No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Renaissance Footprint: The Material Trace in Print Culture from Dürer to Spenser
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Abstract
This article argues that Renaissance print culture appropriated the cultural meanings of the footprint. The potent analogy between the printing press and printing foot informed Reformation debates over Christ’s footprints as objects of devotion and subjects of representation. In sixteenth-century England a model for investigative reading informed by Erasmian humanism was developed in the print projects of George Gascoigne and Edmund Spenser. Experimentation with effects of the press and the material environment of the page culminated in extensive play upon the material and metaphorical sign of the printing foot in Spenser’s “Amoretti.”
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2018 Renaissance Society of America
References
Anderson, Christine, and Talbot, Charles. From a Mighty Fortress: Prints, Drawings, and Books in the Age of Luther, 1483–1546. Detroit: Detroit Institute of Arts, 1983.Google Scholar
Areford, David S. “Multiplying the Sacred: The Fifteenth-Century Woodcut as Reproduction, Surrogate, Simulation.” In The Woodcut (2009), 119–54.Google Scholar
Ariosto, Ludovico. Orlando Furioso in English heroical verse, by Iohn Haringto[n]. London, 1591.Google Scholar
Aristotle. On The Vital Principle [De Anima]. Trans. Charles Collier. Cambridge and London: Macmillan and Nutt, 1855.Google Scholar
The Arma Christi in Medieval and Early Modern Material Culture. Ed. Andrea Denny-Brown and Lisa H. Cooper. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
Arnold, Richard. In this booke is conteyned the names of ye baylifs custos mairs and sherefs of the cite of londo[n] from the tyme of king richard the furst. London, 1503.Google Scholar
Ashton, Nick, Lewis, Simon G., Groote, Isabelle De, et al. “Hominin Footprints from Early Pleistocene Deposits at Happisburgh, UK.” PLoS ONE
9.2 (2014). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088329.Google Scholar
Aston, Margaret. The King’s Bedpost: Reformation and Iconography in a Tudor Group Portrait. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Aston, Margaret. “The Bishops’ Bible Illustrations.” In The Church and the Arts, ed. Diana Wood, special issue of Studies in Church History
28 (1995): 267–85.Google Scholar
Aston, Margaret. “Symbols of Conversion: Properties of the Page in Reformation England.” In Printed Images in Early Modern Britain: Essays in Interpretation, ed. Michael Hunter, 23–42. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The tvvoo bookes of Francis Bacon. Of the proficience and aduancement of learning, diuine and humane. London, 1605.Google Scholar
Bangs, Jeremy D. “Maerten ven Heemskerck’s Bel and the Dragon and Iconoclasm.” Renaissance Quarterly
30.1 (1977): 8–11.Google Scholar
Bartram, Giulia. Albrecht Dürer and His Legacy: The Graphic Work of a Renaissance Artist. London: British Museum, 2002.Google Scholar
Bates, Catherine. Masculinity and the Hunt: Wyatt to Spenser. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bath, Michael. “Verse Form and Pictorial Space in Van der Noot’s Theatre for Worldlings.” In Word and Visual Imagination (1988), 73–105.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Sarah. Christ’s Body: Identity, Culture and Society in Late Medieval Writings. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Belting, Hans. Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Berliner, Rudolf. “Arma Christi.” Münchner Jahrbuch der bildenden Kunst
3.6 (1955): 35–152.Google Scholar
Bland, Mark. “The Appearance of the Text in Early Modern England.” Text
11 (1998): 91–154.Google Scholar
Blank, Paula. Broken English: Dialects and the Politics of Language in Renaissance Writing. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Bord, Janet. Footprints in Stone: Imprints of Giants, Heroes, Holy People, Devils, Monsters and Supernatural Beings. Loughborough: Heart of Albion, 2004.Google Scholar
Brooks, Douglas A. “‘Made all of rusty yron, ranckling sore’: The Imprint of Paternity in The Faerie Queene.” In Textual Conversations in the Renaissance: Ethics, Authors, Technologies, ed. Zachary Lesser and Benedict S. Robinson, 173–97. Farnham: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Joshua. “The Word Made Flax: Cheap Bibles, Textual Corruption, and the Poetics of Paper.” PMLA
126.2 (2011): 327–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvin, Jean. A Very profitable treatise, MADE BY M. IHON Caluyne, declarynge what great profit might come to al christendome, yf there were a regester made of all Sainctes bodies and other reliques, which are aswell in Italy, as in Fraunce, Dutchland, Spaine, and other kingdomes and countreys. Trans. Steuen Wythers. London, 1561.Google Scholar
Campbell, Ewan. “Royal Inauguration in Dál Raita and the Stone of Destiny.” In The Stone of Destiny: Artefact and Icon, ed. Richard Welander, David J. Breeze, and Thomas Owen Clancy, 43–60. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 2003.Google Scholar
