Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:21:20.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irrationalism and Myth in Georges Sorel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

S. P. Rouanet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The First World War is sometimes credited with the dissolution of the well-ordered universe of the nineteenth century. In fact, by 1914 there was very little left to destroy, for most of the essential work had already been accomplished. The aftermath of the war merely helped to make the collapse of order and stability more visible. But the post-1918 atmosphere of gloom, later crystallized in the “Lost Generation” and in the escapist movements of the twenties, gave the impression that the war had been responsible for the moral and intellectual Zusammenbruch of the period. The feeling of decay was everywhere; the old values, the former certainties and criteria had vanished, leaving an impression of emptiness behind. The old order had crumbled, without dignity, “not with a bang but with a whimper,” as T. S. Eliot put it.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1964 , pp. 45 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bergson, Henri, The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, translated by Audra, R. Ashley and Brereton, Cloudesley (Garden City, n.d.), pp. 220–221Google Scholar.

2 Gide, André, L'Immoraliste (Paris, 1939), p. 61Google Scholar.

3 Burke, Edmund, Burke's Politics, ed. by Hoffman, Ross J. S. and Levack, Paul (New York, 1949), p. 304Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., p. 227.

5 Shils, Edward A., “Georges Sorel,” Introduction of the American Edition of Reflections on Violence, trans, by Hulme, T. E. and Roth, J. (Glencoe, 1950), p. 25Google Scholar.

6 Sorel, Georges, Réflexions sur la Violence (Paris, 1946), p. 65Google Scholar. The English translation, used for subsequent passages, has for this passage “overturn … by the breath of the professors.” See Sorel, , Reflections on Violence, trans. Hulme, and Roth, , int. by Shils (Glencoe, 1950), p. 70Google Scholar. Later references will cite the French edition as Sorel and the English edition as Reflections.

7 Sorel, pp. 110–111; Reflections, p. 100.

8 Sorel, p. 130; Reflections, p. 113.

9 Sorel, p. 161; Reflections, p. 132.

10 Sorel, p. 200; Reflections, p. 157.

11 Sorel, p. 434; Reflections, p. 301.

12 Sorel, pp. 112–113; Reflections, p. 102.

13 Sorel, p. 122; Reflections, p. 108.

14 Sorel, p. 126; Reflections, p. 110.

15 Sorel, pp. 368–369.

16 Michels, Robert, Political Parties, trans, by Eden, and Paul, Cedar (New York, 1959), p. 325Google Scholar.

17 Lafargue, Paul, “Socialism and the Intellectuals” in The Intellectuals, ed. de Huszar, George B. (Glencoe, 1960), pp. 323–324Google Scholar.

18 Sorel, p. 35; Reflections, p. 50.

19 Sorel, p. 217; Reflections, p. 167.

20 Sorel, p. 207; Reflections, p. 161.

21 Sorel, pp. 316–317; Reflections, p. 232.

22 Sorel, p. 218; Reflections, p. 168.

23 Lukacs, Georg, quoted by Mannheim, Karl, Ideology and Utopia, trans. Wirth, Louis and Shils, Edward (New York, 1936), p. 127Google Scholar.

24 Sorel, p. 109; Reflections, p. 99.

25 Sorel, p. 358; Reflections, p. 258.

26 Sorel, p. 324; Reflections, p. 237.

27 Sorel, p. 161; Reflections, p. 132.

28 Sorel, p. 249; Reflections, p. 189.

29 See Kahn, Paul, “Mythe et Réalité Sociale Chez Sorel,” Cahiers Internacionaux de Sociologie, VI (1951), 131–132Google Scholar.

30 Toynbee, Arnold J., A Study of History, Abridgement by Somervell, D. C., Vol. I (Oxford University Press, 1954), 60Google Scholar.

31 For a complete account of these theories, see, among other works, Myth and Mythmaking, edited by Murray, Henry A. (New York, 1960)Google Scholar; Gusdorf, Georges, Mythe et Métaphysique (Paris, 1953)Google Scholar; Chase, Richard, Quest for Myth (Baton Rouge, 1949)Google Scholar.

32 Malinowski, Bronislaw, Magic, Science and Religion (Garden City, 1948), p. 101Google Scholar.

33 Kahn, Paul, op. cit., p. 133Google Scholar.

34 Georges Sorel, Introduction a l'Economie Moderne, quoted by Kahn, Paul, op. cit., p. 133Google Scholar.

35 Ibid., p. 137.

36 Sorel, pp. 32–33; Reflections, p. 49.

37 Sorel, p. 44; Reflections, p. 56.

38 Sorel, p. 46; Reflections, p. 57.

39 Rossignol, Pour Connaitre la Pensée de Sorel, quoted by Kahn, Paul, op. cit., p. 142Google Scholar.

40 Sorel, pp. 35–36; Reflections, pp. 50–51.

41 Sorel, pp. 45–46; Reflections, p. 56.

42 Sorel, p. 319; Reflections, p. 234.

43 Sorel, p. 49; Reflections, p. 59.

44 Sorel, p. 39; Reflections, p. 53.

45 Sorel, p. 219; Reflections, p. 169.