1 For a concise introduction, see Tonkins, Adam, Our Republican Constitution (Oxford: Hart ublishing, 2005), pp. 52–56Google Scholar .

2 Long, Katya, ‘Civilising International Politics': Republicanism and the World Outside’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38:3 (2010), p. 773CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

3 A common argument against the feasibility of modern republicanism is that a truly republican polity is only possible when it is small-sized. Modern states are big-sized and can hence not be republican in practice. Herreros, Compare Fransisco, ‘Size and Virtue’, European Journal of Political Theory, 6:4 (2007), pp. 463–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

4 Hobson, John and Hall, Martin, ‘Liberal International theory: Eurocentric but not always Imperialist’, International Theory, 2:2 (2010), pp. 210–245Google Scholar .

5 Kleingeld, Pauline, ‘Six Varieties of Cosmopolitanism in Eighteenth-Century Germany’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 60:3 (1999), pp. 505–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

6 Waltz, Compare Kenneth, ‘Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory’, Journal of International Affairs, 44:1 (1990), pp. 21–37Google Scholar .

7 Deudney, Daniel, Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar .

8 Heidegger, Martin, ‘The question concerning technology’, in Krell, David (ed.), Martin Heidegger Basic Writings (San Fransisco: Harper, 1993)Google Scholar .

9 Macmillan, John, ‘Liberalism and the democratic peace’, Review of International Studies, 30:2 (2004), pp. 179–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

10 ‘Locke et praeterea nihil.’ See Shalhope, Robert, ‘Toward a Republican Synthesis: The Emergence of an Understanding of Republicanism in American Historiography’, The William and Mary Quarterly, 29:1 (1972), pp. 49–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

11 Daniel Deudney, Bounding Power. Throughout this essay the focus is on the theoretical elaboration of republican security theory (introduction, chapters 1 & 2, and conclusion), less so on the historical exegesis that informs it (chapters three to nine). The reason is one of space and competence. Note also that the aim here is not to prove Deudney right or wrong, but rather to disclose how his theory works, and what his premises foreclose.

12 Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 4Google Scholar .

13 Baldwin, David, ‘The Concept of Security’, Review of International Studies, 23:1 (1997), p. 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

14 Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 14Google Scholar .

15 Ringmar, Erik, ‘On the Ontological Status of the State’, European Journal of International Relations, 2:4 (1996), pp. 439–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

16 Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 31Google Scholar .

17 Ibid., pp. 31–3.

18 Ibid., p. 31.

19 Baldwin, ‘Concept of security’, p. 16.

20 Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 2, 14Google Scholar .

21 Petitt, Philip, Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar ; Magnette, Paul, Citizenship: the history of an idea (Colchester: ECPR Press, 2005)Google Scholar .

22 Section 3 ‘Liberalism et praeterea nihil’ discusses the notion of virtue at some length.

23 Contributions to the Cambridge School's account of republicanism include: Pocock, John G. A., The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975)Google Scholar ; Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio (eds), Machiavelli and Republicanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar .

24 Deudney, , Bounding Power, pp. 55–58Google Scholar .

25 Ibid., p. 55, emphasis added.

26 The concept is Der Derian's. Cf. Der Derian, James, On Diplomacy: a Genealogy of Western Estrangement (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987)Google Scholar .

27 Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 57Google Scholar .

28 Adorno in Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 27Google Scholar .

29 ‘The stakes and divisions over intensifying security globalization and the status of broadly liberal political arrangements are particularly acute concerning nuclear weapons.’ Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 3Google Scholar , emphasis added. See also, Deudney, Daniel, ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Waning of the Real-State’, Daedalus, 124:2 (1995), pp. 209–231Google Scholar .

30 Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 37Google Scholar .

31 Lebow, Richard Ned, A Cultural Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), p. 150CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

32 Ward, Lee, ‘Nobility and Necessity: The Problem of Courage in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics’, American Political Science Review, 95:1 (2001), pp. 77–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

33 Machiavelli, Niccolo, The Art of War – Neville Translation (1521), p. 13Google Scholar . Available at: {http://files.libertyfund.org/files/984/Machiavelli_0523_EBk_v5.pdf} accessed on 10 February 2010.

34 Pocock, , The Machiavellian Moment, p. 201Google Scholar .

35 Ibid., p. 293.

36 Another matter altogether is if contemporary ways of waging war still feature warriors, if contemporary military practice allows for (military) virtue. On this issue, see Coker, Christopher, Waging War Without Warriors? The Changing Culture of Military Conflict (London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002)Google Scholar .

37 Baldwin, ‘Concept of security’, p. 13.

38 Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole and Wilde, Jaap de, Security: a New Framework for Analysis (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1998), p. 23Google Scholar .

39 Onuf, Nicholas, The Republican Legacy in International Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar .

40 Notice that this is no personal quirk. Like Deudney, many historians of ideas doubt the validity of distinguishing liberalism and republicanism as though they were separate paradigms. Cf. Kalyvas and Katznelson, Liberal Beginnings; Sullivan, Vickie B., Machiavelli, Hobbes and the Making of a Liberal Republicanism in England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

41 Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 269Google Scholar .

42 Ibid.

43 Onuf, , Republican Legacy, pp. 6–7Google Scholar .

44 Sandel, Michael, ‘The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self’, Political Theory, 12:1 (1984), pp. 81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

45 ‘Within the crowded marketplace of contemporary political and international thought, the views and commitments of this author [Deudney] are, in simple terms, liberal-democratic and globalist.’ Deudney, Bounding Power, p. xi.

46 Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 14Google Scholar .

47 Ward, ‘Nobility and Necessity’, p. 80.

48 Viroli, Maurizio, ‘Machiavelli and the republican idea of politics’, in Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio (eds), Machiavelli and Republicanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 156Google Scholar , emphasis in original.

49 Patomäki, Heikki (ed.), Peaceful Changes in World Politics (Tampere: TAPRI, 1996)Google Scholar ; Patomäki, , ‘Republican public sphere and the governance of globalizing political economy’, in Lensu, Maria and Fritz, Jan-Stefan (eds), Value Pluralism, Normative Theory and International Relations (Houndmills: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 160–195Google Scholar ; Patomäki, and Teivainen, Teivo, A Possible World: Democratic Transformation of Global Institutions (London: Zed Books, 2004)Google Scholar ; Patomäki, , ‘Rethinking Global Parliament: Beyond the Indeterminacy of International Law’, Widener Law Review, 13 (2007), pp. 373–391Google Scholar .

50 Skinner, Quentin, ‘Machiavelli's Discorsi and the pre-humanist origins of republican ideas’, in Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio (eds), Machiavelli and Republicanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 125Google Scholar .

51 Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment, chaps I–IX.

52 And their vicious counterparts: tyranny, oligarchy, and (again) democracy.

53 Skinner, ‘Machiavelli's Discorsi’, p. 135.

54 Ibid., p. 128–9.

55 Pocock, , The Machiavellian Moment, p. 253Google Scholar .

56 Ibid., p. 262.

57 Viroli, ‘Machiavelli and the republican idea of politics’, p. 155.

58 Glover, Samuel Dennis‘The Putney debates: popular versus elitist republicanism’, Past & Present, 164 (1999), pp. 47–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

59 Onuf, , Republican Legacy, p. 7Google Scholar .

60 Ibid., chap. 10.

61 Patomäki, Heikki, ‘The Role of “Critical” in the Theory and Practice of Global Civil Society’, Globalizations, 4:2 (2007), pp. 312–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

62 ‘Romantic republicanism’ is an existing but not well-known category in debates about republicanism. I take the notion to refer to a reactive strand of modern republicanism, which thematises modernity (in terms of a loss) and proposes to return to more classical ways of organising the political community. In this vein, Onuf speaks of communitarianism as a ‘romanticized republicanism’. Onuf, , Republican Legacy, p. 4Google Scholar . Inspiration for the label comes from: Wingrove, Elizabeth, Rousseau's Republican Romance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar . It has to be noted that the concept of ‘romantic republicanism’ is an anachronism before modernity. Before then, it is probably more apt to speak of a civic and an Aristotelian, or a Roman and a Greek, kind.

63 Skinner, Quentin, ‘The republican idea of political liberty’, Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio (eds), Machiavelli and Republicanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 293Google Scholar .

64 Pocock, , The Machiavellian Moment, p. 104Google Scholar .

65 Ibid., p. 292.

66 Viroli, ‘Machiavelli and the republican idea of politics’, p. 155.

67 Patricia Owens argues that neo-conservatism is a perversion of ‘real’ republicanism. In my opinion, this judgment has to be qualified in light of republicanism's history and its intra-ideological variety. This reinforces my intuition that we should be careful about embracing republicanism all too quickly. Cf. Owens, Patricia, ‘Beyond Strauss, lies, and the war in Iraq: Hannah Arendt's critique of neoconservatism’, Review of International Studies, 33:2 (2007), pp. 265–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

68 Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989)Google Scholar .

69 But note the favourable references to Aristotle and Rousseau in Schmitt, Carl, Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. Ellen Kennedy (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1988)Google Scholar .

70 On Schmitt and international politics, see Odysseos, Louiza and Petito, Fabio (ed.), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal War, and the Crisis of Global Order (London, Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar .

71 McCormick, John, ‘Fear, Technology, and the State: Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, and the Revival of Hobbes in Weimar and National Socialist Germany’, Political Theory, 22:4 (1994), pp. 619–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

72 Harré, Rom, Physical Being (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1991)Google Scholar . Unlike Deudney, Harré offers a thoroughly sociological reading of the body's place in social theory.

73 Schmitt, Carl, Roman Catholicism and Political Form, trans. G. L. Ulmen (Westport: Greenwood, 1996)Google Scholar .

74 Schmitt, , Roman Catholicism, p. 17Google Scholar .

75 McCormick, John, ‘Carl Schmitt's Europe: Imperial, Cultural and Spatial Proposals for European Integration, 1923–1955’, in Joerges, Christian and Ghaleigh, N. S. (eds), Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2003), pp. 133–142Google Scholar .

76 Schmitt, , Roman Catholicism, p. 21Google Scholar .

77 Ibid., p. 13, emphasis added.

78 McCormick, John, ‘Political Theory and Political Theology: The Second Wave of Carl Schmitt in English’, Political Theory, 26:6 (1998), p. 832CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

79 Schmitt, , Roman Catholicism, p. 7Google Scholar .

80 McCormick, ‘Political Theory and Political Theology’, p. 831.

81 Clearly, Schmitt despised romanticism's celebration of the private self. He even devoted a book to combating political romanticism. However, within the spectrum of modern republicanism, Schmitt's analysis does incline toward the romantic side. John McCormick likewise comes to the conclusion that Schmitt ultimately aestheticised violence and the state. McCormick, John, ‘Fear, Technology, and the State: Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, and the Revival of Hobbes in Weimar and National Socialist Germany’, Political Theory, 22:4 (1994), p. 626CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Compare Carl Schmitt, Political Romanticism.

82 Baldwin, ‘Concept of Security’, p. 13.

83 Schmitt, , Roman Catholicism, p. 14Google Scholar .

84 Ibid., pp. 14–5.

85 Columba Peoples draws on the distinction between instrumentalist and substantivist conceptions of technology in order to make sense of the American debate about ballistic missile defence. Cf. Peoples, Columba, Justifying Ballistic Missile Defence: Technology, Security and Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar .

86 For a broad overview, see Scharff, Robert and Dusek, Val (eds), Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition: An Anthology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003)Google Scholar .

87 Adas, Michael, Dominance by Design: technological imperatives and America's civilizing mission (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2006), p. 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

88 Cf., for example, Ellul, Jacques, The Technological Society (New York: Vintage Books, 1964)Google Scholar ; Heidegger, Martin, ‘Nur noch ein Gott kann uns retten’, Der Spiegel (31 May 1976)Google Scholar .

89 Norbert Wiener cited in Peoples, Justifying Ballistic Missile Defence, p. 27.

90 Kaag, John and Kaufman, Whitley, ‘Military frameworks: technological know-how and the legitimization of warfare’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22:4 (2009), p. 595CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

91 Sloterdijk, Peter, Terror From The Air (Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2009), p. 17Google Scholar .

92 Patomäki, and Teivainen, , Possible World, pp. 46–47Google Scholar .

93 Onuf, , Republican Legacy, chap. 10, specifically pp. 573–576Google Scholar .

94 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 230Google Scholar . ‘The point is that Plato, and, to a lesser degree, Aristotle, who thought craftsmen not even worthy of full-fledged citizenship, were the first to propose handling political matters and ruling political bodies in the mode of fabrication. This seeming contradiction clearly indicates the depth of the authentic perplexities inherent in the human capacity for action and the strength of the temptation to eliminate its risks and dangers by introducing into the web of human relationships the much more reliable and solid categories inherent in activities with which we confront nature and build the world of the human artifice.’

95 Deudney, , Bounding Power, p. 78Google Scholar .

96 The indeterminacy of the international meaning of nuclear weapons is a by now classic example used by Alexander Wendt to demonstrate the importance of ideas in mediating material variables. Wendt, Alexander, ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46:2 (1992), p. 397CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

97 Der Derian, , On Diplomacy, chap. 9Google Scholar .

98 Ibid., p. 206.

99 Anders Stephanson, ‘Fourteen Notes on the Very Concept of the Cold War: an H-Diplo Essay’ (1996/2007), {http://www.h-net.org/~diplo/essays/PDF/stephanson-14notes.pdf} accessed on 10 June 2010, pp. 1–2.

100 Stephanson, ‘Fourteen Notes’, p. 8.

101 Clark, Ian, Legitimacy in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), chap. 4Google Scholar .

102 Boucoyannis, Deborah, ‘The International Wanderings of a Liberal Idea, or Why Liberals Can Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Balance of Power’, Perspectives on Politics, 5:4 (2007), pp. 703–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

103 Quoted in Stephanson, ‘Fourteen Notes’, p. 9.

104 Stephanson, ‘Fourteen Notes’, p. 16.

105 Ibid., p. 17.

106 Kustermans, Jorg, ‘The state as citizen: state personhood and ideology’, Journal of International Relations and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar (forthcoming).

107 See also, Jackson, Patrick, ‘Defending the West: Occidentalism and the Formation of NATO’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 11:3 (2003), pp. 223–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

108 Wendt, ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It’, p. 397.

109 Orwell, George, ‘You and the Atom Bomb’, The Tribune (19 October 1945)Google Scholar . Burnham, James, The Struggle for the World (New York: John Day Co., 1947)Google Scholar . Cf. Stephanson, ‘Fourteen Notes’, p. 4–5.

110 Quoted in Stephanson, ‘Fourteen Notes’, p. 5.

111 Scheuerman, William, ‘Realism and the critique of technology’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22:4 (2009), p. 568CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

112 Scheuerman, William, ‘Carl Schmitt and Hans Morgenthau: Realism and Beyond’; Williams, Michael C., Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans J. Morgenthau in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 62–92Google Scholar .

113 Tjalve, Vibeke Schou, Realist Strategies of Republican Peace: Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and the Politics of Dissent (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

114 Deudney, , Bounding Power, pp. 265–266Google Scholar .