Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T04:48:23.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining ethnic conflict: the neglected international dimension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

S. Ryan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is rather surprising to note how slow the discipline of international relations was to recognize the importance of ethnic groups as a significant factor in world politics. Whereas there were numerous works in the inter-war period that dealt with the ‘minorities problem’ for over two decades since 1945 this Issue was ignored by most, if not all, of the standard texts on international relations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 161 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See, for example, Macartney, C. A., National States and National Minorities (London, 1934)Google Scholar; Mair, L. P., The Protection of Minorities: The Workings and Scope of the Minority Treaties Under the League of Nations (London, 1928)Google Scholar; Stone, J., The International Guarantee of Minority Rights (Oxford, 1932)Google Scholar. Two notable exceptions to this post-1945 neglect were: Claude, I. L. Jr, National Minorities: An International Problem (Oxford, 1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosenau, J. N. (ed.), International Aspects of Civil Strife (Princeton, NJ, 1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. Smith, A. D., The Ethnic Origin of Nations (London, 1986)Google Scholar, ch. 2.

3. Nielsson, G. P., ‘States and Nation-Groups: A Global Taxonomy’, in Tiryakian, E. A. and Ragowski, R., New Nationalisms of the Developed West (London, 1985)Google Scholar.

4. Connor, W., ‘Nation-Building or Nation-Destroying?’ World Politics, vol. XXIV (1972), pp. 319–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Gellner, E., Nations and Nationalism (Oxford, 1983)Google Scholar.

6. See Smith, A. D., Theories of Nationalism (London, 1971)Google Scholar, ch. 5.

7. Fishman, J. A., ‘Social Theory and Ethnography’, in Sugar, P. F. (ed.), Ethnic Diversity and Conflict in Eastern Europe (Santa Barbara, 1980), p. 84.Google Scholar

8. Journal of International Affairs, vol. 16, no. 2 (1962)Google Scholar.

9. See article by L. W. Doob, Ibid.

10. Ball, George, The Past Has Another Pattern (New York, 1982)Google Scholar, ch. 14.

11. Quoted in Neuberger, B., National Self-Determination in Post-Colonial Africa (Boulder, 1986)Google Scholar, p. 23.

12. See Ronen, D. and Thompson, D. L. (eds), Ethnicity, Politics and Development (Boulder, 1985)Google Scholar, Introduction.

13. Koestler, A., The Heel of Achilles (London, 1976)Google Scholar, p. 171.

14. Quoted in Mandelbaum, M., The Nuclear Revolution (Cambridge, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, p. 80.

15. See, for example, Haas, E. B., Beyond the Nation-State (Stanford, 1964)Google Scholar; Mitrany, D., A Working Peace System (Chicago, 1966)Google Scholar; Groom, A. J. R. and Taylor, P. (eds), Functionalism: Theory and Practice in International Relations (London, 1975)Google Scholar.

16. ‘This tradition is analysed in H. Suganami, The Structure of Institutionalism’, International Relations, vol. VII, pp. 2363–81. A recent attack on the separation of ‘domestic’ and ‘international’ politics can be found in Merle, M., The Sociology of International Relations (Leamington Spa, 1987)Google Scholar (translated by D. Parkin), pp. 7–10.

17. See Banks, M. (ed.), Conflict in World Society (Brighton, 1984)Google Scholar; and ‘Where we are now’, Review of International Studies, vol. 11 (1985), pp. 215–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. Barth, F. (ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries (London, 1969)Google Scholar.

19. The papers were subsequently published in Bell, W. and Freeman, W. F. (eds), Ethnicity and Nation Building (Beverly Hills, Cal., 1974).Google Scholar

20. Papers later published as Adelphi Papers 82 and 83 Civil Violence and the International System (London, 1971)Google Scholar.

21. W. Connor, op. cit.

22. See, for example: Bertelsen, J. S., Non-State Actors in International Politics (New York, 1977)Google Scholar; Neuman, S. G. (ed.), Small States and Segmented Societies (New York, 1976)Google Scholar; Said, A. A. and Simmons, L. R., Ethnicity in an International Context (New York, 1976)Google Scholar; Snyder, L. L., Global Mini-Nationalisms (Westport, Conn., 1982)Google Scholar; Suhrke, A. and Noble, L. G. (eds.), Ethnic Conflict and International Relations (New York, 1977)Google Scholar.

23. Burton, J. W., ‘The Individual as the Unit of Explanation in International Relations’, International Studies Newsletter, vol. 10, no. 2 (1983)Google Scholar; and in Burton, J. W., Dear Survivor (London, 1982), p. 29.Google Scholar

24. J. S. Mill, ‘Considerations on Representative Government’, chapter XVI in Acton, H. B., Mill, J. S.: Utilitarianism, On Liberty, and Considerations on Representative Government (London, 1972), p. 361Google Scholar.

25. Ibid., p. 362.

26. Quoted in Janowsky, O. I., Nationalism and National Minorities (London, 1945), p. 28.Google Scholar

27. Schermerhorn, R. R., Comparative Ethnic Relations (Chicago, 1978), p. 68.Google Scholar

28. Claude, op. cit., p. 1.

29. Furnival, J. S., ‘Colonial Policy an d Practice’, in Stone, J. (ed.), Race, Ethnicity and Social Change (London, 1977)Google Scholar. See also Furnival, J. S., Netherlands India: A Study of Plural Economy (Amsterdam, 1986)Google Scholar.

30. Smith, M. G., ‘Some Developments in the Analytic Study of Pluralism’, in Smith, M. G. and Kuper, L. (eds.), Pluralism in Africa (Berkeley, Cal., 1971), p. 434.Google Scholar

31. Ibid., p. 435.

32. Ibid., p. 446.

33. Ibid., pp. 442–3.

34. Kuper, Leo, Race, Class and Power (London, 1974), p. 65Google Scholar.

35. See especially: Lijphart, A., Democracy in Plural Societies (New Haven, 1977)Google Scholar; Nordlinger, E. A., Conflict Regulation in Divided Societies (Cambridge, Mass., 1972)Google Scholar.

36. Anthony Giddens, for example, has said that a major criticism of the functionalist approach to society, which is perhaps the best example of the ‘consensus’ view, is its ‘failure to make conceptually central the negotiated character of norms, as open to divergent and conflicting ‘interpretations’ in relation to divergent and conflicting interests in society’ (author's emphasis). In Giddens, A., New Rules of Sociological Method (London, 1976), p. 21Google Scholar. Bernard Crick has also claimed that ‘most technologically advanced societies are divided societies’. In Defence of Politics (London, 1964), p. 141.Google Scholar

37. Loizos, P., Cyprus: Minority Rights Group Report No. 30, Part 2 (London, 1976), p. 14.Google Scholar

38. A. Lijphart, Introduction to Ashworth, G. (ed.), World Minorities in the 1980s (London, 1980), p. 27.Google Scholar

39. See Morgenthau, H., Politics Among Nations, Fifth Edition (New York, 1978), p. 27.Google Scholar

40. See Ronen, D., The Quest for Self-Determination (New Haven, 1982)Google Scholar.

41. Two common approaches to national self-determination are that it is a political principle but not an automatic right and that it can be applied as part of an anti-colonial or racist struggle, but not once independence and racial equality has been obtained. The latter qualification is part of the OAU approach to this issue, the former seems to be the view embodied in the UN Charter.

42. Dalberg-Acton, J. E. E., The History of Freedom and Other Essays (London, 1907), pp. 297–298.Google Scholar

43. Claude, op. cit., p. 42.

44. van den Berghe, P., ‘Protection of Ethnic Minorities: A Critical Appraisal’, in Wirsing, R. G. (ed.), Protection of Ethnic Minorities: Comparative Perspectives (Oxford, 1981), p. 347.Google Scholar

45. In C. A. Macartney, op. cit., p. 100.

46. Quoted in Chaliand, G. (ed.), People Without a Country: The Kurds in Kurdistan (London, 1980), pp. 65–66.Google Scholar

47. In Reich, Walter, A Stranger in My House (London, 1985), p. 18Google Scholar.

48. In Buckheit, L. C., Secession: The Legitimacy of Self-Determination (New Haven, 1978), p. 18.Google Scholar

49. Rajanayagam-Hellmann, D., ‘Educational standard and social distance: two Tamil minorities in Sri Lanka’, in Rothermund, D. and Simon, J., Education and the Integration of Ethnic Minorities (London, 1986), p. 138.Google Scholar

50. Claude, op. cit., p. 42.

51. Calvocoressi, Peter, ‘The Future of International Conflict’, International Relations, vol. VII 1981), p. 1105Google Scholar.

52. Quoted in Coser, L., The Functions of Social Conflict (London, 1965), p. 95Google Scholar.

53. Sterling, R. W., ‘Ethnic Separation in the International System’, in Hall, A. L., Ethnic Autonomy-Comparative Dynamics (Oxford, 1979), p. 414.Google Scholar

54. See Bull, H. (ed.), Intervention in World Politics (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar, and Vincent, R. J., Non-intervention and International Order (Princeton, 1974)Google Scholar.

55. Walker Connor, ‘Ethno-Political Change and Government Responses’, in Sugar, op. cit., p. 172.

56. Mackey, W. F., Trends in Multinationalism, in Mackey, W. F. and Verdoot, A. (eds.), The Multinational Society: Papers of the Ljubljana Seminar (London, 1975), p. 352.Google Scholar

57. Hoffmann, S., Duties Beyond Borders (Syracuse, 1981), p. 23Google Scholar.

58. S. Hoffmann, ‘The Problem of Intervention’, in Bull, Intervention in World Politics.

59. Northedge, F. S. and Donelan, M. D., International Disputes: The Political Aspects (London, 1971), p. 131Google Scholar.

60. Orwell, G., Collected Essays etc., vol. 4 (Harmondsworth, 1970), p. 282.Google Scholar

61. This is a point made by Irwin, Z. T., ‘Yugoslavia and Ethnonationalism’, in Shiels, F. L. (ed.), Ethnic Separatism and World Politics (London, 1984)Google Scholar.

62. See M. K. Flowers, ‘Canada and Quebec’, in F. L. Shiels (ed.), op. cit.

63. Fawcett, J., The International Protection of Minorities, Minority Rights Group Report No. 41 (London, 1979)Google Scholar, appendix C.

64. Kuper, L., The Prevention of Genocide (New Haven, 1986)Google Scholar.

65. For a fuller analysis of problem solving workshops see: J. W. Burton, Conflict and Communication, and ‘The Resolution of Conflict’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 16 (1972), pp. 5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fisher, R. J., ‘Third Party Communication as a Method of Inter-group Conflict Resolution’, Journal of Conflict Research, vol. 27 (1983), pp. 301–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hill, B. J., ‘An Analysis of Conflict Resolution Techniques: From Problem Solving Workshops to Theory’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 26 (1982), pp. 109–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mitchell, C. R., Peacemaking and the Consultant's Role (London, 1981)Google Scholar.

66. Walzer, M., ‘The Obligations of Oppressed Minorities’, Obligations (Cambridge, Mass., 1970)Google Scholar, ch. 3.

67. L. Buckheit, op. cit.

68. Smith, A. D., ‘Conflict and Collective Identity: Class, Ethnie and Nation’, in Azar, E. and Burton, J. W. (eds.), International Conflict Resolution (Brighton, 1986)Google Scholar.