Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:49:46.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms and Popular Chinese Political Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Peter R. Moody Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years, scholars have been increasingly applying “behavioral” approaches to the study of Chinese politics. One interesting strain of this is the work of Lucian Pye and Richard Solomon, who stress the study of Chinese “political culture” analyzed mainly in terms of an “authority crisis.” Solomon's explication is the more detailed and elaborate. Part of his thesis is that harmony and peace are “basic and enduring political values in the Confucian tradition,” and therefore “questions of the handling of social conflict constitute a major area of tension in the Chinese political culture.” The Chinese hopes for order and believes that this comes about only through strong authority; without such authority there is luan, “chaos.” But the means required to exercise authority create resentment, and resentment becomes the basis for more luan.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 175 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pye, Lucian, The Spirit of Chinese Politics: A Psychocultural Study of the Authority Crisis in Political Development (Cambridge, Mass., 1968)Google Scholar; Solomon, Richard H., Mao's Revolution and the Chinese Political Culture (Berkeley, Calif., 1971)Google Scholar.

2 Solomon, , Political Culture, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., pp. 135–153. These attitudes, of course, are traced back to the child-rearing process.

4 For this distinction, see Popper, Karl R., The Poverty of Historicism (Boston, 1957), p. 151Google Scholar.

5 Solomon, , Political Culture, pp. 524–525.Google Scholar

6 Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney, The Civic Culture, abridged edition (Boston, 1965), ch. 7Google Scholar.

7 Pye, Lucian, Warlord Politics: Conflict and Coalition in the Modernization of Republican China (New York, 1971)Google Scholar.

8 Mote, F. W., “China's Past in the Study of China Today: Some Comments on the Recent Work of Richard Solomon,” Journal of Asian Studies, 32, 1(11, 1972), 107–120, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also Thomas A. Metzer, “On Chinese Political Culture,” idem., 101–105.

9 I am using here the edition (hereafter referred to as Romance) put out by the Ta-chung Shu-chü (Taipei, 1969)Google Scholar. This particular edition omits most of the less important poems scattered throughout other editions. For the convenience of those with other editions, however, citations to the work will contain both page and chapter numbers. There is an English translation by G. H. Brewitt-Taylor (Tokyo, 1959; first published, 1925). This contains numerous errors, and at least one crucial one.

10 For examples of this sort of thing—something of a fad a few years ago —see Jaffa, Henry V., “The Limits of Politics: An Interpretation of King Lear, Act I, Scene 1,” American Political Science Review (APSR), 51, 2 (06, 1957), 405–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bloom, Alan D., “Cosmopolitan Man and the Political Community: An Interpretation of Othello,” APSR, 54, 1 (03, 1960), 130–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also Egger, Rowland, “The Administrative Novel,” APSR, 53, 2 (06, 1959), 448–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Kariel, Henry S., Open Systems: Arenas for Political Action (Itasca, 1969)Google Scholar, draws on examples from literature, but does not engage in much detailed analysis. For the need for caution in this type of analysis, see Buckhardt, Sigurd, “English Bards and APSR Reviewers,” APSR, 54, 1 (03, 1960), 158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar, whose criticisms, in their specifics, I find convincing. See also the exchange between Bloom, and Buckhardt, , APSR, 54, 2 (06, 1960), 457–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Yao, Meng, Chung-kuo Hsiao-shuo Shih (Taipei, 1969), p. 313Google Scholar. It would be wrong to think of the Romance as in any sense a “folk” work; the fact of its popularity is enough to justify its use here. The novel, I suspect, has done much to create the cluster of attitudes identified by Solomon.

12 “Introduction,” in Brewitt-Taylor, , p. vGoogle Scholar.

13 For a general treatment of the novel, see Yao, Meng, Chung-kuo, pp. 304–345Google Scholar.

14 Ruhlmann, Robert, “Traditional Heroes in Chinese Popular Fiction,” in Confucianism and Chinese Civilization, ed. Wright, Arthur (New York, 1964), pp. 122–157.Google Scholar

15 Cf. Han Fei-tzu, “Nan Shih,” for a relatively systematic discussion of the concept, purporting to prove that effective rule depends entirely upon the shih, and not upon the moral qualities of the ruler.

