Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:34:28.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding sovereignty through Kelsen/Schmitt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Kelsen and Schmitt, two leading legal theorists of the twentieth century, constitute a powerful pair that sheds light on the intertwining of politics and law in the phenomenon of sovereignty. Although their conceptions of sovereignty are far apart, they are interconnected as different ways of making sense of the same social phenomenon, or what I call the ‘practice of sovereignty’, whereby an ultimately unauthorised authority continuously authorises itself as the authority and the rest by and large accept this, acquiesce in this, or are made to do so. Having clarified their differences and interconnection, I explore some of the implications of the two writers’ differing conceptions of sovereignty and of the practice of sovereignty that underlie them.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2007