Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:01:44.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canadian-American Relations in the Arctic: The Effect of Environmental Influences upon Territorial Claims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Thomas M. Tynan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Wallace K. Ferguson, the noted Renaissance scholar, once wrote that history must be seen through the eyes of the one writing it. He went on to say that, “since history is in this sense created by the historian, and he, in turn, is the product of his age and environment, history varies from generation to generation and must be constantly reinterpreted.” It is with this thought in mind that we will undertake a reexamination of the role of the Arctic in Canadian-American relations.

In recent years the Arctic has become a region of growing significance for both the United States and Canada after decades of marginal interest bordering on neglect. It is this article's position that Canadian foreign policy, concerning the Arctic regions to the north of her mainland, has consistently from 1880 to 1970 been based upon a perception of potential threats, which in fact never existed. Furthermore, such a perception has been based in part upon the unsettled nature of international law in the Arctic and the effect of certain environmental factors, labeled as domestic sources of foreign policy in Dale Thomson and Roger Swanson's Canadian Foreign Policy: Options and Perspectives. The article, then, shows how Canadian foreign policy in this issue-area illustrates the Sprout's paradigm of perception in decision-making. According to this paradigm, “what matters in policymaking (and, of course, in analysis thereof) is how the human policymaker (or group) perceives, interprets and responds to the environing conditions and events.”

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 1979 , pp. 402 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ferguson, Wallace K., The Renaissance (New York, 1967), p. 2Google Scholar.

2 Thomson, Dale C. and Swanson, Roger F., Canadian Foreign Policy: Options and Perspectives (Toronto, 1971)Google Scholar.

3 Harold, and Sprout, Margaret, An Ecological Paradigm for the Study of International Polities (Princeton, 1968), p. 31Google Scholar.

4 Canada, , Parliament, Parliamentary Debates (Commons), vol. 5 (1878): 2391Google Scholar.

5 Cohen, Maxwell, “The Arctic and the National Interest,” International Journal, 26 (Winter 1970–1971), 54–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Johnston, V. K., “Canada's Title to the Arctic Islands,” Canadian Historical Review, 14 (03 1933), 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Head, Ivan L., “Canadian Claims to Territorial Sovereignty in the Arctic Regions,” McGill Law Journal, 9 (1963), 212Google Scholar; and Smith, Gordon W., “Sovereignty in the North: The Canadian Aspect of an International Problem,” in The Arctic Frontier, ed. Macdonald, R. St J. (Toronto, 1966), p. 203Google Scholar.

6 As quoted in Johnston, , “Canada's Title to the Arctic Islands,” p. 34Google Scholar, and found in Bernier, J. E., Report on the 'Dominion of Canada Government Expedition to the Arctic Islands and Hudson Strait on Board the D.GJS. ‘Arctic’ (Ottawa, 1910), p. ixGoogle Scholar.

7 Smith, , “Sovereignty in the North,” p. 208Google Scholar.

8 Ibid., p. 209 and Johnston, , “Canada's Title to the Arctic Islands,” p. 40Google Scholar.

9 Whiteman, Marjorie M., Digest of International Law, 15 vols. (Washington, 1963–1973), 2: 1052 and 1268Google Scholar. See also Smith, , “Sovereignty in' the North,” pp. 225–226Google Scholar; and Dellapenna, Joseph W., “Canadian Claims in Arctic Waters,” Land and Water Law Review, 7 (1972), 418–419Google Scholar.

10 See: Green, L. C., “Canada and Arctic Sovereignty,” Canadian Bar Review, 48 (1970): 775Google Scholar; Meredith, Brian, “A Plan for the Arctic: Mr. Trudeau's International Regime,” Round Table, 60 (04 1970), 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Morin, J. Y., “Le progrès technique, la pollution et 'évolution recente du droit de la mer au Canada, particulièrement à l'égard le l'Arctique,” Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 8 (1970), 240Google Scholar. A number of Canadian government maps still have sector lines printed on them; however, Trudeau stated (1969) that the sector theory applies to the seabed only. On this see: Pharand, Donat, The Law of the Sea of the Arctic with Special Reference to Canada (Ottawa, 1973), p. 141Google Scholar.

11 Zaslow, Morris, The Opening of the Canadian North 1870–1914 (Toronto, 1971), p. 270Google Scholar.

12 Letter of 11 September 1935 to Mr. Hill, from The Office of the Historical Advisor, Department of State (S. W. Boggs). U.S. National Archives, State Department File (800.014 Arctic/40).

