Article contents
Globalisation and resistance: struggles over common sense in the global political economy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 October 2010
Abstract
This article develops and applies the role of ‘common sense’ in a Gramscian theory of transnational counter-hegemony. Building on recent interpretative literature on the alter-globalisation movement, it applies this framework to then evaluate empirically the impact of the alter-globalisation movement on the realm of global ‘common sense’ understandings of the world in the period 2002 to 2007. It shows that there is little empirical support for the notion that the alter-globalisation movement effected a legitimation crisis for neo-liberalism as a hegemonic project on a global scale. Instead, a more ambivalent and potentially reactionary situation amongst collectively held norms is revealed. This indicates the shortcomings of the alter-globalisation movement as a coalition of social forces capable of mounting an ideological attack on neo-liberalism and forging a new intellectual-moral bloc.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British International Studies Association 2010
References
1 For the politics and tribulations of naming and ‘school’ formation, see Morton, Adam David, ‘The Sociology of Theorising and Neo-Gramscian Perspectives: The Problems of “School” Formation in IPE’, in Bieler, Andreas and Morton, Adam David (eds), Social Forces in the Making of the New Europe (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 25–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Gill, Stephen, ‘Gramsci and Global Politics: Towards a Post-Hegemonic Research Agenda’, in Gill, Stephen (ed.), Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; and Cox, Robert, The Political Economy of a Plural World, with Schechter, Michael (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 26–29Google Scholar .
2 Colás, Alejandro, International Civil Society (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002), p. 16Google Scholar .
3 Drainville, André, Contesting Globalization (London: Routledge, 2004), p. 29Google Scholar .
4 Hobson, John M., ‘Is Critical Theory Always For the White West and For Western Imperialism? Beyond Westphilian [sic] Towards a post-Racist Critical IR’, Review of International Studies, 33 (2007), pp. 91–116, at p. 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; see also, Strange, Gerard, ‘Globalisation, Regionalism and Labour Interests in the New International Political Economy’, New Political Economy, 7:3 (2002), pp. 343–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
5 Gill, Stephen and Law, David, ‘Global Hegemony and Structural Power of Capital’, in Gill, Stephen (ed.), Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 93–124, at p. 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Rupert, Mark, Producing Hegemony (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 207Google Scholar ; Bieler, Andreas and Morton, Adam David, ‘A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations’, Capital and Class, 82 (2004), pp. 85–113, at p. 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Bieler, Andreas, ‘Class Struggle Over the EU Model of Capitalism’, in Bieler, Andreas and Morton, Adam David (eds), Images of Gramsci (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 119–132, at p. 128Google Scholar .
6 Cox, , Political Economy of a Plural World, p. 42Google Scholar .
7 Often referred to as the ‘anti-globalisation movement’, I use here an appellation that seems to have taken favour in recent years and doesn't cause anyone serious offence.
8 Rupert, Mark, Ideologies of Globalization: Contending visions of a New World Order (London: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar ; Gill, Stephen, ‘Toward a Postmodern Prince? The Battle in Seattle as a Moment in the New Politics of Globalisation’, Millennium, 29:1 (2000), pp. 131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Morton, Adam David, ‘“La Resurreccion del Maiz”: Globalisation, Resistance and the Zapatistas’ Millennium, 31:1 (2002), pp. 27–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Morton, Adam David, ‘Structural Change and Neoliberalism in Mexico: “Passive Revolution” in the Global Political Economy’, Third World Quarterly, 24:4 (2003), pp. 631–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
9 Bieler, Andreas and Morton, Adam David, ‘Another Europe is Possible? Labour and Social Movements at the European Social Forum’, Globalizations, 1:2 (2004), pp. 305–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Bieler, Andreas and Morton, Adam David, ‘Class Formation, Resistance and the Transnational’, in Bieler, Andreas et al. , Global Restructuring: State, Capital and Labour (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2006), pp. 196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
10 Birchfield, Vicki and Freyberg-Inan, Annette, ‘Constructing Opposition in the Age of Globalization: The Potential of ATTAC’, Globalizations, 1:2 (2004), pp. 278–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Birchfield, Vicki and Freyberg-Inan, Annette, ‘Organic Intellectuals and Counter-Hegemonic Politics in the Age of Globalisation’, in Eschle, Catherine and Maiguashca, Bice (eds), Critical Theories, International Relations and ‘the Anti-Globalisation Movement’ (London: Routledge, 2005), pp. 154–173Google Scholar .
