Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:37:03.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can conflict-generated diasporas be moderate actors during episodes of contested sovereignty? Lebanese and Albanian diasporas compared

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2010

MARIA KOINOVA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conflict-generated diasporas are considered likely to maintain radical behaviours. This article seeks to explain why and how they nevertheless adopt moderate claims, especially when advocating highly sensitive issues such as state sovereignty. Focusing on groups in the US I investigate the Lebanese diaspora linked to the pro-sovereignty movement in Lebanon (2000–2005) and the Albanian diaspora linked to Kosovo's independence movement (1999–2008). The contentious episodes take place during the original homeland's post-conflict reconstruction. Embedded in the literatures on diasporas, conflicts, and transnational social movements, this article argues that instrumental approach towards the achievement of sovereignty explains why conflict-generated diasporas adopt moderate behaviours. Diasporas hope that by linking their claims to a global political opportunity structure of ‘liberalism’ they ‘play the game’ of the international community interested in promoting the liberal paradigm, and thus expect to obtain its support for the legitimisation of their pro-sovereignty goals. Diaspora entrepreneurs advance their claims in a two-step process. Initially they use frame bridging and frame extension to formulate their existing grievances. Then, an increased responsiveness from their host-state emerges to sustain their initial moderation. While individuals or groups in diaspora circles occasionally issue threats during the contentious episodes, the majority in the diaspora consider moderate politics as their dominant behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 437 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jennifer Brinkerhoff, ‘Digital Diasporas and Conflict Prevention’, Review of International Studies, 32 (2006), pp. 25–47.

2 Yossi Shain, Kinship and Diasporas in International Affairs (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007); Hazel Smith and Paul Stares (eds), Diasporas in Conflict (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2007); Fiona Adamson, ‘Crossing Borders. International Migration and National Security’, International Security, 31 (2006), pp. 165–1999; Fiona Adamson, ‘Global Liberalism Versus Political Islam’, International Studies Review (2005), pp. 547–69; Terrence Lyons, ‘Diasporas and Homeland Conflict’, in Miles Kahler and Barbara Walter (eds), Territoriality and Conflict in an Era of Globalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2006); Sarah Wayland, ‘Ethnonationalist Networks and Transnational Opportunities: The Sri Lankan Tamil Diaspora’, Review of International Studies, 20 (2004), pp. 405–26; Christine Fair, ‘Diaspora Involvement in Insurgencies’, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 11 (2005), pp. 125–56; Daniel Byman et al., Trends for Outside Support in Insurgent Movements (RAND Corporation, 2001); Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, Greed and Grievances in Civil War, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2355 (2000).

3 Thomas Faist, ‘Transnationalization in International Migration’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23 (2000), pp. 189–222; Lyons, ‘Homeland Conflict,’ pp. 112–17.

4 On liberalism as a global political opportunity structure see Adamson, ‘Global Liberalism’, pp. 547–69.

5 Paul Hockenos, Homeland Calling: Exile Patriotism and the Balkan Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003); Yossi Shain, ‘The Role of Diasporas in Conflict Perpetuation and Resolution’, SAIS Review, 22 (2002), pp. 115–44; Fiona Adamson, ‘Mobilizing for the Transformation of Home’, in ‘New Approaches to Migration’, pp. 155–68; Fair, ‘Diaspora Involvement’, pp. 125–56; Brinkerhoff, ‘Digital Diasporas’, pp. 25–47; Byman et al., ‘Trends’, 2001.

6 Shain, ‘Perpetuation’, pp. 115–44.

7 Fair, ‘Diaspora Involvement’, pp. 125–56.

8 Sheffer, ‘Diaspora Politics’, 2003.

9 Denise Natali, ‘Kurdish Interventions in the Iraq War’ in ‘Diasporas in Conflict’, pp. 196–217; Lyons, ‘Homeland Conflict’, pp. 112–7.

10 Feargal Cochrane, ‘Civil Society beyond the State’, GMJ Mediterranean Edition, 2 (2007); Anna Lindley, ‘Remittances in Fragile Settings’, HiCN Working Paper, 27 (March 2007); Khalid Koser, ‘African Diasporas and Post-conflict Reconstruction’, in ‘Diasporas in Conflict’, pp. 239–54.

11 Collier and Hoeffler, ‘Greed’, 2000.

12 Smith and Stares, ‘Diasporas in Conflict’, 2007; Adamson ‘Global Liberalism’, 2005; Wayland ‘Ethnonationalist Networks’, 2005.

13 Sidney Tarrow, The New Transnational Activism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005); Donatella della Porta et al. (eds), Transnational Protest and Global Activism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005). Aminzade et al., Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001); Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists beyond Borders (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998); Thomas Risse et al., The Power of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

14 Adamson, ‘Global Liberalism’, 2005; Wayland, ‘Ethnonationalist Networks’, 2005.

15 Wayland, ‘Ethnonationalist Networks’, 2005.

16 Maria Koinova, ‘Diasporas and Secessionist Conflicts: Mobilizaton of the Albanian, Armenian and Chechen Diasporas’ Ethnic and Racial Stuides (forthcoming, 2010).

17 David Snow and Robert Benford, ‘Master Frames and Cycles of Protest’, in Aldon Morris et al. (eds), Frontiers of Social Movement Theory (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992), pp. 137.

18 Keck and Sikkink, ‘Activists’, p. 19.

19 Sidney Tarrow, ‘Mentalities, Political Cultures, and Collective Action Frames: Constructing Meanings through Action’, in Aldon Morris et al. (eds), Frontiers, pp. 186–97.

20 Clifford Bob, The Marketing of Rebellion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005); Tarrow, ‘Transnational Activism’, 2005; William Gamson, ‘The Social Psychology of Collective Action’, in Morris et al., ‘Frontiers’, 1992.

21 Robert Benford and David Snow, ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26 (2000), pp. 625.

22 Benford and Snow, ‘Framing Processes’, p. 628.

23 Bob, ‘Marketing’, pp. 28–37.

24 Fiona Adamson, ‘Crossing Borders. International Migration and National Security’, International Security, 31 (2006), pp. 165–99; Christopher Rudolph, ‘Security and the Political Economy of International Migration’, American Political Science Review, 97 (2003), pp. 603–20; Peter Andreas and Richard Price, ‘From War Fighting to Crime Fighting: Transforming the American National Security State’, International Studies Review, 3 (2001), pp. 31–52.

25 Christine Fair, ‘Sustaining Conflict and Pushing for Peace’, in ‘Diasporas in Conflict’, pp. 172–95.

26 Yossi Shain, Marketing the American Creed Abroad (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999); Matthew Evangelista, Unarmed Forces (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999); Risse, ‘The Power of Human Rights’, 1999; Marta Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, 52 (1998), pp. 887–917; Peter Katzenstein, The Culture of National Security, Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).

27 Lyons, ‘Diasporas in Conflict’, pp. 123–7.

28 Shain, ‘Marketing’, p. 68.

29 James Fearon, ‘Commitment Problems and the Spread of Ethnic Conflict’, in David Lake and Donald Rothchild (eds), The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict. Fear, Diffusion, and Escalation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998), pp. 107–27; Barry Posen, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, in Michael E. Brown (ed.), Ethnic Conflict and International Security (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), pp. 103–25.

30 Roland Paris, At War's End (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 19.

31 Rey Koslowski, ‘International Migration and the Globalization of Domestic Politics. A Conceptual Framework’, in Rey Koslowski (ed.), International Migration and the Globalization of Domestic Politics (Oxon,UK: Routledge, 2005), p. 13.

32 A ‘strong test’ is one whose outcome is unlikely to result from any factor except the operation or failure of the theory. Stephen Van Evera, Guides to Methods for Students of Political Science (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997), p. 31.

33 Przeworski and Teune's ‘most different systems design’ corresponds to John Stuart Mill's ‘method of agreement’. See The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry (New York: Wiley, 1970).

34 Alexander George and Andrew Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004), pp. 157–63.

35 George and Bennett, ‘Case Studies’, pp. 205–32.

36 McAdam et al., ‘Dynamics’, p. 7.

37 Classic diaspora theorists Safran (2005); Scheffer (2003); Cohen (1997); Esman (1996) and Tololyan (1991) view a ‘diaspora’ in positivist terms. A more recent tendency is to view diasporas as ‘contingency’. Francesco Ragazzi, ‘The Concept of “Diaspora” and the Transnational Social Space’. Paper presented at EUI/IMISCOE Conference on Diasporas and Transnationalism (Florence, Italy, April 2008); Rogers Brubaker, ‘The “Diaspora’ Diaspora” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28 (2005), pp. 1–19.

38 Brubaker, ‘Diaspora’, pp. 3–19.

39 Benedict Anderson, ‘The New World Disorder’, New Left Review, 193 (1992), pp. 3–13.

40 Michael Humphrey, ‘Lebanese Identities between Cities, Nations and Trans-nations’, in Paul Tabar (ed.), Lebanese Diaspora (Beirut, Lebanon: LAU, 2005), p. 36.