13 Letter of 27 September to Mr. H. Arthur Leatherman, from R. Walton Moore for the Secretary of State. U.S. National Archives, State Department File (800.014 Arctic/39).

14 Letter of 4 April 1944 to the Hon. Clarence F. Lea, Chairman of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, from Cordell Hull, Secretary of State. U.S. National Archives, State Department File (800.014 Arctic/64).

15 See: Memorandum of 6 January 1939 to President Roosevelt, from Sumner Wells in re Territorial Rights in Arctic and Antarctic. U.S. National Archives, State Department File (800.014 Antarctic/129A); Memorandum from F.D.R. to Acting Secretary of State Welles, dated 7 January 1939. U.S. National Archives, State Department File (800.014 Antarctic/135); and also, Roosevelt, Elliott, ed., F.D.R. His Personal Letters: 1928–1945, 2 vols. (New York, 1950), 2: 906–907Google Scholar.

16 As quoted in Sutherland, R. J., “The Strategic Significance of the Canadian Arctic,” in The Arctic Frontier, ed. Macdonald, R. St. J. (Toronto, 1966), p. 256Google Scholar.

17 Taken from Dziuban's, Stanley W., Military Relations Between the United States and Canada: 1939–1945 (Washington, 1959), p. 149Google Scholar.

18 Eayrs, James, In Defence of Canada — Appeasement and Rearmament (Toronto, 1965), p. 171Google Scholar.

19 Dziuban, , Military Relations, p. 152Google Scholar; and also Eayrs, , In Defence of Canada, p. 172Google Scholar.

20 Sutherland, , “Strategic Significance,” p. 262Google Scholar.

21 Dziuban, , Military Relations, pp. 337–39Google Scholar.

22 Sutherland, , “Strategic Significance,” p. 262Google Scholar.

23 Judd, David, “Canada's Northern Policy: Retrospect and Prospect,” in Canada's Changing North, ed. Wonders, William Clare (Toronto, 1971), pp. 340–341Google Scholar.

24 Kennleyside, H. L., “The Canada-United States Permanent Joint Board on Defence,” International Journal, 16 (Winter 1960–1961), 58Google Scholar.

25 Warnock, John W., Partner to Behemoth: The Military Policy of a Satellite Canada (Toronto, 1970), p. 114Google Scholar.

26 Eayrs, James, Canada in. World Affairs: October 1955 to June 1957 (Toronto, 1959), p. 151Google Scholar.

27 Ibid.

28 Smith, , “Sovereignty in the North,” p. 213Google Scholar.

29 See: Martin, Paul, “The American Impact on Canada,” in The Star- Spangled Beaver, ed. Redekop, John H. (Toronto, 1971), pp. 25–35Google Scholar, esp. p. 29; and Canada, , Parliament, Parliamentary Debates (Commons), vol. 7 (1956): 6955Google Scholar.

30 TIAS 3049 DEFENSE: Continental Radar Defense System (Pinetree Line), 1 August 1951; TIAS 2875 DEFENSE: Haines-Fairbanks Oil Pipeline Installation, 30 June 1953; TIAS 3019 NAVIGATION: Loran Station on Cape Christian, Baffin Island, 3 May 1954; TIAS 3218 CANADA: Establishment in Canada of Warning and Control System Against Air Attack (DEW-line), 5 May 1955; TIAS 3452 DEFENSE: Radar Stations in British Columbia, Ontario and Nova Scotia, 15 June 1955; TIAS 4051 DEFENSE: Aerial Refueling Facilities, 20 June 1958; TIAS 4208 CANADA: Establishment in Canada of Warning and Control System Against Air Attack—Communication Facilities at Camp Dyer, Baffin Island, 13 April 1959; TIAS 4218 DEFENSE: Short Range Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) Facilities, 1 May 1959; TIAS 4264 Establishment of Ballistic Missile Early Warning System, 13 July 1959; TIAS 4859 DEFENSE: Improvements in the Continental Air Defense System, 27 September 1961; and TIAS 5911 DEFENSE: Ground-To-Air Communications Facilities in Northern Canada, 1 September 1965.

31 “Our Last Great Frontier,” an editorial reprint from the Toronto Tele gram found in the Chronicle-Herald (Halifax), 10 09 1969, p. 4Google Scholar.

32 “Too Big to Be Ignored,” an editorial, Globe and Mail (Toronto), 9 09 1969, p. 6Google Scholar.