11 Rupert, Mark, ‘In the Belly of the Beast: Resisting Globalisation and War in a Neo-Imperial Moment’, in Eschle, Catherine and Maiguashca, Bice (eds), Critical Theories, International Relations and ‘the Anti-Globalisation Movement’ (London: Routledge, 2005), pp. 36–52Google Scholar .
12 Rupert, Mark, ‘Anticapitalist Convergence? Anarchism, Socialism, and the Global Justice Movement’, in Steger, Manfred B. (ed.), Rethinking Globalism (Lanham, USA: Rowman and Littlefield, 2004), pp. 121–135Google Scholar .
13 Garza, Rosalba Icaza, ‘To Be and Not to Be: The Question of Transborder Civic Activism and Regionalization in Mexico. A Critical Account of Neo-Gramscian Perspectives’, Globalizations, 3:4 (2006), pp. 485–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
14 Gibson, John, ‘The Myth of the Multitude: The Endogenous Demise of Alter-Globalist Politics’, Global Society, 22:2 (2008), pp. 253–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Stephen, Matthew, ‘Alter-Globalism as Counter-Hegemony: Evaluating the “postmodern Prince”’, Globalizations, 6:4 (2009), pp. 483–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
15 Rupert, ‘Belly of the Beast’, pp. 36–7, 50–1. See also his contrition of earlier excitement in ‘Reflections on Some Lessons Learned from a Decade of Globalisation Studies’, New Political Economy, 10:4 (2005), pp. 457–458 at pp. 472–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
16 Gill, ‘Postmodern Prince’, p. 137; ‘Constitutionalizing Inequality’, p. 64.
17 Bieler and Morton, ‘Another Europe Is Possible’, pp. 320–1, at p. 305.
18 Shilliam, Robbie, ‘Hegemony and the Unfashionable Problematic of “Primitive Accumulation”’, Millennium, 32:1 (2004), pp. 59–88 at p. 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
19 Cox, Robert, ‘Beyond Empire and Terror: Critical Reflections on the Political Economy of World Order’, New Political Economy, 9:3 (2004), pp. 307–323 at pp. 309, 314–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
20 Gill, Stephen, ‘Constitutionalizing Inequality and the Clash of Globalizations’, International Studies Review, 4:3 (2002), pp. 47–65 at p. 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
21 Gill, ‘Postmodern Prince?’, p. 140.
22 Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio, Multitude (New York: Penguin, 2004), p. 322Google Scholar .
23 Bull, Malcolm, ‘The Limits of the Multitude’, New Left Review, 35 (2005), pp. 19–39 at pp. 19–20Google Scholar .
24 Bullard, Nicolla, ‘Where is the Movement Moving?’, Development, 48:2 (2005), pp. 4–7 at p. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
25 Editors, , ‘Introduction’, New Left Review, 9 (2001), pp. 81–89 at p. 88Google Scholar .
26 Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks (New York: International Publishers, 1971), pp. 332–335, 395, 419–425Google Scholar .
27 Cox, Robert, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, [1981] in Cox, Robert with Sinclair, Timothy, Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 85–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Cox, Robert, ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: an Essay in Method’, [1983] in Cox, and Sinclair, , Approaches to World Order, pp. 124–143Google Scholar ; Gill, ‘Postmodern Prince?’; Gill and Law, ‘Global Hegemony’, p. 114; Murphy, Craig N., ‘Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci’, Review of International Studies, 24 (1998), pp. 417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Rupert, , ‘(Re-)Engaging Gramsci: A Response to Germain and Kenny’, Review of International Studies, 24 (1998), pp. 427–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Rupert, Mark, ‘Globalising Common Sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (Re-)Vision of the Politics of Governance/Resistance’, Review of International Studies, 29 (2003), pp. 181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
28 Partial exceptions include Mittelman, James H. and Chin, Christine B. N., ‘Conceptualising Resistance to Globalization’, [2000] in Amoore, Louise (ed.), The Global Resistance Reader (London: Routledge, 2005), pp. 17–27Google Scholar ; Morton, ‘La Resurreccion’; Rupert, Mark, Producing Hegemony (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 25–31Google Scholar . By comparison, such a systematic attempt has been made in a Gramscian study of the rise of political Islamist organisations in the Middle East: Butko, Thomas J., ‘Revelation or Revolution: A Gramscian Approach to the Rise of Political Islam’, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 31:1 (2004), pp. 41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
29 Compare Cox, Robert, Production, Power and World Order (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987), p. 299Google Scholar ; Gill, Stephen, Power and Resistance in the New World Order (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2003), pp. 60, 116–120Google Scholar ; Payne, Anthony, The Global Politics of Unequal Development (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2005), pp. 26–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
30 Cox, ‘Social Forces’.
31 Cox, Robert, ‘Civil Society at the Turn of the New Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order’, in Amoore, (ed.), Global Resistance Reader, pp. 103–124 at p. 109Google Scholar .
32 Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, pp. 229–235Google Scholar . This is often misread as a binary opposition between two alternative strategies of social contestation.
33 Ibid., p. 238. ‘Heartland’ and ‘contender state’ terminology is from van der Pijl, Kees, Global Rivalries from the Cold War to Iraq (London: Pluto, 2006)Google Scholar .
34 Ibid., p. 235.
35 Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, p. 419Google Scholar .
36 Rupert, ‘Globalising Common Sense’, p. 185.
37 Gramsci, Antonio, Quaderni del Carcere, 4 vols., Gerratana, Valentino (ed.), (Torino: Einaudi, 1975), p. 1319Google Scholar ; as quoted in Germino, Dante, Antonio Gramsci: Architect of a New Politics (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1990), pp. 236–237Google Scholar .
38 Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, pp. 323–324, 419–425Google Scholar .
39 Ibid., pp. 376–7. It is with this in mind that Gramsci reiterated Marx's point in the introduction to a Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right that ‘popular beliefs’ can assume the same energy as ‘material forces’. See also p. 404.
40 Hall, Stuart, ‘The Problem of Ideology – Marxism without Guarantees’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10:2 (1986), pp. 28–44 at p. 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar as cited in Bieler, Andreas and Morton, Adam David, ‘The Deficits of Discourse in IPE: Turning Base Metal into Gold?’, International Studies Quarterly, 52 (2008), pp. 103–128 at p. 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
41 Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, p. 239Google Scholar .
42 Ibid., p. 162.
43 Cox, , Production, Power, and World Order, p. 358Google Scholar .
44 As Gramsci wrote, ‘[…] though hegemony is ethico-political, it must also be economic, must necessarily be based on the decisive function exercised by the leading group in the decisive nucleus of economic activity’. Prison Notebooks, p. 161.
45 Sklair, Leslie, The Transnational Capitalist Class (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001)Google Scholar . In contrast to the more excitable literature on the transnational capitalist class, I see this more as an emerging tendency than as a fait accompli, which will fracture and weaken with the appearance of more hostile inter-state relations.
46 Rupert, Mark, ‘Globalising Common sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (re-)vision of the politics of governance/resistance’, Review of International Studies, 29 (2003), pp. 181–198 at p. 190CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
47 ‘[…] the material forces would be inconceivable historically without [ideological] form and the ideologies would be individual fancies without the material forces’. Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, p. 377Google Scholar .
48 Gill, ‘Epistemology, Ontology and the “Italian School”’, p. 26.
49 Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, p. 420Google Scholar .
50 van der Pijl, , Transnational Relations, pp. 133–134Google Scholar .
51 Stephen, ‘Alter-Globalism as Counter-Hegemony’.
52 Ibid., p. 424.
53 Ibid., p. 344.
54 Ibid., p. 395.
55 Birchfield, Vicki, ‘Contesting the Hegemony of Market Ideology: Gramsci's “Good Sense” and Polanyi's “Double Movement”’, Review of International Political Economy, 6:1 (1999), pp. 27–54 at p. 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
56 Gramsci, , Quaderni, p. 1050Google Scholar ; as quoted in Augelli, and Murphy, , America's Quest, p. 125Google Scholar .
57 van der Pijl, , Transnational Relations, p. 11Google Scholar .
58 Bleiker, Roland, ‘Seattle and the Struggle for a Global Democratic Ethos’, in Eschle, and Maiguashca, (eds), Critical Theories, IR and ‘the Anti-Globalisation Movement’, pp. 195–211 at p. 202Google Scholar .
59 Nineham, Chris, ‘Anti-Capitalism, Social Forums and the Return of Politics’, International Socialism, 109 (2006), pp. 91–108 at p. 91Google Scholar .
60 Robert Cox seems to be of this view. He writes that ‘Collective images are not aggregations of fragmented opinions of individuals such as are compiled through surveys; they are coherent mental types expressive of the world views of specific groups such as may be reconstructed through the work of historians and sociologists […]’. Cox, ‘Social Forces’, p. 153, fn. 2.
61 Adorno, Theodor and Frenkel-Brunswik, Else and Levinson, Daniel and Sanford, Nevitt, The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper and Row, 1950)Google Scholar .
62 Held, David, Introduction to Critical Theory (London: Hutchinson, 1980), p. 165Google Scholar .
63 Nel, Philip, ‘The Foreign Policy Beliefs of South Africans: A First Cut’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 17:1 (1999), pp. 123–146 at p. 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
64 This is how I would reconcile this approach with Cox's point in note 60 (above).
65 Pew Global Attitudes Project, World Publics Welcome Global Trade – But Not Immigration (Washington: Pew Research Centre, 2007), p. 9Google Scholar . Available at: {http://pewglobal.org/display.php?ReportID=258}, accessed on 26 May 2008.
66 Pew Global Attitudes Project, Conflicting Views in a Divided World: 2006 (Washington: Pew Research Centre, 2006), p. iiiGoogle Scholar . Available at: {http://pewglobal.org}, accessed on 26 May 2008.
67 Pew Global Attitudes Project, Views of a Changing World: 2003 (Washington: Pew Research Centre, 2003)Google Scholar . Available at: {http://pewglobal.org}, accessed on 26 May 2008.
68 Pew, World Publics Welcome Global Trade – But Not Immigration.
69 Pew, , Conflicting Views in a Divided World: 2006, p. 95Google Scholar ; Pew, , World Publics Welcome Global Trade – But Not Immigration, p. 80Google Scholar .
70 Pew, , Views of a Changing World: 2003, pp. 119–120Google Scholar .
71 Pew, , World Publics Welcome Global Trade – But Not Immigration, pp. 79–87Google Scholar .
72 Gramsci, Prison Notebooks, n. 80.
73 Epstein, Barbara, ‘Notes on the Antiwar Movement’, Monthly Review, 55:3 (2003), pp. 109–116 at p. 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Karin Simonson, ‘The Anti-war Movement: Waging Peace on the Brink of War’ (Geneva: Centre for Applied Studies in International Negotiations: 2003). Available at:{http://www.casin.ch/web/pdf/The%20Anti-War%20Movement.pdf}, accessed on 26 May 2008.
74 Pew, , Views of a Changing World: 2003, p. 1Google Scholar .
75 Ibid., p. 2.
76 Ibid., p. 3.
77 BBC World Service Poll, World View of US Role Goes from Bad to Worse. Available at: {www.bbc.com}, accessed on 26 May 2008.
78 Jackson, Richard, ‘Language, Policy and the Construction of a Torture Culture in the War on Terror’, Review of International Studies, 33 (2007), pp. 353–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
79 As reported by Bieler and Morton, ‘Another Europe Is Possible?’, p. 320.
80 Pew, , Views of a Changing World: 2003, p. 1Google Scholar .
81 Ibid., p. 11.
82 Ibid., p. 98.
83 Ibid., p. 98–9.
84 Cox's term nébuleuse was re-applied to NGOs by Drainville, in Contesting Globalization, p. 118Google Scholar .
85 Pew, , Views of a Changing World: 2003, p. 100Google Scholar .
86 Ibid.
87 Ibid.
88 Ibid. The Bolivian poll was undertaken at the same time as a private consortium spearheaded by the US corporation Bechtel tendered to acquire the rights to the municipal water supply (and potentially threatening the right of water collection by private citizens) in Cochabamba, which the Pew researchers rightly point out in their report.
