Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T18:15:53.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Islamic Studies in U.S. Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Charles Kurzman  and
Carl W. Ernst
Charles Kurzman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Carl W. Ernst
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As in Europe, Islamic studies in the U.S. originated in the tradition of Orientalist scholarship and Christian theology, with its strong textual emphasis, but it has gradually expanded to overlap with Middle East area studies as well as a number of humanistic and social science disciplines, especially religious studies. Over the past several decades, and especially since 9/11, scholarly interest in Islamic studies has mushroomed. This interest is visible in the number of doctoral dissertations produced on Islam and Muslims over the past half-century. As a percentage of all dissertations in the Proquest Dissertations and Theses Database, Islamic studies themes grew from less than one percent prior to the late 1970s to three percent in the 1980s and 1990s, to over four percent since 2001 (see Figure l).

Type
Essays
Information
Review of Middle East Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , Summer 2012 , pp. 24 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

End Notes

1 We thank Seteney Shami and the Social Science Research Council for their support of this project. For a comparative international overview of the field, see the June 2008 report of the Higher Education Foundation Council for England (HEFCE), “International Approaches to Islamic Studies in Higher Education,” http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2008/rd07_08/.Google Scholar

2 ProQuest’s Dissertations and Theses Database. Search terms: Ph.D. dissertations only, Islam* or Muslim* in title, abstract, subject, or keyword. Includes a few non-U.S. dissertations.Google Scholar

3 Geographic focus is determined from article titles and, where available, abstracts. Articles whose geographic focus could not be determined are excluded, as are articles shorter than six pages in length. We thank Ilyse Morganstein Fuerst, James Knable, and Katherine Locke for their assistance with this coding.Google Scholar

4 “Qur’an and Tafsir,” edited by Welch, Alford T., Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 47, No. 4S, December 1979, pp. 619–758; “In This Issue: The Modern Middle East,” The American Historical Review, Vol. 96, No. 5, December 1991, p. iv.Google Scholar

5 Geertz, Clifford, “Which Way to Mecca?” New York Review of Books, June 12, 2003, p. 27.Google Scholar

6 Kurzman, Charles, “Islamic Studies and the Trajectory of Political Islam,” Contemporary Sociology, Vol. 36, No. 6, November 2007, pp. 519–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Starkey, John, “Arabists in the USA,” Saudi Aramco Magazine (July-August, 1965), pp. 16–25.Google Scholar

8 For a brief overview, see Mahdi, Muhsin, “The Study of Islam, Orientalism and America,” in Mapping Islamic Studies: Genealogy, Continuity, and Change, ed. Nanji, Azim (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997), pp. 149–179.Google Scholar

9 Adams, Charles J., “Islamic Religious Tradition,” in The Study of the Middle East: Research and Scholarship in the Humanities and the Social Sciences, ed. Binder, Leonard (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1976), pp. 29–95, esp. pp. 34–54, quoting p. 53.Google Scholar

10 Hitti, P. K., “Arabic and Islamic Studies in Princeton University,” Moslem World 31 (1941), pp. 292–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Grunebaum, G. E., “Islamic Studies and Culture Research,” Studies in Islamic culture history (Menasha, WI: American Anthropological Association, 1954), pp. 1–22Google Scholar; Laroui, Abdallah, “For a Methodology of Islamic Studies: Islam Seen by G. Von Grunebaum,” Diogenes, Vol. 21, No. 83, September 1973, pp. 12–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Banani, Amin, “G. E. Von Grunebaum: Toward Relating Islamic Studies to Universal Cultural History,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2, April 1975, pp. 131–147.Google Scholar

12 W. A. Bijlefield divided the century-long history of the study of Islam at Hartford seminary into three periods: l) The “Muslim Lands” Department, 1892–1966; 2) Islamic studies within the history-of-religions context, 1967–1973; 3) The Duncan Black McDonald Center for the Study of Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 1973-present. Biejlefeld, W. A., “A Century of Arabic and Islamic Studies at Hartford Seminary,” Muslim World, Vol. 83, No. 2, April 1993, pp. 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Kõszegi, Michael and Melton, J. Gordon, eds., Islam in North America: A Sourcebook (New York: Garland Publishing, 1992), pp. 303–305.Google Scholar

14 Ernst, Carl W. and Martin, Richard C., “Introduction: Toward a Post-Orientalist Approach to Islamic Religious Studies,” in Ernst, and Martin, , eds., Rethinking Islamic Studies: From Orientalism to Cosmopolitanism (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2010).Google Scholar

15 Waldman, Marilyn Robinson, “Islamic Studies: a New Orientalism?” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 8, 1978, pp. 545–562, quoting 545–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Hermansen, Marcia K., “The State of the Art of Islamic Studies in the United States and Canada,” Islamic Culture, Vol. 65, No. 1, 1991, pp. 1–22Google Scholar; Hermansen, , “Trends in Islamic Studies in the United States and Canada since the 1970s,” American journal of Islamic Social Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1993, pp. 96–118Google Scholar; Wheeler, Brannon W., “Report on the International Workshop on the Integration of Islamic Studies into Liberal Arts Curricula,” American journal of Islamic Social Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1998, pp. 159–66Google Scholar; Ernst, Carl W., “The Study of Religion and the Study of Islam,” paper given at Workshop on “Integrating Islamic Studies in Liberal Arts Curricula,” University of Washington, Seattle WA, March 6–8, 1998, http://www.unc.edu/~cernst/study.htm.Google Scholar

17 Mackeen, A. M. Mohamed, in a 1965 essay on the design of an Islamic University, demonstrated a theological trend towards establishing Islamic studies as a normative discipline within Muslim societies, and we note in passing that there are numerous such institutions in majority Muslim countries today. See Mackeen, A. M. Mohamed, “Islamic Studies: A University Discipline,” Muslim World, Vol. 55, Nos. 3 and 4, July and October 1965, pp. 246–260, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 The Supreme Court’s distinction between “teaching religion” and “teaching about religion,” spelled out in the case of School District of Abington Township v. Schempp (1963), is discussed in Haynes, Charles C. and Thomas, Oliver, Finding Common Ground: A Guide to Religious Liberty in Public Schools (Nashville, TN: First Amendment Center, 2001), available online at http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=3979.Google Scholar

19 For overviews of the development of religious studies as a discipline, see Sharpe, Eric J., Comparative Religion: A History, 2nd ed. (London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd., 1986)Google Scholar; Vries, Jan de, The Study of Religion: A Historical Approach (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1967).Google Scholar

20 Directory of Departments and Programs of Religious Studies in North America, published by the Council of Societies for the Study of Religion (1981, 1991, 2001 editions). The directory has apparently not been updated since 2002. Not all departments paid to be included in the directory.

21 For a list of Ph.D. programs in Islamic studies in religious studies departments, see http://www.unc.edu/~cernst/reliprograms.htm.Google Scholar

22 We thank Professor Omid Safi for assistance in collecting these figures. For a list of current job openings in Islamic studies, see http://mideast.unc.edu/jobs.Google Scholar

23 Adams, Charles J., “The History of Religions and the Study of Islam,” ACLS Newsletter, Vol. 25, Nos. 3–4, 1974, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

24 Anonymous, “Curiosities of Diet: Locusts and Wild Honey,” Harper’s Bazaar, March 10, 1883, Vol. 16, No. 10, p. 154.Google Scholar

25 The New York Times, July 9, 1898, Saturday Review of Books and Art, p. BR4624.Google Scholar

26 D. L., , “Problem of the Middle East,” The Outlook (London), Vol. 1, May 14, 1898, pp. 455–456.Google Scholar

27 Gordon, T.E., “The Problem of the Middle East,” The Nineteenth Century, Vol. 37, March 1900, p. 413Google Scholar. See also Koppes, Clayton R., “Captain Mahan, General Gordon, and the Origins of the Term ‘Middle East’,” Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, January 1976, pp. 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Mahan, Alfred Thayer, “The Persian Gulf and International Relations,” The National Review, Vol. 40, September 1902, pp. 27–45Google Scholar. See also Davison, Roderic H., “Where Is the Middle East?” Foreign Affairs 38 (1960): 665–675Google Scholar; Keddie, Nikki R., “Is There a Middle East?” International Journal of Middle East Studies 4 (1973): 255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Adelson, Roger, London and the Invention of the Middle East: Money, Power, and War, 1902–1922 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

29 Kurzman, Charles, “Cross-Regional Approaches to Middle East Studies: Constructing and Deconstructing a Region,” Middle East Studies Association Bulletin, Vol. 41, No. l, June 2007, pp. 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Binder, Leonard, “Area Studies: A Critical Reassessment,” in Binder, Leonard, ed., The Study of the Middle East: Research and Scholarship in the Humanities and the Social Sciences (New York: Wiley, 1976), p. 10.Google Scholar

31 Said, Edward W., Orientalism (New York: Vintage Books, 1979 [1978]), p. 300.Google Scholar

32 Lerner, Daniel, The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1958).Google Scholar

33 These abstracts are written by the Historical Abstracts staff, not by the articles’ authors; IJMES does not run abstracts. An alternative method, counting articles with the word “Islam” in the full text of IJMES articles, shows no trend over the period 1970–2003. However, this method, using JSTOR’s Data for Research service (http://dfr.jstor.org), does not allow for truncation (it would have to be run separately for the word “Islamic,” for example), and picks up a large number of articles that do not focus primarily on Islam.

34 The following discussion draws on Kurzman, “Cross-Regional Approaches to Middle East Studies.”Google Scholar

35 Ho, Engseng, The Craves of Tarim: Genealogy and Mobility Across the Indian Ocean (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Ernst, Carl W. and Lawrence, Bruce B., Sufi Martyrs of Love: The Chishti Order in South Asia and Beyond (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 Laffan, Michael Francis, Islamic Nationhood and Colonial Indonesia: The Umma below the Winds (London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 MSSRC Evaluation, respondent P42, school #500, 2005–2006.

39 Respondent P43, school #500, 2005–2006.

40 Respondent P11, school #400, 2005–2006; Respondent P7, school #600, 2005–2006.

41 Respondent P38, school #300, 2005–2006; Respondent P40, school #100, 2005–2006.

42 Respondent P1, school #200, 2005–2006.

43 Graham, William A., Waldman, Marilyn Robinson, and Rozen, Miryam, eds., Islam-Fiche (Zug, Switzerland: Inter Documentation Co., 1983)Google Scholar; Bodman, Herbert L. and Humphreys, R. Stephen, eds., The Lands and People of Islam: A Traditional Perspective (New York: American Council of Learned Societies, 1987).Google Scholar