33 Canada, , Parliament, Parliamentary Debates (Commons) vol. 8 (y1969): 8720–21Google Scholar.

34 Ibid.

35 Sharp, Mitchell, “A Ship and Sovereignty in the North,” Globe and Mail (Toronto), 18 09 1969, p. 7Google Scholar.

36 Ibid.

37 Burns, John, “Trudeau Will Meet U-Thant,” Globe and Mail (Toronto), 25 10 1969, pp. 1–2Google Scholar.

38 “Boost in Military Effort in Arctic—MP's Say,” Globe and Mail (Toronto), 19 02 1970, p. 4Google Scholar.

39 McKegney, James, “Letter to the Editor,” Globe and Mail (Toronto), 27 02 1970, p. 6Google Scholar.

40 U.S. Department of State, Department of State Statement on Government of Canada's Bills on Limits of the Territorial Sea, Fisheries and Pollution, Press Release No. 121 (15 April 1970) and found in International Legal Materials, 9 (1970), 605–606Google Scholar.

41 Government of Canada, Summary of Canadian Note of April 16 Tabled by the Secretary of State for External Affairs in the House, 17 April 1970, found in International Legal Materials, 9 (1970), 607–615Google Scholar.

42 “Ours to Protect,” an editorial, Calgary Herald, 4 April 1970, p. 4.

43 “The Crisis Is Now,” an editorial, Globe and Mail (Toronto), 17 04 1970, p. 6Google Scholar.

44 “Ottawa Strikes Sparks,” an editorial, Vancouver Express, 11 04 1970, p. 4Google Scholar.

45 O'Brien, William V. and Chapelli, Armando C., “The Law of the Sea in the ‘Canadian’ Arctic: The Pattern of Controversy,” McGill Law Journal, 19 (1973), 542Google Scholar.

46 The Legal Status of Eastern Greenland: Denmark v. Norway—Judgment, April 5, 1933 (Series A/B No. 53, pp. 22–147 of The Permanent Court of International Justice) as found in World Court Reports—Volume Three: 1932–1935, ed. Hudson, Manley O. (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1938), pp. 151–251Google Scholar.

47 O'Connell, D. P., International Law, with foreword by McNair, Lord, 2 vols. (London, 1970), 1: 411Google Scholar.

48 See: Communication to Mr. Bryn, Norwegian Minister at Washington, 2 April 1924 in Foreign Relations of the United States of America, vol. 2 (1924), 519; and also Goggs', S. W., The Polar Regions: Geographical and Historical Data for Consideration in a Study of Claims to Sovereignty in the Arctic and Antarctic Regions, Office of the Historical Advisor to the Department of State, dated 21 09 1933Google Scholar. U.S. National Archives, State Department File (800.014 Arctic/31).

49 Eastern Greenland, p. 201.

50 Ibid., p. 202. See also, Meyers, John E., “Political Rights in the Canadian Arctic,” International Lawyer, 4 (07 1970), 666–672Google Scholar.

51 Smith, , “Sovereignty in the North,” p. 213Google Scholar.

52 For a comprehensive treatment of the law of the sea of the Arctic, see Donat Pharand's Law of the Sea of the Arctic. A more recent work has been edited by Johnson, Barbara and Zacher, Mark W., Canadian Foreign, Policy and the Law of the Sea (Vancouver, 1978)Google Scholar; see esp. Roger D. McConchie and Robert S. Reid's chapter on Canadian foreign policy and international straits.

53 Thomson, and Swanson, , Canadian Foreign Policy, p. 9Google Scholar.

54 For example, see Gough, Barry, Canada (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1975)Google Scholar; Carlson, Lucile, Geography and World Politics (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1962)Google Scholar; and Tupper, Stanley and Bailey, Douglas L., Canada and the United States: The Second Hundred Years (New York, 1967)Google Scholar.

55 Canada, , Canada, Statistics, Canada Yearbook — 1973 (Ottawa: Information Canada, 1973), pp. 208–209 and 211Google Scholar.

56 For examples, see Cohen, , “The Arctic,” pp. 52–53Google Scholar.

57 Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York, 1964), p. 135Google Scholar.

58 Sharp, Mitchell, “Canada-U.S. Relations: Options for the Future,” International Perspectives (Autumn 1972), p. 17Google Scholar.

59 Sprout, and Sprout, , Ecological Paradigm, pp. 30–31Google Scholar. Dosman, E. J., ed., The Arctic Question (Toronto, 1976)Google Scholar, Contains a number of articles which illustrate this continued perception.