Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:24:41.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Ottomanism to Arabism: the Origin of an Ideology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

C. Ernest Dawn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since 1918 the doctrine that the Arabs are a nation and that nationality is the basis of politics has come to be accepted by a very large majority of Arab political leaders and of at least the lay intellectuals. The espousal of this doctrine, by a people who are predominantly Moslem in religion, is a development of revolutionary significance, since for many centuries Moslems viewed the state in terms of religion and dynasty. Moslems have recognized the existence of distinct peoples, or nations, since the time of Mohammed. Indeed, Islam in its first century or so was the peculiar religion of the Arab nation, and to become a Moslem was to join the Arab nation as a dependent person. This system, however, proved unworkable, and in the end Islam became the supreme bond which superseded nationality.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , July 1961 , pp. 378 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Poliak, A. N., “L' arabisation de l' Orient sémitique,” Revue des Ėtudes Islamiques (1938), 37–40Google Scholar; Goldziher, Ignaz, Muhammedanische Studien, 2 vols. (Halle, 1889–1890), I, 101–176Google Scholar.

2 Lewis, Bernard, “The Impact of the French Revolution on Turkey,” Journal of World History, I (1953), 107–108Google Scholar.

3 Heyworth-Dunne, J., “Rifā ah Badawi Rāfi at-Tahtawi: the Egyptian Revivalist,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (London University), IX (1939), 961–967, X (1940), 400–401.Google Scholar

4 Kitāb talkhis al-ibrīz ila talkhīs bārīz [The book of the distillation of pure gold, even the disti lation of Paris] (Cairo, A.H. 1323/A.D. 1905), pp. 5, 7, 14, 19, 20–21, 55–58, 258, 260, 262Google Scholar.

5 Briaune, Walter, “Beiträge zur Geschichte des neuarabischen Schrifttums,” Mitteilungen des Seminars fur Orientalischen Sprachen zu Berlin, XXXVI (1933), 119–123Google Scholar; Heyworth-Dunne, , op. cit., B X (1939), 339–400, 403, 404Google Scholar. For examples of his patriotic poems, see Abd al-Rahmān al-Rāfi i, Shu arā al-watanīyah [The poets of patriotism] (Cairo: Maktabah al-Nahdah al- Misriyah, A.H. 1373/A.D. 1954), pp. 8–12Google Scholar.

6 Davison, Roderic H., “Turkish Attitudes concerning Christian-Muslim Equality in the Nineteenth Century,” American Historical Review, LIX (1954), 852Google Scholar.

7 The same was true of much later writers on nationalism, see Haim, Sylvia G., “Islam and the Theory of Arab Nationalism,” Die Welt des Islams, n.s., IV (1955), 127–140Google Scholar and my article, “Ideological Influences in the Arab Revolt,” The World of Islam: Studies in Honour of Philip K. Hitti, ed. Kritzeck, James and Winder, R. Bayly (New York, 1959), p. 248Google Scholar.

8 For an example, see Lewis, p. 118, n. 35.

9 Rāfi, pp. 54–55.

10 The Turkish literature remains to be investigated, but for suggestive remarks, see Berkes, Niyazi, “Historical Background of Turkish Secularism,” Islam and the West, ed. Frye, Richard N. (The Hague, 1957), pp. 48–62Google Scholar, and Davison, pp. 849–853.

11 Rāfi, p. 9. In this paragraph, other references to this work will be given in the text.

12 Journal Asiatique, 7th ser., XIX (1882), 169–170Google Scholar; 8th ser., V (1885), 244; IX (1887), 360.

13 Goldziher, I., “Ueber Muhammedanische Polemik gegen ahl al-kitâab,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, XXXII (1878), 343–344Google Scholar; Hurgronje, C. Snouck, Mekka in the Latter Part of the Nineteenth Century, trans. Monahan, J. H. (London, 1931), p. 173Google Scholar.

14 Brockelmann, C., art. “Fāaris al-Shidyāak Ahmad b. Yūsuf,” Encyclopaedia of Islam,[1st ed.], II, 67–68Google Scholar; M. Hartmann, art. “Djarīda,” ibid., I, 1019.

15 al-Shidyīq, Ahmad Fīris (Faris El-Chidiac), Kit¯ab al-s¯aq ala al-s¯aq fi-ma huwa al-faryāq (La vie et les aventures de Fariac) (Paris, 1855), pp. 597–605, 641–644, 659–660, especially pp. 603–605, 659 for denial of true civilization to the EuropeansGoogle Scholar.

16 Appendix, pp. 1–2. The contrast between the new conservatives like al-Shidyāq and the older ones is well illustrated by the contrast between this appendix and the remarks of R¯afi (pp. 68–75) concerning Orientalists.

17 Menzel, Th., art. “Kemīl Mehmed Nīmik,” Encyclopaedia of Islam, [1st ed.], II, 849–850Google Scholar; Davison, 861–864; Berkes, Niyazi, “Ziya Gökalp: His Contribution to Turkish Nationalism,” Middle East Journal, VIII (1954), 379–380Google Scholar; Rossi, Ettore, “Dall Impero Ottomano alia Repubblica di Turchia,” Oriente Moderno, XXIII (1943), 364–366, 367–368, 369Google Scholar.

18 Réfutation des Matérialistes, trans. Goichon, A. M. (Paris, 1942), pp 121–130, 133–134, 152–171. CfGoogle Scholar. Adams, Charles C., Islam and Modernism in Egypt (London, 1933), pp. 15–16Google Scholar.

19 See his essay, “al- Ulum inda al- arab [the sciences among the Arabs],” and his poem “Tanabbihu wa istafīqu [Awake! Awake!],” in Isa Mikhā īl Sāba, al-Shaykh Ibrāahīm al-Yāziji, 1847–1906, Nawābigh al-fikr al-arabi, 14 (Cairo, 1955), pp. 71–74, 49–50Google Scholar.

20 Goldziher, Ignaz, ZDMG, XXVIII (1874), 167–168.Google Scholar

20 Abdou, Mohammed, Rissalat al Tawhid: Expoś de la Religion Musulmane, trans. Michel, B. and Razik, Moustapha Abdel (Paris, 1925), pp. 123–130Google Scholar. In this paragraph, subsequent references to this work are given parenthetically in the text. This work, which was first published in 1897, is a reworking of lectures delivered in Beirut in 1885–1888.

22 Rida, Muhammad Rash¯id, Ta' rīkh al-Ustādh al-Imām al-Shaykh Muhammad Abduh, 2nd ed., II (Cairo, A.H. 1344 / [A.D. 1925–6]), 506Google Scholar.

23 Rash¯id Rida, II, 507, 353.

24 Rash¯id Rida, II, 506.

25 Rashīd Rida, II, 515–516.

26 See Abduh's, al-lslām wa al-nasrānīyah ma al-ilm wa al-madan¯iyah [Islam and Christianity compared with respect to science and civilization], ed. Rida, Muhammad Rash¯id, 7th ed (Cairo, A.H. 1367/ [a.D. 1947–8]), esp. pp. 62–64Google Scholar (for Islam as the final and perfect religion), and pp. 81, 119– 121, 151–154 (for Arab revival as the foundation of Islamic revival). This book, which was first published in 1902, is a compilation of articles which had previously been published in periodicals.

27 Al-Manār, I, no. 40 (1 Sha bān 1316/Dec. 24, 1898, 2nd printing A.H. 1327 / [A.D. 1909]), 799, 800, 885, 800–801. Rash¯id Rida had already expounded these ideas at length in a series of articles: ibid., 606–610, 628–633, 649–655, 670–679, 696–704, 722–730.

28 Al-Manār, I, 764–771, 788–793 (quotation on 770).

29 Quoted in Sylvia Haim, G., “Intorno alle origini della teoria del panarabismo,” Oriente Moderno, XXXVI (1956), 416, 415Google Scholar. The passages were published in July and May, 1900.

30 al-Kawākibi, Abd al-Rahmāan, Umm al-qura [The mother of villages (one of the names for Mecca)] (Cairo, A.H. 1350/ A.D. 1931), p. 3Google Scholar. Subsequent references to this book in this and the following paragraphs will be given in the text.

31 For a discussion of al-Kawākibi's Arab caliphate, see Haim, Sylvia G., “Blunt and al-Kawākibi,” Oriente Moderno, XXXV (1955), 132–143Google Scholar.

32 Relatively few Christians actually participated in the Arab political movement of the early twentieth century. They worked instead for Lebanese or Syrian nationalism. Al-Yāziji himself exhibits traces of Syrian nationalism in his essay, “Syria”: Sāaba, pp. 93–95.

33 Al-Durar [The pearls], ed. Ishāq, Awni (Beirut, 1909), p. 105Google Scholar. In this and the succeeding paragraphs, further references to this work will be given in the text.

34 Al-Shidyāq, Appendix, p. 2; see also pp. 703–704.

35 Text of speech in al-Mu tamar al- arabi al-awwal [The first Arab Congress] (Cairo: A.H. 1331/ A.D. 1913), pp. 58, 55, 56Google Scholar.

38 Haim, Sylvia G., “‘The Arab Awakening,’ A Source for the Historian?” Die Welt des Islams, n.s. II (1953), p. 249Google Scholar, n.l. For a later (1930) expression of the same idea, see Oriente Moderno, X (1930), 57Google Scholar.

37 Ishāq, pp. 102, 454, 165.