Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:12:30.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do general rules of international law exist?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

A. V. Lowe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aim of this short paper is to explore the concept of ‘general’ rules of customary international law (i.e., rules in principle binding upon all states, as contrasted with ‘special’ rules binding only on a few states, usually on a regional or local basis), and-the tension which exists between that concept and the consensual basis of customary international law. It will be suggested that it is possible to hold a view of international law which denies the general applicability of most rules of customary law and preserves its consensual character, while admitting that a few rales of truly general application do exist which, however, must derive their binding force from outside the framework of consensual law creation.

Type
Note
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 1983 , pp. 207 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. O'Connell, D. P., International Law, 2nd ed., (London, 1970), pp. 15–16Google Scholar.

2. PCIJ Reports, Ser. A, No. 10, (1927), p. 18.

3. (1951) ICJ Reports 116, at p. 131.

4. (1960) ICJ Reports 6, at pp. 43–4.

5. See, e.g., Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law, 3rd ed., (Oxford, 1979), p. 10Google Scholar.

6. See, e.g., D'Amato, A. A., ‘The Concept of Special Custom in International Law’, 63 American Journal of International Law (1969), p. 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Per Lord Alverstone C. J., in West Rand Central Gold Mining Co. Ltd. v. The King (1905) 2 K.B. 391, at p. 406.

8. See, e.g., Fitzmaurice, Sir G., ‘The Formal Sources of International Law’, Symbolae Verzijl, (The Hague, 1958), p. 153Google Scholar at p. 164.

9. See, e.g., Tunkin, G., Theory of International Law (Trans. Butler, W. E.) (London, 1974), p. 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar.