Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T17:57:03.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Woman's Capacity to Create: The Unusual Case of Sofonisba Anguissola*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Fredrika H. Jacobs
Fredrika H. Jacobs*
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the more than 160 uomitti valenti whose lives and works are included in the second edition of Giorgio Vasari's Le vite de’ più eccellentipittori, scultori et architettori, 1568, are several women: Properzia De’ Rossi (c. 1490-1530), Suor Plautilla Nelli (1532-1587/88), Lucrezia Quistelli, who was “taught by Alessandro Allori,” Sofonisba Anguissola (c. 1532-1625), and her sisters Lucia (c. 1540-c. 1565) and Europa (1542/43-78). Although De' Rossi was the only one of these women distinguished by her own vita, it was Sofonisba Anguissola who accrued the greatest amount of literary adulation during her lifetime (fig. 1). If contemporaneous sources are to be believed, this acclaim may be attributed to her excellence as a portrait painter.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , Spring 1994 , pp. 74 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Some of the material included in this article was part of a paper read at the National Conference of the Renaissance Society of America, Durham, North Carolina, March 1991. The present version profited greatly from suggestions made by the Colloquium of Women in the Renaissance, Washington, DC and by the two readers for the Renaissance Quarterly. Although one of those readers remains anonymous, the other, Mary Garrard, has continued to provide me with direction. It is to her, as reader, critic, and, most importantly, as an inspiring mentor-colleague that I dedicate this study.

References

The Age of Correggio and the Carracci. Washington, DC and New York, 1986.Google Scholar
Alciati, Andreas. Emblems in Translation, Trans.Daly, Peter M.. Toronto, 1985.Google Scholar
Alpers, Svetlana. “Ekphrasis and Aesthetic Attitude in Vasari's Lives.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 22 (1960): 190-215.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologica. New York, 1947.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . De generatione animalium. Trans. Peck, A.L.. Cambridge, MA and London, 1943.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . De partibus animalium. Trans. Ross, W.D.. Chicago and London, 1952.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Historia animalium. Trans. Peck, A.L.. Cambridge, MA and London, 1963.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Metaphysics. Trans. Hugh Tredennick. Cambridge, MA and London, 1961.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Physics. Trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA and London, 1959.Google Scholar
Armenini, Giovanbattista. De’ veri precetti della pittura. Ravenna, 1587.Google Scholar
Atanagi, Dionigi. Vita d’ Irene da Spilimbergo. In L’ Atanagida Cagli, ed. Tarducci, D.A.. Cagli, 1904.Google Scholar
Averroes, . Commentary on Plato's Republic. Trans. E. I.J. Rosenthal. Cambridge, 1956.Google Scholar
Baglione, Giovanni. Le vite de'pittori, scultori et architetti dal pontificato di Gregorio XIII del 1512 aljino a’ tempi di Papa Urbano Ottavo nel 1642. Rome, 1642.Google Scholar
Baldinucci, Filippo. Notizie de'professori del disegno da Cimabue in qua. Milan, 1681.Google Scholar
Barocchi, Paola, ed. Scritti d’ arte del cinquecento. Milan and Naples, 1971-76.Google Scholar
Barocchi, Paola. ed. Trattati d’ arte del cinquecento fra manierismo e contrariforma. Bari, 1960.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert J. “A Phenomenon of Epistemology in the Renaissance.” Journal of the History of Ideas 31 (1970): 281-88.Google Scholar
Boccaccio, . Concerning Famous Women. Trans. Guarino, G.. Princeton, 1963.Google Scholar
Borghini, Raffaello. Il Riposo. Reggio, 1826.Google Scholar
Bottari, Giovanni. Raccolta di Lettere sulla Pittura, Scultura, ed Architettura. Milan, 1822.Google Scholar
Boylan, Michael. “The Galenic and Hippocratic Challenges to Aristotle's Conception Theory. ”Journal of the History of Biology 17 (1984): 83-112.Google Scholar
Bruni, Domenico. Difesa delie Donne. Milan, 1559.Google Scholar
Bullough, Vern L. “Medieval Medical and Scientific Views of Women.” Viator 4 (1973): 483-501.Google Scholar
