Article contents
Strauss Before Straussianism: Reason, Revelation, and Nature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2009
Extract
Despite the impact of Leo Strauss on American political science and political theory, where, exactly, Strauss was “coming from,” in both senses of that phrase, has been far from clear. Carl Friedrich, reviewing the, at that point, unknown author's book on Hobbes, noted that Strauss might have been more forthcoming about his own position, but he believed that it was safe to conclude that he was a “historical relativist.” Friedrich may have been closer to the mark than many subsequent commentators realized, but in order to understand Strauss's work, it is necessary to return to the universe he inhabited before “coming to America.” Since Strauss's death, his enterprise has been subject to careful scrutiny, but his early life and work have remained opaque.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1991
References
1. Strauss, , The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism, ed. Pangle, Thomas (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), p. 43.Google Scholar
This essay is the final version of a long paper originally presented at a symposium on Leo Strauss sponsored by the Institute of Human Values at the annual conference of the Canadian Learned Societies, Laval, Quebec City, June 1989. The proceedings of the symposium were printed in the first issue of The Vital Nexus, May 1990. Two subsequent revisions were the basis of presentations at the University of Chicago (November 1989) and Princeton University (April 1990). Although the focus, argument, length, and content have been substantially transformed, I have retained the original main title, since the subject has remained “Strauss Before Straussianism.” I wish to acknowledge valuable conversations with Shadia Drury over a period of several years as well as her considerable aid in obtaining material, such as Strauss's dissertation, to which I did not have initial access. I also thank my colleague Peter Breiner for helping me work through passages in the untranslated dissertation.
2. Friedrich, Carl, “Thomas Hobbes: Myth Builder of the Modern World,” Journal of Social Philosophy 3 (1938): 25–57.Google Scholar
3. See, for example, Deutsch, Kenneth L. and Soffer, Walter, eds., The Crisis of Liberal Democracy: A Straussian Perspective (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Drury, Shadia, The Political Ideas of Leo Strauss (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. See Gunnell, John G., “American Political Science, Liberalism, and the Invention of Political Theory,” American Political Science Review 82 (1988): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. For a more analytical treatment of these issues based primarily on Strauss's later work, see Gunnell, John G., Political Theory: Tradition and Interpretation (Cambridge, MA.: Winthrop, 1979; University Press of America, 1987).Google Scholar“Political Theory and Politics: The Case of Leo Strauss,” Political Theory 13 (1985): 339–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Klein, Jacob and Strauss, Leo, “A Giving of Accounts,” The College 25 (1970): 2.Google Scholar
7. Strauss, Leo, “Why We Remain Jews: Can Jewish Faith and History still Speak to Us?” Lecture at the Hillel Foundation, Chicago, 1962, p. 3.Google Scholar
8. Strauss, Leo, Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), p. 31.Google Scholar
9. Leo, Strauss, Das Erkenntnisproblem in der philosophischen Lehre Fr. H. Jacobis, dissertation, University of Hamburg, 1921.Google Scholar This manuscript, and the possible impact of more than one dimension of the work of both Jacobi and his friend and contemporary J. G. Hamann, deserve more attention than can be rendered here.
10. Beiser, Frederick, The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
11. Klein and Strauss, “A Giving of Accounts” p. 2.Google Scholar
12. Ibid., p. 3.
13. Ibid., p. 1.
14. Ibid., p. 3.
15. Leo, Strauss, “An Unspoken Prologue to a Public Lecture at St. John's,” Interpretation 7 (1978): 2.Google Scholar
16. Strauss, , The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism, p. 28.Google Scholar
17. Strauss, , “An Unspoken Prologue to a Public Lecture at St. John's,” p. 2.Google Scholar
18. Klein, and Strauss, , “A Giving of Accounts,” p. 3.Google Scholar
19. Strauss, Leo, Spinoza's Critique of Religion (New York: Schocken Books, 1965), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
20. Klein, and Strauss, , “A Giving of Accounts,” p. 3.Google Scholar
21. Leo, Strauss, Philosophic und Gesetz (Berlin: Schocken, 1935)Google Scholar; The Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: Its Genesis and Its Basis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936).Google Scholar
22. Strauss, , Spinoza's Critique of Religion, p. 1.Google Scholar
23. Ibid.
24. Ibid., p. 2.
25. Strauss, , “Why We Remain Jews: Can Faith and History Still Speak to Us?” p. 3.Google Scholar
26. Strauss, , Spinoza's Critique of Religion, p. 3.Google Scholar
27. Ibid., p. 5.
28. Strauss, , “Why We Remain Jews: Can Jewish Faith and History Still Speak to Us?” p. 9Google Scholar; “The Problem of Socrates,” Lecture at St. John's College, Annapolis, 1970, p. 5.Google Scholar
29. Strauss, , Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy, pp. 168, 233, 247.Google Scholar
30. Strauss, , Spinoza's Critique of Religion, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
31. Ibid., pp. 9–10.
32. Ibid., p. 15.
33. Ibid., p. 16.
34. Ibid., p. 20.
35. Ibid., p. 29.
36. Ibid., p. 30.
37. Ibid., p. 31.
38. Strauss, Philosophy and Law (New York: Jewish Publication Society, 1987), p. 3.Google Scholar
39. Ibid., pp. 5, 7, 8.
40. Ibid., pp. 13, 16.
41. Ibid., pp. 40–41.
42. Ibid., pp. 50–51.
43. Ibid., p. 55.
44. Strauss, , Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy, p. 150.Google Scholar
45. Strauss, , The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism, p. 270.Google Scholar
46. Strauss, , Spinoza's Critique of Religion, pp. 8–9, 31.Google Scholar
47. Strauss, , Philosophy and Law, p. 112.Google Scholar
48. Ibid.
49. Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political, trans, and ed. Schwab, George (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1976), pp. 27, 19.Google Scholar
50. Ibid., pp. 45, 53.
51. Ibid., p. 78.
52. Strauss, Leo, “Comments on Carl Schmitt's Der Begriff des Politischen,” in Schmitt, The Concept of the Political, p. 89.Google Scholar
53. Ibid., p. 90.
54. Ibid., p. 91.
55. Leo, Strauss, letter to Carl Schmitt, in Heinrich Meier, Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, und “Der Begriff des Politischen” (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1988), pp. 132–33.Google Scholar
56. Strauss, , “Comments on Carl Schmitt's Der Begriff des Politischen” pp. 99, 97.Google Scholar
57. Ibid., pp. 100–101.
58. Ibid., pp. 102–104.
59. Ibid., p. 105.
60. Strauss, Leo, letter to Karl Lowith, 10 January 1946, in “Correspondence Concerning Modernity,” Independent Journal of Philosophy 4 (1983): 107–108Google Scholar; The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism, p. 42.Google Scholar
61. Ibid.
62. Strauss, , Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy, p. 140.Google Scholar
63. Klein, and Strauss, , “A Giving of Accounts,” p. 4.Google Scholar
64. Strauss, Leo, On Tyranny (Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1963), pp. 208, 219.Google Scholar
65. Ibid., p. 210.
66. Strauss, , The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism, p. 43.Google Scholar
67. Strauss, , Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy, p. 37.Google Scholar
68. Ibid., pp. 32–34.
69. Leo Strauss, letter to Eric Voegelin, 2 January 1950.
70. Strauss, , Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy, p. 30.Google Scholar
71. Strauss, , The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism, p. 31, 40.Google Scholar
72. Ibid., p. 30, emphasis added.
73. Ibid., p. 28.
74. Ibid., p. 39.
75. Ibid., p. 29.
76. Dannhauser, Werner J., “Leo Strauss: Becoming Naive Again,” The American Scholar 44 (1975): 641.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by