Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:36:54.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure, norms and normative theory in a re-defined English School: accepting Buzan's challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2010

JOHN WILLIAMS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article looks at the significance of Barry Buzan's 2004 reformulation of the English School from the perspective of the normative dimension of English School theory. Picking up a challenge that Buzan set, but which has largely gone unanswered, for those who see normative theory as a key aspect of the English School's contribution, the article assesses three possible responses. It rejects a stance denying the relevance of Buzan's approach to normative theory and is dissatisfied with a second line that distinguishes methodologically between Buzan's social structural theorising and an approach to normative theory that draws principally on political theory. Instead, it argues for the inherent normativity of Buzan's position because of its reliance on values, arguing that many of the analytical benefits of Buzan's approach can also be deployed normatively because of the way he highlights contested and competing dynamics in play at different times and at different levels. The article suggests that this has the potential to revive pluralism as a normative position in the English School in a way that retains and extends the enhanced analytical power that Buzan's reformulation offers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 1235 - 1253
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Buzan, Barry, ‘The English School as a Research Programme: an overview and a proposal for reconvening’, Paper to the British International Studies Association Annual Conference, Manchester (December 1999). Published as ‘The English School: an underexploited resource in IR’, Review of International Studies, 27:3 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

2 See, for example, Finnemore, Martha, ‘Exporting the English School’, Review of International Studies, 27:3 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

3 Published by Cambridge University Press.

4 Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 228–9. Emphasis in original.

5 Adler, Emanuel, ‘Barry Buzan's Use of Constructivism to Reconstruct the English School: “Not all the way down”’, Millennium, 34:1 (2005)Google Scholar ; Dunne, Tim, ‘System, State and Society: how does it all hang together?’, Millennium, 34:1 (2005)Google Scholar ; Bellamy, Alex, ‘From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation’, International Affairs, 80:5 (2004)Google Scholar .

6 Buzan, From International to World Society?, p. 228.

7 Ibid., pp. 90–160.

8 Ibid., pp. 1–2.

9 Ibid., pp. 11–14, 16–17.

10 Ibid., p. 14.

11 There seems to be widespread consensus on the significance of the book. See Bellamy, ‘From International To World Society?’, p. 985; Dunne, ‘State, System and Society’, p. 170.

12 Adler, ‘Buzan's Use of Constructivism’; Dunne, ‘State, System and Society’.

13 For a discussion of ‘membership’ of the English School see Linklater, Andrew and Suganami, Hidemi, ‘The English School of International Relations: a contemporary reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 12–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

14 Buzan, From International to World Society?, p. 2.

15 Ibid., pp. 16–21, 49–50, 58.

16 Ibid., pp. 45–62, 139–60.

17 Ibid., p. 100.

18 Ibid., pp. 158–9.

19 Ibid., pp. 12–15.

20 See, for example, Brown, Chris, ‘International Theory and International Society: the viability of the middle way’, Review of International Studies, 21:2 (1995)Google Scholar ; Rengger, Nicholas J., International Relations, Political Theory and the Problem of Order: Beyond international relations theory (London:Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar .

21 Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 22–6.

22 Dunne, ‘State, System and Society’.

23 Ibid., p. 167.

24 Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: a study of order in world politics (London: Macmillan, 1977)Google Scholar ; James, Alan, ‘System or Society’, Review of International Studies, 19:3 (1993)Google Scholar ; Jackson, Robert H., The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar .

25 Dunne, ‘State, System and Society’, p. 170.

26 Keene, Edward, Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

27 Jeffery, Renée, Hugo Grotius in International Thought (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

28 Bain, William, ‘One Order, Two Laws: Recovering the “Normative” in English School Theory’, Review of International Studies, 33:4 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

29 Jeffery, Renée, ‘Australian Realism and International Relations: John Anderson and Hedley Bull on Ethics, Religion and Society’, International Politics, 45:1 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

30 Williams, John, ‘Mislaid foundations and lost opportunities: Hedley Bull and Just War theory’, European Journal of International Relations, 16:2 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

31 Bull, Hedley, ‘Recapturing the Just War for Political Theory’, World Politics, 31:4 (1979)Google Scholar ; Bull, Hedley, ‘Natural Law and International Relations’, British Journal of International Studies, 5:2 (1979)Google Scholar .

32 Vincent, John, Human Rights and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar ; Wheeler, Nicholas J., Saving Strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar ; Williams, John, ‘Territorial Borders, Toleration and the English School’, Review of International Studies, 28:4 (2002)Google Scholar ; Williams, John, ‘Pluralism, Solidarism and the Emergence of World Society’, International Relations, 19:1 (2005)Google Scholar .

33 Linklater, Andrew, The Transformation of Political Community (Cambridge: Polity, 1998)Google Scholar ; Linklater, Andrew and Suganami, Hidemi, The English School of International Relations: a contemporary reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 155–188Google Scholar .

34 Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 152–4.

35 Brown, Chris, ‘“Special Circumstances”: intervention by a liberal utopia’, Millennium, 30:3 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

36 Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 1–4.

37 Dunne, ‘State, System and Society’, p. 167.

38 Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 172–203.

39 Ibid., pp. 24–5, 230.

40 Ibid., pp. 99–107.

41 Ibid., pp. 253–7.

42 Ibid., pp. 80–7.

43 Ibid., pp. 116–7.

44 Ibid., pp. 179–98.

45 Ibid., pp. 108–18.

46 Ibid., pp. 129–32.

47 Ibid., pp. 131–2.

48 Williams, ‘Pluralism, Solidarism and the Emergence of World Society’, pp. 19–23.

49 Wight, Martin, Systems of States (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977), pp. 33–34Google Scholar . Also Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 28, 35–9.

50 Dunne, ‘State, System and Society’, p. 167; Bull, Hedley, The Control of the Arms Race: Disarmament and arms control in the missile age (second edition) (New York: Frederick A. Praeger), pp. 20–21Google Scholar ; Bull, ‘Recapturing the Just War for Political Theory’; Bull, ‘Natural Law and International Relations’; Jeffery, ‘Australian Realism’; Williams, ‘Mislaid Foundations’.

51 Bull, Anarchical Society, p. 13.

52 Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 161–204.

53 Ibid., pp. 176–204.

54 See, for example, Wheeler, Saving Strangers.

55 Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 117–8.

56 Brown, ‘International Theory and International Society’.

57 Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 49–63.

58 Ibid., pp. 105–6.

59 Williams, ‘Pluralism, Solidarism and the Emergence of World Society’.

60 Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 58–9.

61 Ibid., p. 160.

62 Vincent, Human Rights.

63 Buzan, From International to World Society?, p. 203.

64 See, for example, Wheeler, Saving Strangers.

65 Elshtain, Jean Bethke, Just War Against Terror: the Burden of American Power in a Violent World (New York: Basic Books, 2004)Google Scholar .

66 Téson, Fernando, ‘Ending Tyranny in Iraq’, Ethics & International Affairs, 19:2 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

67 Buchanan, Allen and Keohane, Robert O., ‘The Preventive Use of Force: a Cosmopolitan Institutional Perspective’, Ethics & International Affairs, 18:1 (2004)Google Scholar ; Feinstein, Lee and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘A Duty to Prevent’, Foreign Affairs, 83:1 (2004)Google Scholar .

68 Buzan, From International to World Society?, pp. 212–17.

69 Williams, ‘Territorial Borders, Toleration and the English School’.

70 Williams, The Ethics of Territorial Borders, pp. 82–115. Also Williams, John, ‘Hannah Arendt and the International Space In-Between?’, in Lang, Anthony F. Jr. and Williams, John (eds), Hannah Arendt and International Relations: Readings across the lines (New York: Palgrave, 2005)Google Scholar .

71 Williams, John, Ethics and Territorial Borders: drawing lines in the shifting sands (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

72 Linklater, Transformation of Political Community; Cochran, Molly, Normative Theory in International Relations: a pragmatic approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .