Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:49:13.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

George Washington on Religious Liberty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Vincent Phillip Muñoz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the Supreme Court's repeated invocations of America's Founding Fathers for First Amendment religion jurisprudence, George Washington's political thought regarding religious freedom has received almost no scholarly attention. This is unfortunate, for Washington's words and actions speak to contemporary Establishment Clause and Free Exercise issues. Washington, moreover, offers an alternative to Jefferson's and Madison's approach to church-state matters. The scholarly exclusion of Washington thus has led to a narrow view of the Founders' thought on religious liberty. This article sets forth Washington's understanding of the right to religious liberty. It pays particular attention to Washington's disagreement with Madison on the propriety of government support of religion. It also draws attention to the limits Washington placed on an individual's right to religious free exercise by focusing on how Washington dealt with Quaker claims for religious exemptions from military service.

Individuals entering into society, must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance, as on the object to be obtained. It is at all times difficult to draw with precision the line between those rights which must be surrendered, and those which may be reserved. —G. Washington, Letter submitting the proposed constitution to the President of Congress 17 September 1787

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , Winter 2003 , pp. 11 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The author would like to thank Mark Blitz, Paul Carrese, Charles Kesler, Sandy Kessler, Paul Rahe, Ralph Rossum, and the anonymous reviewers of The Review of Politics for their comments and criticisms of drafts of this article. The author would also like to acknowledge The Pew Civitas Program in Faith and Public affairs for its support.

1. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, ed. Farrand, Max (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), 2: 666Google Scholar.

2. Boller, Paul F. offers the most comprehensive account of George Washington's personal religious beliefs in George Washington and Religion (Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1963)Google Scholar, especially chapter 5. For a more recent discussion, see West, John G. Jr, “George Washington and the Religious Impulse,” in Patriot Sage: George Washington and the American Political Tradition, ed. Gregg, Gary L. and Spaulding, Matthew (Wilmington, Delaware: ISI Books, 1999), pp. 267–86Google Scholar. Boiler claims Washington was a Deist, yet maintained an “eminently serene and untroubled faith” in a providential God (p. 107). West agrees that Washington possessed a firm belief in a providential God and therefore concludes that he cannot be considered a Deist (p. 269). Phelps, Glen, George Washington and American Constitutionalism (Lawrence, KS: Kansas University Press, 1993Google Scholar) addresses Washington's political thought more generally, but does not address Washington's understanding of religious liberty.

3. Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947), 13Google Scholar

4. For further discussion of this point see, Dreisbach, Daniel L., “A Lively and Fair Experiment: Religion and the American Constitutional Tradition,” Emory Law Journal 49 (Winter 2000): 228–38Google Scholar.

5. Washington, George to the Reformed German Congregation in the City of New York, 27 November 1783, in The Writings of George Washington, ed. Fitzpatrick, John C. (Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1938), 27:249Google Scholar.

6. Madison's “strict-separationism” has been documented most exhaustively by Brant, Irving, “Madison: On the Separation of Church and State,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd series, 8 (01 1951): 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Other scholars labeling Madison a “strict-separationist” include Pfeffer, Leo, Church, State, and Freedom (Boston: Beacon Press, 1953), pp. 111–13, 129, 137Google Scholar; and Levy, Leonard W., The Establishment Clause: Religion and the First Amendment (New York; Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986)Google Scholar. The Supreme Court adopted the “strict-separationist” interpretation of Madison, and hence the Establishment Clause, in Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947)Google Scholar. On the contemporary Supreme Court, Justice Souter has defended this position most forcefully in a pair of non-majority opinions: Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992)Google Scholar (Souter concurring); Rosenberger v. Virginia, 515 U.S. 819 (1995)Google Scholar (Souter dissenting). For competing accounts of Madison see: Cord, Robert, Separation of Church and State: Historical Fact and Current Fiction (New York: Lambeth Press, 1982), 20–36Google Scholar; Weber, Paul, “James Madison and Religious Equality: The Perfect Separation,” Review of Politics 44 (1982): 163–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Justice Rehnquist's dissent in Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985)Google Scholar (Rehnquist dissenting); and Thomas′, Justice concurring opinion in Rosenberger v. Virginia, 515 U.S. 819 (1995)Google Scholar (Thomas concurring). For a redonsideration of Madison's position, see Muñoz, Vincent Phillip, “James Madison's Principle of Religious Liberty,” American Political Science Review 97 (2003): 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Washington's emphasis. Washington, George to George Mason, 3 10 1785, Writings of George Washington, 28:285Google Scholar. Washington wrote to Mason on account of Mason's sending to Washington a copy of a memorial and remonstrance against Henry's bill. It is fair to assume that Mason sent Washington Madison's “Memorial and Remonstrance,” although it is unclear from Washington's letter, which refers only to “a memorial and remonstrance.” Madison published his “Memorial and Remonstrance” anonymously and several other petitions against the bill were also circulating at that time.

