Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:40:35.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The causal power of securitisation: an inquiry into the explanatory status of securitisation theory illustrated by the case of Somali piracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Gilberto Carvalho Oliveira
Gilberto Carvalho Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
*
*Correspondence to: Gilberto Carvalho Oliveira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Defesa e Gestão Estratégica Internacional, Faculdade de Letras, Bloco C, 2o andar/ Cidade Universitária – Rio de Janeiro, 21941917, RJ – Brasil. Author’s email address: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article joins the nascent debate on the causal status of securitisation theory. Relying on critical realist’s efforts to deepen and broaden the concept of cause – defined as ‘causal complex’ – and its insights to integrate discourse and constitutive relations into a non-positivist framework for causal explanation, the article aims to explore the explanatory status of securitisation theory, without downgrading its discursive core. To illustrate this argument, the article uses the securitisation of Somali piracy as an example of how the causal analysis of securitisation can contribute to explain some of the dynamics involved in security governance. From this perspective, securitisation works within a broader empirical framework of security, significantly implicated in causal relations, going beyond the Copenhagen School’s conception of securitisation as a non-causal constitutive theory merely defined as a formal framework for analysis. The article discusses, finally, the relevance and implications of introducing causal analysis in the study of securitisation.

Keywords

Causal ComplexConstitution vs CausationGovernanceSomali PiracySecuritisation
Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 504 - 525
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wæver, Ole, ‘Securitization and desecuritization’, in Ronnie D. Lipschutz (ed.), On Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), pp. 46–86 Google Scholar; Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole, and Wilde, Jaap De, Security: A New Framework for Analysis (London: Lynne Rienner, 1998)Google Scholar.

2 Ole Wæver, ‘Securitization: Taking Stock of a Research Programme in Security Studies’, communication presented at BISA Roundtable (unpublished manuscript, 2003), p. 9, emphasis in original. See also Buzan, Wæver, and De Wilde, Security, pp. 24–6.

3 Wæver, ‘Securitization’, p. 10.

4 Wæver, ‘Securitization and desecuritization’, p. 55.

5 Buzan, Wæver, and De Wilde, Security, pp. 29–31.

6 Wæver, Ole, ‘Politics, security, theory’, Security Dialogue, 42:4–5 (2011), p. 476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Ibid.

8 Buzan, Wæver, and De Wilde, Security, pp. 29–31.

9 Wæver, ‘Politics, security, theory’, p. 468.

10 Guzzini, Stefano, ‘Securitization as a causal mechanism’, Security Dialogue, 42:4–5 (2011), pp. 329–341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Balzacq (ed.), Securitization Theory, pp. 22–7.

11 Jackson, Patrick T., The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011), p. 76 Google Scholar.

12 Kurki, Milja, Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), p. 11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve, Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Oxford: Claredon Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

14 Kurki, Milja, ‘Causes of a divided discipline: Rethinking the concept of cause in International Relations theory’, Review of International Studies, 32:2 (2006), p. 189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Wæver, ‘Politics, security, theory’, p. 476.

16 Ibid.

17 Balzacq, Thierry, ‘A theory of securitization: Origins, core assumptions and variants’, in Thierry Balzacq (ed.), Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011), pp. 1–30 Google Scholar.

18 Balzacq, ‘A theory of securitization’, p. 18.

19 Ibid.

20 Ibid., p. 2.

21 Thierry Balzacq, ‘Enquiries into methods’, in Balzacq (ed.), Securitization Theory, pp. 40–52.

22 Balzacq, ‘Enquiries into methods’, p. 47.

23 Guzzini, ‘Securitization as a causal mechanism’, pp. 330–2.

24 Ibid., p. 330.

25 Wæver, ‘Securitization and desecuritization’.

26 Guzzini, ‘Securitization as a causal mechanism’, p. 335.

27 Ibid., p. 335.

28 Estefano Guzzini, ‘A Dual History of “Securitisation”’, DIIS Working Paper No. 2015–2 (Copenhagen, 2015), p. 14.

29 Guzzini, ‘Securitization as a causal mechanism’, p. 335.

30 Wæver, ‘Politics, security, theory’, p. 476.

31 Elster in Guzzini, ‘Securitization as a causal mechanism’, p. 332.

32 Guzzini, ‘Securitization as a causal mechanism’, p. 337.

33 Ibid.

34 Ibid.

35 Ibid., p. 338.

36 Epstein, Charlotte, The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2008), p. 8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Banta, Benjamin, ‘Analysing discourse as a causal mechanism’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:2 (2012), p. 382 Google Scholar.

38 Derrida, Jacques, Of Grammatology (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), p. 158 Google Scholar.

39 Hansen, Lene, Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 25–26 Google Scholar.

40 Campbell, David, Writing Security, United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992), p. 4 Google Scholar.

41 Wæver, ‘Securitization’, p. 32.

42 Kurki, ‘Causes of a divided discipline’, pp. 197–9.

43 Wight, Colin, Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Ibid., p. 28.

45 Ibid.

46 Bhaskar, Roy, A Realist Theory of Science (London: Routledge, 2008), p. 5 Google Scholar.

47 Wight, Agents, Structures and International Relations, p. 28.

48 Bhaskar, A Realist Theory of Science, p. 6.

49 Wight, Agents, Structures and International Relations, p. 29.

50 Ibid., p. 278, emphasis in original.

51 I thank one of the anonymous reviewers for this important insight.

52 Wight, Agents, Structures and International Relations, p. 29.

53 Jackson, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations, p. 74.

54 Patomaki, Heikki and Wight, Colin, ‘After postpositivism? The promises of critical realism’, International Studies Quarterly, 44:2 (2000), p. 223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Jackson, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations, p. 74.

56 Kurki, ‘Causes of a divided discipline’, p. 202.

57 Wendt, Alexander, ‘On constitution and causation in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 24:5 (1999), pp. 101–118; Colin Wight, ‘Theorizing the mechanisms of conceptual and semiotic space’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34:2 (2004), pp. 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58 Wight, ‘Theorizing the mechanisms’, p. 288.

59 George, Alexander and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005), pp. 132–133 Google Scholar.

60 Guzzini, ‘Securitization as a causal mechanism’, p. 332.

61 King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp. 85–87 Google Scholar.

62 Jackson, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations, p. 109.

63 Kurki, Causation in International Relations, p. 233.

64 Patomaki and Wight, ‘After postpositivism?’.

65 Kurki, Causation in International Relations, p. 10.

66 Kurki, ‘Causes of a divided discipline’, pp. 206–8.

67 Ibid., p. 209.

68 Ibid., p. 212.

69 Ibid.

70 The UN specialised agency for maritime affairs.

71 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), ‘United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’ (New York: United Nations, 1982), Art. 101.

72 A.1025/26 2010, ‘Code of Practice for the Investigation of Crimes of Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships’ (London: International Maritime Organization, 2010), Annex, par 2.2.

73 UNCLOS, Arts 105–7.

74 International Maritime Bureau (IMB), ‘Piracy Report – 1 January–31 December 1999’ (Barking: ICC International Maritime Bureau), p. 2.

75 Mak, J. N., ‘Securitizing piracy in Southeast Asia: Malaysia, the International Maritime Bureau and Singapore’, in Mely Caballero-Anthony, Ralf Emmers, and Amitav Acharya (eds), Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitisation (Hampshire: Ashgate, 2006), p. 72 Google Scholar.

76 Mak, ‘Securitizing piracy in Southeast Asia’, p. 72.

77 IMB, ‘Piracy Report – 1 January–31 December 1992’, p. 2.

78 IMB, ‘Piracy Report – 1 January–31 December 1999’, pp. 12, 24.

79 S/PRST/2005/32, ‘Statement by the President of the Security Council’ (New York: United Nations Security Council, 2005).

80 OMI-WFP, ‘Joint Communiqué: Co-ordinated Action Urged as Piracy Threatens UN Lifeline to Somalia’, IMO Briefing 23, 12 July 2007 (London: International Maritime Organization, 2007).

