Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:08:37.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Jerusalem: Archaeologists Versus Residents?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Katharina Galor*
Affiliation:
Brown University

Extract

Very few cities are defined as much by their antiquities as Jerusalem: religiously, culturally, politically, and economically. Erasing the Old City, or at least part of it, as suggested variously by Theodor Herzl and David Ben-Gurion, would have been an act difficult to reverse. The ruins of the past are now recognized and protected as the city's most distinct physical and visual attribute, in which past and present landscapes mingle to project the deceitful image of harmony. That said, this paper is not concerned with the usual questions of how certain monuments or artifacts inform us about past accomplishments or lost cultures. It in fact distances itself from the material and visual dimensions of Jerusalem's antiquities and addresses instead the human aspects exclusively, questioning the interaction between those who explore Jerusalem's antiquities and those who dwell amongst the surviving remnants. This polarized encounter between archaeologists and residents has defined most of Silwan's 150 years of excavation, reaching new heights of tension with the escalating geopolitical conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. As a case study, explorations in the City of David (figure 1), demonstrate how professional interests increasingly compromise and indeed violate the needs and rights of those who are most closely tied to, and indeed dependent on, the locus of exploration (Galor 2017, 126–131). Silwanis, both the small minority of Jewish settlers and the predominantly Palestinian population, have been persuaded and largely misguided as to the area's biblical heritage. In contrast, the 1300-years of nearly continuous Islamic presence, is perceived by neither as a legacy, which can be archaeologically explored and publicly validated.

Type
Roundtable
Copyright
Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ben-Ami, Dorong, and Tchekhanovets, Yana. 2010. “Jerusalem, Giv'ati Parking Lot.” Hadashot Arkheologiyot 122.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Meiron. 1996. City of Stone: The Hidden History of Jerusalem. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Talia. 1997. “Israeli Law, Jewish Law and the Archaeological Excavation of Tombs.” International Journal of Cultural Property 6: 4779.Google Scholar
Galor, Katharina. 2017. Finding Jerusalem: Archaeology between Science and Ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hasson, Nir. 2016. “Jerusalem, The Descent: A Voyage in the Underground City.” Haaretz, 21 April. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Hasson, Nir. 2014a. “East Jerusalem Remains ‘Arab’ Despite Jewish Settlers, Experts Say.” Haaretz, 2 October.Google Scholar
Hasson, Nir. 2014b. “Hidden Links Unearthed Between State, Settler Group at Israel's Most Controversial Dig.” Haaretz, 17 November.Google Scholar
Herzl, Theodor. 1960. The Complete Diaries of Theordor Herzl. Edited by Patai, Raphael, 2 vols. London and New York: Herzl Press with Thomas Yoseloff.Google Scholar
Mazar, Eilat. 2006. “Did I Find King David's Palace?Biblical Archaeology Review 32 (1): 1627, 70.Google Scholar
Reich, Ronny. 2011. Excavating the City of David: Where Jerusalem's History Began. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society and Biblical Archaeology Society.Google Scholar
Reich, Ronny, and Shukron, Eli. “Light at the End of the Tunnel.” Biblical Archaeology Review 25 (1): 2233, 72.Google Scholar
Vincent, Louis-Hugues, and Steve, Marie-Joseph. 1954. Jérusalem de l'Ancien Testament: recherches d'archéologie et d'histoire I. Paris: J. Gabalda.Google Scholar
Weill, Raymond. 1920. La cité de David: compte rendu des fouilles exécutées à Jérusalem, sur le site de la ville primitive, campagne de 1913–1914. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Warren, Charles. 1876. Underground Jerusalem. London: Palestine Exploration Fund.Google Scholar