Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:48:29.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sempster's Wares: Merchandising and Marrying in The Fair Maid of the Exchange (1607)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Juana Green
Juana Green*
Affiliation:
Clemson University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay demonstrates how handkerchiefs in The Fair Maid map out the cultural anxieties about courtship and marriage practices that were mobilized by women's participation in early modern England's expanding market economy. It locates handkerchiefs within the material culture of the period, examining the status of handkerchiefs as commodities as well as women's relationships to these commodities, and it considers how handkerchiefs are transformed into love tokens when women personalize them with embroidery. Contextualizing the play's use of handkerchiefs with historical evidence from matrimonial cases, the essay shows how handkerchiefs embody the social contradictions embedded within early modern marriage practices.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , Winter 2000 , pp. 1084 - 1118
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research for this article was funded by grants and fellowships from Columbia University, the Folger Institute, and the Huntington Library. Earlier versions of this essay were presented at the Central New York Conference on Language and Literature SUNY Cortland, October 1997, and The Group for Early Modern Cultural Studies Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, September 1996. I wish to thank Laetitia Yeandle for her patient instruction in Renaissance paleography; the members of the Renaissance dissertation seminar at Columbia and the readers for Renaissance Quarterly for their helpful suggestions; and Lena Cowen Orlin, whose work on material culture has greatly influenced my own, for her advice and encouragement. Finally, I am indebted to Jean E. Howard for her pointed critiques, scholarly guidance, and unwavering support through many versions of this essay.

References

Atkinson, J. A., ed. 1993. Darlington Wills and Inventories 1600-1625. Newcastle- Upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Abegg, Margaret. 197'8. Apropos Patterns for Embroidery, Lace and Woven Textiles. Bern.Google Scholar
Agnew, Jean-Christophe. 1986. Worlds Apart: The Market and the Theater in Anglo-American Thought, 1550-1750. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Amman, Jobst. 1586. Gynaeceum, or The Theatre of Women. Frankfort.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun, ed. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Appleby, Joyce Oldham. 1978. Economic Thought and Ideology in Seventeenth- Century England. Princeton.Google Scholar
Arnold, Janet. 1988. Queen Elizabeth's Wardrobe Unlock'd. Leeds.Google Scholar
Baker, C. H. Collins. 1912. Lely and the Stuart Portrait Painters, Volume 1. London.Google Scholar
Beck, Thomasina. 1993, reprint. The Embroiderer's Flowers. 1992. Newton Google Scholar
Abbot, Devon, Best, Henry. 1972. “Types of Linen Cloth Known to a Yorkshire Farmer, 1641.” In Seventeenth Century Economic Documents, ed. Thirsk, Joan and Cooper, J. P.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boschma, C. 1969. “Friese en Noordhollandse knottekistjes.” Antiek 3: 559-66.Google Scholar
Boulton, Jeremy. 1991. “Itching After Private Marryings? Marriage Customs in Seventeenth-Century London.” London Journal 16: 15–34.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1982. The Wheels of Commerce. Trans. Reynolds, Sian. London.Google Scholar
Brenner, Robert. 1993. Merchants and Revolution: Commercial Change, Political Conflict, and London's Overseas Traders, 1550-1653. Princeton.Google Scholar
Brewer, John, and Roy Porter, ed. 1993. Consumption and the World of Goods. London.Google Scholar
Brodsky Elliott, Vivien. 1981. “Single Women in the London Marriage Market: Age, Status and Mobility, 1598- 1619.” In Marriage and Society, ed. Outhwaite, R. B., 81–100. New York.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. 1992. Drama and the Market in the Age of Shakespeare. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clark, Alice. 1992. Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century. 3rd ed. London.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephanie S. 1995. “'Met een wenende ziel … doch droge ogen': Women Holding Handkerchiefs in Seventeenth-Century Dutch Portraits.” Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 46: 333-67.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1994. The Civilizing Process. Trans. Jephcott, Edmund. Oxford.Google Scholar
Eliot, John. 1593. Ortho-epia Gallica. London.Google Scholar
Erickson, Amy Louise. 1993. Women and Property in Early Modern England. London.Google Scholar
Ezell, Margaret J. M. 1987. The Patriarch's Wife: Literary Evidence and the History of the Family Chapel Hill. The Fair Maid of the Exchange. 1962. Brown, Arthur, ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fairholt, F. W 1896. Costume in England: A History of Dress, Volume 2. 4th ed. London.Google Scholar
Foakes, R. A., and Rickert, R. T., eds. 1961. Henslowe's Diary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Freeman, Rosemary. 1948. English Emblem Books. London.Google Scholar
Gerard, John. 1597. The Herbal! or General! Historic of Plantes. London.Google Scholar
Gillis, John R. 1985. For Better, For Worse: British Marriages, 1600 to the Present. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gouge, William. 1622. Of Domestical! Duties. London.Google Scholar
