Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T21:40:19.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irish Catholicism and English Toryism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Gilbert A. Cahill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the midst of the European Revolution of 1848, T. B. Macaulay offered the classical Whig explanation for England's immunity to it. England needed no revolution in 1848 because it had had its own safe and sane revolution of 1688, climaxed by that masterpiece of political wisdom, the Whig settlement. Without wholly superseding this distinctly Whig interpretation of England's stability in the midst of Europe's mid-nineteenth century cataclysms, Elie Halévy has supplemented it by pointing to the stabilizing influence of the Methodist-Evangelical Movement.Macaulay and Halévy overlooked one important element in Britannia's ability to rule the waves of revolution. It is an element somewhat repellent to liberal-minded historians, both in its nature and its source. For one of the factors in England's stability was the growth of a xenophobic, anti-revolutionary, nationalistic spirit and it was closely connected with anti-Catholicism. This anti-Catholicism was fostered and given direction by the Conservatives between 1832 and 1845, at which time it split that party wide open over the issue of the grant to the Roman Catholic Seminary of Maynooth in Ireland, as it had sixteen years earlier over Catholic Emancipation. The remarkable success of the Conservatives in rallying Englishmen to the anti-Irish “no-Popery” standard has been obscured by the traditional view that the period 1829–1848 saw the triumph of the liberal ideology, beginning with Catholic Emancipation, passing through the Reform Bill of 1832, and culminating in the Repeal of the Corn Laws.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1957 , pp. 62 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For an excellent statement of this thesis see Trevelyan, G. M., The English Revolution 1688–1689 (New York, 1939), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

2 Halévy, Élie, A History of the English People in 1815 (New York, 1924), I, 514.Google Scholar

3 Walpole, Spencer, A History of England (London, 1890), III, 288–316Google Scholar; Molesworth, William N., The History of England (London, 1874), I, 20–32, 302–303Google Scholar; McCarthy, Justin, History of Our Own Times (London, 1903), I, 182–203.Google Scholar

4 Halévy, , op. cit., II, 217, 238.Google Scholar

5 Clapham, J. H., “Irish Immigration into Great Britain in the 19th Century,” International Committee of Historical Science, 1933, V.Google Scholar

6 Gash, Norman, Politics in the Age of Peel (London, 1953), p. ix.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., p. xviii

8 Ibid., p. xiv.

9 The Times, 04 7, 21, 26, 1845.Google Scholar

10 Gash, op. cit., Chapter III.

11 Blackwood's Magazine, XXV (1829), 759–762, 767, 770, 782; XXVII (1830), 643; XXIX, 240, 356–358, 749, 754–762Google Scholar; Fraser's Magazine, I (1830), 7, 733; II (1830), 191–193; VI (1832), 206; V (1832), 610–616Google Scholar; Quarterly Review, XLIV (1831), 285, 307, 584; XLVI (1831), 552, 558, 580, 621–622; XLVIII (1832), 553–556.Google Scholar

12 Molesworth, , op. cit., I, p. 306.Google Scholar

13 Blackwood's Magazine, XXXIII (1832), 272Google Scholar; Quarterly Review, XLVI (1831), 552Google Scholar; Fraser's Magazine V (1832), 304.Google Scholar

14 The History of the Times, The Thunderer in the Making (London, 1935–1939), I, 337–339.Google Scholar

15 Tait's Magazine, III (1835), 662.Google Scholar

16 The Times, 04 16, 05 19, 06 22, 30, 07 13, 22, 08 23, 09 11, 10 6, 12 18, 26, 1835.Google Scholar

17 Halévy, Élte, The Age of Peel and Cobden (New York, 1948), pp. 174–175.Google Scholar

18 The Times, 12 22, 1835; 07 6, 08 9, 09 2, 5, 1836.Google Scholar

19 Ibid., March 4, 6, August 12, September 7, October 3, 4, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 1835.

20 Edinburgh Review, LXII (1836), 286.Google Scholar

21 British Critic, Ser. 4, XVIII (1835), 148Google Scholar; The Times, 04 7, 9, 15, 21, 25, 28, 1835; 08 24, 11 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 18, 1836.Google Scholar

22 Blackwood's Magazine, XXXVII (1835), 30–48, 431–444, 796–814Google Scholar; The Protestant Association's Publications, 12 19, 1839–1827Google Scholar pamphlets, 8 handbills and several narrative tracts.

23 The Times, 02 11, 14, 17, 19, 24, 10 14, 15, 16, 1835.Google Scholar

24 The Times, Letters of Eneas MacDonnell, 04 5, 20, 05 18, 06 7, 11, 07 5, 12, 1838; 04 5, 08 26, 09 13, 28, 1839Google Scholar; “B”'s letters on O'Connell, , 10 13, 17, 31, 11 20, 28, 1838; 10 3, 29, 11 5, 12, 19, 26, 12 10, 24, 31, 1839.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., December 4, 5, 10, 1835.

26 Ibid., August 26, September 8, 10, 11, 12, 29, October 5, 6, 26, 29, 1835.

27 Ibid., August 24, November 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 18, June 15, 22, July 10, 11, 1835.

28 Edinburgh Review, LXII (1836), 264.Google Scholar

29 Proceedings of the Protestant Association, Tenth Annual Report, 05, 1846.Google Scholar

30 Ibid.

31 The Times, 01 30, 1835Google Scholar, Buckingham Conservative Association; 02 3, 1835Google Scholar, Durham Conservative Association; 02 5, 1835Google Scholar, North Surrey Conservative Association; 02 14, 1835Google Scholar, Cambridgeshire Conservative Association; 02 23, 1835Google Scholar, Tamworth Conservative Association.

32 Ibid., December 17, 1835, Northampton Election; 12 31, 1835Google Scholar, North Leicestershire Election; 02 11, 1836Google Scholar, Carlow Election; 02 20, 1836Google Scholar, Glasgow Election; 05 7, 1836Google Scholar, Mayo Election; 07 2, 4, 08 20, 09 28, 1836Google Scholar, So. Warwickshire Election; 08 23, 09 5, 1836Google Scholar, East Cumberland Election; 09 10, 1836Google Scholar, So. Lancashire Election.

33 Ibid., April 29, May 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 22, 24, June 5, 1837, Westminster Election.

34 Hexter, J. H., “The Protestant Revival and the Catholic Question in England 1778–1829,” Journal of Modern History, VIII (1936), 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Parker, Charles S., Sir Robert Peel (London, 1899), III, pp. 334–356.Google Scholar

36 The Times, 04 3, 1845Google Scholar; Thelwall, Algernon S., Proceedings of the Anti-Maynooth Conference of 1845 (London, 1845).Google Scholar

37 British Quarterly Review, II (1845), 104.Google Scholar

38 Fraser's Magazine, XXXI (1845), 494–496, 629.Google Scholar

39 The Times, 04 17, 05 1, 1845Google Scholar; Fraser's Magazine, XXXI (1845), 494–496Google Scholar; Punch, VIII (1845), 191.Google Scholar

40 The Times, 04 7, 21, 26, 1845.Google Scholar

41 Monypenny, William F., The Life of Benjamin Disraeli (New York, 1913–1920), II, pp. 322–330.Google Scholar

42 British Quarterly Review, II (1845), 104Google Scholar; Fraser's Magazine, XXXI (1845), 494–496.Google Scholar

43 The Times, 04 7, 21, 1845.Google Scholar

44 British Quarterly Review, II (1845), 127–130.Google Scholar

45 The Times, 04 7, 21, 1845.Google Scholar

46 Thelwall, , op. cit., p. vi.Google Scholar

47 The Times, 05 15, 1845Google Scholar, The Protestant Association; Ibid., June 23, 1845, The National Club; National Club Bulletins (1846–1847), 1–20.Google Scholar

48 Thelwall, , op. cit., ix–xv.Google Scholar

49 Report of the Proceedings of the Conference of the Evangelical Alliance (London, 1846).Google Scholar

50 National Club Bulletins (1846–1847), 1–20Google Scholar; National Club, “Substance of the Speech of J. C. Colquhoun Esq., M.P. at the Opening Dinner of the National Club,” 05 12, 1847.Google Scholar

51 The Times, 07 4, 5, 1845Google Scholar, Dartmouth Election; 07 5, 7, 8, 9, 1845Google Scholar, Exeter Election; 07 7, 8, 1845Google Scholar, W. Suffolk Election; 07 5, 7, 8, 1845Google Scholar, Abingdon Election; 07 10, 1845Google Scholar, Cambridge Election.

52 Halévy, , op. cit., IV, pp. 155–161Google Scholar. Halévy traces the changes in the membership of the House of Commons to the political weariness of the older members of Parliament, whose retirement left vacant seats “which were filled in many cases by men of business who wanted to defend and to serve their private interests.”

53 The Times, 05 26, 28, 29, 07 30, 1847Google Scholar, The Roebuck election; 08 2, 1847Google Scholar, The Macaulay election.

54 Punch, VIII (1845), 191Google Scholar; Fraser's Magazine, XXXI (1845), 494–496Google Scholar; The Times, 04 7, 21, 1845Google Scholar; Thelwall, , op. cit.Google Scholar

55 Monypenny, , op. cit., III, 68, 80, 86.Google Scholar

56 British Quarterly Review, II (1845), 127–130Google Scholar; Report of the Proceedings of the Protestant Dissenters' Anti-Maynooth Conference (London, 1845).Google Scholar

57 Cahill, Gilbert Aloysius, “Irish Catholicism and English Toryism” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of History, University of Iowa 1954), pp. 198–258.Google Scholar

58 Ibid., pp. 352–382.

59 Ibid., pp. 364–382. These pages give a detailed analysis of the part played by The Times in the campaign against Irish Repeal and Chartism.

60 One exception was the so-called Papal Aggression of 1850. During this agitation, Lord John Russell played much the same game that he had played in 1848, substituting the “no-Popery” standard in 1850 for the anti-Irish one of 1848. The sentiments invoked, those of the anti-Maynooth demonstration, have been aptly described by Spencer Walpole. “The Mussulman, driven to his last defence, raises the standard of the Prophet and proclaims a holy war. But the Englishman, if Protestantism be in danger, shouts, ‘No Popery’ and creates equal enthusiasm.” Walpole, , op. cit., V, 119.Google Scholar