Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:01:13.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Researching Mahr in Germany: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2015

Ursula Günther ,
Martin Herzog  and
Stephanie Müssig
Ursula Günther*
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universtität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Martin Herzog*
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universtität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Stephanie Müssig*
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universtität Erlangen-Nürnberg
*
Ursula Günther, Martin Herzog, and Stephanie Müssig are research associates at Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected], respectively.
Ursula Günther, Martin Herzog, and Stephanie Müssig are research associates at Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected], respectively.
Ursula Günther, Martin Herzog, and Stephanie Müssig are research associates at Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected], respectively.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers the legal institution of mahr in Islamic family law from three research perspectives in order to provide insights into the phenomenon's complexity, particularly with regard to current legal practices. In particular, emphasis is placed both on countries where family law is shaped by Islamic traditions (e.g., Morocco) and on countries whose legal traditions do not have a mahr counterpart (e.g., Germany). First, the social and economic function of dower will be described. As a special form of property transfer, mahr will be analyzed in its historical and present shape in theory and practice. Second, the legal conceptualization of mahr in the German legal context will be discussed. The example of Morocco serves to illustrate the changes with regard to mahr because of the process of incorporation of Islamic legal concepts into a national statutory law system. Given the Muslim diaspora, these insights are important contributions to the legal intepretation of mahr in a transnational context.

Keywords

mahrfamily lawproperty transfermarriageMuslim diasporaIslam in Germanylegal practicestransnational contexts of family law
Type
Articles
Information
Review of Middle East Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 23 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abraham, Martin, Auspurg, Katrin, and Hinz, Thomas. 2010. “Migration Decisions within Dual-Earner Partnerships: A Test of Bargaining Theory.” Journal of Marriage and Family 72 (4): 876–892.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Leila. 1992. Women and Gender in Islam. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Siwan. 2007. “The Economics of Dowry and Brideprice.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (4): 151–174.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary Stanley. 1993. A Treatise on the Family. Enlarged edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Borrmans, Maurice. 1979. “Documents sur la famille au Maghreb de 1940 à nos jours. Avec les textes législatifs marocain, algérien, tunisien et égyptien en matière de statut personnel musulman.” Oriente Moderno 59 (1–5): i–x, 1–438.Google Scholar
Botticini, Maristella, and Siow, Aloysius. 2003. “Why Dowries?” American Economic Review 93 (4): 1385–1398.Google Scholar
Buskens, Léon. 2010. “Sharia and National Law in Morocco.” In Sharia Incorporated, edited by Otto, Jean Michiel, 89–138. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Esposito, John L. 1982. Women in Muslim Family Law. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Katja Jansen. 2011. “ Mahr (Dower) as a Bargaining Tool in a European Context: A Comparison of Dutch and Norwegian Judicial Decisions.” In Embedding Mahr (Islamic Dower) in the European Legal System, edited by Mehdi, Rubya and Nielsen, Jørgen S., 147–190. Kopenhagen: DJOF Forlag.Google Scholar
Gernhuber, Joachim, and Coester-Waltjen, Dagmar. 2010. Familienrecht. 6th ed. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. 2010. “Anmerkung zum Urteil des BGH vom 09.12.2009—Anspruch auf Morgengabe unterliegt Art. 14 EGBGB.” Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht 2010: 537–538.Google Scholar
Hill, Paul Bernhard, and Kopp, Johannes. 2006. Familiensoziologie. Grundlagen und theoretische Perspektiven. 4th ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Iranbomy, Seyed Shahram. 2011. “Rosinentheorie der Morgengabe. Islamisches Familienrecht und das Deutsche Internationale Familienrecht am Beispiel von Brautgabe/Morgengabeauseinandersetzungen.” Zeitschrift für Familienrecht und Familienverfahrensrecht 2011: 123–126.Google Scholar
Mehdi, Rubya, and Nielsen, Jørgen S.. 2011. “Introduction.” In Embedding Mahr (Islamic Dower) in the European Legal System, edited by Mehdi, Rubya and Nielsen, Jørgen S., 13–17. Copenhagen: DJOF Forlag.Google Scholar
Mörsdorf-Schulte, Juliana. 2010. “Anknüpfungszeitpunkt und Anpassung bei der Morgengabe.” Zeitschrift für Europarecht, Internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung 2010: 166–170.Google Scholar
Motzki, Harald. 1985. “Geschlechtsreife und Legitimation zur Zeugung im frühen Islam.” In Geschlechtsreife und Legitimation zur Zeugung, edited by Müller, Ernst Wilhelm, Wilhelm, Ernst, 479–550. Freiburg, München:Google Scholar
Motzki, Harald. 2001. “Bridewealth.” In Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾan (vol. 1), edited by McAuliffe, Jane Dammen, 258–259. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Otto, Jean Michiel. 2010. “Introduction: Investigating the Role of Sharia in National Law.” In Sharia Incorporated, edited by Otto, Jean Michiel, 17–49. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Papps, Ivy. 1983. “The Role and Determinants of Bride-Price: The Case of a Palestinian Village.” Current Anthropology 24 (2): 203–215.Google Scholar
Rohe, Mathias. 2011. Das islamische Recht. 3rd ed. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Schacht, Joseph. 1966. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schwab, Dieter. 2014. Familienrecht. 22th ed. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, Tracie Rogalin. 2007. “Interpretation of Islamic Marriage Contracts by American Courts.” Family Law Quarterly 41: 639–658.Google Scholar
Spies, Otto. 1991. “Mahr.” In The Encyclopaedia of Islam, New edition (EI-2), vol. 6, 78–80. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Spiro, Melford E. 1975. “Marriage Payments: A Paradigm from the Burmese Perspective.” Journal of Anthropological Research 31 (2): 89–115.Google Scholar
Takim, Liyakat. 2005. “Law. The Four Sunni Schools of Law.” In Encyclopaedia of Women and Islamic Cultures (vol. 2, Family, Law and Politics), edited by Suad, Joseph, 440–445. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Thielmann, Jörn, and Dupret, Baudouin. 2013. “Understanding Property in Moslem Transitional Environments: The French-German PROMETEE Research Project.” In GAIR-Mitteilungen 2013 (5): 62–69. Accessed on 20 June 2014, http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/12520/GAIR-2013-Mitteilungen.pdf.Google Scholar
Vikør, Knut S. 2005. Between God and the Sultan: A History of Islamic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watt, W. Montgomery, and Welch, Alfort T.. 1980. Der Islam I. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Wurmnest, Wolfgang. 2007. “Die Mär von der mahr. Zur Qualifikation von Ansprüchen aus Brautgabevereinbarungen.” Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 71: 527–558.Google Scholar
Wurmnest, Wolfgang. 2010. “Anmerkung zu BGH, Urteil vom 9.12.2009—XII ZR 107/08.” JuristenZeitung 2010: 736–739.Google Scholar
Yassari, Nadjma. 2011a. “The Islamic Mahr in German Courts: Characterization in Private International Law and Accommodation in German National Family Law.” In Embedding Mahr (Islamic Dower) in the European Legal System, edited by Mehdi, Rubya and Nielsen, Jørgen S., 193–217. Copenhagen: DJOF Forlag.Google Scholar
Yassari, Nadjma. 2011b. “Die islamische Brautgabe im deutschen Kollisions—und Sachrecht. Anmerkung zu BGH, Urteil vom 9.12.2009—XII ZR 107/08.” Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 2011: 63–68.Google Scholar
Yassari, Nadjma. 2014. Die Brautgabe im Familienvermögensrecht. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar