Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T04:27:38.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power and Knowledge Revisited in Middle East Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Mervat Hatem
Mervat Hatem*
Affiliation:
Howard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In thinking about a focus for the 2008 Presidential Address, I could not help but be influenced by the fact that this year marked the thirtieth anniversary of Edward Said’s seminal book on Orientalism. I chose to examine the connection between power and knowledge, central to his work, and how this has influenced not only the study of the Middle East, but how it has influenced the members and activities of the Middle East Studies Association, the largest North American professional association devoted to the study of the region, an organization whose influence sometimes extends beyond its territorial boundaries to other parts of the world.

Type
Mesa Presidential Address 2008
Information
Review of Middle East Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , Summer 2009 , pp. 3 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

End Notes

1 Lewis, Bernard, “The Question of Orientalism,” The New York Review of Books (June 24,1982), pp. 49–56.Google Scholar

2 al-’Azm, Sadik Jalal was one of the earliest critics. See his “Orientalism and Orientalism in Reverse,” Khamsin 8 (1981), pp. 5–26.Google Scholar

3 See Said’s acknowledgement of this feminist criticism in describing the masculine ethos within which Orientalism was written in Said, Edward W., Culture and Imperialism (New York: Vintage Books, 1994), p. xxiv.Google Scholar

4 Tucker, Judith E., “Pensee 2: We’ve Come a Long Way, Baby-But We’ve Got a Long Way to Go,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 40(1) (February 2008), pp. 19–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Handoussa, Heba, ed. Arab Women and Economic Development (Kuwait: The Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development, 2003)Google Scholar.

6 Hatem, Mervat F., “Discourses on the ‘War on Terrorism’ in the US and its Views of the Arab, Muslim and Gendered ‘Other’,” Arab Studies Journal (Fall 2003/Spring 2004), pp. 77–97.Google Scholar

7 Langohr, Vicki, “Does Gender Discrimination Explain Arab Authoritarianism?” Revised Paper originally presented at the 2005 Meeting of the Middle East Studies Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

8 Kramer, Martin, Ivory Towers on Sand: the Failure of Middle East Studies in America (Washington, DC: Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 2001)Google Scholar.

9 Hatem, Mervat F., “How the Occident Meets the Orient in the Discourses Dealing with Gender in the Regional and Global Wars on Terror,” Edward, Inaugural Said Distinguished lecture presented at San Francisco, October 9,2008.Google Scholar

10 UNDP and Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development, Arab Human Development Report 2002 (New York: UNDP, 2002), pp. 2–5.Google Scholar

11 Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1969)Google Scholar.

12 Pateman, Carol, The Sexual Contract (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

13 Secretary of State Colin Powell, “The U.S. Middle East Partnership Initiative,” transcript of lecture delivered at the Heritage Foundation on December 12, 2006.Google Scholar

14 Wolfowitz, Paul, “Change and Opportunity in the Middle East,” 8th German-World Bank Forum, Hamburg Germany, June 1,2006.Google Scholar

15 Condoleezza Rice, the U.S. Secretary of State, used the term “freedom deficit” to describe the “core problem” in the Middle East in a press conference held in December 2006 on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.