41 Albert Hourani and Nadim Shehadi (eds), Lebanese in the World (London: Centre for Lebanese Studies, 1992).

42 Federal Writers Project, The Albanian Struggle in the Old World and New (Boston, MA: The Writer Incorporated, 1939), pp. 63–87.

43 Boutros Labaki, ‘Lebanese Emigration during the War (1975–1989)’, in Hourani and Shehadi (ed.), Lebanese in the World (1992).

44 John Zogby, ‘Arab America Today’, Arab American Institute (Washington D.C., 1990).

45 Nicholas Blanford, Killing Mr. Lebanon (London: I.B.Tauris, 2006), p. 48.

46 Hockenos, ‘Homeland Calling’, p. 213.

47 Barjaba Kosta, ‘Albania: Looking Beyond Borders’, Migration Information Service (August 2005), available at: {http://www.migrationinformation.org/Profiles/print.cfm?ID=239}.

48 US Census, The Arab Population. December 2003, {http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-23.pdf}.

49 Since I use a constructivist definition of the term ‘diaspora’, the numbers provided should be treated as proxies. Not all diaspora members who claim an identity act politically upon them.

50 Michael Humphrey, Islam, Multiculturalism, and Transnationalism (London: Centre for Lebanese Studies, 1998).

51 Walid Phares, Lebanese Christian Nationalism (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1995).

52 Anonymous 1, Official, Arab-American Anti-discrimination Committee, author's interview (Washington D.C., 14 August 2006).

53 George Labaki, The Maronites in the United States (Notre Dame University, Lebanon: Louaize Press, 1993), pp. 71–81; Jamil Intisar Azzam, Persistence and Malleability of Ethnic Boundaries: The Experience of the American Druze, Ph.D. Dissertation (University of California, 1995); Irvine, p. 49.

54 Anonymous 2, Former Ambassador of Lebanon, author's interview (Beirut, Lebanon, 28 May 2007).

55 Anonymous 3, Lebanese expatriate, author's telephone interviews (May 2007 and February 2009).

56 Hockenos, ‘Homeland Calling’, p. 208.

57 Frances Trix, Albanians in Michigan (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 2001), pp. 4–5.

58 See n. 53 above, p. 213.

59 Anonymous, US official, close to the government author's interviews (Washington D.C., 2 August 2006 and 17 July 2007); Andy Balla, ‘US-Albanian Diaspora Bridge Investment Gap in Kosovo’, Balkan Investigative Report Network, 9 (2007), {http://kosovo.birn.eu.com/en/1/70/3611/}.

60 McAdam et al., ‘Dynamics’, p. 24.

61 International legal sovereignty designates the judicial recognition of an international legal entity. Domestic sovereignty denotes the ability of domestic authority structures to control activities within their territorial borders. Stephen Krasner, Problematic Sovereignty (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001), pp. 1–52.

62 Rudolph, ‘Security’, p. 616.

63 Anonymous 5, Source close to the National Albanian-American Council, author's interview (Washington D.C., 3 August 2006); Anonymous 6, Albanian-American analyst, author's interviews (Washington D.C., 12 July 2006 and 12 July 2007).

64 Tom Diaz and Barbara Newman, Lightning out of Lebanon (New York: Ballantine Books, 2006), pp. 109, 226.

65 Quirijins Klaartije, The Brooklyn Connection: How to Build a Guerilla Army, Documentary, US Premiere on 19 July 2005.

66 Atlantic Battalion, Albanews Archives, 17 July 2007 available at: {http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0707d&L=albanews&P=2103}.

67 Norms are ‘collective expectations for the proper behaviour of actors within a given identity.’ Peter Katzenstein, The Culture of National Security, p. 5.

68 Shawn Pogatchnik, AP (30 May 2008).

69 Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, 54 (Autumn 1998), pp. 887–917.

70 James March and Johan Olsen, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: Free Press, 1989).

71 Anonymous 3, author's telephone interview (February 2009).

72 Nagi Najjar, Open Letter to the International Maronite Foundation, LFP Web-site, 2002, {http://www.free-lebanon.com/LFPNews/congress/congress.html}.

73 Sherley DioGuardi, Kosova: Official Versus Public Reality (24 July 2003), {http://blog.aacl.com/kosova-official-versus-public-reality/}.

74 An outburst without central planning but with a high degree of local co-ordination swept Kosovo and left 19 people dead, nearly 900 injured, 4,500 displaced, and over 700 minority homes, public buildings and 30 Serbian churches and monasteries damaged or destroyed, ICG, ‘Collapse’, p. 28.

75 Human Rights Watch, Failure to Protect, 16 (2004), p. 59.

76 Will Kymlicka, Multicultural Citizenship: a Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).

77 Discussions with participants in the international conference, ‘Politics, Culture, and the Lebanese Diaspora’, Lebanese American University (Beirut, Lebanon, May 2007).

78 Lyons, ‘Diasporas in Conflict’, p. 123.

79 Jacob Bercovitch, ‘A Neglected Relationship’, in Smith and Stares, ‘Diasporas in Conflict’, pp. 17–38; Lyons, ‘Diasporas in Conflict’, p. 123.

80 See n. 69 above.

81 Political opportunity is defined as ‘dimensions of the political environment that provide incentives for collective action by affecting people's expectations for success or failure.’ Tarrow, ‘Power in Movement’, p. 77. Political opportunity structure is defined as ‘factors that are relatively stable over time, and outside the control of movement actors.’ Jeff Goodwin and James Jasper, ‘Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory’, Sociological Forum, 14 (1999), pp. 27–54. Attribution of opportunity is a causal mechanism. Opportunities and threats are not objective categories but depend on a collective attribution of meaning to them in the mobilisation process. McAdam et al., ‘Dynamics’, p. 45.

82 Adamson, ‘Global Liberalism’, p. 548; John Ikenberry, Liberal Order and Imperial Ambition (London: Polity, 2006).

83 Sikkink defines international opportunity structure as the ‘degree of openness of international institutions to the participation of transnational NGOs, networks, and coalitions’. Domestic opportunity structure refers to ‘primarily how open or closed domestic political institutions are to domestic social movement or NGO influence’. Kathryn Sikkink, ‘Patterns of Dynamic Multilevel Governance and the Insider-Outside Coalition’, in Della Porta et al., ‘Transnational Protest’, pp. 156–7.

84 James Fearon and David Laitin, ‘Neo-trusteeship and the Problem of Weak States’, International Security, 28 (2004), pp. 5–43.

85 ICG, The New Kosovo Protectorate. Balkans Report 69 (20 June 1999), p. 2.

86 On diaspora association in liberal democracies: Adamson, ‘Transformation’, p. 162; Koslowski, ‘Globalization of Domestic Politics’, p. 12. On ‘boomerang’ effects under closed opportunity structures: Keck and Sikkink, ‘Activists’, p. 13; On ‘spiral effects’: Risse, ‘Human Rights’, 1999. On adaptation of boomerang effects to diaspora mobilisation: Wayland, ‘Ethno-nationalist networks’, p. 411.

87 ‘Rooted cosmopolitans’ primarily think of themselves as locals embedded in a host-land while maintaining transnational ties. Tarrow, ‘Transnational Activism’, p. 40. In contrast, works on transnationalism maintain that diasporas are embedded simultaneously in two political contexts, of the homeland and the host-land. Glick Shiller et al., Nations Unbound (New York, Gordon and Breach, 1994).

88 Christian groups supporting former General Michel Aoun (FPM) and Samir Geagea (LF) fought bitterly against each other during the Lebanese civil war yet supported Lebanon's independence from Syria in its aftermath by different means. After an unsuccessful ‘war of liberation’ (1988–1990) Aoun fled to France. Marie-Joelle Zahar, ‘Peace by Unconventional Means’, in Donald Rothchild et al. (eds), Ending Civil Wars (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002), pp. 572–5. Samir Geagea openly resented Syrian domination from within Lebanon, yet his LF were banned in 1994, and he and many sympathisers were imprisoned while others fled in exile. Blanford, ‘Killing’, p. 59.

89 Elizabeth Pickard, Lebanon. A Shattered Country (New York: Holmes and Meier, 2002), p. 199.

90 Anonymous 7, Lebanese expatriate, author's interview (Washington D.C 27 July 2007).

91 Nagi Najjar, ‘Open Letter to President George W. Bush’ USCFL web-site, 2001, {http://www.freelebanon.org/articles/a112.htm}; Anonymous 4, Lebanese expatriate close to the LF, author's interview (Washington D.C, 31 July 2007).

92 Pickard, ‘Shattered Country’, p. 199; Freedom House, Lebanon 2002, Overview, {http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=1}.

93 Daniel Pipes and Ziad Abdelnour, ‘Ending Syria's Occupation of Lebanon: The US Role?’, Middle East Forum (2000).

94 Ziad Abdelnour, ‘The Syrian Accountability Act and Lebanon’, Middle East Intelligence Bulletin, 4 (2002), {http://www.meib.org/articles/0210_l3.htm} quoting Al-Nahar from 4 September 2002.

95 LFP. ‘Informal Minutes on Developments at the World Maronite Congress in Los Angeles for 18 June’, (2002), {http://www.free-lebanon.com/LFPNews/congress/congress.html}.

96 Anonymous 6, Albanian-American analyst, author's interviews (Washington D.C., 12 July 2006 and 12 July, 2007).; Anonymous 8, Kosovo Albanian student leader, author's interview (Washington D.C., 14 July 2007).

97 ICG, Kosovo After Haradinaj. Europe Report 163 (2005), 26 May; Anonymous 8, Source close to the US government, author's interview (Washington D.C., 24 July 2007).

98 Benford and Snow, ‘Framing Processes’, p. 625.

99 Najjar, ‘Letter to George Bush’ (2001).

100 LFP, ‘The Fourth World Maronite Congress’ 2002, Press Release, {http://www.free-lebanon.com/LFPNews/congress/congress.html}.

101 Anonymous 7, ‘Interview’ (2007).

102 Elias Bejjani, General Aoun, LF Blog (2006), {http://www.ouwet.com/lf-boston/political/general-aoun-by-elias-bejjani/}.

103 Anonymous 9, Lebanese expatriate, author's interview (Washington D.C., 31 July 2007).

104 Zeri Weekly, ‘A Strong Man on the Side of Kosova. Interview with Former Congressman Joe DioGuardi’ (Prishtina, Kosovo, 25 October 2000), AACL web-site available at {http://www.aacl.com/Diaspora.html}.

105 Anonymous 5, ‘Interview’ (2006).

106 Benford and Snow, ‘Framing Processes’, p. 625.

107 Beijjani, ‘General Aoun’ (2006).

108 Anonymous 3, ‘Interview’ (February 2009); Anonymous 8, author's telephone interview (February 2009).

109 Charles Brockett, Political Movements and Violence in Central America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), p. 56.

110 Anonymous 3, Lebanese expatriate, author's telephone interview (May 2007).

111 Anonymous 10, Lebanese expatriate, author's interview (Washington D.C., 24 July 2007).

112 The bill was introduced in Congress in 2002, but did not pass. It was reintroduced for consideration in 2003 when it was adopted.

113 Norton, ‘Hezbollah’, p. 126.

114 Gary Gambill, ‘Hariri's Dilemma’, Middle East Intelligence Bulletin, 5 (November 2003), {http://www.meib.org/articles/0311_l2.htm}.

115 See n. 103 above.

116 USA Today, ‘Syrian Withdrawal from Lebanon Nearly Complete’, 24 April 2005, at {http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-04-24-syria-lebanon_x.htm}.

117 Maria Stephan and Rudy Jaafar, ‘Lebanon's Independence Intifada’, unpublished manuscript, 2006.

118 Norton, ‘Hezbollah’, p. 128.

119 Since its military withdrawal, Syria continues to interfere in Lebanon's affairs. It obstructed a UN-launched investigation into the assassination of Rafiq Hariri and was allegedly behind the assassinations of high profile anti-Syrian politicians, journalists, and activists. The 33-day war between Hezbollah and Israel in 2006 ended with no side defeated, while the local reputation of Hezbollah increased due to its ability to sustain a major attack and quickly recuperate. Hezbollah has been part of the opposition to the US-backed local government and has obstructed the political process through demonstrations and by seizing large parts of Beirut in May 2008 in order to advance its preferred presidential candidate.

120 ICG, ‘Collapse’, p. 28.

121 ICG, ‘After Haradinaj’, p. 9.

122 Anonymous 4, ‘Interview (2006).

123 Anonymous 4 and Anonymous 8, interviews in 2007.

124 ICG, Kosovo's First Month, Europe Briefing 47 (18 March 2008).

125 Adamson, ‘Global Liberalism’, pp. 547–69.

126 Lori Brainard and Jennifer Brinkerhoff, ‘Sovereignty under Siege, or a Circuitous Path for Strengthening the State? Digital Diasporas and Human Rights’, International Journal of Public Administration, 29 (2006), pp. 595–618.