Campi, Antonio. Cremona fedelissima citta. Dell’ historia di Cremona. Cremona, 1585.Google Scholar
Cantaro, Maria Teresa. Lavinia Fontana bolognese. Milan, 1989.Google Scholar
Caro, Annibale. Lettere familiari. Ed. Aulo Greco. Florence, 1959.Google Scholar
Cavatelli, Lodovico. Annates. Quibus res ubiquegestas memorabiles a patria suae origine usque ad annum salutis 1583 breviter ille cornplexus. Cremona, 1588.Google Scholar
Cennini, Cennino. Il libro dell’ arte. Ed. Thompson, D.. New Haven, 1932.33.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Whitney. Women, Art, and Society. London, 1990.Google Scholar
Chantelou, Paul Freart de. Diary of the Cavaliere Bernini's Visit to France. Trans. Margery Corbett. Princeton, 1985.Google Scholar
Cheney, Liana. “Barbara Longhi of Ravenna.” Women's Art Journal 9 (1988): 16-20.Google Scholar
Cropper, Elizabeth. “The Beauty of Woman: Problems in the Rhetoric of Renaissance Portraiture.” In Rewriting the Renaissance, Ed.Ferguson, Margaret W., Maureen Quilligan, andVickers, Nancy J., 175-90. Chicago, 1986.Google Scholar
Delia Casa, Giovanni. Opere. Milan, 1806. Delle Donne lllustri Italiane dal XIII al XX Secolo. Rome, 1855.Google Scholar
Domenici, Bernardo De. Vite deipittori, scultori ed architetti napoletani. Naples, 1843.Google Scholar
Dunstan, G. R., ed. The Human Embryo. Aristotle and the Arabic and European Traditions. Exeter, 1990.Google Scholar
Freedberg, Sidney J. Painting in Italy, 1500— 1600. Harmondsworth and Baltimore, 1971.Google Scholar
Galen, . On the Natural Faculties. Trans. Brock, A.J.. Cambridge, MA and London, 1963.Google Scholar
Galli, R. Lavinia Fontana Pittrice. Imola, 1940.Google Scholar
Garrard, Mary. Rev. of The Women Artists of Bologna by Ragg, Laura M.. Women's Art Journal 1 (1980/81): 58-64.Google Scholar
Ghiberti, Lorenzo. I Commentari. Ed. Morisani, O.. Naples, 1947.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony and Lisa Jardine. From Humanism to the Humanities, Education and the Liberal Arts in 15th and 16th Century Europe. London, 1986.Google Scholar
Grasselli, Giuseppe. Abecedario biografico dei pittori, scultori ed architetti cremonesi. Milan, 1827.Google Scholar
Gratiano, Giulio Cornelio. Di Orlando Santo vita, et morte con venti mila Christiani uccisi in Roncisualle Cavata dal Catalogo de Santi. Ascoli, 1636.Google Scholar
Greer, Germaine. The Obstacle Race. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Halio, Jay L. “The Metaphor of Conception and Elizabethan Theories of the Imagination.” Neophilologus 50 (1966): 454-61.Google Scholar
Harris, Ann Sutherland and Linda Nochlin. Women Artists 1550-1950. Los Angeles and New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Heninger, S. K., Jr. “A World of Figures: Enargeiac Speech in Shakespeare.” In “Fanned and Winnowed.Opinions:” Shakespeare Essays Presented to Harold Jenkins, Mahon, John W. and Pendleton, Thomas A., 216-30. London, 1987.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Maryanne Cline. “Aristotle and Woman.” Journal of the History of Biology 9 (1976): 183-213.Google Scholar
Hulse, Clark. The Rule of Art. Chicago, 1990.Google Scholar
Jordan, Constance. Renaissance Feminism. Ithaca, 1990.Google Scholar
King, Margaret L. Women of the Renaissance. Chicago and London, 1991.Google Scholar
Klein, Robert. Form and Meaning. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Kusche, Maria. “Sofonisba Anguissola en España Retratista en la Corte de Felipe II Junto a Alonso Sánchez Coello y Jorge de la Rua.” Archivio Español de Arte 62 (1989): 391-420.Google Scholar
Labalme, Patricia. “Venetian Women on Women: Three Early Modern Feminists.” Archivio Veneto 112 (1981): 81-109.Google Scholar
Lacqueur, Thomas. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
Lamo, Alessandro. Intorno alia scoltura, e pittura. In Notizie istoriche de’ pittori, scultori, ed architetti cremonesi, ed. Gian Battista Zaist. Cremona, 1976.Google Scholar
Land, Norman. “Ekphrasis and Imagination.” Art Bulletin 68 (1986): 207-17.Google Scholar
Lanzi, Luigi. Storia pittorica della Italia. Florence, 1968.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Jacqueline. “Making Up Representations: The Risks of Femininity.” Representations 20 (1987): 77-87.Google Scholar
Lomazzo, Gian Paolo. Scritti suite arti. Ed. Roberto Paolo Ciardi. Florence, 1973.Google Scholar
Longhi, Roberto. “Indicazione per Sofonisba Anguissola.” Paragone 157 (1963): 50-52.Google Scholar
Luigini, Federico. Il Libro della bella Donna. Venice, 1554.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. The Renaissance Notion of Woman. Cambridge, 1980.Google Scholar
Malvasia, Carlo Cesare. Felsina pittrice. Vite dei pittori bolognesi. Ed. Marcella Brascaglia. Bologna, 1971.Google Scholar
Marinello, Giovanni. Delle medicine partenenti all’ infermita delle donne. Venice, 1574.Google Scholar
Meiss, Millard. Painting in Florence and Siena after the Black Death. New York, 1951.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Leatrice. Paragoni: Benedetto Varchi's “due lezzioni” and Cinquecento Art Theory. Ann Arbor, 1982.Google Scholar
Mirollo, James V. Mannerism and Renaissance Poetry. New Haven, 1984.Google Scholar
Morigia, Paolo. La nobiliti di milano. Milan, 1619.Google Scholar
Odorisio, Ginevra Conti. Donna e Societa nel Seicento. Lucrezia Marinelli e Arcangela Tarabotti. Rome, 1979.Google Scholar
Petrarch, . Prose Milan and Naples, 1955. Pierlingieri, Ilya Sandra Sofonisba Anguissola. New York, 1992.Google Scholar
Pierlingieri, Ilya Sandra. “Sofonisba Anguissola's Early Sketches.” Women's Art Journal 9 (1988/89): 10-14.10.2307/1358314Google Scholar
Pliny, . Natural History. Trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA and London, 1956-66.Google Scholar
Parker, Rozsika and Griselda Pollock. Old Mistresses: Women, Art and Society. London, 1981.Google Scholar
Pope-Hennessy, John. The Portrait in the Renaissance. Princeton, 1979.Google Scholar
Preus, Anthony. “Galen's Criticism of Aristotle's Conception Theory.” Journal of the History of Biology 10 (1977): 65-85.Google Scholar
Ridolfi, Carlo. Delle maraviglia dell'arte. Venice, 1648.Google Scholar
Rogers, Mary. “Sonnets on Female Portraits from Renaissance North Italy.” Word and Image 2 (1986): 291-305.Google Scholar
Rosand, David, “The Portrait, the Courtier, and Death.” In Castiglione, The Ideal and the Real in Renaissance Culture, ed. Hanning, Robert W. and David Rosand, 91-130, New Haven, 1983.Google Scholar
Saffi, Antonio. Discorso all ‘Accademia di Belle Arti. Bologna, 1832.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi. Reading in Detail: Aesthetics and the Feminine. New York and London, 1987.Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita. “Has Her(oine's) Time N ow Come?” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (1990): 365-410.Google Scholar
Simons, Peggy M. “Alciati's Two Venuses as Letter and Spirit of the Law.” In Andrea Alciato and the Emblem Tradition: Essays in Honor of Virginia Woods Callahan, 95-125. AMS, 1989.Google Scholar
Soprinai, Raffaello. Vite de'pittori, scultori, ed architetti Genovesi. Genoa, 1768.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. R. “Ut Rhetorica Pictura: A Study in Quattrocento Theory of Painting.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 20 (1957): 26-44.10.2307/750149Google Scholar
Summers, David. “Aria II: The Union of Image and Artist as an Aesthetic Ideal in Renaissance Art.” Artibus et historiae 20 (1989): 15-31.Google Scholar
Summers, David. “Form and Gender.” New Literary History 24 (1993): 243-71.Google Scholar
Summers, David. The Judgement of Sense. Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar
Summers, David. Michelangelo and the Language of Art. Princeton, 1981.Google Scholar
Tasso, Torquato. “Discorso della virtu femminile e donnesca.” In Prose filosofiche. Florence, 1847.Google Scholar
Tolnay, Charles De. “Sofonisba Anguissola and Her Relations with Michelangelo.” The Journal of the Walters Art Gallery 4 (1941): 115-19.Google Scholar
Varchi, Benedetto. Due lezzioni di M. Benedetto Varchi, nella prima delle quali si dichiara un Sonetto di M. Michelagnolo Buonaroti, nella seconda si disputà quale sia più) nobile arte, la scultura o la pittura, con una lettera d' esso Michelagnolo e più altri eccellentissimi pittori, et scultori, sopra la quistione sopradetta. Florence, 1549.Google Scholar
Vasari, Giorgio, Le vite de’ piu eccellenti pittori, scultori ed architettori. Ed. GaetanoMilanesi. Florence, 1906.Google Scholar
Vasari, Giorgio. Le vite de’ più eccelenti architetti, pittori, et scultori italiani, da Cimabue insino a’ tempi nostri. Ed. Luciano Bellosi and Aldo Rossi. Torino, 1986.Google Scholar
Zaist, Gian Battista. Notizie istoriche de’ pittori, scultori, ed architetti cremonesi. Cremona, 1976.Google Scholar