Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:02:36.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coercion and third-party mediation of identity-based conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2019

Jacob Eriksson Open the ORCID record for Jacob Eriksson [Opens in a new window]
Jacob Eriksson*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of York
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyses third-party mediation of identity-based conflicts, which are notoriously difficult to resolve. It seeks to reconcile the contradiction in the mediation literature between the need for less coercive strategies to ensure ownership of a peace agreement and the need for more coercive strategies to reach a final agreement. Through an analysis of mediation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the article makes four contributions to existing literature. First, the article develops a theoretical ‘best fit’ model that proposes a u-shaped relationship between intensity of mediator coercion and transition through phases of negotiation. Second, it challenges the prevailing notion that pre-negotiation does not involve coercion. Third, it suggests that epistemological and ontological understandings of a conflict and the role of a mediator by both the mediator and the parties mean that mediators enjoy limited capacity to effectively shift from high- to low-coercive strategies. Multi-party mediation can provide the flexibility needed to execute the coercion u-curve effectively. Fourth, it challenges existing understandings of the US-mediated negotiations during the Annapolis process, 2007–08.

Keywords

MediationCoercionIdentity-based ConflictIsraeli-Palestinian Conflict
Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 2019 , pp. 387 - 406
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Burton, John and Dukes, Frank, Conflict: Practices in Management, Settlement and Resolution (London: Macmillan, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Touval, Saadia, The Peace Brokers: Mediators in the Arab-Israeli Conflict (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982)Google Scholar ; Carnevale, Peter, ‘Mediating from strength’, in Jacob Bercovitch (ed.), Studies in International Mediation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Z. Rubin (London: Palgrave, 2002)Google Scholar ; Smith, James D. D., ‘Mediator impartiality: Banishing the chimera’, Journal of Peace Research, 31:4 (1994), pp. 445–450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

2 Rubin, Jeffrey Z., ‘International mediation in context’, in Jacob Bercovitch and Jeffrey Z. Rubin (eds), Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management (London: Palgrave, 1992)Google Scholar ; William Zartman, I. and Touval, Saadia, ‘International mediation in the post-Cold War era’, in Chester Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall (eds), Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict (Washington, DC: USIP Press, 2001)Google Scholar ; Heemsbergen, Luke and Siniver, Asaf, ‘New routes to power: Towards a typology of power mediation’, Review of International Studies, 37:3 (2011), pp. 1169–1190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

3 Zartman, I. William, ‘Prenegotiation: Phases and functions’, in Janice Gross Stein (ed.), Getting to the Table: The Processes of International Prenegotiation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989)Google Scholar ; Aggestam, Karin, ‘Mediating asymmetrical conflict’, Mediterranean Politics, 7:1 (2002), p. 73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

4 Beardsley, Kyle C., Quinn, David M., Biswas, Bidisha, and Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, ‘Mediation style and crisis outcomes’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50:1 (2006), pp. 58–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Bercovitch, Jacob and Gartner, Scott S., ‘Is there method in the madness of mediation? Some lessons for mediators from quantitative studies of mediation’, in Jacob Bercovitch and Scott S. Gartner (eds), International Conflict Mediation: New Approaches and Findings (London: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar ; Bercovitch, Jacob and Houston, Allison, ‘Why do they do it like this? An analysis of the factors influencing mediation behaviour in international conflicts’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44:2 (2000), pp. 170–202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, Young, Kathleen, Asal, Victor, and Quinn, David, ‘Mediating international crises: Cross-national and experimental perspectives’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47:3 (2003), pp. 279–301 Google Scholar .

5 Harold Saunders, ‘Pre-negotiation and circum-negotiation: Arenas of multi-level peace processes’, in Crocker, Osler Hampson, and Aall (eds), Turbulent Peace, p. 489.

6 Beardsley et al., ‘Mediation style and crisis outcomes’, p. 83.

7 Fisher, Ronald J. and Keashly, Loraleigh, ‘The potential complementarity of mediation and consultation within a contingency model of third party intervention’, Journal of Peace Research, 28:1 (1991), p. 30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

8 Malley, Robert and Agha, Hussein, ‘How not to make peace in the Middle East’, The New York Review of Books, 56:1 (January 2009)Google Scholar ; Siniver, Asaf, ‘Arbitrating the Israeli-Palestinian territorial dispute’, International Politics, 49:1 (2012), pp. 117–129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar . During the Oslo process, the US did broker the 1996 Hebron Agreement, the 1997 Wye River Memorandum, and the 1999 Sharm el-Sheikh Agreement. However, these were either negotiations about the implementation of previous agreements like Oslo II or renegotiations of those previous agreements.

9 Nathan Thrall, ‘Israel and the US: the delusions of our diplomacy’, The New York Review of Books (9 October 2014). One can argue whether this is a case of being unable or unwilling, but this is beyond the scope of this article.

10 Thrall, Nathan, The Only Language They Understand: Forcing Compromise in Israel-Palestine (New York: Metropolitan, 2017)Google Scholar .

11 Barak, Oren, ‘The failure of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, 1993–2000’, Journal of Peace Research, 42:6 (2005), pp. 719–736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

12 For all of their strengths, this is a weakness of Thrall (The Only Language They Understand), Siniver (‘Arbitrating the Israeli-Palestinian territorial dispute’), and Pressman, Jeremy, ‘American engagement and the pathways to Arab-Israeli peace’, Cooperation and Conflict, 49:4 (2014), pp. 536–553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

13 Heemsbergen and Siniver, ‘New routes to power’, p. 1176.

14 Eriksson, Jacob, Small-state Mediation in International Conflicts: Diplomacy and Negotiation in Israel-Palestine (London: I. B. Tauris, 2015)Google Scholar ; Kriesberg, Louis, ‘Mediation and the transformation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict’, Journal of Peace Research, 38:3 (2001), pp. 373–392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Aggestam, ‘Mediating asymmetrical conflict’.

15 Helene Cooper, ‘Rice’s way: Restraint in quest for peace’, The New York Times (29 November 2007).

16 Kurtzer, Daniel, Lasensky, Scott, Quandt, William, Spiegel, Steven, and Telhami, Shibley, The Peace Puzzle: America’s Quest for Arab-Israeli Peace, 1989–2011 (New York: Cornell University Press, 2013), p. 220 Google Scholar .

17 Miller, Aaron D., The Much Too Promised Land: America’s Elusive Search for Arab-Israeli Peace (New York: Bantam Books, 2008), pp. 300 Google Scholar , 310–11.

18 Abrams, Elliott, Tested by Zion: The Bush Administration and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar ; Indyk, Martin, Innocent Abroad: An Intimate Account of American Peace Diplomacy in the Middle East (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009)Google Scholar ; Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle; Miller, The Much Too Promised Land; Ross, Dennis and Makovsky, David, Myths, Illusions, and Peace: Finding a New Direction for America in the Middle East (London: Viking, 2009)Google Scholar ; Zoughbie, Daniel, Indecision Points: George W. Bush and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

19 Beardsley et al., ‘Mediation style and crisis outcomes’, p. 83.

20 Quoted in Jacob Bercovitch, ‘Introduction: Putting mediation in context’, in Bercovitch (ed.), Studies in International Mediation, p. 15.

21 Jacob Bercovitch, ‘The structure and diversity of mediation in international relations’, in Bercovitch and Rubin (eds), Mediation in International Relations, p. 17; Bercovitch (ed.), Studies in International Mediation, p. 16; Bercovitch and Gartner (eds), International Conflict Mediation , p. 27.

22 Beardsley et al., ‘Mediation style and crisis outcomes’; Bercovitch and Rubin (eds), Mediation in International Relations; Bercovitch (ed.), Studies in International Mediation; Bercovitch and Gartner Gartner (eds), International Conflict Mediation; Touval, Saadia and Zartman, I. William (eds), International Mediation in Theory and Practice (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1985)Google Scholar ; Wilkenfeld et al., ‘Mediating international crises’.

23 Aggestam, ‘Mediating asymmetrical conflict’, p. 73.

24 Bercovitch and Houston, ‘Why do they do it like this?’, p. 175.

25 Eriksson, Small-state Mediation in International Conflicts, p. 3.

26 Marieke Kleiboer, ‘Understanding success and failure of international mediation’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40:2 (1996); Heemsbergen and Siniver, ‘New routes to power’, p. 1177.

27 Marieke Kleiboer, ‘Great power mediation: Using leverage to make peace?’, in Bercovitch (ed.), Studies in International Mediation.

28 Fen Osler Hampson, ‘Third party roles in conflict management’, in Crocker, Osler Hampson, and Aall (eds), Turbulent Peace, p. 396.

29 Kleiboer, ‘Great power mediation’.

30 Princen, Thomas, Intermediaries in International Conflict (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992), p. 22 Google Scholar .

31 Heemsbergen and Siniver, ‘New routes to power’, pp. 1188–9; Kleiboer, ‘Understanding success and failure’, p. 372.

32 Zartman, I. William, ‘Conflict resolution and negotiation’, in Jacob Bercovitch, Victor Kremenyuk, and I. William Zartman (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution (London: SAGE Publications, 2009), pp. 330–331 Google Scholar .

33 Zartman, ‘Prenegotiation’, pp. 4, 13.

34 Deutsch, Morton, ‘Commentary: On negotiating the non-negotiable’, in Barbara Kellerman and Jeffrey Z. Rubin (eds), Leadership and Negotiation in the Middle East (London: Praeger, 1988), p. 252 Google Scholar .

35 Zartman, ‘Prenegotiation’, pp. 2, 5; Janice Gross Stein, ‘Pre-negotiation in the Arab-Israeli Conflict: the paradoxes of success and failure’, in Gross Stein (ed.), Getting to the Table. For this and other reasons, the author prefers Bercovitch’s definition of mediation, which allows inclusion of such activities: mediation is ‘a process of conflict management, related to but distinct from the parties’ own efforts, where the disputing parties or their representatives seek the assistance, or accept an offer of help, from an individual, group, state, or organisation to change, affect, or influence their perceptions or behaviour, without resorting to physical force or invoking the authority of the law.’ (Bercovitch and Rubin (eds), Mediation in International Relations, p. 7.

36 Ben-Ami, Shlomo, Scars of War, Wounds of Peace: The Israeli-Arab Tragedy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 198 Google Scholar ; Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 28–9.

37 Savir, Uri, The Process: 1100 Days that Changed the Middle East (New York: Random House, 1998), p. 280 Google Scholar .

38 Beardsley et al., ‘Mediation style and crisis outcomes’, p. 82.

39 Azar, Edward, The Management of Protracted Social Conflict: Theory and Cases (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1990)Google Scholar ; Ramsbotham, Oliver, ‘The analysis of protracted social conflict: a tribute to Edward Azar’, Review of International Studies, 31:1 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

40 Azar, The Management of Protracted Social Conflict, pp. 2, 7–10.

41 Azar, Edward and In Moon, Chung, ‘Managing protracted social conflicts in the Third World: Facilitation and development diplomacy’, Millenium, 15:3 (1986), p. 401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Bercovitch, Jacob and Langley, Jeff, ‘The nature of the dispute and the effectiveness of international mediation’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37:4 (1993), p. 677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Bercovitch and Houston, ‘Why do they do it like this?’, pp. 177–8, 189; Zartman, ‘Conflict resolution and negotiation’, p. 335; Kleiboer, ‘Understanding success and failure’, p. 364; Eriksson, Small-state Mediation in International Conflicts.

42 Beardsley et al., ‘Mediation style and crisis outcomes’, pp. 81–3.

43 Ibid., p. 81.

44 Zartman, ‘Conflict resolution and negotiation’, p. 328.

45 Bercovitch, Jacob and Jackson, Richard, Conflict Resolution in the Twenty-first Century: Principles, Methods and Approaches (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009), p. 38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

46 Touval, Saadia, ‘The impact of multiple asymmetries on Arab-Israeli negotiations’, in I. William Zartman and Jeffrey Z. Rubin (eds), Power and Negotiation (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), p. 169 Google Scholar .

47 Hermann, Tamar, ‘Only America, and only through diplomacy: Israeli Jewish attitudes to international involvement in the quest for a solution to the conflict’, Palestine-Israel Journal, 11:2 (2004)Google Scholar .

48 Bercovitch and Gartner (eds), International Conflict Mediation, p. 26; Princen, Intermediaries in International Conflict; Young, Oran, The Intermediaries: Third Parties in International Crises (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967), p. 81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

49 Touval, The Peace Brokers, pp. 11–14.

50 I. William Zartman and Jeffrey Z. Rubin, ‘Symmetry and asymmetry in negotiation’, in Zartman and Rubin (eds), Power and Negotiation, p. 288.

51 Aggestam, ‘Mediating asymmetrical conflict’, p. 74.

52 Jeswald W. Salacuse, ‘Lessons for practice’, in Zartman and Rubin (eds), Power and Negotiation, pp. 258–9.

53 Ross and Makovsky, Myths, Illusions, and Peace, pp. 91–113; Thrall, ‘Israel and the US’.

54 Ross and Makovsky, Myths, Illusions, and Peace, pp. 114–30; Thrall, ‘Israel and the US’.

55 Thrall, ‘Israel and the US’.

56 Thrall, The Only Language They Understand, p. 39; Thrall, ‘Israel and the US’; Indyk, Innocent Abroad, p. 408; Abrams, Tested by Zion, p. 307.

57 Ross and Makovsky, Myths, Illusions, and Peace, pp. 135–7; Bercovitch and Houston, ‘Why do they do it like this?’, pp. 196–8.

58 Indyk, Innocent Abroad, p. 379; Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 154–5, 157, 237; Miller, The Much Too Promised Land, p. 324.

59 The Clinton parameters of December 2000 referred to a Palestinian state, but these were proposals rather than official government positions and expired when he left office.

60 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 163–4, 168–9, 178, 190; Indyk, Innocent Abroad, pp. 380–1; Zoughbie, Indecision Points, pp. 25, 48–53.

61 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 158–9; Miller, The Much Too Promised Land, p. 325; Zoughbie, Indecision Points, pp. 19–21.

62 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 155, 188–9; Ross and Makovsky, Myths, Illusions, and Peace, pp. 91–113; Thrall, ‘Israel and the US’.

63 Indyk, Innocent Abroad, pp. 379–80.

64 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 196–7.

65 Abrams, Tested by Zion, pp. 191–5.

66 Author’s interview with former US official, 24 May 2017; Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, p. 230.

67 Rice, Condoleezza, No Higher Honour: A Memoir of My Years in Washington (New York: Random House, 2011), p. 414 Google Scholar ; Philologos, ‘Hitkansut’, Forward (31 March 2006), available at: {http://forward.com/articles/1165/hitkansut/}.

68 United Nations, ‘A Performance-based Road Map to a Permanent Two-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict’ (n.d.), available at:

{http://www.un.org/News/dh/mideast/roadmap122002.pdf}.

69 Khaled Elgindy, ‘The Middle East Quartet: A Post-Mortem’, analysis paper, The Saban Centre for Middle East Policy at Brookings, No. 25 (February 2012), pp. 11–12.

70 Abrams, Tested by Zion, pp. 200–02.

71 In her memoirs, Rice reflects on a conversation with Olmert about his hitkansut policy: ‘I didn’t like the sound of that term but thought it could be shaped to mean a negotiated solution – not a unilateral one – to the Palestinian question.’ (Rice, No Higher Honour, p. 414).

72 Abrams, Tested by Zion, pp. 222–3.

73 Rice, No Higher Honour, pp. 459, 551–4, 575, 582.

74 Abrams, Tested by Zion, p. 250.

75 Ibid., pp. 249–51.

76 Author’s interview with former US official, 24 May 2017; Rice, No Higher Honour, pp. 602–05; The Palestine Papers, ‘Preliminary Thoughts on Process’ (4 October 2007).

77 Shai Feldman and Khalil Shikaki, ‘Is It Still Fall in Annapolis? Thinking About a Scheduled Meeting’, Crown Center for Middle East Studies Middle East Brief, No. 21 (November 2007); Rice, No Higher Honour, pp. 613–16.

78 Abrams, Tested by Zion, p. 226; Ross and Makovsky, Myths, Illusions, and Peace, pp. 110–11, 141; Schiff, Amira, ‘The “Annapolis Process”: a chronology of failure’, Israel Affairs, 19:4 (2013), p. 666 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

79 Olmert himself emphasised that creating inflated expectations would be dangerous (Abrams, Tested by Zion, p. 235).

80 Rice, No Higher Honour, p. 612; Carol Migdalovitz, ‘Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process: The Annapolis Conference’, CRS Report for Congress (7 December 2007), p. 2.

81 Abrams, Tested by Zion, p. 249.

82 Ibid.; The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Summary: Erekat and EU Heads of Mission’ (13 November 2007).

83 Author’s interview with former US official, 31 May 2017; Rice, No Higher Honour, pp. 613–14.

84 The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Minutes: 2nd Negotiation Team Meeting’ (15 October 2007).

85 The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Minutes: 7th Negotiation Team Meeting’ (12 November 2007).

86 The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Minutes: 6th Negotiation Team Meeting’ (8 November 2007); The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Minutes: 9th Negotiation Team Meeting’ (17 November 2007); The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Summary: Erekat and EU Heads of Mission’ (13 November 2007).

87 Author’s interview with former US official, 31 May 2017.

88 Brzezinski, Zbigniew, Hamilton, Lee H., Hills, Carla, Kassebaum-Baker, Nancy, Pickering, Thomas R., Scowcroft, Brent, Sorensen, Theodore C., and Volcker, Paul, ‘Failure risks devastating consequences’, The New York Review of Books, 54:17 (8 November 2007)Google Scholar ; Ross and Makovsky, Myths, Illusions, and Peace, pp. 123–5. They reference an article by William Quandt entitled, ‘Reluctant peacemaker: Bush brought Arabs and Israelis together but failed to put forth proposals and apply pressure’); Cooper, ‘Rice’s way’. For analysis of this element of Camp David in 2000, see Eriksson, Small-state Mediation in International Conflicts, p. 190

89 Cooper, ‘Rice’s way’.

90 Author’s interview with former US official, 31 May 2017; Cooper, ‘Rice’s way’; Rice, No Higher Honour, p. 600.

91 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, p. 222.

92 In his negotiations with the Palestinians and the Syrians (1999–2000), Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak was particularly concerned about being seen to make significant concessions up front (Indyk, Innocent Abroad, p. 251; Eriksson, Small-state Mediation in International Conflicts, p. 190).

93 Abrams, Tested by Zion, p. 250.

94 Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ‘Israel and the PLO Joint Understanding presented to the Annapolis Conference by US President George W. Bush’ (27 November 2007), available at:

{http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/aboutisrael/history/pages/the%20annapolis%20conference%2027-nov-2007.aspx}.

95 Bernard Avishai, ‘A plan for peace that still could be’, The New York Times Magazine (7 February 2011). While Avishai claims the meetings ended in mid-September, Abrams confirms that another meeting took place on 17 November 2008 (Abrams, Tested by Zion, p. 287).

96 Rice, No Higher Honour, pp. 552–3. Author’s interview with Ron Pundak, 10 July 2013. For more on the development of a two-state vision during the Oslo process, see Eriksson, Small-state Mediation in International Conflicts, pp. 120–63 and Eriksson, Jacob, ‘Israeli Track II diplomacy: the Beilin-Abu Mazen understandings’, in Clive Jones and Tore Petersen (eds), Israel’s Clandestine Diplomacies (London: Hurst, 2013)Google Scholar .

97 Elie Podeh, Chances for Peace: Missed Opportunities in the Arab-Israeli Conflict (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2016), p. 355; Council on Foreign Relations, ‘Abbas-Olmert Talks a “First” in Mideast Diplomacy: Interview with Aaron David Miller’ (30 April 2008), available at: {http://www.cfr.org/israel/abbas-olmert-talks-first-mideast-diplomacy/p16148}.

98 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, p. 225.

99 Author’s interview with former US official, 31 May 2017.

100 The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Minutes: 2nd Negotiation Team Meeting’ (15 October 2007).

101 The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Minutes: 8th Negotiation Team Meeting’ (13 November 2007).

102 I. William Zartman, ‘Explaining Oslo’, Negotiation Journal, 2:2 (1997), pp. 195–215.

103 Eriksson, Small-state Mediation in International Conflicts, pp. 193–4; Avishai, ‘A plan for peace that still could be’.

104 Golan, Galia, Israeli Peacemaking since 1967: Factors behind the Breakthroughs and Failures (London: Routledge, 2015), p. 171 Google Scholar .

105 ‘The time has come to say these things’, The New York Review of Books, 55:19 (4 December 2008).

106 Abrams, Tested by Zion, pp. 267–8.

107 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, p. 226.

108 The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Minutes: General Plenary Meeting’ (29 June 2008).

109 Abrams, Tested by Zion, pp. 277–8.

110 Ibid., p. 311.

111 The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Summary: Erekat and EU Heads of Mission’ (13 November 2007).

112 Golan, Israeli Peacemaking since 1967, p. 191; Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 222, 230; Barak Ravid and Aluf Benn, ‘Olmert’s negotiator: Full Mideast peace impossible’, Ha’aretz (25 January 2010).

113 The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Minutes: US-Palestinian Bilateral Session’ (16 July 2008).

114 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 228–9; Avishai, ‘A plan for peace that still could be’; The Middle East Media Research Institute, ‘Mahmoud Abbas: “I Reached Understandings with Olmert on Borders, Security”’ (16 November 2010).

115 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, p. 229.

116 Golan, Israeli Peacemaking since 1967, p. 185.

117 Abrams, Tested by Zion, p. 290; The Palestine Papers, ‘Report on Diplomatic Outreach to Russia and Czech Republic’ (10 October 2008). However, as Golan (Israeli Peacemaking since 1967, p. 183) argues, this may be because advisors were not always present for the leaders’ talks.

118 For detailed analysis of the offer made, see Abrams, Tested by Zion, pp. 287–93; Avishai, ‘A plan for peace that still could be’; Golan, Israeli Peacemaking since 1967, pp. 179–83; Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 231–2.

119 Abrams, Tested by Zion, p. 291; Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 231–2; Thrall, The Only Language They Understand, pp. 181–3; Author’s interview with former US official, 31 May 2017.

120 The Palestine Papers, ‘Talking Points for President Mahmoud Abbas Re: Upcoming Quartet Meeting’ (9 November 2008); Avishai, ‘A plan for peace that still could be’; Gil Hoffman and Niv Elis, ‘Abbas: Olmert negotiations would have succeeded’, The Jerusalem Post (14 October 2012).

121 Rice, No Higher Honour, pp. 651–3. NSU documents dated 9 September 2008 confirm that elements of Olmert’s offer had been discussed prior to the presentation of the map on 16 September (The Palestine Papers, ‘NSU Emails Re: Meeting Summary – Saeb Erekat and Territory Team – and Discussion’ (9 November 2008)).

122 The Palestine Papers, ‘President Bush Presents a “Trilateral Understanding”’ (10 August 2008).

123 Golan, Israeli Peacemaking since 1967, p. 184.

124 Ibid., pp. 184, 194; Abrams, Tested by Zion, pp. 292–3; Podeh, Chances for Peace, pp. 352–3.

125 Podeh, Chances for Peace, p. 356; Kurzter et al., The Peace Puzzle, p. 275.

126 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, p. 187; Author’s interview with former US official, 31 May 2017.

127 Miller, The Much Too Promised Land, pp. 300, 310–11.

128 Podeh, Chances for Peace, p. 354; Golan, Israeli Peacemaking since 1967, p. 195.

129 Abrams, Tested by Zion, pp. 284, 291.

130 Ibid., pp. 285, 291; Golan, Israeli Peacemaking since 1967, p. 184; Rice, No Higher Honour, p. 724; Avi Isacharoff, ‘Revealed: Olmert’s 2008 peace offer to Palestinians’, The Jerusalem Post (24 May 2013).

131 Clayton E. Swisher, The Palestine Papers: The End of the Road? (London: Hesperus, 2011), pp. 38–50.

132 Golan, Israeli Peacemaking since 1967, pp. 178–9.

133 Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, p. 230.

134 The Palestine Papers, ‘Meeting Minutes: General Plenary Meeting’ (29 June 2008); Abrams, Tested by Zion, p. 279.

135 Golan, Israeli Peacemaking since 1967, p. 188; Author’s interviews with US officials, 24 May 2017; 31 May 2017.

136 Zoughbie, Indecision Points, pp. 140–1.

137 Interview with former US official, 31 May 2017; Kurtzer et al., The Peace Puzzle, pp. 232–3; Miller, The Much Too Promised Land, pp. 360, 381.

138 Thrall, The Only Language They Understand, pp. 68–74.

139 Cooper, ‘Rice’s way’.

140 Eriksson, Small-state Mediation in International Conflicts.

141 Chester Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, ‘Two’s company but is three a crowd? Some hypotheses about multiparty mediation’, in Bercovitch (ed.), Studies in International Mediation.

142 Siniver, Asaf, ‘Arbitrating the Israeli-Palestinian territorial dispute’, International Politics, 49:1 (2012), pp. 117–129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .