Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:22:41.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Trade Disputes and Trade Unions Act of 1927: The Aftermath of the General Strike

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Melvin C. Shefftz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The British general strike of May, 1926, was a strange event. Over two and a half million men left their work and for nine days closed down the British economy. It was the greatest strike ever to take place in Western Europe and it evoked much class bitterness. And yet many middle- and upper-class Englishmen who had been bitter and angry during the strike came eventually to look back on it as a gay adventure which showed how peaceful and sensible Englishmen were. They were proud that they had fought so great an industrial battle to a conclusion without a single death or even the firing of a single shot. Alfred Duff Cooper (Lord Norwich) who was a young back-bencher at the time of the strike (he later became Secretary of State for War and First Lord of the Admiralty) wrote in 1953 in his autobiography: “… it [the strike] threatened the survival of parliamentary government, and it brought the country nearer to revolution than it has ever been.” But despite this, English good sense triumphed: “Happily, no grave errors of judgment were made by either side and the remarkable result was achieved of complete victory without vindictiveness on the one side or rancour on the other. The air was cleared and from that day to this relations between capital and labour have been happier in Great Britain.”.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , July 1967 , pp. 387 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cooper, Duff, Old Men Forget, (London, 1953), p. 147.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., p. 155.

3 Graubard, Stephen Richards, British Labour and the Russian Revolution, 1917–1924 (Cambridge, Mass., 1956), pp. 64–116.Google Scholar

4 British Gazette, 05 6, 1926.Google Scholar

5 British Worker, 05 7, 1926.Google Scholar

6 Nicholson, Harold, King George the Fifth, His Life and Reign (London, 1952), pp. 418–419.Google Scholar

7 Citrine, Lord, Men and Work (London, 1964), pp. 182–183. Citrine was secretary of the Trade Union Congress and kept a diary during the strike.Google Scholar

8 British Gazette, 05 10, 1926.Google Scholar

9 Commons Debates, 06 2, 1926, cols. 822–826, speech of the Home Secretary, Sir Joynson-Hicks, William.Google Scholar

10 Arnot, R. Page, The Miners: Years of Struggle (London, 1953), pp. 499–506;Google ScholarCrook, Wilfred Harris, The General Strike (Chapel Hill, 1951), pp. 423–469;Google Scholar and Symons, Julian, The General Strike (London, 1957), pp. 203–225.Google Scholar

11 Commons Debates, 02 8, 1927, col. 10.Google Scholar

12 Ibid., February 14, 1927, col. 597.

13 Ibid., col. 659.

14 Ibid., col. 713.

15 Commons Debates, 05 6, 1926, col. 583.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., col. 585.

17 Ibid., May 10, 1926, col. 788.

18 The Times, 05 12, 1926.Google Scholar

19 Goodhart, A. L., The Legality of the General Strike in England (Cambridge, 1927). It first appeared as an article in the Yale Law Journal for 02, 1927.Google Scholar

20 Crook, Wilfred Harris, The General Strike (Chapel Hill, 1931), p. 614.Google Scholar

21 Commons Debates, 03 6, 1925, cols. 815–823, and Cooper, Duff, op. cit., pp. 141–143.Google Scholar

22 Commons Debates, 03 6, 1925, cols. 840–841.Google Scholar

23 Crook, , op. cit., pp. 614–622.Google Scholar.

24 Commons Debates, 05 2, 1927, col. 1306.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., col. 1307.

26 Ibid., col. 1310.

27 Ibid., col. 1327.

28 Ibid., col. 1332.

29 Ibid., col. 1340.

30 Ibid., col. 1343.

31 The Times, 05 4, 1927.Google Scholar

32 Webb, Beatrice, Diaries, 1924–1932, Cole, Margaret I., ed., (London, 1956), p. 140.Google Scholar

33 New Statesman, 05 7, 1927.Google Scholar

34 Commons Debates, 05 4, 1927, col. 1647.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., May 5, 1927, col. 1656.

36 Pelling, Henry, The British Communist Party, a Historical Profile (New York, 1958), pp. 27, 60–72. and 69–72Google Scholar

37 Commons Debates, 05 5, 1927, col. 1656.Google Scholar

38 Ibid., col. 1793.

39 Ibid., col. 1794.

40 Ibid., cols. 1792–1793.

41 Ibid., cols. 1886.

42 Ibid., cols. 1884.

43 Commons Debates, 05 16, 1927, col. 944.Google Scholar

44 The Home Secretary, Sir Joyson-Hicks, William had said in a speech on 12 6, 1913: “The people of Ulster have behind them the Unionist Party; behind them is the Lord God of Battle; in His name and in your name I say to the Prime Minister: ‘Let your armies and batteries fire. Fire if you dare; fire and be damned.’”Google Scholar[Johnson, Thomas, A Handbook for Rebels, a Guide to the Successful Defiance of the British Government (Dublin, 1918), p. 33.]Google Scholar

45 Commons Debates, 06 23, 1927, col. 2159.Google Scholar

46 Mowat, Charles Loch, Britain Between the Wars (London, 1956), p. 337.Google Scholar

47 Cole, G.D.H., British Trade Unionism To-Day (London, 1939), pp. 122–123Google Scholar, and Williams, Francis, Magnificent Journey (London, 1954), pp. 397–399.Google Scholar

48 Cole, G.D.H., A History of the Labour Party from 1914 (London, 1948), pp. 195 and 480–481.Google Scholar

49 Cooke, Colin, The Life of Richard Stafford Cripps (London, 1957), pp. 121–123Google Scholar, and Simon, Viscount, Retrospect, The Memoirs (London, 1952), pp. 164–165.Google Scholar

50 Bullock, Alan, The Life and Times of Ernest Bevin Vol. I (London, 1960), p. 637.Google Scholar

51 Cole, , op. cit., p. 393.Google Scholar

52 Commons Debates, 02 12, 1946, p. 194.Google Scholar

53 Ibid., col. 408.

54 Ibid., col. 402.

55 Ibid., col. 403.

56 Ibid., col. 399.

57 Cooper, Ibid.