Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:07:56.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

India and Brazil in pursuit of the competitive knowledge economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2018

Valbona Muzaka Open the ORCID record for Valbona Muzaka [Opens in a new window]
Valbona Muzaka*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Science and Public Policy, King’s College London
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this article is twofold: first, it seeks to address the question of why the competitive knowledge economy orientation that emerged in certain economically advanced states as a response to the crisis of Fordism came to be embraced by the Indian and the Brazilian states from the late 1980s onwards. Second, it aims to elucidate the manner in which the goal of becoming competitive knowledge economies has been articulated and implemented locally, especially from the mid-1990s onwards, by key fragments of the Indian and the Brazilian states. Drawing on insights from the competition state, regulation school, knowledge economy literature and that on India and Brazil, attention is paid to the context- and conjuncture-specific domestic and international factors that have contributed not only to the adoption of the competitive knowledge economy orientation, but also to the necessarily distinctive ways in which it found expression in practice in India and Brazil.

Keywords

Competition State OrientationCompetitivenessKnowledge EconomyInstitutional ReformsIndiaBrazil
Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 345 - 364
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jakobson, Linda (ed.), Innovation with Chinese Characteristics: High Tech Research in China (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

2 Government of India, ‘Science, Technology and Innovation Policy’, Ministry of Science and Technology, New Delhi (2013), available at: http://www.dst.gov.in/st-system-india/science-and-technology-policy-2013

3 Geun-hye Park, ‘Opening a New Era of Hope (18th Presidential Inaugural Address)’, Office of the President, Republic of Korea (25 February 2013), available at: http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2013/02/25/95/0301000000AEN20130225001500315F.HTML.

4 Government of Mauritius, ‘Transforming Mauritius into a Knowledge Hub’, Sectoral Committee Report, Ministry of Education & Human Resources (2006), available at: http://www.hrdc.mu/index.php/publications/sectoral-committee-reports.

5 Lula da Silva, Presidential Address (Discurso do Presidente da República, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, na cerimônia de lançamento da Política de Biotecnologia), Palácio do Planalto, Brasília (8 February 2007).

6 See, for example, Cerny, Philip, ‘Paradoxes of the competition state: the dynamics of political globalization’, Government and Opposition, 32 (1997), pp. 251–274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar , and ‘Globalisation and the changing logic of collective action’, International Organization (1995), pp. 595–625; Jessop, Bob, ‘Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-Fordist political economy’, Studies in Political Economy, 40 (1993), pp. 7–40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar , and The Future of the Capitalist State (Cambridge: Polity, 2002). See also Palan, Ronen and Abbott, Jason, with Deans, Phil, State Strategies in the Global Political Economy (London: Pinter, 1996)Google Scholar .

7 This approach emerged as a way of making sense of the challenges that the crisis of the 1970s posed to the Fordist growth regime in key advanced economies; for a primer, see Boyer, Robert, The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990)Google Scholar .

8 Palan, Ronen, ‘Is the competition state the new, post-Fordist mode of regulation?’, Competition & Change, 10 (2006), pp. 246–262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

9 Exceptions exists; see, for example, Palan and Abbott, State Strategies.

10 This is especially true of certain streams of the regulation approach; see Palan, ‘The competition state’.

11 This is obviously central to the competition state literature, but also to the regulationist one; see, for instance, Boyer, The Regulation School.

12 Weiss, Linda, America Inc. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014)Google Scholar ; Fougner, Tore, ‘The state, international competitiveness and neoliberal globalisation’, Review of International Studies, 32:1 (2006), pp. 165–185 Google Scholar ; Chesnais, François, ‘Technological competitiveness considered as a form of structural competitiveness’, in Jorge Niosi (ed.), Technology and National Competitiveness (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1991), pp. 142–176 Google Scholar .

13 Kenway, Jane et al. (eds), Haunting the Knowledge Economy (London: Routledge, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

14 Mazzucato, Entrepreneurial State; Weiss, America Inc.

15 Jessop, Bob, ‘The knowledge economy as a state project’, in M. Böss et al. (eds), The Nation-State in Transformation (Santa Barbara: Aarhus University Press, 2010), pp. 110–129 Google Scholar .

