Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:52:10.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legitimation for turning-point decisions in foreign policy: Israel vis-à-vis Germany 1952 and Egypt 1977

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Yehudit Auerbach
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Determinist views are prevalent in human thinking. King Solomon's reflection that ‘What has been is what will be done and what has been done is what will be done and there is nothing new under the sun’ seems as valid today as it was three thousand years, ago. The international arena, overrun by scenes of bloody, wars, acute crises and protracted conflicts is a constant reminder of the truthfulness of this pessimistic view.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 1989 , pp. 329 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. On the distinction between legitimation, the process of gaining public support, and legitimacy, the outcome of that process, see Merelman, R. M., ‘Learning and Legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, lx (1966), pp. 548–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Holsti, O. R., ‘Cognitive Dynamics and Images of the Enemy: Dulles and Russia’, in Finlay, D. J., Holsti, O. R. and Fagen, R. R. (eds.), Enemies in Politics (Chicago, 1967), pp. 25–96Google Scholar; Holsti, O. R., ‘The Belief System and National Images: A Case Study’, in Rosenau, J. N. (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy (New York, 1969), pp. 543–550Google Scholar; Lebow, R. N., Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis (Baltimore, 1981)Google Scholar; Stuart, D. and Starr, H., ‘The Inherent Bad Faith Model Reconsidered: Dulles, Kennedy and Kissinger’, Political Psychology, xxxiv (1981-1982), pp. 553–577.Google Scholar

3. Heradstveit, D., The Arab-Israeli Conflict: Psychological Obstacles to Peace (Oslo, 1979)Google Scholar; Rosenberg, S. W. and Wolfsfeld, G., ‘International Conflict and the Problem of Attribution’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, xxi (1977), pp. 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Auerbach, Y., ‘Turning Point Decisions: A Cognitive-Dissonance Analysis of Conflict Resolution in Israel-West Germany Relations’, Political Psychology, vii (1986), pp. 533–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Tetlock, P. E., ‘Accountability: The Neglected Social Context of Judgement and Choice’, in Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vii (Greenwich, 1985), pp. 297–332Google Scholar; Tetlock, P. E., ‘Toward an Intuitive Political Model of Attribution Processes’, in SchlenkerB, R. B, R. (ed.), The Self in Social Life (New York, 1985), pp. 203–234.Google Scholar

6. The cognitive literature uses mainly the term ‘accountability’ which is basically analogous to ‘legitimation’. For an excellent discussion of the ‘accountability’ concept see Semin, G. R. and Manstead, A. S. R., The Accountability of Conduct: A Social Psychological Analysis (London, 1983).Google Scholar

7. Anderson, P. A., ‘Justification and Precedents as Constraints in Foreign Policy Decision Making’, American Journal of Political Science, xxv (1981), pp. 738–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bennett, W. L., ‘The Paradox in Public Discourses: A Framework for the Analysis of Political Accounts’, Journal of Politics, xlii (1980), pp. 792–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Tetlock, P. E., ‘Accountability: The Neglected Social Context of Judgement and Choice’, pp. 311–325.Google Scholar

9. George, A. L., ‘Domestic Constraints on Regime Change in U.S. Foreign Policy: The Need for Policy Legitimacy’, in Holsti, O. R., Siverson, R. M. and George, A. L. (eds.), Changes in the International System (Boulder, 1980), pp. 236–237.Google Scholar

10. Begin, M., ‘Speech to Herut Convention’, Jabotinsky Archives (Tel-Aviv, 1979).Google Scholar

11. A survey of public opinion held on 13 August 1979 by the Institute for Applied Social Research and the Communications Department of the Hebrew University found that the percentage of those having confidence in the government and its spokesmen went down during 1978–79 from 40/50 per cent to 20–30 per cent. H. Levinson, ‘Public Attitude s towards the Settlement and Autonomy’, (S)HL/ 747/H (Jerusalem, 1979).

12. Divrei HaKnesset (Official Records of the Knesset) 84–86 (Jerusalem, 1948–82), pp. 1891, 1898.

13. A. L. George, ‘Domestic Constraints on Regime Change in U.S. Foreign Policy’, p. 235; Trout, T. B., ‘Rhetoric Revisited: Political Legitimation and the Cold War’, International Studies Quarterly, xix (1975), p. 256.Google Scholar

14. Divrei HaKnesset, 83, p. 4063.

15. Merelman, R. M., ‘Learning and Legitimacy’, p. 548.Google Scholar

16. Divrei HaKnesset, 81, p. 928.

17. Ibid., 10, p. 897.

18. Ben-Gurion, D., ‘Speech to Mapai Center’, Beit Bed Archives (Kfar Saba, 1951).Google Scholar

19. Ibid.

20. Tetlock, P. E., ‘Toward an Intuitive Political Model of Attribution Processes’, p. 216.Google Scholar

21. For an extensive review of the aforementioned defensive tactics see Semin and Manstead, op. cit.

22. Schlenker, B. R, ‘Translating Actions Into Attitudes: An Identity Analytic Approach to the Explanation of Social Conduct’, in Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Psychology, xv (New York, 1982), pp. 193–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23. Divrei HaKnesset, 84–86, p. 1899.

24. Ibid., 81, p. 992.

25. Ibid., p. 994.

26. Israeli Foreign Ministry Documents (Jerusalem, 1953), p. 44.

27. Divrei HaKnesset, 84–86, p. 2085.

28. Edelman, M., The Symbolic Use of Politics (Urbana, 1964), p. 6.Google Scholar

29. Divrei HaKnesset, 83, p. 4066.

30. M. Edelman, op. cit., p. 6.

31. Ibid., p. 126.

32. Divrei HaKnesset, 83, pp. 4059–60.

33. Ma'axriv, daily newspaper (Tel-Aviv, 3 March 1979).