Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:05:56.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Main Patterns of Philippine Foreign Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

H. B. Jacobini
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Philippine foreign policy is important to the United States for several reasons. The epigram describing the Filipinos as the most occidental of the Orientals and the most oriental of the Occidentals, emphasizes the Philippines as potentially one of the world's most important cultural bridges between these two worlds. It combines some of the best features of both areas and offers the possibility of giving each world an insight into the other. From the American standpoint the Philippines is often thought of as a show window in the Orient, and this country has a stake not only in the success of Philippine democracy, but also the Philippines provides some testimony to the fairness of American colonial policy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , October 1961 , pp. 507 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Macridis, R. C., Foreign Policy in World Politics (Englewood Cliffs, 1958), pp. 351–378Google Scholar; Pascual, R. R. and Majul, C. A., “The Foreign Policy of the Republic” Philippines Social Sciences and Humanities Review, XXIII, Nos. 2–4 (06–12, 1958), 159–188Google Scholar.

2 Philippine Information Agency, The Philippines: A Handbook of Information (Manila, 1955), pp. 1–4Google Scholar; also the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1959), XVII, 727Google Scholar.

3 Baldoria, P. L., “Political Geography of the Philippines” in Baldoria, P. L. (editor), Readings: Documents and Literature on Philippine Government and Foreign Relations (Quezon City, 1954), pp. 417–427Google Scholar; Pascual, and Majul, , op. cit., pp. 174–5Google Scholar.

4 Romani, J. H., The Philippine Presidency (Manila, 1956), pp. 149–173Google Scholar; Aruego, J. M., The Framing of the Philippine Constitution (Manila, 1949), I, 439–440Google Scholar.

5 Jacobini, H. B. and Drews, T. H., “The Administration of Foreign Affairs,” Stene, E. O. and Associates, Public Administration in the Philippines (Manila, 1955), pp. 341–365Google Scholar; Samonte, A. G. and Jacobini, H. B., “Protective, Legal, and Diplomatic Services,” Jacobini, H. B. and Associates, Governmental Services in the Philippines (Manila, 1956), pp. 15–63Google Scholar; Baldoria, , op. cit., pp. 551–571Google Scholar; Foreign Affairs: A Report by the Government Survey and Reorganization Commission (Manila, 1956)Google Scholar, passim.

6 Jacobini and Drews, loc. cit. For examples of the vigorous press criticism attention is invited to virtually any Manila newspaper. Editorials in the Philippines Free Press are often highly critical, for example, issues of January 3, 1959 or January 17, 1959. See also Fifield, R. H., “The Challenge of Magsaysay” Foreign Affairs (10, 1954), pp. 149–154 (hereafter cited as Fifield, “Challenge… ”)Google Scholar.

7 Corpuz, O. D., The Bureaucracy in the Philippines (Manila, 1957), pp. 1–9Google Scholar.

8 Hayden, J. R., The Philippines: A Study in National Development (New York, 1942), pp. 9–10Google Scholar.

9 Fernandez, L. H., The Philippine Republic (New York, 1926), pp. 9–51Google Scholar.

10 Ibid., pp. 51–63; Aguinaldo, E. and Pacis, V. A., A Second Look at America (New York, 1957), pp. 29–39Google Scholar.

11 Aguinaldo, and Pacis, , op. cit., pp. 82–129Google Scholar; Fernandez, , op. cit., pp. 172–175Google Scholar.

12 Liang, D., The Development of Philippine Political Parties (Hong Kong, 1939), pp. 17–84Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., pp. 82–3, 259–66.

14 Kirk, G., Philippine Independence (New York, 1936), pp. 73–135Google Scholar.

15 Public Law 127 (1934), Sec. 10(a); 48 U.S. Statutes 456Google Scholar.

16 Aruego, , op. cit., II, 731–733Google Scholar; Baldoria, , op. cit., pp. 586–588.Google ScholarThe first legislation of the new government provided for national defense, Commonwealth Act No. 1, 12 21, 1935Google Scholar.

17 Quezon, M. L., The Good Fight (New York, 1946), pp. 255–278Google Scholar.

18 Buss, C. A., Southeast Asia and the World Today (Princeton, 1958), pp. 37, 47, 55, 63, 80–81Google Scholar; especially pp. 147–149 where Nu's, Thakin “Burma Under the Japanese 1942–1945” is reproducedGoogle Scholar.

19 Abaya, H., Betrayal in the Philippines (New York, 1946)Google Scholar, passim; Bernstein, D., The Philippine Story (New York, 1947), pp. 200–216Google Scholar. For accounts, sympathetic to the leaders of the puppet government, arguing that they were acting to ameliorate the suffering of their countrymen, see Lichauco, M. P., Roxas (Manila, 1952)Google Scholar; Bustos, F. G., And Now Comes Roxas (Manila, 1945)Google Scholar; del Castillo, T. and del Castillo, J., The Saga of Jose P. Laurel (Manila, 1949)Google Scholar; Recto, C. M., Three Years of Enemy Occupation (Manila, 1946)Google Scholar.

20 Abaya, op. cit., passim; Bernstein, loc. cit. See also the interesting anonymous document, “The Peasant War in the Philippines: A study of the Sources of Social Unrest in the Philippines — An Analysis of Philippine Political Economy” (1946), reprinted in Philippines Social Sciences and Humanities Review (June–December, 1958), pp. 373–436.

21 “The Candidate Accepts the Nomination for the Presidency,” speech of January 19, 1946, Papers Addresses and Other Writings of Manuel Roxas, (Manila, 1954), I, 1–12, quotation on p. 10Google Scholar; see also “An Appeal for Understanding and Cooperation,” Radio Address to the American People of April 28, 1946, Papers … I, 13.

22 Presidential Proclamation No. 2695, 60 U.S. Statutes 1352.

23 Public Law 371 (1946) 60 U.S. Statutes 141; Public Law 370 (1946), 60 U.S. Statutes 128. See also Roxas, , “Message to the Congress on Amending the Constitution” (09 11, 1946)Google Scholar and “Address on the Parity Question at the University of the Philippines” (November 19, 1946), Papers …, I, 190–194 250–270.

24 Roxas, Manuel A., “Philippine Foreign Policy,” an undated mimeographed release by the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs, p. 1, 2–3Google Scholar.

25 Quirino, Elpidio, “Basis of our Foreign Policy,” an undated mimeographed release by the Dept. of Foreign Affairs, p. 1Google Scholar.

26 Treaty of General Relations Between the United States of America and The Republic of the Philippines, 61 U.S. Statutes 1174; Consular Convention Between the United States of America and the Republic of the Philippines, 62 U.S. Statutes 1593.

27 Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of the Philippines Concerning Military Bases, 61 U.S. Statutes 4019.

28 Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines on Military Assistance to the Philippines, 61 U.S. Statutes 3283.

29 Public Law 371 (1946), Sec. 202Google Scholar; 60 U.S. Statutes 141.

30 Araneta, Salvador, Economic Re-Examination of the Philippines (Malabon, 1953)Google Scholar, passim; Jenkins, Shirley, American Economic Policy Toward the Philippines (Stanford, 1954), pp. 54–96Google Scholaret passim.

31 Quirino became President upon the death of President Roxas on April 15, 1948.

32 Romulo, Carlos P., “Principles of Philippine Foreign Policy,” Commencement Address at University of the East, 04 28, 1951Google Scholar; in Baldoria, , op. cit., p. 653–657Google Scholar.

33 Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States of America and the Republic of the Philippines; 3 UST 3947.

34 Report to the President of the United States by the Economic Survey Mission to the Philippines, Washington, 10 6, 1950Google Scholar; Philippine Agricultural and Industrial Development Program, Revised, 1950; the main provisions are in Jacobini, and Drews, , op. cit., p. 357Google Scholar.

35 Official Gazette 5411–5413. Economic and Technical Cooperation Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Philippines, 3 UST 3707.

36 Jacobini, and Drews, , op. cit., p. 359Google Scholar.

37 See the anonymous document, “The Peasant War in the Philippines …” previously cited fn. 20. It is an almost bitterly anti-landlord and anti- American argument which, however, professes to be non-communist.