Gowing, Laura. 1996. Domestic Dangers: Women, Words, and Sex in Early Modern London. Oxford.Google Scholar
Howard, Jean E. 1994. The Stage and Social Struggle in Early Modern England. London and New York.Google Scholar
Ingram, Martin. 1987. Church Courts, Sex and Marriage, 1570-1640. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jones, Ann Rosalind. Forthcoming. Renaissance Clothing and the Materials of Memory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kerridge, Eric. 1985. Textile Manufactures in Early Modern England. Manchester.Google Scholar
Klein, Lisa M. 1997. “Your Humble Handmaid: Elizabethan Gifts of Needlework.” Renaissance Quarterly 50: 459-93.Google Scholar
Lester, Katherine Morris. 1940. Accessories of Dress. Peoria, IL.Google Scholar
Linthicum, M. Channing. 1936. Costume in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries. Oxford.Google Scholar
Morris, Frances. 1923. “An Elizabethan Embroidery.” Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 18:228-30.Google Scholar
Morse, H. K. 1934. Elizabethan Pageantry. London.Google Scholar
Moulton, Ian Frederick. 1996. “'A Monster Great Deformed': The Unruly Masculinity of Richard III.” Shakespeare Quarterly 47: 251-68.Google Scholar
Mukerji, Chandra. 1983. From Graven Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism. New York.Google Scholar
N. B. 1618. The Court and Country, Or, A Brief Discourse Dialogue-wise set downe betweene a Courtier and a Countryman. London.Google Scholar
Nevinson, John L. 1938. Catalogue of English Domestic Embroidery of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. London.Google Scholar
O'Hara, Diana. 1991. “'Ruled by my friends': Aspects of Marriage in the Diocese of Canterbury, c. 1540-1570.” Continuity and Change 6:9–41.Google Scholar
O'Hara, Diana. 1992. “The Language of Tokens and the Making of Marriage.” Rural History 3: 1–40.Google Scholar
Orlin, Lena Cowen. 1999. “Three Ways to be Invisible in the Renaissance: Sex, Reputation, and Stitchery.” In Renaissance Culture and the Everyday, ed. Fumerton, Patricia and Hunt, Simon, 183–203. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Parker, Rozsika. 1984. The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine. London.Google Scholar
Partridge, Eric. 1969. Shakespeare's Bawdy. Rev. ed. New York.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1961. “Symposium.” In The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington, 526-74. Princeton.Google Scholar
Prior, Mary. 1985. “Women and the Urban Economy: Oxford 1500-1800.” In Women in English Society 1500-1800, ed. Prior, Mary, 93–117. London.Google Scholar
Remington, Preston. 1945. English Domestic Needlework of the XVI, XVII, and XVIII Centuries. New York. Google Scholar
Roberts, Michael. 1990. “Women and Work in Sixteenth-Century English Towns.” In Work in Towns 850-1850, ed. Corfield, Penelope J. and Keene, Derek, 86–102. Leicester. Google Scholar
Shrewsbury, Elizabeth, Countess of. Accounts [1589- ]. “A note of all such money as I Edward Whalley have dysbursed … Since the ixth daye of September… 1589.” Folger Shakespeare Library MSS. V.b. 308.Google Scholar
Slater, Miriam. 1976. “The Weightiest Business: Marriage in an Upper-Gentry Family in Seventeenth-Century England.” Past and Present 72: 25–54.Google Scholar
Smith, David R. 1982. Masks of Wedlock: Seventeenth-Century Dutch Marriage Portraiture. Ann Arbor. Google Scholar
Speed, John. 1611. The Theatre of the Empire of Great Britaine. London.Google Scholar
Spinosa, Charles. 1994. “The Transformation of Intentionality: Debt and Contract in The Merchant of Venice.” ELR 24: 370–409.Google Scholar
Staniland, Kay. 1991. Embroiderers. Toronto.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Philip. 1583. The Anatomie of Abuses. London.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Henry. 1978. A Treatise Of Spousals, Or Matrimonial Contracts (London, 1686). In Classics of English Legal History in the Modern Era, eds. Berkowitz, David S. and Thorne, Samuel E.. New York.Google Scholar
Taylor, John. 1631. The Needle's Excellency. London.Google Scholar
Thirsk, Joan. 1988, reprint. Economic Policy and Projects: The Development of a Consumer Society in Early Modern England. 1978. Oxford.Google Scholar
Townshend Family Household Books, 1589-1652. “A note of my maister his wearing Lynen taken the 10 of Iune 1621.” Folger Shakespeare Library MSS.V.b. 161.Google Scholar
Traub, Valerie. 1992. Desire and Anxiety: Circulations of Sexuality in Shakespearean Drama. London.Google Scholar
Wace, A. J. B. 1932-1933. “English Embroideries belonging to Sir JohnGoogle Scholar
Carew Pole, Bart. ” Walpole Society 21: 53–66.Google Scholar
Weigall, Rachel. 1911. “An Elizabethan Gentlewoman. The Journal of Lady Mildmay, circa 1570-1617.” Quarterly Review 215: 119-38.Google Scholar
Whitney, Geffrey. 1586. A Choice of Emblemes. Leyden.Google Scholar
Wiesner, Merry E. 1986. “Spinsters and Seamstresses: Women in Cloth and Clothing Production.” In Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe, ed. Ferguson, Margaret, et al., 191–205. Chicago.Google Scholar
Willen, Diane. 1983. “Guildswomen in the City of York, 1560-1700.” Historian 46: 204-18.Google Scholar
Willett, C. 1962. Handbook of English Costume in the Sixteenth Century. London.Google Scholar
Williams, Gordon. 1994. A Dictionary of Sexual Language and Lmagery in Shakespearean and Stuart Literature, Volume 3. London.Google Scholar
Wright, Sue. 1985. “'Churmaids, Huswyfes and Hucksters': The Employment of Women in Tudor and Stuart Salisbury.” In Women and Work in Pre- Industrial England, ed. Charles, Lindsey and Duffin, Lorna. London. Google Scholar
Wrightson, Keith. 1982. English Society 1580-1680. New Brunswick.Google Scholar