Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:42:50.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral Pluralism and Liberal Democracy: Isaiah Berlin's Heterodox Liberalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

William A. Galston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While Isaiah Berlin considered himself principally as a political theorist in the liberal tradition, his was an unorthodox liberalism in both method and substance, rooted in the confluence of three traditions—British, Russian, and Jewish. Unlike many liberals, he wrestled with the tension between universalism and particularism, and also between individualism and communalities. He rejected all monistic approaches to morality (including liberal monism) but repudiated as well the moral relativism of much modern thought, espousing instead value pluralism. While we cannot arrive at a universally valid conception of the summum bonum, we can specify the summun malum—the great evils of the human condition. Berlin saw political theory as a branch of moral philosophy but drew political morality from political life rather than imposing it on politics. The range of goods and principles that human beings rightly prize cannot be combined into harmonious wholes in either our individual or collective existence. Some goods exclude others, and we must choose among them.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , Winter 2009 , pp. 85 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Berlin's dispatches gave rise to one of the great stories of the Second World War. Churchill was so impressed than when his wife informed him that “Irving Berlin” was visiting London, the prime minister, mistaking the famous composer for the witty philosopher/correspondent, insisted on inviting him to lunch. The conversation did not go smoothly, as the visitor proved mysteriously unable to field questions on American politics and economics. Finally an exasperated Churchill asked Irving Berlin to name the most important thing he had written. “White Christmas,” he replied. The lunch broke up in disarray, and only later did an aide inform Churchill of the mistaken identity, to the vast amusement of the prime minister as well as official London and Washington.

2 The best single source for Berlin's life is Ignatieff, Michael, Isaiah Berlin (New York: Henry Holt, 1998)Google Scholar.

3 Lukes, Steven, “An Unfashionable Fox,” in The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin, ed. Lilla, Mark, Dworkin, Ronald, and Silvers, Robert B. (New York: New York Review Books, 2001), 54Google Scholar.

4 Crowder, George, Isaiah Berlin: Liberty and Pluralism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004), 192Google Scholar.

5 Aileen Kelly, The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin, 63; Thomas Nagel, The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin, 65; Crowder, Isaiah Berlin, 130–31.

6 Crowder, Isaiah Berlin, 55.

7 Ignatieff, Isaiah Berlin, 294.

8 Berlin, Isaiah, “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in Four Essays on Liberty (London: Oxford University Press, 1969), 120Google Scholar.

9 As John Rawls famously did for justice in A Theory of Justice.

10 Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, sec. 124.

11 Berlin, Four Essays, lvi.

12 Berlin, Isaiah, Freedom and Its Betrayal: Six Enemies of Human Liberty, ed. Hardy, Henry (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003), 103–4Google Scholar.

13 Berlin, Four Essays, xxxix.

14 Crowder, Isaiah Berlin, 84–86.

15 Berlin, Four Essays, xlvii.

16 Berlin, Isaiah, “From Hope and Fear Set Free,” in Berlin, The Proper Study of Mankind, ed. Hardy, Henry and Hausheer, Roger (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1998), 109Google Scholar.

17 Quoted in Crowder, Isaiah Berlin, 98.

18 Avishai Margalit, “The Crooked Timber of Nationalism,” in The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin, 151.

19 Mark Lilla, The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin, 68.

20 Ignatieff, Isaiah Berlin, 249.

21 Berlin, Freedom and Its Betrayal, 141.

22 Crowder, Isaiah Berlin, pp. 105–7.

23 Quoted in Berlin, Freedom and Its Betrayal, 144.

24 Michael Walzer, “Liberalism, Nationalism, Reform,” in The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin; also Crowder, Isaiah Berlin, 41.

25 Berlin, Isaiah, Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder, Hardy, Henry, ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), 186Google Scholar.

26 Berlin, Three Critics of the Enlightenment, 55.

27 Crowder, Isaiah Berlin, 127.

28 Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty, xxxi.

29 Ibid., lvii.

30 Ronald Dworkin, “Do Liberal Values Conflict?” in The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin, 126–27, 132.

31 Bernard Williams, “Liberalism and Loss,” in The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin, 102.

32 Charles Taylor, “Plurality of Goods,” in The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin, 118.

33 Gray, John, Isaiah Berlin (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar, chap. 6.

34 Crowder, Isaiah Berlin, chap. 6; and Crowder, , Liberalism and Value Pluralism (London: Continuum, 2002)Google Scholar, part 3.

35 Galston, William A., Liberal Pluralism (New York: Cambridge, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chap. 5.

36 For a parallel controversy concerning the relation between value pluralism and the truth-claims of religion, see William A. Galston, “Must Value Pluralism and Religious Belief Collide?”; Michael Jinkins, “Pluralism and Religious Faith”; Hardy, Henry, “Taking Pluralism Seriously”; all in Crowder, George and Hardy, Henry, eds., The One and the Many: Reading Isaiah Berlin (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2007)Google Scholar.