81 S/RES/1772/2007, ‘Security Council Resolution 1772 (2007)’ (New York: United Nations, 2007), pp. 2, 5; S/PV.5749, ‘Security Council 5749th Meeting Record’ (New York: United Nations, 2007), p. 15; S/PV.5792, ‘Security Council 5792th Meeting Record’ (New York: United Nations, 2007), p. 15; EU, ‘Council Joint Action 2008/851/CFSP’, Official Journal of the European Union, L301 (2008), p. 35; NATO, ‘Press Briefing by the NATO Spokesman, James Appathurai at the Informal meeting of NATO Defence Ministers, Budapest, Hungary’ (2008).

82 Which means that military force was authorised to combat Somali pirates (UNSC resolutions S/RES 1816, 1838, 1846 and 1851, all from 2008).

83 Oliveira, Gilberto C., ‘Securitização da Violência Privada no Mar: A Construção da Pirataria Somali como Problema de Segurança Internacional [Securitisation of Private Violence at Sea: The Construction of Somali Piracy as an International Security Problem]’, in André Barrinha and Maria Raquel Freire (eds), Segurança, Liberdade e Política: Pensar a Escola de Copenhaga em Português [Security, Liberty and Politics: Thinking the Copenhagen School in Portuguese] (Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais, 2015), pp. 129–131 Google Scholar.

84 S/PV.5902, ‘Security Council 5902th Meeting Record’ (New York: United Nations, 2008).

85 This point is extensively analysed by Heinze, Eric A., ‘A “global war on piracy?” International law and the use of force against sea pirates’, in Struett, Carlson, and Nance (eds), Maritime Piracy, pp. 54–55 Google Scholar.

86 ‘Countering Piracy off the Horn of Africa: Partnership & Action Plan’ (Washingto, DC: US National Security Council, 2008), p. 6.

87 Heinze, ‘A “global war on piracy?”’, p. 56.

88 Oliveira, ‘Securitização da Violência Privada no Mar’, p. 130.

89 Ibid., p. 134.

90 Kurki, ‘Causes of a divided discipline’, p. 212.

91 Dreyer Hansen, Allan and Sørensen, Eva, ‘Polity as politics: Studying the shaping and effects of discursive polities’, in David Howarth and Jacob Torfing (eds), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Polity and Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005), p. 93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92 Hansen and Sørensen, ‘Polity as politics’, p. 94.

93 Kraska, James and Wilson, Brian, ‘The global maritime partnership and Somali piracy’, Defence & Security Analysis, 25:3 (2009), pp. 223–234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Bueger, Christian and Stockbruegger, Jan, ‘The practices of counter-piracy governance’, in Struett, Carlson, and Nance (eds), Maritime Piracy and the Construction of Global Governance (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013), p. 101 Google Scholar.

95 Mak, ‘Securitizing piracy in Southeast Asia’.

96 Oliveira, Gilberto C., ‘New wars at sea: a critical transformative approach to the political economy of Somali piracy’, Security Dialogue, 44:1 (2013), p. 13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

97 Bruce Cronin, ‘Conclusion’, in Struett, Carlson, and Nance (eds), Maritime Piracy, p. 196.

98 Oliveira, Gilberto C., ‘Naval peacekeeping and piracy: Time for a critical turn in the debate’, International Peacekeeping, 19:1 (2012), p. 50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

99 ‘NOC 10 – Naval Operations Concept 2010’ (Washington DC: US Navy, US Marine Corps and US Coast Guard, 2010).

100 NATO, ‘Committee Report – Maritime Security: NATO and EU Roles and Co-Ordination’ (Brussels: NATO Parliamentary Assembly, 2010).

101 Bigo, Didier, ‘Internal and external aspects of security’, European Security, 15:4 (2006), pp. 385–404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102 Pitney, John J. Jr and Levin, John-Clark, Private Anti-Piracy Navies: How Warships for Hire are Changing Maritime Security (Plymouth: Lexington Books, 2014)Google Scholar, ch. 3.

103 Using Wæver’s own metaphor (‘Politics, security, theory’, p. 476).

104 Balzacq, ‘A theory of securitization’, p. 1.

105 Balzacq, ‘Enquiries into methods’, p. 49, emphasis in original.

106 See Balzacq, ibid., as an exception.

107 See Balzacq, ‘A theory of securitization’.