16 Romance, ch. 1, p. 2.

17 Skinner, B. F., Beyond Freedom and Dignity (New York, 1971), p. 110Google Scholar.

18 [Yu-lan, Feng], Chung-huo Che-hsueh Shih (n.p., n.d.—I have a pirated edition printed in Taiwan, which omits even the author's name, as he chose to remain behind in 1949), pp. 546ffGoogle Scholar; Creel, H. G., Chinese Thought from Confucius to Mao Tse-tung (Chicago, 1953), pp. 145–147Google Scholar.

19 Romance, ch. 1, pp. 1–2.

20 Levenson, Joseph, Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy (Berkeley, Calif., 1968), pt. 2, pp. 61–62Google Scholar.

21 Romance, ch. 50.

22 Ruhlmann, , “Chinese Popular Fiction,” p. 156Google Scholar. Technically, this is not a conflict of loyalties. Ts'ao has shown en—“grace”—to Kuan, and Kuan feels bound in “honor,” i, to repay this. But the general point remains the same.

23 Romance, ch. 85, p. 525.

24 Ruhlmann, , “Chinese Popular Fiction,” p. 140Google Scholar.

25 Romance, ch. 1, p. 3.

26 Meng-wu, Sa, Shui-hu Chuan yü Chung-kuo She-hui (Taipei, 1970), p. 10Google Scholar. Liu-mang is a somewhat offensive term. A more polite and more traditional term would be be lü-lin hao han—“good fellows of the green wood.”

27 Benedict, Ruth, The Chrysanthemum and the Sword (Boston, 1946), pp. 99–117Google Scholar.

28 Romance, ch. 5, p. 29.

29 Ibid., ch. 5, p. 30.

30 Ibid., ch. 7, pp. 37–39.

31 Ibid., ch. 7, passim.

32 Pye, , Warlord Politics, pp. 77, 167Google Scholar; quote on p. 167.

33 This was the Confucian version of wu-wei, “nonaction.” See Kracke, E. A., Civil Service in Early Sung China, 960–1067 (Cambridge, Mass., 1953), p. 29Google Scholar.

34 Despite his general decency, however, to most readers, Chinese and Western, his reaction to an inadvertent case of cannibalism might seem rather repellent: Liu Pei, on the lam, meets a hunter, and the hunter, having no food to offer him, slaughters his (the hunter's) own wife and serves her up. Liu Pei, of course, does not realize that he is eating human flesh, but when he accidentally discovers this in the morning, he is moved to tears by the kindness of his host! Romance, ch. 19, p. 120. Cannibalism forms a minor but rather disturbing motif in Chinese culture, and this seems to form the basis for the theme of Lu Hsun's “Diary of a Madman.” See Lyell, William A. Jr, A Lu Hsun Reader (New Haven, 1967), pp. 7–17Google Scholar; also Tse-tsung, Chow, The May Fourth Movement: Intellectual Revolution in Modern China (Stanford, 1967), p. 308nGoogle Scholar.

35 Ruhlmann, , “Chinese Popular Fiction,” p. 140.Google Scholar

36 Romance, ch. 21, p. 135.

37 Ibid., ch. 1, pp. 2–3.

38 The ruling family in the Han dynasty had the surname “Liu,” and this seems to be about the only reason Lo Kuan-chung grants legitimacy to Liu Pei and to Shu. Liu Pei is a very remote relative of the ruling house.

