Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:31:36.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Vows to the Blackest Devil”: Hamlet and the Evolving Code of Honor in Early Modern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Reta A. Terry
Reta A. Terry*
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Renaissance was a period in which the honor code underwent a significant metamorphosis. The medieval, chivalric code of honor, with its emphasis on lineage, allegiance to one's lord and violence, evolved into an honor code that was both more moral and political in that it began to emphasize the individual conscience and allegience to the state. Analysis of Shakespeare's Hamlet, and in particular its characters' use of promise, provides new and revealing insights into the evolving Renaissance codes of honor, for Shakespeare creates characters in Hamlet that represent various stages in the evolution of a changing honor system.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , Winter 1999 , pp. 1070 - 1086
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. Fancies Ague-fittes or Beauties Nettle bed. London, 1599. STC 0684.Google Scholar
Anon. The Instruction of a Gentleman. London, 1568. STC 4105.Google Scholar
Babington, Gervase. A very fruitfall exposition of the Commaundments by way of question and answer. London, 1611. STC 18743.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles. Honour in the English Drama 1591-1700. Gothenburg, 1957.Google Scholar
Becon, Thomas. An inuectyve agenst Swearing. London, 1543. STC 1732.Google Scholar
Bicknoll, Edmond. A Swoord Agaynst Swearying. London, 1579. STC 3050.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Richard. The English Gentleman. London, 1630. STC 3563.Google Scholar
Breitenberg, Mark. Anxious Masculinity in Early Modern England. Cambridge, 1996.10.1017/CBO9780511586231Google Scholar
Bristol, Michael D. Big-Time Shakespeare. London, 1996.Google Scholar
Council, Norman. When Honour's at the Stake. London, 1973.Google Scholar
Cust, Richard. “Honour and Politics in Early Stuart England: The Case of Beaumont vs. Hastings.” Past and Presen. 149 (1994): 57–94.Google Scholar
Foakes, R.A. Hamlet Versus Lear. Cambridge, 1993.10.1017/CBO9780511518867Google Scholar
Gallagher, Lowell. Medusa's Gaze: Casuistry and Conscience in the Renaissance. Stanford, 1991.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. “Introduction to Hamlet .” In The Norton Shakespeare. Eds. Stephen, Greenblatt et al., 1659-1666. New York, 1997.Google Scholar
Herrup, Cynthia. “'To Pluck Bright Honour From the Pale-Faced Moon': Gender and Honour in the Castlehaven Story.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 6th Series. 137-59.10.2307/3679233Google Scholar
James, Mervyn. Society, Politics and Culture. Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
Keen, Maurice. Chivalry. New Haven, 1984.Google Scholar
Kerrigan, William. Hamlet's Perfection. Baltimore, 1994.Google Scholar
Miles, Gary. “How Roman are Shakespeare's “Romans?” Shakespeare Quarterly. 40.3 (1989): 257-83.10.2307/2870723Google Scholar
Norden, John. The Mirror of honour. London, 1597. STC 18614.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Anita. “Shakespeare and the Contradictions of Honour.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of York, 1990.Google Scholar
Perkins, William. A Direction for the Government of the Tongue according to Gods word. London, 1593. STC 676.Google Scholar
Perkins, William. A Discourse of Conscience. The Works of that Famous and Worthy Minister of Christ… Mr. William Perkins. 3 vols. London, 1612-1613.Google Scholar
Rich, Barnaby. Roome for a Gentleman. London, 1609. STC 20985.Google Scholar
Salmon, J.H.M. “Seneca and Tacitus in Jacobean England.” In The Mental World of the Jacobean Court. Ed. Linda Levy, Peck, 169-88. Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Oxford Shakespeare. Eds. Stanley, Wells and Gary, Taylor. Oxford: 1994.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. In The Oxford Shakespeare. eds. Stanley, Wells and Gary, Taylor, 653-90. Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Othello, Moor of Venice. In The Oxford Shakespeare. 819-54.Google Scholar
Shirley, Frances. Swearing and Perjury in Shakespeare's Plays. London, 1979.Google Scholar
Slights, Camille Wells. The Casuistical Tradition, in Shakespeare, Donne, Herbert and Milton. Princeton, 1981.Google Scholar
Slights, William WE. “'Swear by thy Gracious SelP: Self-Referential Oaths in Shakespeare.” English Studies in Canad. 13.2 (1987): 147-60.10.1353/esc.1987.0018Google Scholar
States, Bert O. Hamlet and the Concept of Character. Baltimore, 1992.Google Scholar
Stubbes, Philip. The Anatomie of Abuses. London, 1583. STC 357.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sir Keith. Religion and the Decline of Magic. London, 1991.Google Scholar
Watson, Curtis Brown. Shakespeare and the Renaissance Concept of Honour. Princeton, 1960.Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert. Authority and Representation in Early Modern Discourse. Ed. David, Hillman. Baltimore, 1996.Google Scholar