Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:47:39.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The responsibility to educate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

R. E. Jones
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some years ago, in a joint affirmation of faith, Professor Walker identified himself as a ‘dissident’ producer of ‘works of thought’ at ‘margins’ distant from ‘all presumptive sovereign centres of interpretation and judgement’. From these remote sites, or heights, he and his critical colleagues aim to exacerbate ‘the crisis of the discipline of international studies’ by upsetting its ‘notions of space, time, and progress’ and thus questioning its status as a ‘discipline’ (pp. 375–6). This particular academic crisis must be understood as one among many others. It is made to connect with ‘a crisis of the human sciences, a crisis of patriarchy, a crisis of governability, a crisis of late industrial society, a generalized crisis of modernity’ (p. 377) to mention but a few. So enormous is this congeries of crises that the ‘possibility of truth is put in doubt’ (p. 378) and ‘words manifestly fail’ (p. 376). An academic without words is without a job. Critical dissidents are not at a loss.

Type
Review Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 299 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ashley, Richard K. and Walker, R. B. J., ‘Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies’, International Studies Quarterly, 34 (1990), pp. 367–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar, p. 368. All further references in this text are to this publication.

2 Walker, R. J. B., Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge, 1993), p. 20Google Scholar. All further references in this text are to this edition.

3 Walker, Inside/Outside, p. 78. Foucault's term, quoted by Walker.

4 Earle, Edward Mead (ed.), Makers of Modern Strategy; Military Thought from Machiavelli to Hitler (Princeton, 1943)Google Scholar.

5 Baylis, John and Garnett, John (eds.), Makers of Nuclear Strategy (London, 1991), p. 4Google Scholar. All further references in this text are to this edition.

6 Williams, Howard, International Relations in Political Theory (Milton Keynes, 1992), p. ixGoogle Scholar. All further references in this text are to this edition.

7 Nye, Joseph S., Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History (Glasgow, 1993), p. 5Google Scholar. All further references in this text are to this edition.