39 E.g., Romance, ch. 39, p. 245.

40 Ibid., ch. 60, p. 376.

41 See especially ibid., ch. 63, the story of Chang Fei's battle against Yen Yen.

42 Throughout this essay, of course, I am talking about the fictional character Ts'ao Ts'ao, not the historical personage who bears the same name—as, indeed, I am talking about the fictional Liu Pei. The real Ts'ao Ts'ao, while certainly no bodhisatva, was not as bad as he is depicted in the novel, and apparently no more bloody-minded and considerably more competent than the historical Liu Pei. In addition to his political accomplishments, Ts'ao was an outstanding poet and military theoretician (both traits of the fictional Ts'ao as well). Balazs, Etienne, Chinese Civilization and Bureaucracy (New Haven, 1964), pp. 173–179Google Scholar. Ts'ao also enjoys some favor among communist historians, partly a reflection of adherence to historical fact, partly for doctrinal considerations, partly for reasons of the “new morality,” and partly because Chairman Mao finds Ts'ao sympathetic. See Mo-jo, Kuo, People's Daily, 23 03 1959, p. 7Google Scholar. There is some irony in the communists' sympathy for Ts'ao, since of all the characters Liu Pei is the most nearly “proletarian” in his background, and the only one with an honest trade (he weaves sandals and mats out of straw).

43 Romance, ch. I, p. 5. Brewitt-Taylor, renders the last prophecy, “You are able enough to rule the world, but wicked enough to disturb it” (p. 9)Google Scholar. As this is one of the key sentences in the whole book, the error is extremely serious.

44 Ibid., ch. 4, p. 26.

45 Ibid., ch. 17, p. 113.

46 Ibid., cb. 17, p. 114.

47 Ibid., ch. 47, p. 298.

48 Ibid., ch. 106, p. 669.

49 Ibid., ch. 119, p. 741.

50 Ibid., ch. 80, p. 495.

51 Ibid., ch. 9, p. 55.

52 This view of the function has also been shared by some Western historians. “The very fact that there existed a man named Tacitus, who recorded the wickedness of his times, is for Gibbon sufficient reason for optimism” (Jordan, David P., Gibbon and His Roman Empire [Carbondale, I11., 1971], p. 81)Google Scholar.

53 Dahrendorf, Ralph, Essays in the Theory of Sociology (Stanford, 1968), p. 227.Google Scholar

54 Ibid., p. 148. Machiavelli, Discourses, First Book, ch. IV.

55 An exception to this last point is perhaps “modern industrial society,” in which the state may be able to retain its coercive ability despite any “moral” collapse. In these societies, the only ones to suffer from “unofficial violence” would seem to be the perpetrators and the innocent.

56 Hebrew history recorded in the Bible may also indicate the limits of the theory: things do not seem to have improved much once there was a king in Israel.

57 Chadwick, H. Munro, The Heroic Age (Cambridge, 1925; first edition, 1912), p. 462Google Scholar.

58 Bloc, Marc, Feudal Society (Chicago, 1961), vol. I, 123, 136ffGoogle Scholar. Couborn, Rushton, Feudalism in History (Princeton, 1956), pp. 7, 236ff., 255Google Scholar. It would probably be an error to identify “feudalism” with the politics of “chaos,” as chaos is not limited to feudal situations, and institutionalized feudalism is one way out of chaos. But it does seem to be a weak solution to the problem.

59 Duus, Peter, Feudalism in Japan (New York, 1969), esp. pp. 56ffGoogle Scholar. It will be recalled that the ethical system in the Romance is rather similar to the ethical system discussed by Miss Benedict in her Chrysanthemum and the Sword.

60 Skinner, Beyond Freedom; Kariel, Open Systems, in many of his implications. More innocuously, Huntington, Samuel P., Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven, 1968)Google Scholar; more innocuously still, Lowi, Theodore, The End of Liberalism (New York, 1969)Google Scholar.

61 Agassi, Joseph, “The Nature of Scientific Problems and Their Roots in Metaphysics,” in The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, ed. Bunge, Mario (London, 1964), pp. 189–211, 203.Google Scholar

62 Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2nd ed. rev. (Chicago, 1970)Google Scholar.

63 Cf. the critique of Huntington, by Kesselman, Mark, “Order or Movement? The Literature of Political Development as Ideology,” World Politics, 26, 1 (10, 1973), 139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar.