Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T01:29:48.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vesalius and the Reading of Galen's Teleology*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Nancy G. Siraisi
Nancy G. Siraisi*
Affiliation:
Hunter College and Cuny Graduate Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sixteenth-century approaches to the world of nature remained resolutely bound to ancient texts. Hostility to the medieval past, new theories, new experiences, and new information were evidently abundantly present. But medieval predecessors were far more likely to be criticized for failure to understand ancient authority than for slavish dependence on it; dissatisfaction with intellectual tradition was apt to express itself in form of a call for return to the ideas of ancients who preceded the standard school authors in time; and in every branch of natural philosophy, natural history, and medicine, examination of the writings of ancient Greek authors was a major, perhaps the major, part of the task of the investigator. Innovators — some of them very bold and some very eccentric indeed — reworked, recombined, and criticized the ancients, or measured their teachings against modern experience; but they seldom ignored them.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , Spring 1997 , pp. 1 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

My research on Vesalius has been assisted by grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Science Foundation. I am very grateful to Brian Copenhaver, Anthony Grafton, and Vivian Nutton for comments on an earlier draft of this essay.

References

Achillini, Alessandro. Annotationes anatomiae. Bologna, 1520.Google Scholar
Adelmann, Howard B. The Embryological Treatises of Hieronymus Fabricius of Aquapendente. 2 vols. Ithaca, 1942.Google Scholar
Aldrovandi, Ulisse. Ornithologiae, hoc est De avibus historiae libri XII. Vol. 1. Bologna, 1610.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J.B. “Marsilio Ficino's Interpretation of Plato's Timaeus and its Myth of the Demiurge.” In Supplementum Festivum: Studies in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. Hankins, James, Monfasani, John, and Purnell, Frederick Jr., 399–439. Binghamton, NY, 1987.Google Scholar
Belloni, L. “L'aneurisma di S. Filippo Neri nella relazione di Antonio Porto.” Rendiconti del'Istituto Lornbardo di Scienze e Lettere. Classe di scienze 83 (1950): 665–80.Google Scholar
Benedetti, Alessandro. Historia corporis humani sive anatomice. Venice, 1502.Google Scholar
Berengario da Carpi, Jacopo. “Anatomia Carpi. Isagoge Breves ….” In Anatomiam humani corporis. Venice, 1535.Google Scholar
Binns, J.W. Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England: The Latin Writings of the Age, chaps. 15-16. Leeds, 1990.Google Scholar
Bylebyl, Jerome J. Cardiovascular Physiology in the Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries. Yale University Ph. D. Dissertation, 1969.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. Fragmentation and Redemption. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Carcano Leone, G.B. Exenterationis cadaveris illustrissimi Cardinalis Borrhomaei Mediolani Archiepiscopi. Milan, 1584.Google Scholar
Carlino, Andrea. La fabbrica del corpo: Libri e dissezione nel Rinascimento. Turin, 1994.Google Scholar
Cicero, , De natura deorum. Cambridge and London, 1972.Google Scholar
Colombo, Realdo. De re anatomica libri XV. Venice, 1559; facs. Brussels, 1983.Google Scholar
Cook, Harold J. “The Cutting Edge of A Revolution? Medicine and Natural History Near the Shores of the North Sea.” In Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen, and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, ed. Field, J.V. and James, Frank A.J.L., 45–61. Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian P., and Schmitt, Charles B.. Renaissance Philosophy. Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
Durling, Richard J. “A Chronological Census of Renaissance Editions and Translations of Galen.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 24 (1961): 230–305.10.2307/750797Google Scholar
Edelstein, Ludwig. “Andreas Vesalius, the Humanist.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 14 (1943): 547–61.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Samuel Y. Jr., Pictures and Punishment: Art and Criminal Prosecution During the Florentine Renaissance. Ithaca and London, 1985.Google Scholar
Edguardus [Edwards], David. In Anatomicen introductio luculenta et brevis. London, 1532; facs., Stanford, 1961.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. The Colloquies of Erasmus, trans. Thompson, Craig R.. Chicago, 1965.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Giovanna. “Public Anatomy Lessons and the Carnival: The Anatomy Theatre of Bologna.” Past and Present 117 (1987): 50–106.10.1093/past/117.1.50Google Scholar
Fichtner, Gerhard. “Die verlorene Einheil- der Medizin und das ‘Handwerk.’” In Verlorene Einheit der Medizin, ed. Kröner, Peter et al., Ars Medica. Stuttgart, Jena and New York, 1995.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Compendium Marsilii in Timaeum. In [Ficino, Marsilio, tr. Opera Platonis]. Venice, 1491.Google Scholar
French, R.K. “De iuvamentis membrorum and the reception of Galenic physiological anatomy.” Isis 70 (1979): 96–110.10.1086/352157Google Scholar
French, R.K. “Natural Philosophy and Anatomy.” In Le corps à la Renaissance. Actes du XXXe Colloque de Tours 1987, ed. Ceard, Jean, Fontaine, Marie Madeleine, Margolin, Jean-Claude, 447–60. Paris, 1990.Google Scholar
French, R.K. William Harvey's Natural Philosophy. Cambridge, 1994.10.1017/CBO9780511628245Google Scholar
Galen, . De usu partium corporis humani libri XVII. In Opera. Basel, 1542.Google Scholar
Galen, . De anatomicis administrationibus. Trans. Johann Guinter of Andernach. In Galen, , Opera omnia, vol. 7. Venice, 1544.Google Scholar
Galen, . De usu partium corporis humani libri XVII. In Opera omnia, ed. Kühn, C.G., vols. 3 and 4. Leipzig, 1821-33.Google Scholar
Galen, . On Anatomical Procedures. Trans. Singer, Charles. Oxford, 1956.Google Scholar
Galen, . On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body, trans. May, M.T.. 2 vols. Ithaca, 1968.Google Scholar
Galen, . On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato, ed. and trans. De Lacy, P.. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 4, 1, 2. Berlin, 1980.Google Scholar
Gesner, Conrad. Historiae animalium Liber I de Quadrupedibus viviparis. Vol. 1. Zurich, 1551.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450-1800. Cambridge, MA, 1991.Google Scholar
Gui, Alain. “La Theologia naturalis en son temps: structure, portée, origines.” In Montaigne: Apologie de Raimond Sebond. De la Theologia à la théologie, ed. Blum, Claude, 1347, and biblio. of eds., 303–08. Paris, 1990.Google Scholar
de Chauliac, Gui. Chirurgia magna Guidonis de Gauliaco. Lyon, 1585; facs., Darmstadt, 1976.Google Scholar
Guinter, Johannes, of Andernach. Anatomicarum institutiones ex Galeni sententia libri IIII. Lyon, 1541.Google Scholar
Hankins, James. Plato in the Italian Renaissance. 2 vols. Leiden, 1990.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R.J. “Galen and the Best of All Possible Worlds.” Classical Quarterly 39 (1989): 206–27.10.1017/S0009838800040593Google Scholar
Harcourt, Glenn. “Andreas Vesalius and the Anatomy of Antique Sculpture.” Representations 17 (1987): 28–61.10.1525/rep.1987.17.1.99p0422bGoogle Scholar
Heckscher, William S. Rembrandt's Anatomy of Dr. Tulp. New York, 1958.Google Scholar
Incisa della Rochetta, Giovanni, et al., eds. Il primo processo per San Filippo Neri. 2 vols. Vatican City, 1957-58.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa. “Humanistic Logic.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Schmitt, Charles B. et al., 173-98. Cambridge, 1988.10.1017/CHOL9780521251044.009Google Scholar
Kemp, Martin. “‘The Mark of Truth’: Looking and Learning in Some Anatomical Illustrations from the Renaissance and Eighteenth Century.” In Medicine and the Five Senses, ed. Bynum, W.F. and Porter, Roy, 85–121. Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
Kusukawa, Sachiko. The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge, 1995.10.1017/CBO9780511598524Google Scholar
Lactantius, , De opificio Dei. PL 7:11-78.Google Scholar
Lactantius, , De opificio Dei. In Opera [Venice, 1472].Google Scholar
Laguna, Andrés de. Anatomica methodus. In Studies in Pre-Vesalian Anatomy: Biography, Translations, Documents, ed. Lind, L.R.. Philadelphia, 1975.Google Scholar
Lunsingh Scheurleer, Th. “Un amphithéatre d'anatomie moralisée.” In Leiden University in the Seventeenth Century: An Exchange of Learning, ed. Scheurleer, Th. Lunsingh and Meyjes, G.H.M. Posthumus, 217–77. Leiden, 1975.Google Scholar
Massa, Niccolò. Liber introductorius de anatomia. Venice, 1536.Google Scholar
Markwart, Michler. “Die Mittelhand bei Galen und Vesal.” Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin 48 (1964): 200–15.Google Scholar
de’ Liuzzi, Mondino. Anothomia, ed. Giorgi, Piero P. and Pasini, Gian Franco. Bologna, 1992.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. Apologie de Raimond Sebond. In Les Essais de Michel de Montaigne, ed. Villey, P., 2. 12, 449–486. Rpt., Paris, 1965.Google Scholar
Nutton, Vivian. “ De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis in the Renaissance.” In Le opere psicologiche di Galeno. Atti del Terzo Colloquio Galenico Internazionale, Pavia, 10-12 Settembre 1986, ed. Manuli, Paola and Vegetti, Mario, 281-309.Google Scholar
Nutton, Vivian. “Wittenberg Anatomy.” In Medicine and the Reformation, ed. Grell, Ole Peter and Cunningham, Andrew, 11–31. London and New York, 1993.Google Scholar
O'Malley, C.D. Andreas Vesalius of Brussels, 1514-1564. Berkeley, 1964.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “The Criminal and the Saintly Body: Autopsy and Dissection in Renaissance Italy.” Renaissance Quarterly 47 (1994): 1–33.10.2307/2863109Google Scholar
Pigeaud, Jackie. “Formes et normes dans le De fabrica de Vésale.” In Le corps à la Renaissance: Actes du XXXe Colloque de Tours 1987, ed. Céard, Jean, Fontaine, Marie Madeleine, and Margolin, Jean-Claude, 399–421. Paris, 1990.Google Scholar
Plato, . Timaeus, tr. Ficino, Marsilio. In [Opera Platonis]. Venice, 1491.Google Scholar
Plato, . Timaeus, tr. Ficino, Marsilio. In Omnia divini Platonis Opera tralatione Marsilii Ficini, Emendata et ad Graecum codicem collatione Simonis Grynaei, summa diligentia repurgata. Basel, 1551.Google Scholar
Reeds, Karen. Botany in Medieval and Renaissance Universities. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Richardson, W.F., and Carman, J.B. “On Translating Vesalius.” Medical History 38 (1994): 281–302.10.1017/S0025727300036619Google Scholar
Roots, Peter A. “The De opificio Dei: The Workmanship of God and Lactantius.” Classical Quarterly 37 (1987): 466–86.10.1017/S0009838800030676Google Scholar
Rutherford, David. “A Finding List of Antonio Da Rho's Works and Related Primary Sources.” Italia medioevale e umanistka 33 (1990): 75–108.Google Scholar
Sabunde, Raymundus de. De natura hominis dialogi …. Lyon, 1568.Google Scholar
Sawday, Jonathan. “The Flaying of Marsyas: Dissecting the Renaissance Body.” In Renaissance Bodies: The Human Figure in English Culture, ca. 1540-1660, ed. Gent, Lucy and Llewellyn, Nigel, 112–35. London, 1980.Google Scholar
Sawday, Jonathan. The Body Emblazon'd: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London and New York, 1995.Google Scholar
Schupbach, William. The Paradox of Rembrandt's “Anatomy of Dr. Tulp,” Medical History, Supp. 2. London, 1982.Google Scholar
Seidel Menchi, Silvana. Erasmo in Italia, 1520-1580. Turin, 1987.Google Scholar
Serrai, Alfredo. Conrad Gesner, ed. Cochetti, Maria. Rome, 1990.Google Scholar
Shuger, Debra K. Sacred Rhetoric: The Christian Grand Style in the English Renaissance. Princeton, 1988.10.1515/9781400859269Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. “Nature as Craftsman in Greek Thought.” Journal of the History of Ideas 24 (1963): 473–96.10.2307/2707979Google Scholar
Stinger, Charles. Humanism and the Church Fathers. Albany, 1977.Google Scholar
Swerdlow, Noel M. “The Recovery of the Exact Sciences of Antiquity: Mathematics, Astronomy, Geography.” In Rome Reborn: The Vatican Library and Renaissance Culture, ed. Grafton, Anthony, 125-67. Washington, DC, 1993.Google Scholar
Trinkaus, Charles. In Our Image and Likeness: Humanity and Divinity in Italian Humanist Thought. 2 vols. Chicago, 1970.Google Scholar
Vesalius, Andreas. De humani corporis fabrica libri septem. Basel, 1543, 1555.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A. “Aristotle's Concept of Nature: Avicenna and Aquinas.” In Approaches to Nature in the Middle Ages, ed. Robens, Lawrence D., 137-60. Binghamton, 1982.Google Scholar