Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T20:50:33.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Reconciliation of Christianity with Progress: Philippe Buchez

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Extract

Philippe buchez is best known for his work as a founder of social Catholicism and as an advocate of workers' associations. As a man of varied interests Buchez brought to the consideration of industrial problems a knowledge of contemporary ideas and a theory of history to support his own solutions. His Introduction à la science de l'histoire provides an example of what has been called the “Idolization of History”:

It is no mean paradox that the idolization of HISTORY should have been the outcome of and sequel to the collapse of concrete historic continuity embodied in organized religion, national tradition, local custom and social hierarchies of long standing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Talmon, J. L., Political Messianism: The Romantic Phase (New York, 1961), pp. 2425Google Scholar.

2 For a brief and excellent treatment of de Bonald's and de Maistre's ideas, cf. Horton, Walter Marshall, The Philosophy of the Abbé Bautain (New York, 1926), pp. 236Google Scholar.

3 de Maistre, Joseph, “Considerations sur la Révolution française,” in Oeuvres Complètes (Lyon, 1884), I, 39Google Scholar.

4 For a general discussion of Traditionalism, cf. Bagge, Dominique, Les Idées Politiques en France sous la Restauration (Paris, 1954), pp. 187328Google Scholar.

5 Biographical material on Buchez is taken from August Ott, “Notice sur Buchez,” in Buchez, Pierre, Traité de politique et de la science sociale (Paris, 1866), I, xiiicxliiiGoogle Scholar.

6 Quoted in Iggers, G. G., The Cult of Authority: Political Philosophy of the Saint-Simonians (The Hague, 1958), p. 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Isambert, F. A., “Epoques critiques et epoques organiques,” Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, XXVll (1959), 131152Google Scholar.

8 Buchez, and Roux-Lavergne, P. C., Histoire parlementaire de la révolution francaise; ou journal des assemblées nationales dépuis 1789 jusqu'en 1815 (1st ed.; Paris, 18341838), VIII, xiiiGoogle Scholar.

9 Buchez' break with the Saint-Simonians has been thoroughly discussed by Cuvillier, Armand, Hommes et ideologies de 1840 (Paris, 1960), pp. 1049Google Scholar.

10 Quoted in Duroselle, Jean Baptiste, Les débuts du Catholicisme Social en France (1822–1870) (Paris, 1951), p. 83Google Scholar.

11 A letter dated 1829 quoted in ibid., p. 84.

12 Buchez, , Introduction à la science de l'histoire: ou science du developpement de l'humanité (2nd ed.; Paris, 1842), I, 2Google Scholar.

18 Louis, , de Bonald, Vicomte, “Reflexions sur la Tolerance des opinions,” Oeuvres Complétes (Paris, 1859), III, 488Google Scholar.

14 Buchez, , Introduction, I, 3Google Scholar.

15 Ibid., I, 7–8.

16 Ibid., I, 13–14.

17 Ibid., I, 128.

18 Ibid., I, 35–36.

19 Ibid., I, 39.

20 Ibid., I, 46.

21 Ibid., I, 44.

22 de Bonald, , “Legislation primitive consderée dans les dernièrs Temps par les seules lumiéres da la raison,” Oeuvres Complètes, I, 10921093Google Scholar.

23 Buchez, , Introduction, I, 60Google Scholar.

24 Ibid., I, 76.

25 Ibid., I, 84.

26 Ibid., I, 203.

27 This pantheistic error was what Buchez objected to in the doctrines of Saint-Simon and Comte. This is discussed in Cuvillier, A., Revue du mois, XXI (0506, 1920), 500501Google Scholar.

28 Buchez, , Introduction, I, 156157Google Scholar.

29 Ibid., I, 196.

30 de Bonald, , “Theorie du pouvoir politique et religieux dans la société civile, démontrée par le raisonnement et par l'histoire,” Oeuvres Complètes, I, 146177Google Scholar; de Maistre, , “Etude sur la souverainété Oeuvres Complètes, I, 375377Google Scholar; Ballanche, , “Essai sur les institutions,” Oeuvres Complètes (Paris, 1830), II, 262Google Scholar.

31 Buchez, , Introduction, I, 165Google Scholar.

32 Ibid., I, 171.

34 Ibid., I, 195.

35 Ibid., I, 236.

37 Ibid., I, 242.

38 Ibid., I, 243.

39 Ibid., I, 258–270.

40 Buchez, Ibid., II, 506.

41 Ibid., II, 508.

42 Buchez, , Introduction, I, 321Google Scholar.

43 Buchez, , Traité de politique et de la science sociale (Paris, 1866), I, 63Google Scholar.

44 Buchez, , Introduction, I, 321Google Scholar.

45 Ibid., I, 169.

46 Ibid., I, 298.

47 Buchez, , Introduction, II, 209Google Scholar.

48 Buchez, , Histoire parlementaire, XXIII, ivGoogle Scholar.

49 Buchez, , Introduction, II, 252Google Scholar.

50 de Maistre, , “Du Pape,” Oeuvres Complètes, II, 34Google Scholar.

51 Buchez, , Introduction, II, 254Google Scholar.

52 Ibid., II, 304.

53 Ibid., II, 509.

54 Buchez, , Histoire parlementaire, XLV, viGoogle Scholar.

55 Ibid., I, i.

56 de Maistre, , The Works of Joseph de Maistre, Lively, Jack, editor (New York, 1965), pp. 50,91Google Scholar.

57 Buchez, , Histoire parlementaire, XXX, vviiiGoogle Scholar.

58 Ibid., XXXIII, v.

59 de Bonald, , “Essai analytique sur les lois naturelles de l'ordre social,” Oeuores Complètes, I, 966Google Scholar.

60 Buchez, , Traité, I, 112Google Scholar.

81 Buchez, , Histoire parlementaire, XXIII, viiiixGoogle Scholar.

62 Ibid., xv.

63 The first edition of the Introduction à la science de l'histoire appeared in 1833 and a second edition appeared in 1842. Buchez took cognizance in the second edition of the work done by his own associates, particularly: Dr. Cerise, Essai d'histoire universelle; A. Ott, Manuel d'histoire universelle; and J. F.-A. Boulland, Histoire des transformations religieuses et morales des peuples.

64 L'Européen, journal des sciences morales et économiques, December 31, 1831—October 27, 1832; Revue nationale, May, 1847—July, 1848; Ott, A., Des Associations d'oeuvriers (1838)Google Scholar; Appel aux hommes de bonne Volonté (1839); Traité d'économie sociale (1851); Feugueray, N., L'Association Oeuuriere (1851)Google Scholar.

65 Duroselle, , Les débuts du Catholicisme social, p. 118Google Scholar.

66 Buchez', introduction to the Revue nationale, no. 1, 05, 1847Google Scholar.