Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Prys, Miriam
2008.
Developing a Contextually Relevant Concept of Regional Hegemony: The Case of South Africa, Zimbabwe and 'Quiet Diplomacy'.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Prys, Miriam
2008.
Developing a Contextually Relevant Concept of Regional Hegemony: The Case of South Africa, Zimbabwe and 'Quiet Diplomacy'.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Prys, Miriam
2009.
Regional Hegemon or Regional Bystander: South Africa's Zimbabwe Policy 2000–2005.
Politikon,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 2,
p.
193.
Beeson, Mark
and
Broome, André
2010.
Hegemonic Instability and East Asia: Contradictions, Crises and US Power.
Globalizations,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 4,
p.
507.
Knafo, Samuel
2010.
Critical approaches and the legacy of the agent/structure debate in international relations.
Cambridge Review of International Affairs,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 3,
p.
493.
Hinnebusch, Raymond
2011.
The Middle East in the world hierarchy: imperialism and resistance.
Journal of International Relations and Development,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
213.
Saull, Richard
2012.
Rethinking Hegemony: Uneven Development, Historical Blocs, and the World Economic Crisis1.
International Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 2,
p.
323.
Leggett, Will
2013.
Restoring society to post-structuralist politics.
Philosophy & Social Criticism,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 3,
p.
299.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus
and
Nexon, Daniel H.
2013.
International theory in a post-paradigmatic era: From substantive wagers to scientific ontologies.
European Journal of International Relations,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
543.
Bulmer, Simon
and
Paterson, William E.
2013.
Germany as the EU's reluctant hegemon? Of economic strength and political constraints.
Journal of European Public Policy,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 10,
p.
1387.
Wigger, Angela
and
Buch-Hansen, Hubert
2014.
Explaining (Missing) Regulatory Paradigm Shifts: EU Competition Regulation in Times of Economic Crisis.
New Political Economy,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
113.
2015.
Discursive Strategies and Political Hegemony.
Vol. 64,
Issue. ,
YALVAÇ, Faruk
2016.
Türk Dış Politikasının Tarihsel Materyalist Bir Analizi: Sınıf, Devlet ve Hegemonya.
Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 52,
p.
3.
Bulmer, Simon
and
Joseph, Jonathan
2016.
European integration in crisis? Of supranational integration, hegemonic projects and domestic politics.
European Journal of International Relations,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
725.
Vadrot, Alice B.M.
2017.
Knowledge, International Relations and the structure–agency debate: towards the concept of “epistemic selectivities”.
Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 1,
p.
61.
Alejandro, Audrey
Jørgensen, Knud Erik
Reichwein, Alexander
Rösch, Felix
and
Turton, Helen
2017.
Reappraising European IR Theoretical Traditions.
p.
107.
Lambach, Daniel
2017.
Herrschaft in den Internationalen Beziehungen.
p.
29.
Beeson, Mark
2017.
Alternative realities: Explaining security in the Asia-Pacific.
Review of International Studies,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 3,
p.
516.
Makarychev, Andrey
and
Yatsyk, Alexandra
2017.
Unpacking the Post-Soviet: Political Legacy of the Tartu Semiotic School.
All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,
Yükselen, Hasan
2018.
Strateji Kavramını Çalışmak.
Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 27,
p.
1.