources, Benjamin also observes, “experience which is passed on from mouth to mouth is the source from which all storytellers have drawn” (Illuminations, 90).

20 Quoted in Arendt, Between Past and Future, 77.

21 Ibid., 132, 45. Also Arendt, “Modern Concept of History,” 575.

22 Assmann, Aleida, Assmann, Jan, and Hardmeier, Christof, eds., Schrift und Gedächtnis: Beiträge zur Archäologie der literarischen Kommunikation (Munich: W. Fink, 1983)Google Scholar; Arendt, “The Modern Concept of History,” 573–74.

23 Arendt, The Human Condition, 95.

24 Ibid., 194–95; Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Brace Harcourt, 1951), 465Google Scholar.

25 Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, 465; Owens, “Walking Corpses,” 77. See also Arendt, Hannah, “Ideology and Terror: A Novel Form of Government,” Review of Politics 15, no. 3 (1953): 311Google Scholar.

26 Arendt, The Human Condition, 198; Arendt, Between Past and Future, 256–57; Jeremy Waldron, “Arendt's Constitutional Politics,” in Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt, 208.

27 Arendt, The Human Condition, 197–98.

28 Kohn, “Freedom,” 125; Kateb, George, Hannah Arendt: Politics, Conscience, Evil (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, 1984), 158Google Scholar; McMullin, “Amnesia of the Modern,” 93.

29 McMullin, “Amnesia of the Modern,” 104.

30 Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, 434; McMullin, “Amnesia of the Modern,” 105; Arendt, Hannah, “Authority in the Twentieth Century,” Review of Politics 18, no. 4 (1956): 405Google Scholar.

31 Arendt, “Ideology and Terror,” 303. Agamben argues that under the Führerprinzip the leader takes on the agency, authority, and faculty of the sovereign in his own physical person (Agamben, Giorgio, State of Exception [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005], 83–84Google Scholar). On Arendt's account of the novelty of totalitarianism, see Stanley, John L., “Is Totalitarianism a New Phenomenon? Reflections on Hannah Arendt's Origins of Totalitarianism,” Review of Politics 49, no. 2 (1987): 177–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mayer, Robert, “Hannah Arendt, National Socialism and the Project of Foundation,” Review of Politics 53, no. 3 (1991): 469–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Mayer, “Hannah Arendt, National Socialism and the Project of Foundation,” 471, 485.

33 Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, 465–66. Also Arendt, “Authority in the Twentieth Century,” 408; Arendt, “Ideology and Terror,” 312–13.

34 Arendt, “Authority in the Twentieth Century,” 405, see also 408; Arendt, Hannah, The Promise of Politics (New York: Schocken Books, 2005), 77Google Scholar.

35 McMullin, “Amnesia of the Modern,” 105.

36 Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, 434–35.

37 Heidegger, Martin, “Das Ge-Stell,” in Gesamtausgabe, vol. 79 (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1994), 27Google Scholar, translation mine, and the third Bremer lecture entitled “Die Gefahr.” For more, see Harries, Karsten, “Philosophy, Politics, Technology” in Martin Heidegger: Politics, Art, and Technology, ed. Harries, Karsten and Jamme, Christoph (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1994)Google Scholar.

38 Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, 452.

39 Ibid, 332.

40 Arendt, Between Past and Future, 94.

41 Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Penguin Books, 2006), 63, 287–88Google Scholar. For more references to Eichmann's memory, see also 48, 54, 55, and 106. See also Schiff, Jacob, “The Varieties of Thoughtlessness and the Limits of Thinking,” European Journal of Political Theory 12, no. 2 (2013): 99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McMullin, “Amnesia of the Modern,” 104–6.

42 Arendt, “Walter Benjamin,” 38. Cf. Garsten, Bryan, “The Elusiveness of Arendtian Judgment,” Social Research 74, no. 4 (2007): 1071–1108Google Scholar.

43 Benhabib, Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt, 91; Levy, Daniel and Sznaider, Natan, “Memory Unbound: The Holocaust and the Formation of Cosmopolitan Memory,” European Journal of Social Theory 5, no. 1 (2002): 87–106Google Scholar; Owens, Patricia, “Hannah Arendt,” in Critical Theorists and International Relations, ed. Edkins, Jenny and Vaughan-Williams, Nick (London: Routledge, 2009), 34Google Scholar.