Celenza, Christopher S. “Lorenzo Valla’s Radical Philology: The ‘Preface’ to the Annotations to the New Testament in Context.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies
42.2 (2012): 365–94.Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian. The Literary Culture of the Reformation: Grammar and Grace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Daniels Siftyng in these our dayes, aptly applyed to the true Preachers of the Gospell. London, 1572.Google Scholar
Davenport, Edwin. “Elizabethan England’s Other Reformation of Manners.” ELH
63 (1996): 255–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grazia, Margareta. “Imprints: Shakespeare, Gutenberg and Descartes.” In Alternative Shakespeares, ed. Terence Hawkes, 2:63–94. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta, and Stallybrass, Peter. “The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text.” Shakespeare Quarterly
44 (1993): 255–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny-Brown, Andrea, and Cooper, Lisa H.. “Introduction: Arma Christi: The Material Culture of the Passion.” In The Arma Christi (2014), 1–19.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Deshman, Robert. “Another Look at the Disappearing Christ: Corporeal and Spiritual Vision in Early Medieval Images.” Art Bulletin
79 (1997): 518–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desjardins, R. “Les Vestiges du Seigneur au mont des Oliviers: Un courant mystique et iconographique.” Bulletin de Littérature ecclésiastique
73 (1972): 51–72.Google Scholar
Devereux, E. J. “The Publication of the English Paraphrases of Erasmus.” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library
51 (1969): 348–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Dunlop. “The Unity of Spenser’s Amoretti.” In Silent Poetry: Essays in Numerological Analysis, ed. Alastair Fowler, 153–69. London: Routledge, 1970.Google Scholar
Edwards, Calvin R. “The Narcissus Myth in Spenser’s Poetry.” Studies in Philology
74 (1977): 63–88.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. “Exhortatio ad Studium Euangelicae Lectionis.” In Epistola Nvncvpatoria ad Carolum Caesarem, sigs. a4v–b8r. Basel, 1522.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. An exhortation to the diligent studye of scripture, made by Erasmus Roterodamus. And tra[n]slated in to inglissh. An exposition in to the seventh chaptre of the first pistle to the Corinthians. [Antwerp?], 1529.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. An exhortacyon to the study of readynge the Gospell Made by Erasmus of Roterdame, & lately translated in to Englysshe. Norwich: Robert Wyer, 1534.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. The Praise of Folly and Other Writings. Ed. and trans. Robert M. Adams. New York: W. W. Norton, 1989.Google Scholar
Field, Richard S. “A Fifteenth-Century Picture Panel from the Dominican Monastery of Saint Catherine in Nuremberg.” In The Woodcut (2009), 205–37.Google Scholar
Fleming, Juliet. “Changed Opinion as to Flowers.” In Renaissance Paratexts (2011), 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Juliet. Cultural Graphology: Writing after Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flete, John. The History of Westminster Abbey. Ed. J. Armitage Robinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1909.Google Scholar
Freedberg, David. “Art and Iconcolasm, 1525–1580: The Case of the Northern Netherlands.” In Kunst voor de beeldenstorm: Noordnederlandse Kunst, 1525–1580, ed J. P. Filedt Kok, W. Halsema Kubes, and W. T. Kloek, 39–84. Amsterdam: Staatsuitgeverij, 1986.Google Scholar
Fritz, Jean-Marie. “Empreintes et vestiges dans les récits de pèlerinage: Quand la pierre devient cire.” Le Moyen Age
118.1 (2012): 9–40. doi:10.3917/rma.181.0009.Google Scholar
Fukuda, Shohachi. “The Numerological Patterning of Amoretti and Epithalamion.” Spenser Studies
9 (1988): 33–48.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Roger. “Printing House and Engraving Shop: A Mysterious Collaboration.” The Book Collector
23 (2004): 213–37.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Carlo. “Clues: Roots of an Evidential Paradigm.” In Clues, Myths and the Historical Method, trans. John Tedeschi and Anne Tedeschi, 96–125. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. Writing Matter: From the Hands of the English Renaissance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Gordon, Andrew. Writing Early Modern London: Memory, Text and Community. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goris, J.-A., and Marlier, G.. Albrecht Dürer: Diary of His Journey to the Netherlands, 1520–1521. New York: New York Graphic Society, 1971.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. The Culture of Correction in Renaissance Europe. London: British Library, 2011.Google Scholar
Grogan, Jane. Exemplary Spenser: Visual and Poetic Pedagogy in “The Faerie Queene.”
Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Jeffrey. The Visual and the Visionary: Art and Female Spirituality in Late Medieval Germany. New York: Zone Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Hamrick, Stephen. “‘Set in portraiture’: George Gascoigne, Queen Elizabeth, and Adapting the Royal Image.” Early Modern Literary Studies
11.1 (2005): 1.1–30. http://purl.oclc.org/emls/11-1/hamrgasc.htm.Google Scholar
Harrison, Terry. “Laetoli Revisited: Renewed Paleontological and Geological Investigations at Localities on the Eyasi Plateau in Northern Tanzania.” In Paleontology and Geology of Laetoli: Human Evolution in Context. Volume 1, Geology, Geochronology, Paleoecology and Paleoenvironment, ed. Terry Harrison, 1–15. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
Heninger, S. K., Jr. “The Typographical Layout of Spenser’s Shepheardes Calender.” In Word and Visual Imagination (1988), 33–71.Google Scholar
Hindle, Steve. “Beating the Bounds of the Parish: Order, Memory and Identity in the English Local Community, c. 1500–1700.” In Defining Community in Early Modern Europe, ed. Michael Halvorson and Karen Spierling, 205–27. Farnham: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. “Culture on the Ground: The World Perceived through the Feet.” Journal of Material Culture
9.3 (2004): 315–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Lisa. Erasmus, Man of Letters: The Construction of Charisma in Print. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Johnson, William C. “Spenser’s Amoretti and the Art of the Liturgy.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900
14.1 (1974): 47–61.Google Scholar
Karim Cooper, Farah. The Hand on the Shakespearean Stage: Gesture, Touch and the Spectacle of Dismemberment. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2016.Google Scholar
Kaske, Carol. “Spenser’s Amoretti and Epithalamion of 1595: Structure, Genre, and Numerology.” English Literary Renaissance
8.3 (1978): 271–95.Google Scholar
King, John N.
Spenser’s Poetry and the Reformation Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Knapp, James A. “The Bastard Art: Woodcut Illustration in Sixteenth-Century England.” In Printing and Parenting in Early Modern England, ed. Douglas A. Brooks, 151–72. Farnham: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
Koerner, Joseph Leo. The Moment of Self-Portraiture in German Renaissance Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Koerner, Joseph Leo. “Albrecht Dürer: A Sixteenth Century Influenza.” In Giulia Bartram, Albrecht Dürer and His Legacy: The Graphic Work of a Renaissance Artist, 18–38. London: British Museum, 2002.Google Scholar
Kühnel, Bianca, Noga-Banai, Galit, and Vorholt, Hanna, eds. Visual Constructs of Jerusalem. Turnhout: Brepols, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, David, and Parshall, Peter,. The Renaissance Print, 1470–1550. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Legat, Allice. “Walking Stories: Leaving Footprints.” In Ways of Walking (2008), 35–49.Google Scholar
Luborsky, Ruth Samson. “The Illustrations to The Shepheardes Calender.” Spenser Studies
2 (1981): 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luborsky, Ruth Samson. “The Illustrations to The Shepheardes Calender II.” Spenser Studies
9 (1988): 249–53.Google Scholar
Mandeville, John. The Book of Marvels and Travels. Ed. and trans. Anthony Bale. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ma(r)king the Text: The Presentation of Meaning on the Literary Page. Ed. Joe Bray, Miriam Hadley, and Anne C. Henry. Farnham: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
Mayor, Adrienne, and Sarjeant, William A. S.. “The Folklore of Footprints in Stone: From Classical Antiquity to the Present.” Ichnos
8.2 (2001): 143–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, Richard A. “‘Little booke: thy selfe present’: The Politics of Presentation in The Shepheardes Calender.” In Presenting Poetry: Composition, Publication, Reception, ed. Howard Erskine-Hill and Richard A. McCabe, 15–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
McCabe, Richard A.. “Annotating Anonymity, or Putting a Gloss on The Shepheardes Calender.” In Ma(r)king the Text (2000), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCanles, Michael. “The Shepheardes Calender as Document and Monument.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900
22.1 (1982): 5–19.Google Scholar
McDonald, Mark P.
Ferdinand Columbus: Renaissance Collector. London: British Museum, 2005.Google Scholar
[McLeod, Randall]. “An EPILOGVE, Allegro ma troppo. Hammered, by R. McGeddon.” In Negotiating the Jacobean Printed Book, ed. Pete Langman, 136–99. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar
Morris, Rev. R., ed. and trans. The Blickling Homilies of the Tenth Century. London: Early English Text Society, 1908.Google Scholar
Moshenska, Joe. Feeling Pleasures: The Sense of Touch in Renaissance England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Mukerji, Chandra. From Graven Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, William. The Poetry of Edmund Spenser: A Study. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Nichols, Ann Eljenholm. “‘O Vernicle’: Illustrations of an Arma Christi Poem.” In Tributes to Kathleen L. Scott: English Medieval Manuscripts: Readers, Makers and Illuminators, ed. Marlene Villalobos Hennessey, 138–69. Turnhout: Brepols, 2009.Google Scholar
Nichols, Ann Eljenholm. “The Footprints of Christ as Arma Christi: The Evidence of Morgan B.54.” In The Arma Christi (2014a), 113–33.Google Scholar
Nichols, Ann Eljenholm, ed. “O Vernicle: A Critical Edition.” In The Arma Christi (2014b), 308-91.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Catherine. Uncommon Tongues: Eloquence and Eccentricity in the English Renaissance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Sir Thomas. “Prefatory Letter to James Hawes, Lord Mayor of London, 1574.” British Library, Add MS, 33271, fols. 28r–31v.Google Scholar
Ovid. Shakespeare’s Ovid Being Arthur Golding’s Translation of the Metamorphoses. Ed. W. Rouse. London: De La More Press, 1904.Google Scholar
Parshall, Peter, and Schoch, Rainer, with Areford, David S., Field, Richard S, and Schmidt, Peter. Origins of European Printmaking: Fifteenth-Century Woodcuts and Their Public. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Pon, Lisa. Raphael, Dürer and Marcantonio Raimondi: Copying and the Italian Renaissance Print. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Pon, Lisa. A Printed Icon in Early Modern Italy: Forli’s Madonna of the Fire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, Anne Lake. “The Thirsty Deer and the Lord of Life: Some Contexts for Amoretti 67–70.” Spenser Studies
6 (1985): 33–76.Google Scholar
Pringle, Denys. The Churches of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. A Corpus. Volume III: The City of Jerusalem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Prouty, Charles, and Ruth Prouty. “George Gascoigne, The Noble Arte of Venerie, and Queen Elizabeth at Kenilworth.” In Joseph Quincy Adams Memorial Studies, ed. James Gilmer McManaway, 639–64. Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library, 1948.Google Scholar
Renaissance Paratexts. Ed. Helen Smith and Louise Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Renouard, Philippe. Bibliographie des Impression et des Oeuvres de Josse Badius Ascensius, Imprimeur et Humaniste, 1462–1535. 3 vols. Paris: Em. Paul, 1908.Google Scholar
Rowe, Katherine. “God’s Handy Worke.” In The Body in Parts: Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe, ed. David Hillman and Carla Mazzio, 285–312. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Rubin, Miri. Corpus Christi: The Eucharist in Late Mediaeval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Rublack, Ulinka. “Grapho-Relics: Lutheranism and the Materialization of the Word.” Past and Present 2010): Supplement 5, Relics and Remains, ed. Alexandra Walsham, 144–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Eleanor A. “A Commentary on Iconoclasm in Several Print Series by Maarten van Heemkerch.” Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art
10.2 (1978–79): 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, Meyer. “The Image of the Disappearing Christ.” In Late Antique, Early Christian and Mediaeval Art: Selected Papers, 266–87. New York: G. Brazillier, 1979.Google Scholar
Schiller, Gertrud. Iconography of Christian Art. 2: The Passion of Jesus Christ. Trans. Janet Seligman. London: Lund Humphries, 1972.Google Scholar
Schottus, Franciscus. Italy in its original glory, ruine, and revival being an exact survey of the whole geography and history of that famous country. Trans. Edmund Warcupp. London, 1660.Google Scholar
Scott-Warren, Jason. “Unannotating Spenser.” In Renaissance Paratexts (2011), 153–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scribner, R. W.
For the Sake of the Simple Folk: Popular Propaganda for the German Reformation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Shepard, Alexandra. Meanings of Manhood in Early Modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Shinn, Abigail. “‘Extraordinary discourses of vnnecessarie matter’: Spenser’s Shepheardes Calender and the Almanac Tradition.” In Literature and Popular Culture in Early Modern England, ed. Matthew Dimmock and Andrew Hadfield, 137–50. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Snoek, Godefridus J. C.
Medieval Piety from Relics to the Eucharist: A Process of Mutual Interaction. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. Edmund Spenser’s “Amoretti and Epithalamion”: A Critical Edition. Ed. Kenneth J. Larsen. Tempe: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1997.Google Scholar
Stapleton, M. L. “Devoid of Guilty Shame: Ovidian Tendencies in Spenser’s Erotic Poetry.” Modern Philology
105.2 (2007): 271–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, Ian. The Fossil Trail: How We Know What We Think We Know about Human Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Tribble, Evelyn B.
Margins and Marginality: The Printed Page in Early Modern England. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Tyndale, William. The Obedience of a Christian Man (1528). Ed. David Daniell. London: Penguin, 2000.Google Scholar
Udall, Nicholas. Floures for Latine spekynge selected and gathered oute of Terence, and the same translated in to Englysshe. London, 1534.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nicholas. The Holy Blood: King Henry III and the Westminster Blood Relic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Walker Bynum, Caroline. “Seeing and Seeing Beyond: The Mass of St. Gregory in the Fifteenth Century.” In The Mind’s Eye: Art and Theological Argument in the Middle Ages, ed. Jeffrey F. Hamburger and Anne-Marie Bouché, 208–40. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Walker Bynum, Caroline. Wonderful Blood: Theology and Practice in Late Medieval Northern Germany and Beyond. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Wall, Wendy. The Imprint of Gender: Authorship and Publication in the English Renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra. “Jewels for Gentlewomen: Religious Books as Artifacts in Late Medieval and Early Modern England.” In The Church and the Book, ed. R. N. Swanson, 123–42. Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 2004.Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra. “Footprints and Faith: Religion and the Landscape in Early Modern Britain and Ireland.” In God’s Bounty: The Church and the Natural World, ed. Peter Clarke and Tony Claydon, 169–83. Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 2010.Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra. The Reformation of the Landscape: Religion, Identity and Memory in Early Modern Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ways of Walking: Ethnography and Practice on Foot. Ed. Tim Ingold and Jo Lee Vergunst. Farnham: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
White, Paul. Jodocus Badius Ascensius: Commentary, Commerce and Print in the Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, John. Jerusalem Pilgrims before the Crusades. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1977.Google Scholar
Wood, Christopher. Forgery, Replica, Fiction: Temporalities of German Renaissance Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
The Woodcut in Fifteenth-Century Europe. Ed. Peter Parshall. Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art, 2009.Google Scholar
Word and Visual Imagination: Studies in the Interaction of English Literature and the Visual Arts. Ed. Karl Josef Höltgein, Peter M. Daly, and Wolfgang Lottes. Erlangen: Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg, 1988.Google Scholar
Worm, Andrea. “Steine und Fuβspuren auf dem Ölberg Zu zwei ungewöhnlichen Moitven bei Darstellungen der Himmelfahre Christi.” Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte
66.3 (2003): 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar