Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T20:28:55.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postsecular resistance, the body, and the 2011 Egyptian Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2013

LUCA MAVELLI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At the heart of the notion of the postsecular is an implied and largely under-theorised idea of resistance against the pathologies of modern secular formations. This is most notably exemplified by Jürgen Habermas's highly influential approach which argues that these pathologies can be resisted through a cooperative cognitive effort of secular and religious consciousnesses. This article contends that this understanding overlooks more embodied forms of resistance to the effect that it curtails our capacity to conceptualise postsecular resistance in international relations. Following a contextualisation of Habermas's approach in the broader Kantian tradition to which it belongs, the article develops a contending Foucauldian reading of the body as a locus of resistance and uses this framework to analyse some of the events leading to the 2011 Egyptian revolution. The focus is on the publication of images and videos of police abuses by Egyptian bloggers and independent media as a practice of resistance to the widespread and systematic use of torture. The emotional response to these images, it will be argued, contributed to unite Egyptians despite longstanding fractures, most notably that between secularists and Islamists, thus turning the body from an ‘inscribed surface of events’ into a postsecular locus of resistance. The article concludes by highlighting the main implications of this analysis for future research agendas on the postsecular in international relations.

Type
Articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 38 , Issue 5: The Postsecular in International Relations , December 2012 , pp. 1057 - 1078
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Religion in the Public Sphere’, European Journal of Philosophy, 14:1 (2006), pp. 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jürgen Habermas, ‘Notes on a Post-Secular Society’, signandsight.com (18 June 2008), available at: {http://www.signandsight.com/features/1714.html/} accessed 17 April 2011; Habermas, Jürgen, Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008)Google Scholar; Habermas, Jürgen and Ratzinger, Joseph, The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Habermas, Jürgenet al., An Awareness of What is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-secular Age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011)Google Scholar.

2 Habermas, ‘Notes on a Post-Secular Society’.

3 Habermas, Between Naturalism and Religion, pp. 211, 111.

4 Barbato, Mariano, ‘Conceptions of the Self for Post-secular Emancipation: Towards a Pilgrim's Guide to Global Justice’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39:2 (2010), pp. 547–64, p. 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Cloke, Paul and Beaumont, Justin, ‘Geographies of Postsecular Rapprochement in the City’, Progress in Human Geography, DOI: 10.1177/0309132512440208 (18 April 2012), p. 6Google Scholar.

6 Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Transcendence from Within, Transcendence in this World’, in Mendieta, Eduardo (ed.), The Frankfurt School on Religion: Key Writings by the Major Thinkers (New York, Routledge: 2005), p. 305Google Scholar. See also Habermas, ‘Religion in the Public Sphere’, p. 15.

7 Adrian Pabst, ‘The Secularism of Post-Secularity: Religion, Realism, and the Revival of Grand Theory in IR’, in this Special Issue. See also Fred Dallmayr, ‘Post-Secularity and (Global) Politics: A Need for Radical Redefinition’, and Antonio Cerella, ‘Religion and Political Form: Carl Schmitt's Genealogy of Politics as a Critique of Habermas's Post-Secular Discourse’, both in this Special Issue.

8 On this latter point see Harrington, Austin, ‘Habermas and the “Post-Secular Society”’, European Journal of Social Theory, 10:4 (2007), pp. 543–60, p. 546CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Hoy, David Couzens, Critical Resistance: From Poststructuralism to Post-Critique (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004), p. 2Google Scholar.

10 Foucault, Michel, ‘What is Enlightenment?’, in Foucault, Michel and Rabinow, Paul, The Foucault Reader, (London: Penguin, 1991), p. 46Google Scholar.

11 Guyer, Paul, ‘Immanuel Kant’, in Craig, Edward (ed.), Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge, 2000), p. 432Google Scholar.

12 Kant, Immanuel, ‘An Answer to the Question: “What is Enlightenment?”’, in Reiss, Hans (ed.), Kant: Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 [orig. pub. 1784]), p. 54Google Scholar.

13 Foucault, Michel, The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–1982, (New York: Picador, 2005), p. 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Kennedy, Emmet, Secularism and its Opponents from Augustine to Solzhenitsyn (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), p. 138CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Kant, Immanuel, ‘Critique of Practical Reason’, in Gregor, Mary J. and Wood, Allen W. (eds), Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 [orig. pub. 1788]), p. 238Google Scholar.

16 Ibid.

17 Hunter, Ian, ‘The Morals of Metaphysics: Kant's Groundwork as Intellectual Paideia’, Critical Inquiry, 28:4 (2002), pp. 908–29, pp. 911, 910CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Ibid., p. 912.

19 Ibid., pp. 923–4.

20 Pabst, ‘The Secularism of Post-Secularity’.

21 Mavelli, Luca, Europe's Encounter with Islam: The Secular and the Postsecular (Abingdon: Routledge, 2012)Google Scholar.

22 Habermas, Jürgen, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987), p. 297Google Scholar.

23 Ibid., p. 314.

24 Habermas, Jürgen, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990), p. 160Google Scholar.

25 Shapcott, Richard, Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 120–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Hutchings, Kimberly, ‘Moral Deliberation and Political Judgment: Reflections on Benhabib's Interactive Universalism’, Theory, Culture and Society, 14:1 (1997), pp. 131–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a contending view see Linklater, Andrew, ‘Dialogic Politics and the Civilizing Process’, Review of International Studies, 31:1 (2005), pp. 141–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Harrington, ‘Habermas and the “Post-Secular Society”’, p. 552.

27 Michel Foucault, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, in Foucault and Rabinow (eds), The Foucault Reader, p. 87.

28 Ibid.

29 Levin, David Michael, ‘The Embodiment of the Categorical Imperative: Kafka, Foucault, Benjamin, Adorno and Levinas’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 27:4 (2001), pp. 1–20, p. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Vintage, 1995), p. 8Google Scholar.

31 Ibid.

32 Ibid., p. 26.

33 Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality: Volume 1 (New York: Pantheon Books, 1978), p. 136Google Scholar.

34 Foucault, Michel, ‘Society Must Be Defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76, trans. Macey, David (New York: Picador, 2003), pp. 239–63Google Scholar.

35 Couzens Hoy, Critical Resistance, p. 61.

36 Foucault, ‘Society Must Be Defended’, p. 246.

37 Foucault, Discipline and Punish, p. 25.

38 Foucault, ‘Society Must Be Defended’, pp. 243–51.

39 Butler, Judith, ‘Foucault and the Paradox of Bodily Inscriptions’, The Journal of Philosophy, 86:11 (1989), pp. 601–7, p. 602CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Ibid., p. 607.

41 Ibid.

42 Foucault, ‘What is Enlightenment?’, pp. 45–6.

43 Ibid., p. 45.

44 Couzens Hoy, Critical Resistance, p. 63.

45 Michel Foucault, ‘Dialogue with Baqir Parham’ (Spring 1979), in Afary, Janet and Anderson, Kevin B., Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), p. 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Human Rights Watch (HRW), ‘Work on Him Until He Confesses’: Impunity for Torture in Egypt (New York: HRW, 2011), p. 2Google Scholar.

47 Ahmed Zaki Osman, ‘Egypt's Police: From Liberators to Oppressors’, Almasry Alyoum (24 January 2011), available at: {http://www.almasryalyoum.com/en/node/304946} accessed 12 October 2011.

48 El-Dawla, Aida Seif, ‘Torture: A state policy’, in El-Mahdi, Rabab and Marfleet, Philip (eds), Egypt: The Moment of Change (London: Zed Books, 2009), pp. 120–35, p. 120Google Scholar.

49 Saad Eddin Ibrahim, ‘Egypt's Unchecked Repression’, Ikhwanweb (20 August 2007), available at: {http://ikhwanmisr.com/article.php?id=13834} accessed 12 October 2011. See also Bradley, John R., Inside Egypt: The Land of the Pharaos on the Brink of a Revolution (New York: Palgrave, 2008), p. 140Google Scholar.

50 Ibrahim, ‘Egypt's Unchecked Repression’. See also Al Aswany, Alaa, On the State of Egypt: What Caused the Revolution (London: Canongate, 2011), p. 159Google Scholar: ‘Torture in Egypt is not the work of errant or rogue officers, it is a permanent and systematic policy applied by the state, and there have been more victims of torture in the Mubarak era than in any other period of Egyptian history.’

51 HRW, Behind Closed Doors: Torture and Detention in Egypt (New York: HRW, 1996)Google Scholar; Charged with Being Children: Egyptian Police Abuse of Children in Need of Protection (New York: HRW, 2003)Google Scholar; In a Time of Torture: The Assault on Justice In Egypt's Crackdown on Homosexual Conduct (New York: HRW, 2004)Google Scholar; ‘Work on Him’. See also Forum of Independent Human Rights Organizations, ‘Joint Report’ (November 2009), available at: {http://eipr.org/en/report/2010/02/05/501/504} accessed 18 October 2011. This is not to mention Egypt's major role in the US and other European countries rendition programme, which has turned Egypt in a primary torture destination. See HRW, Black Hole: The Fate of Islamists Rendered to Egypt (New York: HRW, 2005)Google Scholar.

52 El-Dawla, ‘Torture’, p. 122.

53 Beinin, Joel, ‘Workers' Protest in Egypt: Neoliberalism and Class Struggle in 21st Century’, Social Movement Studies, 8:4 (2009), pp. 449–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Adam Hanieh, ‘Egypt's Uprising: Not Just a Question of “Transition”’, The Bullet (14 February 2011), available at: {http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/462.php} accessed 18 October 2011; Mitchell, Timothy, Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, and Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

54 Forum of Independent Human Rights Organizations, ‘Joint Report’.

55 Pratt, Nicola, ‘The Queen Boat Case in Egypt: Sexuality, National Security and State Sovereignty’, Review of International Studies, 33:1 (2007), pp. 129–44, p. 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 For a journalistic account of this argument see Al Aswany, ‘On the State of Egypt’, pp. 162–3.

57 One of the first cases of torture made public which shocked Egyptians was that of Emad al-Kabir, a minibus driver from Cairo, who in 2006 intervened to calm an argument between his cousin and a police officer. Al-Kabir was beaten in the street and then in the police station, where he was filmed while being sodomised with a stick. The footage of his torture {http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5f8d5d16c5} was circulated by the police among his fellow drivers to intimidate them, and eventually published by blogger Wael Abbas on his blog Misr Digital {http://misrdigital.blogspirit.com/} and on YouTube in November 2006.

58 Shorbagy, Manar, ‘The Egyptian Movement for Change – Kefaya: Redefining Politics in Egypt’, Public Culture, 19:1 (2007), pp. 175–96, p. 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Ibid.

60 Oweidat, Nadiaet al., The Kefaya Movement: A Case Study of a Grassroots Reform Initiative (Santa Monica:RAND Corporation, 2008), pp. 21–2Google Scholar.

61 Hossam El-Hamalawy, ‘Bloggers and Rights Activists Against Torture Meeting’, Ikhwanweb (18 March 2007), available at: {http://www.ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=2118} accessed 12 October 2011.

62 Negar Azimi, ‘Bloggers, Kifaya and Ikhwanweb Against Torture’, Ikhwanweb (2 February 2007), available at: {http://www.ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=2542} accessed 12 October 2011.

63 Hirschkind, Charles, ‘New Media and Political Dissent in Egypt’, Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares, LXV:1 (2010), pp. 137–54, pp. 138–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Abdelrahman, Maha M., Civil Society Exposed: The Politics of NGOs in Egypt (London: I. B. Tauris, 2004), p. 108Google Scholar.

65 Agrama, Hussein Ali, ‘Secularism, Sovereignty, Indeterminacy: Is Egypt a Secular or a Religious State?’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 52:3 (2010), pp. 495–593, p. 500CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Ibid., p. 499. See also Asad, Talal, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar, and Connolly, William E., Why I Am Not A Secularist (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

67 Asad, Formations of the Secular, p. 210.

68 Hirschkind, ‘New Media and Political Dissent in Egypt’, p. 139.

69 Shehata, Dina, Islamists and Secularists in Egypt: Opposition, Conflict & Cooperation (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar.

70 Al Aswany, On the State of Egypt, p. 153.

71 Hashim, Ahmed, ‘The Egyptian Military, Part Two: From Mubarak Onward’, Middle East Policy, XVII:4 (2011), pp. 106–28, p. 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Salma Shukralla and Yassin Gaber, ‘What Was Religion Doing in the Debate on Egypt's Constitutional Amendments?’, Ahram Online (22 March 2011), available at: {http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/8267.aspx} accessed 18 October 2011.

72 Hirschkind, ‘New Media and Political Dissent in Egypt’, p. 139

73 Foucault, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, p. 83.

74 Rifaat, Yasmine, ‘Blogging the Body: The Case of Egypt’, Surfacing: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Gender in the Global South, 1:1 (2008), pp. 52–72, p. 66Google Scholar.

75 Brian Ross and Matthew Cole, ‘Egypt: The Face that Launched a Revolution’, ABC News (4 February 2011), available at: {http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/egypt-face-launched-revolution/story?id=12841488&singlePage=true} accessed 5 October 2011.

76 Jennifer Preston, ‘Movement Began With Outrage and a Facebook Page That Gave It an Outlet’, The New York Times (5 February 2011), available at: {http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/06/world/middleeast/06face.html?pagewanted=all} accessed 5 October 2011, Ernesto Londono, ‘Egyptian Man's Death Became Symbol of a Callous State’, The Washington Post (9 February 2011), available at: {http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/08/AR2011020806360.html} accessed 5 October 2011.

77 Al Jazeera, ‘Police killing sparks Egypt protest’ (14 June 2010), available at: {http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2010/06/201061415530298271.html} accessed 5 October 2011.

78 {http://www.facebook.com/ElShaheeed} (Arabic version); {http://www.facebook.com/elshaheeed.co.uk} (English version); see also {http://www.elshaheeed.co.uk/}.

79 HRW, ‘Work on Him’, p. 1.

80 Amro Ali, ‘Egypt's Collision Course With History’, ON LINE opinion (9 July 2010), available at: {http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/print.asp?article=10663} accessed 17 October 2011.

81 Baheyya, ‘Remeber Them’, Baheyya: Egypt Analysis and Whimsy (1 June 2005), available at: {http://baheyya.blogspot.com/2005/06/remember-them.html} accessed 12 October 2011.

82 John D. Sutter, ‘The faces of Egypt's “Revolution 2.0”’, CNN (21 February 2011), available at: {http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/innovation/02/21/egypt.internet.revolution/index.html} accessed 6 October 2011.

83 Hussein Ali Agrama, ‘Asecular Revolution’, The Immanent Frame (11 March 2011), available at: {http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2011/03/11/asecular-revolution/} accessed 18 October 2011.

84 Asef Bayat, ‘Egypt, and the Post-Islamist Middle East’, Open Democracy (8 February 2011), available at: {http://www.opendemocracy.net/asef-bayat/egypt-and-post-islamist-middle-east} accessed 18 October 2011.

85 Ibid.

86 Agrama, ‘Asecular Revolution’.

87 Ibid.

88 Ibid.

89 Hirschkind, ‘New Media and Political Dissent in Egypt’, pp. 139, 149; Marc Lynch, ‘Young Brothers in Cyberspace’, Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP) 245 (Winter 2007), {http://www.merip.org/mer/mer245/young-brothers-cyberspace}.

90 Mavelli, Europe's Encounter with Islam.

91 Mahmood, Saba, ‘Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival’, Cultural Anthropology, 16:2 (2001), pp. 202–36, p. 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92 Asad, Talal, ‘Trying to Understand French Secularism’, in de Vries, Hent and Sullivan, Lawrence E. (eds), Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World, (New York: Fordham University Press, 2006), p. 501Google Scholar. The case of the headscarf has been compounded by a gendered portrayal of Muslim women as vulnerable subjects in need of protection. See Morey, Peter and Yaqin, Amina, Framing Muslims: Stereotyping and Representations after 9/11 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Mavelli, Luca, ‘Between Normalisation and Exception: The Securitisation of Islam and the Construction of the Secular Subject’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41:2 (2013, forthcoming)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93 Habermas, Between Naturalism and Religion, p. 243.

94 Luca Mavelli and Fabio Petito, ‘The Postsecular in International Relations: an Overview’, in this Special Issue.

95 For an excellent overview, see Bleiker, Roland and Hutchison, Emma, ‘Fear no More: Emotions and World Politics’, Review of International Studies, 34:S1 (2008), pp. 115–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

96 Connolly, William E., Europe: A Minor Tradition, in Scott, David and Hirschkind, Charles (eds), Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006), p. 83Google Scholar.

97 Ibid., p. 84.

98 Linklater, Andrew, The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (Oxford: Polity, 1998), p. 5Google Scholar.

99 Habermas, ‘Notes on a Post-Secular Society’.

100 Joseph A. Camilleri, ‘Postsecularist Discourse in an “Age of Transition”’.

101 Mustapha Kamal Pasha, ‘Islam and the Postsecular’.

102 Ibid.

103 Al Aswany, On the State of Egypt.

104 Ibid., p. 152.

105 Ibid.