Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:25:40.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Written on the Leaves: Rabelais and the Sibylline Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Florence M. Weinberg*
Affiliation:
Trinity University

Extract

The episode of the Sibylle de Panzoust, most often brushed aside as merely farcical, scatological and obscene, remaiijs to be examined seriously and at length. My reading of the sibylline episode will begin by placing the Sibylle in the context of Rabelais' general treatment of women; I shall attempt to determine her place among all the other means of divining the future; further, I shall examine the attitudes of the Pantagruelistes (Epistémon, Pantagruel, Panurge) towards her before the consultation, and, of course, thoroughly investigate the consultation itself.

Type
Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bächtold Stäubli, Hanns, and Hoffman-Krayer, E., eds. Handwörterbuch des deutschen Aberglaubens. 10 vols. Berlin, 1942.Google Scholar
Benson, Edward. “ ‘Jamais vostrefemmene sera ribaulde, si la prenez issue de gens de bien': Love and War in the Tiers Livre.Etudes rabelaisieunes 15 (1980): 5576.Google Scholar
Bolzani, Valeriano. Hierogliphica. Basel, 1556.Google Scholar
Céard, Jean. La Nature et lesprodiges: I'insolite au XVle siMe, en France. Geneva, 1977.Google Scholar
Charpentier, Françoise. “Un Royaume qui perdure sans femmes.” In Rabelais's Incomparable Book: Essays on His Art. Ed. by Raymond C. La Charité 195-209. Lexington, KY, 1986.Google Scholar
Cirlot, J. E. A Dictionary of Symbols. Trans, by Sage, Jack. 2d ed. New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Coleman, Dorothy. Rabelais: A Critical Study in Prose Fiction. Cambridge, Eng., 1971.Google Scholar
Creuzer, Friedrich. Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker. 3d ed. 4 vols. Leipzig, 1836.Google Scholar
Donaldson-Evans, Lance. “Panurge Perplexus: Ambiguity and Relativity in the Tiers Livre.” Etudes rabelaisieunes 15 (1980): 7796.Google Scholar
Duval, Edwin M. “Panurge, Perplexity, and the Ironic Design of Rabelais's Tiers “**Livre.” Renaissance Quarterly 35 (1982): 381400.Google Scholar
Freccero, Carla. “The ‘Instance’ of the Letter: Woman in the Text of Rabelais.” In Rabelais's Incomparable Book: Essays on His Art. Ed. by La Charité, Raymond C., 4555. Lexington, KY, 1986.Google Scholar
Goumarre, Pierre. “Rabelais: Misogynie et misogamie.” Littératures 15 (1986): 5972.Google Scholar
Hopper, Vincent F. Medieval Number Symbolism. New York, 1938.Google Scholar
Jackson Knight, W. F. See Vergil.Google Scholar
Rabelais, François. Oeuvres complètes. Ed. by Boulenger, Jacques and Scheler, Lucien. Paris, 1962.Google Scholar
Rabelais, François. Le Tiers Livre. Ed. by Screech, M. A.. Geneva, 1964.Google Scholar
Saulnier, Verdun L. Rabelais. Paris, 1983.Google Scholar
Schlifer, Cathy. “Contextual Misogyny in the Tiers Livre.” Chitnires 17 (1984): 5367.Google Scholar
Sébillot, Paul. Le Folk-lore de France. 3 vols. Paris, 1904.Google Scholar
, Sibyllina Oracula. Ed. by Johannes Opsopeus Brettanus and Sebastianus Castalionis. Paris, 1608.Google Scholar
Vergil, . The Aeneid. Trans. Jackson Knight, W. F.. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, Eng., 1956.Google Scholar
Zegura, Elizabeth C. “Toward a Feminist Reading of Rabelais. “Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 15 (1985): 5972.Google Scholar