Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:20:36.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reasonable Pluralism and Pragmatic Confucian Democracy: Reply to Li

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2019

Sungmoon Kim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , Summer 2019 , pp. 485 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For the central importance of public equality and equal constitutional rights to public reason Confucianism and pragmatic Confucian democracy, see Kim, Sungmoon, Democracy after Virtue: Toward Pragmatic Confucian Democracy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018), 92–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Public Reason Confucianism: Democratic Perfectionism and Constitutionalism in East Asia (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 94–96Google Scholar.

2 Ferrara, Alessandro, The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See, for instance, Kim, Sungmoon, Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014), chap. 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 See Miller, David, On Nationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

5 Kim, Public Reason Confucianism, 88.

6 Koh, Byung-ik, “Confucianism in Contemporary Korea,” in Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity, ed. Wei-ming, Tu (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), 199Google Scholar.

7 I call this “the intelligibility condition” of public reason Confucianism. See Kim, Public Reason Confucianism, 15–16.

8 I allow no special moral and constitutional standing to fully comprehensive Confucianism (ibid., 160–65 and 194–201).

9 Kim, Democracy after Virtue, 75.