44 Arendt, Between Past and Future, 26; Benhabib, Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt, 86–92.

45 Arendt, Hannah, “A Reply,” Review of Politics 15, no. 1 (1953): 77, 79Google Scholar.

46 Owens, Between War and Politics, 2–3.

47 Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, chap. 9; Benhabib, Seyla, The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 216–17Google Scholar.

48 Walter Benjamin, “Theses on the Philosophy of History,” in Illuminations, 257–58.

49 For example, Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar, A444/B476–A457/B479, A538/B566–A558/B586.

50 Arendt, Willing, 195–213.

51 Arendt, The Human Condition, 198; Tsao, Roy T., “Arendt against Athens: Rereading The Human Condition,” Political Theory 30, no. 1 (2002): 110–16Google Scholar.

52 Habermas, Jürgen and Derrida, Jacques, “February 15, or What Binds Europeans Together: A Plea for a Common Foreign Policy, Beginning in the Core of Europe,” Constellations 10, no. 3 (2003): 293Google Scholar.

53 Arendt, Hannah, On Revolution (New York: Penguin Classics, 1990), 195Google Scholar.

54 Arendt, Hannah, Essays in Understanding, 1930–1954, ed. Kohn, Jerome (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1994), 113Google Scholar; Tony Judt, “The ‘Problem of Evil’ in Postwar Europe,” New York Review of Books, 14 February 2008.

55 Arendt, The Human Condition, 241.

56 Tsao, Roy T., “Arendt and the Modern State: Variations on Hegel in The Origins of Totalitarianism,” Review of Politics 66, no. 1 (2004): 105Google Scholar, also 106–7.

57 Arendt, Hannah, “Imperialism, Nationalism, Chauvinism,” Review of Politics 7, no. 4 (1945): 454–55, 444–45Google Scholar; also Ronald Beiner, “Arendt and Nationalism,” in Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt, 44–62; Villa, Dana, “Hannah Arendt, 1906–1975,” Review of Politics 71, no. 1 (2009): 25–26Google Scholar.

58 Bates, David, “On Revolutions in the Nuclear Age: The Eighteenth Century and the Postwar Global Imagination,” Qui Parle 15, no. 2 (2005): 174, 172Google Scholar.

59 Jaspers, Karl, The Future of Mankind, trans. Ashton, E. B. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), vii, 6, 28Google Scholar; Camus, Albert, “Between Hell and Reason,” in Hiroshima's Shadow, ed. Bird, Kai and Lifschultz, Lawrence (Stony Creek, CT: Pamphleteer's Press, 1998), 260–61Google Scholar.

60 Feenberg, Andrew, Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of History (New York: Routledge, 2005), 138Google Scholar; Rensmann, “Europeanism and Americanism in the Age of Globalization,” 144–45.

61 Hannah Arendt, Essays in Understanding, 108, 113; Arendt, On Revolution, 195.

62 See Arendt, Hannah and Blücher, Heinrich, Within Four Walls: The Correspondence between Hannah Arendt and Heinrich Blücher, 1936–1968 (New York: Harcourt, 2000)Google Scholar. Also Hannah Arendt, “The Aftermath of Nazi Rule: Report from Germany,” in Essays in Understanding, 1930–1954, 248–69.

63 Arendt, Hannah and Jaspers, Karl, Correspondence, 1926–1969, ed. Kohler, Lotte and Saner, Hans (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993), 351Google Scholar.

64 Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, 458; Owens, Patricia, “The Ethic of Reality in Hannah Arendt,” in Political Thought and International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme, ed. Bell, Duncan (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 105Google Scholar; also Owens, “Hannah Arendt,” 35. For an example of naïve liberalism, see Angell, Norman, The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to Their Economic and Social Advantage (New York: Putnam, 1910)Google Scholar.

65 Chenaux, Philippe and Mayeur, Jean Marie, Une Europe vaticane? Entre le Plan Marshall et les Traités de Rome (Brussels: Éditions Ciaco, 1990)Google Scholar. For an example of Arendt's view of Adenauer, see Arendt and Jaspers, Correspondence, 370. Other thinkers like Theodor Adorno shared this suspicion of Adenauer and the Christian Democrats. In 1956 Adorno observed that despite the difficulties inherent in political involvement, “we must be against Adenauer” (Adorno, Theodor and Horkheimer, Max, “Towards a New Manifesto?,” New Left Review 65 [September–October 2010]: 57Google Scholar).