16 Fougner, ‘The state, international competitiveness and neoliberal globalisation’.

17 Godin, Benoît, ‘The knowledge-based economy: Conceptual framework or buzzword?’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (2006), pp. 17–30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

18 Jessop, Bob, ‘The state and the contradictions of the knowledge-driven economy’, in John Bryson et al. (eds), Knowledge, Space, Economy (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 63–78 Google Scholar ; Brand et al., Conflicts in Environmental Regulation.

19 Hobson, John, The Wealth of States: A Comparative Sociology of International Economic and Political Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar .

20 Ibid; Jessop, ‘The state and the contradictions of the knowledge-driven economy’.

21 Cumings, Bruce, ‘Webs with no spiders, spiders with no webs: the genealogy of the developmental state’, in Meredith Woo-Cumings (ed.), The Developmental State (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999)Google Scholar .

22 Cerny, ‘Paradoxes of the competition state’; Jessop, The Future of the Capitalist State.

23 Fougner, ‘The state, international competitiveness and neoliberal globalisation’; Palan and Abbott, State Strategies.

24 Harvey, David, A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar .

25 Harris, John, Industrial Espionage and Technology Transfer (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998)Google Scholar ; Borrás, Suzanne, ‘Innovation policy and institutional competitiveness’, in P. Nedergaard and J. L. Campbell (eds), Institutions and Politics (Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2008), pp. 53–72 Google Scholar .

26 Hobson, The Wealth of States; Cumings, ‘Webs with no spiders’.

27 Jessop, ‘Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state?’.

28 Chesnais, ‘Technological competitiveness considered as a form of structural competitiveness’.

29 Jessop, Bob, ‘What follows Fordism?’, in R. M. Albritton et al. (eds), Phases of Capitalist Development: Booms, Crises and Globalizations (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 282–299 Google Scholar .

30 Brand, Ulrich and Görg, Christoph et al., Conflicts in Environmental Regulation and the Internationalisation of the State: Contested Terrains (London: Routledge, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Jessop, ‘What follows Fordism?’.

31 Morris-Suzuki, Tessa, ‘Capitalism in the computer age’, New Left Review, 160 (1986), pp. 81–91 Google Scholar .

32 Smith, Neil, ‘Nature as accumulation strategy’, Socialist Register, 43 (2007), pp. 1–21 Google Scholar (p. 13).

33 Morris-Suzuki, ‘Capitalism in the computer age’; Jessop, Bob, ‘Knowledge as fictitious commodity’, in Ayse Bugra (ed.), Reading Polanyi for the 21 st Century (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. 115–134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

34 Boyle, James, ‘The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (2003), pp. 33–74 Google Scholar .

35 World Bank, ‘World Development Indicators Database’, available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.GSR.ROYL.CD; Bryan, D. et al., ‘Capital unchained: Finance, intangible assets and the double life of capital’, Review of International Political Economy, 24:1 (2017), pp. 56–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 61).

36 Coriat, Benjamin and Schméder, Geneviève, ‘Post-Fordism in a more globalized capitalism’, in P. Coriat, P. Petit, and G. Schméder (eds), The Hardship of Nations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006), pp. 311–340 Google Scholar .

37 See, for instance, Brand et al., Conflicts in Environmental Regulation.

38 Pickel, Andreas, ‘Explaining, and explaining with, economic nationalism’, Nations and Nationalism, 9 (2003), pp. 105–127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

39 Cederlöf, Gunnel and Sivaramakrishnan, K., Ecological Nationalisms: Nature, Livelihoods, and Identities in South Asia (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2006)Google Scholar .

40 Alamgir, Jalal, India’s Open-Economy Policy: Globalism, Rivalry, Continuity (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar ; Krishna, V. V., ‘India’, in Mario Scerri and Helena M. M. Lastres (eds), BRICS National Systems of Innovation: the Role of the State (New Delhi: Routledge, 2013), pp. 138–187 Google Scholar .

41 Schwartzman, Simon, Science and Technology Policy in Brazil: A New Policy for a Global World (Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 1995)Google Scholar .

42 On Brazil as the ‘land of the future’ see, among others, Carvalho, José M., ‘Dreams come untrue’, Daedalus, 129:2 (2000), pp. 57–82 Google Scholar .

43 Rodriguez, Alberto, Knowledge and Innovation for Competitiveness in Brazil (Washington: World Bank Publications, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Panagariya, Arvind, ‘India in the 1980s and the 1990s: a triumph of reforms’, in Wanda Tseng and David Cowen (eds), India’s and China’s Recent Experience with Reform and Growth (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 170–200 Google Scholar .

44 For Brazil, for instance, see Feijo, Carmen A. and Lamonica, Marcos T., ‘The importance of the manufacturing sector for Brazilian economic development’, CEPAL Review, 102 (2010), pp. 7–26 Google Scholar ; for India, see Krishna, ‘India’.

45 Harvey, A Brief History of Neoliberalism.

46 BNDES is Brazil’s influential National Economic and Social Development Bank.

47 IEDI is the Institute of Studies for Industrial Development, a think tank based in São Paolo with strong links to the main national manufacturing firms. Marques, Marília B., ‘Gestão, planejamento e avaliação de políticas de ciência e tecnologia: hora de rever?’, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 4:2 (1999), pp. 383–392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

48 Cassiolato, José E. and Schmitz, Hubert (eds), Hi-Tech for Industrial Development: Lessons from the Brazilian Experience (London: Routledge, 1992)Google Scholar ; Marques, ‘Ciência e tecnologia’.

49 Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, ‘O Brasil a caminho da sociedade do conhecimento’, in João P. Velloso (ed.), O Brasil e a Economia do Conhecimento (Rio de Janeiro: J. Olympio, 2002)Google Scholar .

50 Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Discurso do presidente da República na cerimônia de apresentação do ‘Avança Brasil’: Plano Plurianual 2000/2003 e do Orçamento da União para o ano 2000, Palácio do Planalto, Brasília; FHC in 2003, in Biehl, João, ‘The activist state: Global pharmaceuticals, AIDS and citizenship in Brazil’, Social Text, 22:3 (2004), pp. 105–132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 114).

51 PITCE, Diretrizes de Política Industrial, Tecnológica e de Comércio Exterior, 26 de Novembro de 2003 (The Industrial, Technological and Foreign Trade Policy of 2003), Government of Brazil.

52 PITCE, p. 4, my translation.

53 da Silva, ‘Presidential Address’, my translation.

54 Carvalho, ‘Dreams come untrue’.

55 Bound, Kirsten, Brazil: The Natural Knowledge Economy (London: Demos, 2008)Google Scholar .

56 Nayar, Baldev R., ‘The limits of economic nationalism in India’, Asian Survey, 40:5 (2000), pp. 792–815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Kohli, Atul, ‘Politics of economic growth in India: Part I & II’, Economic and Political Weekly, 6 (2006), pp. 1361–1370 Google Scholar .

57 Nayar, ‘The limits of economic nationalism in India’; Mukherji, Rahul, ‘Ideas, interests and the tipping point: Economic change in India’, Review of International Political Economy, 20:2 (2012), pp. 363–389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

58 Chibber, Vivek, ‘Organized interests, development strategies, and social policies’, in R. Nagaraj (ed.), Growth, Inequality, and Social Policy in India (London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2012), pp. 168–192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

59 This included L. K. Jha, Abid Hussain, Shankar Acharya, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, and the long-serving Manmohan Singh, many of whom had been involved in the reforms of the 1980s.

60 Mukherji, ‘Ideas, interests and the tipping point’; Kohli, ‘Politics of economic growth in India’; Nayar, ‘The limits of economic nationalism in India’.

61 Kohli, ‘Politics of economic growth in India’; Chibber, ‘Organized interests, development strategies, and social policies’; Mukherji, ‘Ideas, interests and the tipping point’.

62 Quoted in Alamgir, India’s Open-Economy Policy, p. 81.

63 Swadeshi, roughly translated as ‘of one’s own country’ retains various interpretations most of which insist upon the value of the local over the remote.