8. Ibid.

9. Fleet, Elizabeth, “Madison's “Detached Memoranda,”” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd series, 3 (09 1946): 559–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. George Washington to the President of Congress, 31 December 1775, Writings of George Washington, 4:197–98Google Scholar, requesting an increase in the salary of military chaplains to $33 a month. On 29 July 1775, the Continental Congress, in its first official act regarding army chaplains, passed a resolution providing for a salary of $20 a month, the same as captains. For a discussion of Washington's military requests and orders pertaining to religion see, Boller, , George Washington and Religion, 49–60Google Scholar.

11. Washington, George to Governor Jonathan Trumbull, 15 12 1775, Writings of George Washington, 4:162Google Scholar

12. General Orders, 4 July 1775, Writings of George Washington, 3:309Google Scholar.

13. General Orders, 22 March 1783, Writings of George Washington, 26:250Google Scholar.

14. General Orders, 4 July 1775, Writings of George Washington, 3:309Google Scholar

15. General Orders, 5 May 1778, Writings of George Washington, 11:354Google Scholar.

16. Fleet, , “Madison's ‘Detached Memoranda,’” pp. 560–62Google Scholar.

17. Both proclamations marked significant events, the former the ratification of the Constitution and the latter when the prospect of another foreign war had decreased.

18. George Washington, “Proclamation. A National Thanksgiving,” 3 October 1787, in Richardson, James D., A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents: 1789–1897 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1896), 1:64Google Scholar

19. Washington, , –A Proclamation,” 1 01 1795Google Scholar, Ibid., 1:180.

20. Washington, George, “First Inaugural Address,” 30 04 1789Google Scholar, Papers of George Washington, Presidential Series, ed. Twohig, Dorothy (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1987–), 2:174Google Scholar.

21. Epstein, Steven B., “Rethinking the Constitutionality of Ceremonial Deism,” Columbia Law Review 96 (12 1996): 2110CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22. Washington's Farewell Address was not a speech but a long letter addressed “To the PEOPLE of the United States,” first published in American Daily Advisor, Philadelphia's largest newspaper, on 19 09 1796Google Scholar. For a discussion of the drafting and publication of the Farewell Address, see Spalding, Matthew and Garrity, Patrick J., A Sacred Union of Citizens: George Washington's Farewell Address and the American Character, intro. Boorstin, Daniel J. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1996), pp. 45–61Google Scholar; Gilbert, Felix, To The Farewell Address: Ideas of Early American Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961), chapter 5Google Scholar.

23. Washington, George, “Farewell Address,” 19 09 1796, Writings of George Washington, 35: 229Google Scholar.

24. Ibid.

25. Montesquieu, , The Spirit of the Laws, book 3Google Scholar, chaps. 1–2.

26. Ibid. For Montesquieu's clarification of what he means by virtue see book 3, chapter 5, note 9, and book 5, chapter 2.

27. Washington's emphasis. “Farewell Address,” p. 229.Google Scholar

28. Ibid. cf. Montesquieu, , Spirit of the Laws, book 24Google Scholar, chaps. 1 and 6.

29. Madison, James, “A Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments,” article 5, in The Writings of James Madison, ed. Hunt, Gaillard (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1900–1910), 2:187Google Scholar.

