Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:52:23.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on MacIntyre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Donald P. Kommers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , Summer 1990 , pp. 362 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. The Republic of Choice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

2. 403 U.S. 15, 26 (1971).

3. Ibid., p. 25.

4. Cox, Archibald, The Role of the Supreme Court in American Government (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976), pp. 46–48.Google Scholar

5. Hardwick, Bowers V., 478 U.S. 186, 205 (1986).Google Scholar

6. See Grant, George Parkin, English-Speaking Justice (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1974), pp. 13–47.Google Scholar

7. Perry, Michael J., “Neutral Politics?” Review of Politics 15 (Fall 1989): 481.Google Scholar

8. Stanford v. Kentucky, 106 L Ed 2d 306, 323–324 (1989).

9. Rehnquist, William H., “The Notion of a Living Constitution,” Texas Law Review 54 (05 1976): 704.Google Scholar

10. 105 L Ed 2d 91 (1989).

11. Ibid., p. 117.

12. 406 U.S. 205 (1972).

13. Judgment of 25 February 1975, Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts [Decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court] (hereafter cited as BVerfGE), vol 39 (1975): 1–97. A full translation of this case appears in Jonas, Robert E. and Gorby, John D., “West German Abortion Decision: A Contrast to Roe v. Wade,” The John Marshall Journal of Practice & Procedure (Spring, 1976): 612.Google ScholarPubMed

14. Judgment of 3 June 1980, 54 BVerfGE 208 (1990). For a partial translation of this case see Kommers, Donald P., The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1989), pp. 419–22.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., p. 313.