66 See Wolin, Richard, The Frankfurt School Revisited and Other Essays on Politics and Society (New York: Routledge, 2006), 232Google Scholar.

67 As Arendt points out, “Economics . . . could achieve a scientific character only when men had become social beings and unanimously followed certain patterns of behavior, so that those who did not keep the rules could be considered to be asocial or abnormal” (The Human Condition, 42).

68 See “L'organisation politique et économique de l'Europe occidentale,” in Une Europe inédite: Documents des archives Jean Monnet, ed. Lefort, Bernard (Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 2001), 61–71Google Scholar.

69 Rensmann, “Europeanism and Americanism in the Age of Globalization,” 160, 146; Owens, “Hannah Arendt,” 39; Owens, “Walking Corpses,” 76.

70 Arendt, On Revolution, 247, 248.

71 The High Authority was a sticking point for a number of postwar intellectuals. For instance, Alexandre Kojève gave up his career as a philosopher to take up a position at the French Ministry of Economic Affairs. From there, he wrote “memorandum after memorandum against supranationality and the High Authority” (Parsons, Craig, A Certain Idea of Europe [Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003], 58Google Scholar).

72 Arendt, Hannah, Crises of the Republic (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1969), 231Google Scholar; Arendt, Between Past and Future, 165.

73 Arendt, Crises of the Republic, 230; Owens, “Hannah Arendt,” 40.

74 Arendt quoted in Nikola Tietze and Ulrich Bielefeld, “In Search of Europe: An Interview with Jacques Delors,” Eurozine, 1 July 2011, 2.

75 Owens, “Walking Corpses,” 73; Assmann, Aleida, “Europe: A Community of Memory?,” GHI Bulletin 40 (Spring 2007): 11–25Google Scholar.

76 Owens, “The Ethic of Reality in Hannah Arendt,” 116.

77 Arendt, Hannah, Men in Dark Times (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1968), 93, 90–91Google Scholar.

78 Arendt, Essays in Understanding, 112.

79 Ibid., 416–17.

80 Ibid., 108; Hannah Arendt, “A Believer in European Unity,” review of Friedrich von Gentz: Defender of the Old Order, by Sweet, Paul R., Review of Politics 4, no. 2 (1942): 247Google Scholar; Owens, “Walking Corpses,” 75.

81 Cf. Rodriguez, Michelle, “The Challenges of Keeping a World: Hannah Arendt on Administration,” Polity 40, no. 4 (2008): 488–508Google Scholar.

82 Arendt, Men in Dark Times, 81; Arendt, On Revolution, 267.

83 Arendt, Crises of the Republic, 231; Owens, “Walking Corpses,” 81; Arendt, Men in Dark Times, 81.

84 Rensmann, “Europeanism and Americanism in the Age of Globalization,” 139–70.

85 Cf. Müller, Jan-Werner, “Europäische Erinnerungspolitik Revisited,” Transit: Europäische Revue, no. 33 (2007): 125–37Google Scholar.

86 Nietzsche, Friedrich, On the Geneology of Morals and Ecce Homo, ed. Kaufmann, Walter (New York: Vintage Books, 1989), 57Google Scholar.

87 Arendt, The Human Condition, 249, 248.

88 Arendt, Men in Dark Times, ix, vii. See Benhabib, Seyla, Tsao, Roy T., and Verovšek, Peter J., eds., Politics in Dark Times: Encounters with Hannah Arendt (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

89 Arendt, The Human Condition, chap. 6.

90 Bottici, Chiara, “Europe, War and Remembrance,” in The Search for a European Identity: Values, Policies and Legitimacy of the European Union, ed. Cerutti, Furio and Lucarelli, Sonia (London: Routledge, 2008), 45–58Google Scholar.

91 Paul Scheffer, “EU Can No Longer Play the War Card,” De Morgen, 19 January 2012, http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/article/1416561-eu-can-no-longer-play-war-card; Fligstein, Neil, Euro-Clash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 141Google Scholar.

92 Smith, Rogers M., Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

93 Beasley, Alessandra, “Public Discourse and Cosmopolitan Political Identity: Imagining the European Union Citizen,” Futures 38 (2006): 139Google Scholar.

94 Peter J. Verovšek, “Memory and the Euro-Crisis of Leadership: The Effects of Generational Change in Germany and the EU,” Constellations (forthcoming).