30. Washington, , “First Inaugural Address,” pp. 173–77Google Scholar.

31. Washington, , “Proclamation. A National Thanksgiving,” p. 64Google Scholar.

32. Washington, , “A Proclamation,” 1 01 1795, p. 180Google Scholar.

33. Washington, George to the President of Congress, 8 06 1777, Writings of George Washington, 8:203Google Scholar.

34. Madison, , “A Memorial and Remonstrance,” article 3, 2:185”86Google Scholar.

35. Thomas G. West claims that the American Founders in general maintained this position. I think it is more properly assigned to Washington and not to Madison or Jefferson. See West, Thomas G., ”Religious Liberty: The View from the Founding,” in On Faith and Free Government, ed. Palm, Daniel C. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1997), pp. 3–27Google Scholar.

36. Madison, “Memorial and Remonstrance,” article 1. Michael McConnell, the leading recognized scholar of the original intentions of the Free Exercise Clause, claims article 1 of Madison's “Memorial” sets forth an argument consistent with the interpretation that finds in the Free Exercise Clause a constitutional right for religious citizens to exemptions from all laws that, in their effect, burden religious exercise. McConnell, Michael W., “The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion,” Harvard Law Review 103 (1990): 1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a competing interpretation of the original intentions of the Free Exercise Clause see Hamburger, Philip A., “A Constitutional Right of Religious Exemptions: An Historical Perspective,” George Washington Law Review 60 (1992): 915–48Google Scholar. Hamburger, it should be noted, fails to address McConnell's interpretation of Madison. For a criticism of McConnell's interpretation of Madison, see Muñoz, “James Madison's Principle of Religious Liberty.”

37. Jaffa, Harry V., The American Founding as the Best Regime: The Bonding of Civil and Religious Liberty (Claremont, CA: The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy, 1990), p. 25Google Scholar.

38. Washington, George to the United Baptist Churches of Virginia, 05 1789, Papers of George Washington, Presidential Series, 2:424Google Scholar

39. Washington, George to Robert Dinwiddie, 25 06 1756, Writings of George Washington, 1:394Google Scholar. Washington refused to discharge the six Quakers on account of their religious beliefs.

40. The Religious Society called Quakers, from their Yearly Meeting for Pennsylvania, New-Jersey, and the western Parts of Virginia and Maryland, 28 September-3 October 1789 to Washington, George, Papers of George Washington, Presidential Series, 4:267Google Scholar.

41. Washington, George to the Society of Quakers, 10 1789, Papers of George Washington, Presidential Series, 4:266Google Scholar.

42. Ibid.

43. Cf. West, John, “George Washington and the Religious Impulse,” p. 285Google Scholar.

44. Washington, George to the Roman Catholics in America, 15 03 1790, Papers of George Washington, Presidential Series, 5: 299–300Google Scholar

45. Washington, George to the Hebrew Congregation in Newport, Rhode Island, 18 08 1790, Papers of George Washington, Presidential Series, 6:285Google Scholar

46. Washington, George to the Pennsylvania Council of Safety, 19 01 1777, Writings of George Washington, 7:35Google Scholar. Also see Washington's, letter to the same dated, 29 01 1777.Google Scholar

47. Boller, , “George Washington and the Quakers”; p. 73Google Scholar.

48. Washington, George to Governor William Livingston, 11 05 1777, Writings of George Washington, 8:44–45Google Scholar.

49. Washington, George, Power to Officers to Collect Clothing, Etc., 11 1777, Writings of George Washington, 10:124Google Scholar. See also Washington's, commands to Colonel John Siegfried, 6 10 1777, Writings of George Washington, 9:318Google Scholar.

50. Washington, George to Brigadier General John Lacy, Junior, 20 03 1778, Writings of George Washington, 11:114Google Scholar.

51. Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963)Google Scholar.

52. Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972)Google Scholar.

53. Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)Google Scholar.

54. General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church to Washington, George, 30 10 1789, The Papers of George Washington, Presidential Series, 2:422Google Scholar.

55. Washington, George to the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church, 10 1789, The Papers of George Washington, Presidential Series, 2:420–21Google Scholar

56. Ibid.