38 Scaff, A. H., The Philippine Answer to Communism (Stanford, 1955)Google Scholar; Smith, R. A., Philippine Freedom 1946–1958 (New York, 1958), pp. 137–169Google Scholar; Quirino, G., Magsaysay of the Philippines (Manila, 1958), pp. 67–120Google Scholar.

39 Fifield, , “Challenge…”, p. 154Google Scholar.

40 Fifield, R. H., The Diplomacy of Southeast Asia: 1945–1958 (New York, 1958), pp. 100–101Google Scholar. (Hereafter cited as Fifield, op. cit.).

41 Smith, , op. cit., especially pp. 160–169Google Scholar; Quirino, loc. cit.

42 “President Maysaysay's Inaugural Address,” official text released by the Dept. of Foreign Affairs.

43 Magsaysay, , “Roots of Philippine Policy,” Foreign Affairs (10, 1956), pp. 29–36Google Scholar.

44 “Speech Prepared and Delivered by Vice-President Carlos P. Garcia at the Capitol City Lions Club Annual Meeting on January 19, 1954,” text from the Dept. of Foreign Affairs; “Speech Prepared and Delivered by Honorable Carlos P. Garcia Vice-President of the Philippines and Concurrently Secretary of Foreign Affairs During the Constitution Day on February 8, 1954,” official text from Dept. of Foreign Affairs; “Our Foreign Service and Foreign Trade” speech by Vice President Garcia, February 18, 1954, text from Dept. of Foreign Affairs; Constitution of the Philippines, Art. II, Sec. 3.

45 “Full Text of the Statement of President Ramon Magsaysay Clarifying His Administration's Foreign Policy with Reference to Asia,” issued on March 10, 1954, official text from Dept. of Foreign Affairs.

46 Romulo, C. P., The Meaning of Bandung (Chapel Hill, 1956), p. 91Google Scholar.

47 “Speech Delivered by the Honorable Raul S. Manglapus, Undersecretary of Foreign Affairs Before the Manila Rotary Club, Manila, September 2, 1954”; also Manglapus, “Collective Leadership for Southeast Asia” (December 13, 1954), texts from Dept. of Foreign Affairs.

48 Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty, Art IV (1, 2); 6 UST 81.

49 Pascual, & Majul, , op. cit., pp. 165–6Google Scholar.

50 Larawan (Series III No. 8), issued by the Philippine Embassy, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar; “Text of President Garcia's address before the American Legion Convention, Manila, June 6, 1959” (Extracts), Larawan (Series III, No. 12).

51 Larawan (Series III, No. 3, 4).

52 Fifield, , op. cit., pp. 76–84Google Scholar; Treaty of Peace with Japan, 3 UST 3169; ratification deposited by Philippines 23 July 1957, 260 UNTS 450; Reparations Agreement Between the Republic of the Philippines and Japan. Signed at Manila, on 9 May 1956, 285 UNTS 3.

53 The original Philippine claim was for $8,000,000,000 while the Japanese settlement offer was for $250,000,000. The settlement eventually agreed to was $550,000,000 in services and products in the form of capital goods, equal to $550,000,000 distributed over twenty years. See reference in Pascual, and Majul, , op. cit., pp. 184–5Google Scholar; also see text of accord 285 UNTS 3.

54 Villanueva, B. M., “Services to Professions & Domestic Business,” Jacobini & Associates op. cit., pp. 442–3Google Scholar; New York Times (November 22, 1959), p. 23.

55 C.A. 613, August 26, 1940; R. A. 562, June 17, 1950; R. A. 1180, June 19, 1954.

56 Manila Bulletin, November 28, 1955, pp. 1, 2 7; November 29, 1955, pp. 1, 8.

57 See Ravenholt, Albert, “Piracy Back Between Borneo and Philippines,” St. Louis Post Dispatch (08 9, 1959), p. 2HGoogle Scholar, which is suggestive of the general problem in addition to dealing with the particular issues in the south.

