Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:17:01.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pessimism and the Revolutions of 1848

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Paul Gottfried
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historians have long argued that an intimate connection exists between the failure of Europe's liberal and, in France at least, radical agitation of 1848 and the spread of pessimistic values during the following two decades. György Lukacs, in The Destruction of Reason, has treated this point at some length. He ascribes the rising popularity throughout the 1850's of Arthur Schopenhauer, the most systematic and erudite interpreter of pessimistic thought, to “a purely bourgeois form of irrationalism.” The defeat of the revolutions of 1848 had left many Germans politically frustrated. What resulted was an “ideologically altered situation” in which Schopenhauer “suddenly grew famous and supplanted Feuerbach as the ideological leader of the (German) bourgeoisie.” Moreover, French capitalists, frightened by the workers' revolt that took place in Paris during June, 1848, helped to give pessimism its “international effect.” Indeed they knew its world despair for what it actually was, “an indirect apology” for their own economic interests.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 1973 , pp. 193 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lukacs, György, Werke (Berlin, 1962), IX, 172Google Scholar. Lukacs' use of “irrational” to describe almost all post-Hegelian, non-Marxist German thought, seems often to be as ritualistic and self-defensive as the medieval Church's reference to the “stiff-necked Jews.”

2 Ibid., pp. 180 and 181.

3 Cf. Il Mondo come Volantà e Rappresentazione (Bari, 1968), I, xi.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., pp. xi and xii.

5 Holborn, Hajo, A History of Modern Germany (New York, 1969), III, 121.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., p. 122.

7 Cf. Berger, Hermann's dissertation, Julius Frauenstädt (Rostock, 1911), especially pp. 10–12.Google Scholar

8 Read Lindner's letter of introduction to the master in Schopenhauer, Arthur, Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Deussen, Paul (Munich, 1929), V, 18.Google Scholar

9 On de Lisle's life, see Putter, Irving, The Pessimism of Leconte de Lisle (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1954)Google Scholar; for the poet's attempt to reconcile pessimism with a worldly outlook, cf. La dernière Illusion de Leconte de Lisle, Lettres Inédites à Emile Leforestier, ed. Putter, Irving (Berkeley, Calif., 1968), p. 109.Google Scholar

10 Cf. Baillot, Alexandre, Influence de la Philosaphie de Schopenhauer en France (1860–1900) (Paris, 1927), pp. 225–227Google Scholar; Gebhard, Richard, Über den Einfluss Schopenhauers auf die schöne Literatur, Jahrbuch der S. Gesellschaft (Heidelberg, 1928), XV, 328.Google Scholar

11 Baillot, , pp. 2 and 3.Google Scholar

12 Brunetière, Ferdinand, Questions de Critique (Paris, 1896), p. 155.Google Scholar

13 Cf. Brunetière's piece in Revue Bleue, No. 5 (01 30, 1886), p. 138.Google Scholar

14 Swart, K. W., The Sense of Decadence in Nineteenth-Century France (The Hague, 1964), pp. 138 and 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 See Alphonse Diétrich's translation of Schopenhauer's Parerga (Paris, 1877), p. vii.Google Scholar

16 Cf. Revue Bleue, No. 44 (05 4, 1878), 1041.Google Scholar

17 Huber, Johannes, Der Pessimismus (Munich, 1876), p. 5.Google Scholar

18 Ibid., p. 72; see also Busch, Wilhelm, Arthur Schopenhauer (Munich, 1878), p. 237.Google Scholar

19 For a flamboyant defense of Hartmann's synthesis, Taubert, A., Der Pessimismus und seine Gegner (Berlin, 1873).Google Scholar

20 von Hartmann, Eduard, Die Philosophie der Unbewussten (7th ed.; 2 vols; Berlin, 1876).Google Scholar

21 Ibid., II, 403–407.

22 Ibid., introduction to Vol. I; see also the invidious comparison between Schopenhauer and himself in the collection of pieces, The Sexes Compared and Other Essays, trans. Kerner, A. (London, 1895), p. 146.Google Scholar

23 Nietzsche, , Werke (Leipzig, 1906), II, 292.Google Scholar

24 Kraus, Ingrid, Studien über Schopenhauer und den Pessimismus in der deutschen Literatur des XIX Jahrhunderts (Bern, 1931).Google Scholar

25 Revue des deux Mondes, 1 08 1860, p. 732.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., pp. 729–731.

27 Schopenhauer, , Sämmtliche Werke, V, 701.Google Scholar

28 Huber, , p. 90.Google Scholar

29 Haym, Rudolf, Arthur Schopenhauer (Berlin, 1864).Google Scholar

30 Pfleiderer, Edmund, Der moderne Pessimismus (Berlin, 1875), pp. 28–30.Google Scholar

31 Ibid., p. 23.

32 Renan, Ernest, Dialogues et Fragments Philosophiques (Paris, 1876), p. 30.Google Scholar

33 Ibid., p. 30; pp. 19–27.

34 Cf. Carl Gebhardt's vita of Gwinner in Jahrbuch der S. G. No. 8 (1919), 208–227.Google Scholar

35 Clark, John, La Pensée de Ferdinand Brunetière (Paris, 1954), especially pp. 12–20.Google Scholar

36 Heller, Eric, The Disinherited (New York, 1959), pp. 85–88.Google Scholar

37 See especially Frauenstädt, 's Briefe über die Schopenhauer'sche Philosophie (Leipzig, 1854)Google Scholar and Das sittliche Leben (Berlin, 1868)Google Scholar for two attempts to place Schopenhauer's vitalistic understanding of nature into the context of evolutionary biology.

38 It is interesting to note the disproportionate representation of physicians and natural scientists among the initial contributors to the Schopenhauer Gesellschaft (set up in 1911), well over one third. Cf. Jahrbuch der S. G. No. 1 (1911), 105–112Google Scholar for the list of dues-payers.

39 Read Brunetière's statement of this point in Revue Bleue (30 01 1886), pp. 138–144Google Scholar; and Huber, , pp. 82–90.Google Scholar

40 For Schopenhauer's quarrels with his disciples, see Sammtliche Werke, V, 152–156 and 365–372.Google Scholar

41 For examples of his intellectual versatility (and savage wit), cf. the essays and aphorisms in Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Hubscher, A. (Wiesbaden, 1948), Vols. V and VI.Google Scholar

42 Baillot, , p. 327.Google Scholar

43 Ibid.; and Gebhard's study in Jahrbuch der S. G., pp. 328 and 329.Google Scholar

44 Nietzsches Werke, II, 214.Google Scholar

45 Ibid., III, p. 46.

46 Ibid., VIII, p. 413.

47 Cf. Löwith, Karl, Nietzsches Philosophie der etvigen Wiederkehr des Gleichen (Stuttgart, 1956)Google Scholar, for a study of Nietzsche's apotheosis of the suffering hero in history and art.

48 See Burckhardt, , Briefe, ed. Kaphan, F. (Leipzig, 1935), pp. 327, 340, and 493Google Scholar; and H. J. Schoeps's portrait of the historian during his last years in Gestalten an der Zeiturende (Berlin, 1936), pp. 7–23.Google Scholar

49 Quoted in Fechter, Paul, Frank Wedekind (Jena, 1920), p. 18.Google Scholar

50 Ibid., pp. 59–64; and the closing scene of the play Der Tod und der Teufel in Wedekind, 's Gesammelte Werke (Munich, 1922), V, 32–36.Google Scholar

51 Baillot, , p. 313.Google Scholar

52 LA Pensée de F. B., pp. 117–120.Google Scholar

53 Le Jardin de Bérénice (Paris, 1894), p. 9.Google Scholar

54 Sous l'oeil des. Barbares (Paris, 1892), p. 20.Google Scholar

55 Ibid., pp. 17–19; and Curtius, E. R., M. B. und die geistigen Grundlagen des französischen Nationalismus (Bonn, 1921).Google Scholar