Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:18:58.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a Hayekian Theory of Commodification and Systemic Contradiction: Citizens, Consumers, and the Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Gus diZerega
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

F. A. Hayek's theory of spontaneous order applies to more than the market. One implication is that different systems of rules generating different spontaneous orders are biased in favor of different values. Markets serve the values of consumers; democracies serve the values of citizens. No spontaneous order perfectly reflects human values because they simplify the context of choice in favor of core systemic values. This insight enables us to distinguish between systemic and individual resources, and tensions between them. It also enables us to develop models of systemic conflict. Of particular interest are interactions between democracies and markets whose rules reflect different values but influence one another. The increasing commodification of the press shifts this institution from reflecting both democratic and economic values more and more to purely economic values, undermining its capacity to serve citizens. Examples illustrating this argument are explored.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , Summer 2004 , pp. 445 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I am grateful to Chirag Kasbekar, James Hess, the George Mason Workshop in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, and referees for the Review of Politics for valuable criticisms and insights that have made this a better essay than it otherwise would have been.

1. Hayek, F. A., Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 3, The Political Order of a Free People (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), p. xiiGoogle Scholar; Dobuzinskis, Laurent, The Self-Organizing Polity, (Boulder: Westview Press, 1987)Google Scholar, diZerega, Gus, Persuasion, Power and Polity: A Theory of Democratic Self-Organization, (Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Macy, Joanna, Mutual Causality in Buddhism and General Systems Theory: The Dharma of Natural Systems, (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991)Google Scholar; and Johnson, Steven, Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software, (New York: Scribner, 2001).Google Scholar Perhaps the first time the term was used in this sense was by Mill, James in his essay “Nature,” Collected Works, volume 10, p. 381.Google Scholar I am grateful to Linda Raeder for this information.

2. Hayek, F. A., Law, Legislation and Liberty: Rules and Order (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1973).Google Scholar

3. Rummel, R. J., Power Kills: Democracy as a Method of Nonviolence (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1997)Google Scholar; diZerega, Gus, “Democracy as a Spontaneous Order,” Critical Review 3:2 (1989): 206–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Hayek, F. A., “The Theory of Complex Phenomena,” Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1967).Google Scholar

5. Radnitzky, Gerard, “Hayek on the Role of the State: A Radical Libertarian Critique,” Policy (2000): 16–20Google Scholar; Hoppe, Hans-Hermann, “F. A. Hayek on Government and Social Evolution: A Critique,” in Contending With Hayek, ed. Frei, Christoph and Nef, Robert, (New York: Peret Lang, 1994), pp. 127–59.Google Scholar

6. Hayek, , Political Order of a Free People, p. 43.Google Scholar

7. Ibid., p. 44.

8. Ibid., p. 45. There is an ambiguity here. Benefiting proportionately to one's contributions and benefiting more than one contributes are different standards. I can benefit proportionately and still regard myself as worse off. I can benefit less than anyone else and regard myself as better off. Hayek's argument depends upon the latter meaning, which is also central to his defense of the legitimacy of market inequality, see Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 2 The Mirage of Social Justice (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), pp. 73–4, 94, 98–99.Google Scholar

9. Hayek, , p. 46.Google Scholar

10. Hayek, F. A., Mirage of Social Justice, p. 7.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., p. 87; see also Political Order of a Free People, p. 55.Google Scholar

12. Hayek, , Mirage of Social Justice, p. 129.Google Scholar

13. Aristotle, , Politics, ed. Barker, Ernest (London: Oxford University Press, 1958), p. 120.Google Scholar

14. Hayek, , Mirage of Social Justice, p, 131.Google Scholar

15. Ibid.

16. Hayek, , Political Order of a Free People, p. 61.Google Scholar

17. Ibid.

18. On the importance of autonomy over both liberty and equality in early liberal thought, see Spragens, Thomas A., Civic Liberalism: Reflections on Our Democratic Ideals (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999), pp. 113–45.Google Scholar

19. Hayek, F. A., The Constitution of Liberty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960), pp. 374–75.Google Scholar This way of putting the matter suggests that there can be more than a single public good for a single person because a person may be a member of more than a single public. Other than bringing this to attention, this paper will not explore these observations. But see diZerega, , Persuasion, Power, and Polity, p. 266.Google Scholar

20. Anderson, Terry L. and Leal, Donald R., Free Market Environmentalism, rev ed. (New York: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Hayek, , Political Order of a Free People, pp. 153–76.Google Scholar

22. Ibid., pp. 50–51. See also Cornuelle, Richard C., Reclaiming the American Dream: The Role of Private Individuals and Voluntary Associations (New Brunsick: Transaction, 1993), pp. 35–41.Google Scholar

23. Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, pp. 108–109.Google Scholar

24. Ibid., pp. 109–10.

25. Sagoff, Mark, The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law and the Environment, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 50–51.Google Scholar

26. Crick, Bernard, In Defense of Politics (Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1962).Google Scholar

27. On democracy as a spontaneous order, see diZerega, Gus, “Elites and Democratic Theory,” Review of Politics 53:2. (1991):CrossRefGoogle Scholar340–72; “Democracies and Peace: The Self-Organizing Foundation of the Democratic Peace,” Review of Politics 57:2 (1995): 279–309Google Scholar, and Persuasion, Power, and Polity.

28. Kingdon, John, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd. ed. (New York: Longman, 1995), pp. 86 and 223Google Scholar; Hayek, “The Theory of Complex Phenomena.”

29. DiZerega, “Elites and Democratic Theory.”

30. Hayek, , Political Order of a Free People, pp. 75–76.Google Scholar

31. Ibid., p. 68. See also Polanyi, Michael, “The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory,” in Knowing and Being: Essays by Michael Polanyi, ed. Grene, Marjorie (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969), pp. 49–72Google Scholar; The Logic of Liberty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951), pp. 49–9.Google Scholar

32. Hayek, , Political Order of a Free People, pp. 75–66.Google Scholar

33. Ziman, John, Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

34. diZerega, Gus, “Market Non-neutrality: Systemic Bias in Spontaneous Orders,” Critical Review 11:1 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35. Of course, organizations can also take on an additional relative independence from their members, but that is another matter. Wilson, James Q., Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It (New York: Basic Books,1989), pp. 90–110.Google Scholar

36. Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983), p. 298.Google Scholar

37. For examples in field biology, see Chase, Alston, Playing God in Yellowstone: The Destruction of America's First National Park (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1987), pp.170–94;Google ScholarHess, Karl Jr., Rocky Times in Rocky Mountain National Park (Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado. 1993), pp. 86–93.Google Scholar

38. Ferguson, Adam, An Essay on the History of Civil Society (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1980) [1767], p. 122.Google Scholar

39. See Cowan, Tyler, Creative Destruction (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

40. When this process happens in the lifeworld (briefly, world of cultural meaning) rather than between impersonal systems, we have what Jürgen Habermas calls the “colonization of the lifeworld.” To explore this important insight further here takes us beyond the limits of this paper. See Habermas, Jürgen, The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (Boston: Beacon Press, 1987), pp. 153–97, 332–73.Google Scholar

41. Buchanan, James and Vanberg, Viktor. “The Market as a Creative Process,” Economics and Philosophy 7:2 (1992): 181;Google Scholar and Kirzner, Israel, “Self-Interest and the New Bashing of Economics: A Fresh Opportunity in the Perennial Debate?” Critical Review 4:1–2 (1990): 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42. Hence the criticism of elevating consumer choice to the standard of freedom. Just because we can choose between dozens of varieties of toothpaste does not mean we are free in the traditional sense of being autonomous.

43. Kingdon, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies: and diZerega, “Elites and Democratic Theory."

44. In purely market terms this is an advantage. In a public corporation the takeover threat keeps companies acting more efficiently in market terms. See Manne, Henry, “Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control,” Journal of Political Economy 73 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45. Wilson, James Q., American Government, 5th ed. (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 2000), pp. 79–80.Google Scholar

46. This account is drawn from Bell, Brenda, “Bainbridge Recalls Editor's Courage During Wartime,” The Seattle Times, 25 03 2001:Google Scholar and Davila, Florangela, “Bainbridge Editor Who Decried Japanese Internment Dies at 91,” The Seattle Times, 14 03 2001.Google Scholar

47. This account is drawn from Golis, Pete, “Without Credibility We've Got Nothing,” Santa Rosa Press Democrat 10 11 1999;Google Scholar and Efron, Eric, “No More Virgins,” Brill's Content February, 2000, pp. 45–46.Google Scholar

48. Hubler, Shawn, “Ex-Publisher Becomes Hero for Quitting Over Profit Goal,” The Seattle Times, 22 04 2001.Google Scholar