Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:26:00.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contemporary Art: The Generative Role of Play

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Extract

AllOfUs who have considered the problem of enjoying contemporary art are aware that the most serious barriers to it are the reluctance on the part of many painters and sculptors to put aside the notion that a work of art must mirror the physical world about us and their unwillingness to accept the fact that all true art must go “through the looking glass” — that is beyond the mirror.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 von Schiller, J. C. Friedrich, Ueber die aesthetische Erziehung des Menschen (Leipzig, 1795), Letter XIVGoogle Scholar.

2 Mallarmé, : Selected prose, poems, essays and letters, translated with an introduction by Cook, Bradford (Baltimore, 1956), p. 101Google Scholar.

3 Plato, : Laws ii, 667EGoogle Scholar.

4 Huizinga, J., Homo Ludens: a Study of the Play Element in Culture (London, 1949), ForewordGoogle Scholar.

5 Chase, Stuart, Men and Machines (New York, 1929)Google Scholar.

6 Huizinga, op. cit., Chapters XI and XII.

7 Reckitt, Maurice B.: Review of Homo Ludens, in New English Weekly, (1949)Google Scholar.

8 Huizinga, , op. cit., p. 119Google Scholar.

9 Ibid., p. 122.

10 Ibid., p. 129.

11 Ibid., p. 129.

12 Astre, Georges-Albert: “Ou va la Poésie Américaine?,” Critique, XII, No. 115 (12, 1956), 1025Google Scholar.

13 Cook, Bradford, op. cit., pp. 100101Google Scholar.

14 Ibid., p. 100.

15 Ibid., p. 93.

16 Ibid., pp. 104–105.

17 Measure for Measure, Act IV, Scene 2.