58 Yap, D. M.. “The Program and Policy of President Carlos P. Garcia,” Bataan (12, 1957), p. 5Google Scholar.

59 Pascual, and Majul, . op. cit., p. 162Google Scholar.

60 Lopez, P., “Why P. I. Hearts ‘No Longer Belong to Daddy,’” Manila Bulletin 56th Annual Edition Sec. I, 04 9, 1956, p. 4Google Scholar; Locsin, T. M., “Is the Philippines Being Taken for Granted by the United States?”, Philippines Free Press (02 7, 1959), pp. 2–3, 54–5Google Scholar; Locsin, T. M., “But Can't We Be Friends?”, Philippines Free Press (02 14, 1959), pp. 2–3, 66–7Google Scholar; see, however, Buss, C. A., “A New American Look at the Philippines,” Philippines Free Press (12 12, 1959), pp. 42–44Google Scholar, 46, 48, 154–156, 160, and editorial in New York Times (10. 11, 1959), IV, p. 10Google Scholar.

61 Agreement between the United States of America and the Republic of the Philippines Concerning Military Bases, 61 U.S. Statutes 4019.

62 Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of the Philippines Respecting the Transfer of Certain Military Reservations to the Philippines, 61 U.S. Statutes 2660; 9 UST 309.

63 “U.S. and Philippines Establish Mutual Defense Board,” The Department of State Bulletin (06 2, 1958), p. 913Google Scholar.

64 New York Times (10. 13, 1959), pp. 1, 7, 38Google Scholar.

65 New York Times (November 22, 1959), p. 24; (November 26, 1959), p. 14; (November 28, 1959), p. 6; (November 29, 1959), p. 19; (December 11, 1959), p. 55.

66 New York Times (August 5, 1959), p. 10; (Oct. 10, 1959), p. 5.

67 Secretary Dulles quoted in Pascual, and Majul, , op. cit., p. 179Google Scholar.

68 New York Times (Oct. 2, 1959), pp. 1, 4; (Oct. 3, 1959); pp. 4, 44; see the later accounts and letters in New York Times (Oct. 17, 1959), p. 22; (Oct. 18, 1959), p. 23; (Oct. 19, 1959), p. 13.

69 Fifield, , op. cit., pp. 85–6Google Scholar.

70 “Full Text of the Statement of President Ramon Magsaysay Clarifying His Administration's Foreign Policy with Reference to Asia, Issued on March 10, 1954,” Text from Dept. of Foreign Affairs.

71 51 Official Gazette 682.

72 Romani, , op. cit., pp.157–172Google Scholar.

73 Ibid., p. 169; Fifield, , op. cit., p. 89Google Scholar.

74 Romulo, op. cit., passim.

75 Pascual, and Majul, , op. cit., pp. 169–174Google Scholar.

76 New York Times (May 23, 1956), p. 6; (May 26, 1956), p. 16; (October 5, 1956), p. 3; News From Viet-Nam (March 16, 1959), pp. 2–13.

77 Paredes, A. F., “The Sultanate of Sulu,” Mobilways (04, 1959), pp. 10–17Google Scholar; Fifield, , op. cit., pp. 90–91Google Scholar. The British position, it should be noted, stresses that the “Sultan granted and ceded in perpetuity … all his rights and powers over all territories and lands tributary to him on the mainland of the island of Borneo.” A later accord is said to have included certain islands, and he or his successors are to receive annually $5300.00 Malayan.

78 Juan M. Arreglado, Minister, Department of Foreign Affairs, Office of Legal Affairs, Republic of the Philippines, Correspondence dated January 27, 1960.

79 “The Philippine Republic in the United Nations,” Larawan (Series I, No. 13); Jacobini and Associates, op. cit., pp. 56–58Google Scholar; Romulo, op. cit., passim.

80 Provisional Agreement Between the United States of America and the Philippines Concerning Friendly Relations and Diplomatic and Consular Representation, 60 U.S. Statutes 1800; Treaty of General Relations Between the United States of America and the Republic of the Philippines and the Spanish State, 70 UNTS 134; Pascual, and Majul, , op. cit., p. 168Google Scholar on relations with Spain.

81 “Final Act of the Baguio Conference of 1950,” in Baldoria, , op. cit., pp. 627–631Google Scholar; Fifield, , op. cit., pp. 100–101, 455Google Scholar.