Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:57:22.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Human Rights Policy Toward Eastern Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Stephen A. Garrett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A number of analyses of American foreign policy suggest that over the course of some two hundred years there have been two distinct themes in the American diplomatic experience. These can be labeled the realist and idealist. At various times first one and then the other appears to have assumed at least a temporary predominance in American thinking and diplomatic activity. The classic statement of the realist approach still remains that which was offered by John Quincy Adams in 1823 in response to pressure on the United States to intervene to assist the Greeks in their war of independence against the Ottoman Turks. “Wherever the flag of freedom may be unfurled,” remarked Adams, the heartfelt sentiments and sympathy of the American people go out to those struggling for freedom. On the other hand, the United States should and could not assume a direct responsibility in such struggles. In Adams' vivid phrase, America “goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy.” The Adamsonian or realist approach to American foreign policy then posits that altruistic or moral concerns are essentially irrelevant to the real objectives of a sound national diplomacy, which are the protection of one's own sovereignty and political and economic well-being. In our external relations, then, the focus ultimately must be on power considerations, the development of our strictly personal national interests.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , October 1981 , pp. 519 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A classic treatment of the realist-idealist controversy remains Osgood's, RobertIdeals and Self-Interest in America's Foreign Relations (Chicago, 1953)Google Scholar.

2 U.S., Congress, House, International Relations Committee, Subcommittee on Europe and the Middle East, Statement by William H. Luers, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs, 7 09 1978 (Washington, D. C., 1978), p. 27Google Scholar.

3 A thorough airing of the issues here may be found in Sonnenfeldt's testimony before Congress. U.S., Congress, House, Committee on International Relations, United States National Security Policy Vis-a-Vis Eastern Europe (Washington, D.C., 1976)Google Scholar.

4 U.S., Congress, House, Statement by William H. Luers, p. 27Google Scholar.

5 Oliver, J. W., “Louis Kossuth's Appeal to the Middle West – 1852,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 14 (1928), 481–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Mametey, Victor, The United States and East Central Europe (Princeton, 1957), pp. 280–86Google Scholar.

7 Leiss, Amelia C., ed., European Peace Treaties after World War II (Boston, 1954), pp. 163–341Google Scholar.

8 Cited in The American Non-Policy toward Eastern Europe, 1943–1947 by Lundestad, Geir (Oslo, 1978), p. 342Google Scholar.

9 Ibid.

10 Laqueur, Walter, “The Issue of Human Rights,” Commentary, 05 1977, p. 33Google Scholar.

11 Ibid., p. 33.

12 Perhaps the best general discussion of American policy toward Eastern Europe since 1945 is Kovrig, Bennett, The Myth of Liberation (Baltimore, 1973)Google Scholar.

13 U.S., Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs, “Humane Purposes in Foreign Policy. President Carter at the Commencement Exercises of the University of Notre Dame,” (Washington, D.C., 1977), p. 3Google Scholar.

14 This is the essential argument of Tufton Beamish and Hadley, Guy in The Kremlin's Dilemma: The Struggle for Human Rights in Eastern Europe (London, 1979)Google Scholar.

15 An excellent survey of the varied human rights situation in Eastern Europe is offered by James F. Brown, Deputy Director for Policy and Research for Radio Free Europe, in testimony before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. See U.S., Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, Basket Three: Implementation of the Helsinki Accords. Volume II: Helsinki Compliance in Eastern Europe (Washington, D.C., 1977), pp. 274–92Google Scholar.

16 Beamish, and Hadley, , Kremlin's Dilemma, p. 12Google Scholar.

17 U.S., Congress, House, Committee on the Judiciary, Human Rights and U.S. Consular Activities in Eastern Europe (Washington, D. C., 1977), p. 41Google Scholar.

18 Beamish, and Hadley, , Kremlin's Dilemma, pp. 143–56Google Scholar.

19 U.S., Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs, “Human Rights Policy. Secretary Cyrus R. Vance on Law Day before the University of Georgia's Law School,” (Washington, D. C., 1977), p. 1Google Scholar.

20 Beamish, and Hadley, , Kremlin's Dilemma, pp. 84–86Google Scholar.

21 U.S., Congress, House, Human Rights and U.S. Consular Activities in Eastern Europe, pp. 34–38Google Scholar.

22 Beamish, and Hadley, , Kremlin's Dilemma, p. 209Google Scholar.

23 U. S., Congress, House, Human Rights and U.S. Consular Activities in Eastern Europe, p. 17Google Scholar.

24 Beamish, and Hadley, , Kremlin's Dilemma, pp. 237–38Google Scholar.

25 U. S., Congress, House, Human Rights and U.S. Consular Activities in Eastern Europe, pp. 36–37Google Scholar.

26 Beamish, and Hadley, , Kremlin's Dilemma, p. 70Google Scholar.

27 Ibid., p. 113.

28 Ibid., p. 154.

29 U.S., International Communication Agency, “U.S. Examines Own Compliance with Helsinki Accords,” Press Release, 3 04 1979Google Scholar.

30 U. S., Congress, House, Human Rights and U.S. Consular Activities in Eastern Europe, p. 47Google Scholar.

31 Ibid., p. 25.

32 A good summary of the Declaration of Principles as well as Basket Three is given in New York Times, 30 July 1975, p. 8.

33 Cook, Don, “Belgrade: Spinning a European Web,” Atlantic, 11 1977Google Scholar.

34 These points are part of a private memorandum by one of the American participants at the Belgrade Conference.

35 Heneghan, Thomas E., “Human Rights Protests in Eastern Europe,” World Today, 03 1977, p. 90Google Scholar.

36 Beamish, and Hadley, , Kremlin's Dilemma, p. 35Google Scholar.