89 Ibid., p. 99.
90 Pew, , World Publics Welcome Global Trade – But Not Immigration, p. 14Google Scholar .
91 Ibid., p. 15.
92 Ibid., p. 2.
93 Ibid., p. 1.
94 Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, pp. 324, 423Google Scholar .
95 Ibid., p. 333; Femia, Joseph, ‘Gramsci's Patrimony’, British Journal of Political Science, 13:3 (1983), pp. 327–364 at p. 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Mann, Michael, Consciousness and Action Among the Western Working Class (London: Macmillan, 1973), p. 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Held, David, Introduction to Critical Theory (London: Hutchinson, 1980), p. 367Google Scholar ; van der Pijl, Kees, Transnational Classes and International Relations (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 46–48Google Scholar ; Rupert, Mark, Ideologies of Globalization (London and New York: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar ; Morton, Adam David, ‘The Antiglobalization Movement: Juggernaut or Jalopy?’, in Veltmeyer, Henry (ed.), Globalization and Antiglobalization: Dynamics of change in the New World Order (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 155–168 at p. 163Google Scholar ; Mittelman and Chin, ‘Conceptualizing Resistance’, p. 19.
96 Pew, , World Publics Welcome Global Trade – But Not Immigration, p. 1Google Scholar .
97 Ibid.
98 Hayden, Patrick and el-Ojeili, Chamsy, Critical Theories of Globalization (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2006), pp. 125–126Google Scholar .
99 Anderson, Perry, ‘Renewals’, New Left Review, 1 (2000), pp. 5–24 at 19Google Scholar .
100 Urbinati, Nadia, ‘From the Periphery of Modernity: Antonio Gramsci's Theory of Subordination and Hegemony’, Political Theory, 26:3 (1998), pp. 370–391 at p. 370CrossRefGoogle Scholar .
101 Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, p. 157Google Scholar .
102 Pew, , Views of a Changing World: 2003, p. 8Google Scholar .
103 Ibid.
104 Pew Global Attitudes Project, Among Wealthy Nations … America Stands Alone in its Embrace of Religion (Washington: Pew Research Centre, 2002), p. 1Google Scholar . Available at: {http://pewglobal.org}, accessed on 26 May 2008.
105 Pew, , World Publics Welcome Global Trade – But Not Immigration, p. 44Google Scholar .
106 Cox, ‘Beyond Empire and Terror’, p. 316.
107 Gramsci touched on some of the themes here, though with differing conclusions, in ‘American and European Civilisation’. Cf. Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, pp. 316–318Google Scholar .
108 Pew, , Views of a Changing World: 2003, p. 79Google Scholar .
109 Ibid., p. 85.
110 Pew Global Attitudes Project, Global Opinion Trends 2002–2007: A Rising Tide Lifts Mood in the Developing World (Washington: Pew Research Centre, 2007), p. 4Google Scholar . Available at: {http://pewglobal.org}, accessed on 26 May 2008.
111 Pew, , Views of a Changing World: 2003, p. 13Google Scholar .
112 Ibid., p. 14.
113 Ibid., p. 10.
114 Ibid.
115 Ibid., p. 79.
116 Pew, , World Publics Welcome Global Trade – But Not Immigration, p. 5Google Scholar .
117 Rupert, ‘Globalising Common Sense’, p. 186.
118 Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, p. 333Google Scholar .
119 Bieler and Morton, ‘Another Europe Is Possible’, p. 319.
120 Overbeek, Henk, ‘Globalization and Britain's Decline’, in English, Richard and Kenny, Michael (eds), Rethinking British Decline (London: Palgrave, 1999), p. 249Google Scholar .
121 Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, p. 235Google Scholar .
122 Ibid., p. 421.
- 9
- Cited by