Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:26:27.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Few Are Chosen: Some Reflections on the Politics of A. J. Balfour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

David Nicholls
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Jogging along the road to a dinner party one evening, Balfour's sister said she thought that the coachman had taken a wrong turn. “Well, that is his business,” remarked the politician laconically, “not ours.” The lady was quite in order to speculate about the matter, but interference was forbidden. Likewise, academic philosophers and sociologists have a perfect right to speculate about politics, but they must not, as academics, interfere with the political process; that is the job of the practical politician. Balfour himself theorized about politics and about the nature of human society, and also took a hand in directing the course of political events; but he saw the two as quite distinct activities. “Knowledge,” he maintained, is seldom power. And a sociologist so coldly independent of the social forces among which he lived as thoroughly to understand them, would, in all probability, be as impotent to guide the evolution of a community as an astonomer to modify the orbit of a comet.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 1968 , pp. 33 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dugdale, B.E.C., Arthur James Balfour (London, 1936) ii, p. 267.Google Scholar

2 Balfour, A. J., Essays and Addresses (London, 1893) p. 270.Google Scholar

3 Oakeshott, M., Rationalism in Politics (London, 1962) p. 270.Google Scholar

4 Balfour, A. J., Essays and Addresses, p. 239.Google Scholar

5 Cohen, I. (ed.), Speeches on Zionism by Balfour, A. J. (London, 1928) p. 64.Google Scholar

6 Balfour, A. J.Essays and Addresses, p. 238.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., p. 267.

8 British Museum, Add. MSS. 49962:40.

9 Idem.

10 Cf. Merton, R.K., Social Theory and Social Structure (1964 ed.), pp. 60 f.Google Scholar

11 Balfour, A. J., Essays and Addresses, p. 277.Google Scholar

12 Almond, G. & Coleman, J., The Politics of the Developing Areas (1960), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

13 Cf. Michels, R., Political Parties (originally published in 1911).Google Scholar

14 British Museum, Add. MSS. 49962:43.

15 Balfour, A. J., Essays Speculative and Political (London 1920) p. 49.Google Scholar

16 House of Commons Debates, 5th series: 22:576 (03 2, 1911).Google Scholar

17 Idem.

18 Deb, H. C.. 5th:25:271 (05 2, 1911).Google Scholar

19 “What we complain of is, not of course that the Government abstained from making declarations on Home Rule … what we complain of is that through the whole course of the elections they laid the emphasis of their whole dialectics and rhetoric upon the immediate prejudices connected with the Upper House.” Deb, H. C.. 5th:24:1194–1195 (04 24, 1911).Google Scholar

20 Deb, H. C.. 5th:22:576 (03 2, 1911).Google Scholar

21 Dugdale, op. cit. II, 34.Google Scholar

22 Deb, H. C.. 5th:29:805 (08 7, 1911).Google Scholar

23 Deb, H. C.. 5th:25:272 (05 2, 1911).Google Scholar

24 Deb, H. C.. 5th:25:458 (05 3, 1911).Google Scholar

25 Petrie, Sir Charles, The Life and Letters of Sir Austen Chamberlain (1939), I, 25251.Google Scholar

26 British Museum, Add. MSS. 49860:186 (12 23, 1909).Google Scholar

27 Dugdale, , op. cit. II, 34.Google Scholar

28 British Museum, Add. MSS. 49860:185.

29 Deb, H. C.. 5th:25:460 (05 3, 1911) cf. also Balfour, A. J., Opinions and Argument (London, 1928) p. 103.Google Scholar

30 Deb, H. C.. 5th:22:566 (03 2, 1911).Google Scholar

31 Dugdale, op. cit. ii p. 70.Google Scholar

32 Balfour, A. J., Opinions and Argument, p. 102.Google Scholar

33 Deb, H. C.. 5th:22:566 (03 2, 1911).Google Scholar

34 Idem.

35 Speech at Hyde, Cheshire (12 9, 1910) in British Museum, Add. MSS. 49869:100.Google Scholar

36 Speech at the Albert Hall—The Times (11 30, 1910).Google Scholar

37 Deb, H. C.. 5th:21:1758 (02 21, 1911).Google Scholar

38 Deb, H. C.. 5th:21:1757 (02 21, 1911). There was some disagreement among the unionists about whether the referendum should be used (a) only in cases when there is disagreement between the two houses of parliament, (b) in all matters of constitutional importance, or (c) in other important policy matters also, like tariff reform. It is unnecessary to enter into the details of these unionist disagreements here.Google Scholar

39 Dugdale, , op. cit. I, 81.Google Scholar

40 Idem.