64 Yashwant Sinha, finance minister in 1998, quoted in Nayar, ‘The limits of economic nationalism in India’, p. 807.

65 Chaturvedi, quoted in Drahos, Peter, The Global Governance of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2010), p. 213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

66 Rajan, Kaushik S., Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Alamgir, India’s Open-Economy Policy.

67 Krishna, ‘India’; Government of India, Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (New Delhi: Ministry of Science and Technology, 2013).

68 Cassiolato and Schmitz, Hi-Tech for Industrial Development; Joseph, K. J. and Abrol, Dinesh, ‘Science, technology and innovation policies in India’, in José E. Cassiolato and Virginia Vitorino (eds), BRICS and Development Alternatives: Innovation Systems and Policies (London: Anthem Press, 2009), pp. 101–131 Google Scholar .

69 Berman, Elizabeth, ‘Not just neoliberalism: Economization in US science and technology policy’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 39:3 (2016), pp. 397–431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

70 Berman, ‘Not just neoliberalism’.

71 See, for instance, the 1977 National Science Foundation SBIR programme; see Weiss, America Inc..

72 Berman, ‘Not just neoliberalism’.

73 Coriat, Petit, and Schméder (eds), The Hardship of Nations.

74 Joseph and Abrol, ‘Science, technology and innovation policies in India’; Krishna, ‘India’.

75 Quoted in Drahos, The Global Governance of Knowledge, p. 220.

76 Rajan, Biocapital.

77 Valbona Muzaka, ‘The state as facilitator and legitimator of “new” capital accumulation: the case of patent reform in India’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 20:2 (2017), pp. 434–57.

78 Ibid.

79 Among developing countries, India, Brazil, and China stand out for enjoying the ISA status under the Patent Cooperation Treaty; see Drahos, The Global Governance of Knowledge.

80 Rajan, Biocapital.

81 Abrol, Dinesh, ‘Where is India’s innovation policy headed?’, The Social Scientist, 41:3–4 (2013), pp. 65–80 Google Scholar .

82 Muzaka, ‘The state as facilitator and legitimator of “new” capital accumulation', pp. 434–57.

83 See, for example, the Science and Technology Entrepreneurship Parks (1990s), Small Business Innovation Research Initiative (2005), and Funds for Accelerating Start-Ups in Technology (2008).

84 Abrol, ‘Where is India’s innovation policy headed?’, p. 66.

85 Krishna, ‘India’; Abrol, ‘Where is India’s innovation policy headed?’.

86 Joseph and Abrol, ‘Science, technology and innovation policies in India’, p. 113.

87 Cassiolato, José E. et al., ‘Transnational corporations and the Brazilian national system of innovation’, in José E. Cassiolato et al. (eds), Transnational Corporations and Local Innovation (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014), pp. 68–132 Google Scholar .

88 Coutinho, Luciano G., ‘Macroeconomic regimes and business strategies’, in José Cassiolato et al. (eds), System of Innovation and Development: Evidence from Brazil (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003)Google Scholar .

89 Cassiolato et al. (eds), Transnational Corporations, p. 80.

90 José G. Palma, Brazil’s Recent Growth, UNCTAD and South Centre Discussion Paper No. 3 (Geneva: UNCTAD, 2012).

91 Schwartzman, Science and Technology.

92 FINEP, the Funding Authority for Studies and Projects, created in 1967 with the goal of financing modernisation and industrialisation projects.

93 Schwartzman, Science and Technology.

94 Embrapa, the Brazilian Corporation for Farming and Livestock Research, was created in 1973 to organise and expand public research on agriculture that until then had been decentralised.

95 Filomeno, Felipe Monsanto and Intellectual Property in South America (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

96 See Lei nº 9.279 of 1996, available at: https://presrepublica.jusbrasil.com.br/legislacao/91774/codigo-de-propriedade-industrial-lei-9279-96; for an analysis, see Valbona Muzaka, ‘Interrupted constructions: the Brazilian health-industrial complex in historical perspective’, Latin American Perspectives, Online First (8 January 2018), available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X17750149.

97 Cassiolato et al. (eds), Transnational Corporations, p. 97.

98 Data from the INPI Badepi version 1.1 database, collected, and analysed by Dr Leonardo Costa Ribeiro of INMETRO, on file with author.

99 Filomeno, Monsanto.