Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:28:41.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contemporary understanding about spheres of influence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Paul Keal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A decade ago it was possible to argue with some confidence not only that the Soviet Union and the United States had spheres of influence but also that they had a tacit understanding about them. The existence of a tacit understanding seemed to be confirmed, for instance, at the time of the invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968, in that while the United States denounced the Soviet action it nevertheless acquiesced in it. At that time it could be claimed that the Soviet Union had merely acted in eastern Europe in the same way as the United States had on various occasions in Latin America, the most recent being the intervention in the Dominican Republic in 1965. Further, the doctrines each power used to justify intervention were alike. The Brezhnev Doctrine justifying the intervention in Czechoslovakia seemed similar to the Johnson Doctrine legitimizing intervention in the Dominican Republic in that both claimed hegemonic rights within a sphere of influence. And from this a reciprocal understanding was inferred about what each would allow the other to do in its respective sphere. Both superpowers denied it. The United States did so because spheres of influence transgress the doctrine of the sovereign equality of states and because the practices associated with them violate the norms of interstate behaviour. The Soviet Union did so because it counterposed the Soviet Union to other socialist States and it would have followed that the Soviet Union would not have been acting, as it claimed, in the interests of socialism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 1983 , pp. 155 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Franck, T. M. and Weisband, E., Word Politics, Verbal Strategy Among the Superpowers (New York, 1972)Google Scholar, passim.

2. Address by Secretary of State, Rusk, Department of State Bulletin, lix, No. 1528,7 October 1968, p. 350; and Sovetov, A., ‘The Present Stage in the Struggle Between Socialism and Imperialism’, International Affairs (Moscow), 11 November 1968, p. 9.Google Scholar

3. Pfaff, William, ‘U.S.-Soviet Contest: Breaking the Rules’, International Herald Tribune, 20 Febrauary 1981, p. 4.Google Scholar

4. Brzezinski, Z., ‘The key question Poland poses for the West’, The Times, 16 Febrauary 1982, p.10.Google Scholar

5. Brummer, Alex, ‘U.S. planning a carve-up with the Russians?’ The Guardian Weekly, 22 Febrauary 1981.Google Scholar

6. Bull, Hedley, ‘Super Power Predominance and World Order’,Google Scholar an unpublished paper. See also Bull, H. N., ‘World Order and the Super Powers’, in Holbraad, Carsten (ed.),Super Powers and World Order (Canberra, 1971), pp. 148–9.Google Scholar

7. See for instance Sovetov, A., ‘The Present Stage in the Struggle Between Socialism and Imperialism’, International Affairs (Moscow), No. 11 (November 1968);Google Scholar Department of State Publication 5556, Inter-American Series 48 (Washington, DC, 1954), pp. 14-17 and Department of State Bulletin, xlvii, No. 1220 (12 November 1962), pp. 720-3.

8. See the New York Times, 22 July 1968, p. 1, 24 July 1968, p. 3 and Address by Ball, George, Department of State Bulletin, lix, No. 1522, (26 September 1968), p. 221.Google Scholar

9. Falk, R. A. and Mendlovitz, S. H. (eds.),The Strategy of World Order, Vol. II (New York, 1966), p. 2.Google Scholar

10. Keal, Paul, Unspoken Rules and Superpower Dominance (London, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Bowett, D. W., The Search for Peace (London, 1972), p. 118.Google Scholar

12. Washington Post, editorial reprinted in The Guardian Weekly, 2 March 1980.

13. The Guardian Weekly, 30 August 1981, p. 1Google Scholar.

14. President Kennedy's message of 27 October 1962, Department of State Bulletin, Ixix, No. 1795, (19 November 1973), pp. 649, 652, and Department of State Bulletin, lxiv, No. 1654, (8 March 1971), p. 284.

15. BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, SU/6980/C/11, 17 March 1982.

16. BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, SU/699I/A 1/10, 30 March 1982.

17. Jonathan Steele, ‘Wher e Brezhnev fears to tread’,The Guardian Weekly, 15 March 1981.

18. ‘Russia's New Drive to Undermine the West’, an interview with CIA Director, Casey, William J., The Bulletin, 23 March 1982, p. 89.Google Scholar

19. Jonathan Steele, ‘Brezhnev's precedent in Kabul’, The Guardian Weekly, 6 January 1980.Google Scholar

20. Jiri Valenta, The Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan: The Difficulty of Knowing Where to ‘Stop’, ORBIS, 24 (Summer 1980), pp. 2-4.

21. Maurice Duverger, Le Monde article reproduced in The Guardian Weekly, 2 March 1980.

22. Andre Fontaine, Le Monde article reproduced in The Guardian Weekly, 20 July 1980.

23. Hedrick Smith, The U.S.-Soviet Crisis in Asia: Some See Start of Cold War IF, The International Herald Tribune, Sat/Sun 2/3 February 1980, p. 7.

24. Jiri Valenta, op. cit. p. 212.

25. Address before a Joint Session of Congress, 23 January 1980, Department of State Bulletin, 80, No. 2035, (Febrauary 1980).Google Scholar

26. The International Herald Tribune, 11 September 1981, p. 1.

27. Jiri Valenta, ‘Soviet Options in Poland’, Survival, xxiii, No. 2, March/April 1981, pp. 53-4.

28. George F. Kennan ‘What do we want Russia to do?’ The Guardian Weekly, 17 January 1982, p. 5.

29. Statement of 3 December 1980, Department of State Bulletin, 81, No. 2046, (January 1981), pp. 20-1.

30. Hella Pick, ‘The Lasting Legacy of Yalta’, The Guardian Weekly, 17 July 1982, pp. 5-6.

31. International Herald Tribune, 21 January 1982, p. 4.

32. George F. Kennan, op. cit.

33. Henry Kissinger, The Times, 23 January 1982, p. 6.