Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:20:02.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Renaissance Consilium as Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Thomas Kuehn
Thomas Kuehn*
Affiliation:
Clemson University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a provocative essay published in Renaissance Quarterly in 1999, Ullrich Langer investigated the critical positions of novellieri such as Boccaccio regarding the legal system, courts, and lawyers. This essay builds on his work, both by broadening the range of critiques of law to include those of the humanists, and by giving the lawyers their day in court, as it were, in an investigation of two representative case-deciding opinions. Then as now, these legal experts did not have the luxury of considering law and justice in the abstract, apart from the need to resolve the particular case before them: they had to resolve a case and follow the law as they understood it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , Winter 2006 , pp. 1058 - 1088
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, Leon Battista. De iciarchia. In Opere volgari, ed. Cecil, Grayson, 2: 185–286. Bari, 1966.Google Scholar
Ascheri, Mario. Tribunali, giuristi e istituzioni dal Medioevo all’età moderna. Bologna, 1989.Google Scholar
Ascheri, Mario. Istituzioni medievali. Bologna, 1994.Google Scholar
Ascheri, Mario. “Le fonti e la flessibilità del diritto comune: Il paradosso del consilium sapientis ”. In Legal Consulting (1999), 11–53.Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni. Il Decameron. Ed.Charles S., Singleton. Trans. G. H., McWilliam. 2 vols. 1966. Reprint, Harmondsworth, 1972.Google Scholar
Bologna nell'età di Carlo V e Guicciardini. Ed. Emilio, Pasquini and Paolo, Prodi. Bologna, 2002.Google Scholar
Bracciolini, Poggio. Oratio in laudem legum. In La disputa delle arti (1947a), 11–15.Google Scholar
Bracciolini, Poggio. Secunda convivalis disceptatio, utra artium, medicinae an iuris civilis, praestet. In La disputa delle art (1947b), 15–33.Google Scholar
Brown, Alison. Bartolomeo Scala, 1430–1497, Chancellor of Florence: The Humanist as Bureaucrat. Princeton, 1979.Google Scholar
Brucker, Gene. “Florence and It s University, 1348–1434.” In Action and Conviction in Early Modern Europe: Essays in Memory of E. H. Harbison, ed. T. K., Rabb and Jerrold E., Siegel, 220–36. Princeton, 1969.10.1515/9781400876068-012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brucker, Gene. “Renaissance Florence: Who Needs a University?” In The University and the City: From Medieval Origins to the Present, ed. Thomas, Bender, 47–58. Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
Brundage, James. Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe. Chicago, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calasso, Francesco. Introduzione al diritto comune. Milan, 1970.Google Scholar
Catalano, Michele. Vita di Ludovico Ariosto. 2 vols. Geneva, 1930–31.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Osvaldo. Francesco Guicciardini giurista: I ricordi degli onorari. Milan, 1991.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Osvaldo. “Una figura di bandito in un communicato colloquio di Guicciardini.” In Bologna nell'età di Carlo V e Guicciardini (2002), 109–50.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Osvaldo, Susan, Degenring, and Julius, Kirshner. A Grammar of Signs: Bartolo of Sassoferrato's “Tract on Insignia and Coats of Arms”. Berkeley, 1994.Google Scholar
Chojnacki, Stanley. “Getting Back the Dowry.” In Stanley, Chojnacki, Women and Men in Renaissance Venice: Twelve Essays on Patrician Society, 95–111. Baltimore, 2000.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John, and Simon, Roberts. Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context. Chicago, 1981.Google Scholar
Conte, Emanuele. “Droit médiéval: Un débat historiographique italien.” Annales: Histoires, Sciences Sociales 57 (2002a): 1593–1613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, Emanuele. “‘Storicità del diritto: Nuovo e vecchio nella storiografia giuridica attuale.” Storica 8 (2002b): 135–62Google Scholar
Corpus iuris civilis. Ed. T. H., Mommsen, W., Kroll, P., Krueger, and R., Schoell. 3 vols. Berlin, 1928–29.Google Scholar
Cortese, Ennio. Il diritto nella storia medievale. Vol. 2, Il basso medioevo. Rome, 1995.Google Scholar
Corti, Gino. “Consigli sulla mercatura di un anonimo trecentista.” Archivio storico italiano 110 (1952): 114–19Google Scholar
Davies, Jonathan. Florence and Its University during the Early Renaissance. Leiden, 1998.Google Scholar
Debby, Nirit Ben-Aryeh. “Political Views in the Preaching of Giovanni Dominici in Renaissance Florence, 1400–1406.” Renaissance Quarterly 55, no. 1 (2002): 19–48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Elia, Anthony F. “Marriage, Sexual Pleasure, and Learned Brides in the Wedding Orations of Fifteenth-Century Italy.” Renaissance Quarterly 55, no. 2 (2002): 379–433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La disputa delle arti nel Quattrocento: Testi editi ed inediti. Ed. Eugenio, Garin. Florence, 1947.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R. Law and Theology in the Middle Ages. London and New York, 2002.Google Scholar
Fantini, Maria Grazia. La cultura del giurista medievale: Natura, causa, ratio. Milan, 1998.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Robert A. “Untold Stories in the Law.” In Law's Stories (1996), 84–98.Google Scholar
Ferrante, Lucia. “Legittima concubina, quasi moglie, anzi meretrice: Note sul concubinato tra Medioevo ed etàmoderna.” In Modernità: Definizioni ed esercizi, ed. Albano, Biondi, 123–46. Bologna, 1998.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. Legal Fictions. Paolo Alto, 1967.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. L’Umanesimo italiano: Filosofia e vita civile nel Rinascimento. Bari, 1975.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. “Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective.” In Clifford, Geertz, Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, 167–234. New York, 1983.Google Scholar
Génestal, Robert. Histoire de la légitimation des enfants naturels en droit canonique. Paris, 1905.Google Scholar
Gewirtz, Paul. “Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law.” In Law's Stories (1996), 2–13.Google Scholar
Gilli, Patrick. La noblesse du droit: Débats et controversies sur la culture juridique et le role des jurists dans l’Italie médiévale (XII e–XV e siècles). Paris, 2003.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Myron P. Humanists and Jurists: Six Studies in the Renaissance. Cambridge, 1963.10.4159/harvard.9780674281738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. Oedipus Lex: Psychoanalysis, History, Law. Berkeley, 1995.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. “Gay Science and Law.” In Rhetoric and Law in Early Modern Europe, ed. Victoria, Kahn and Lorna, Hutson, 95–124. New Haven, 2001.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J., Barbara, Yngvesson, and David M., Engel. Law and Community in Three American Towns. Ithaca, 1994.Google Scholar
Grohman, Alberto. Città e territorio tra medioevo ed età moderna: Perugia, secc. xiii–xvi. 2 vols. Perugia, 1981.Google Scholar
Grossi, Paolo. L e situazioni realinell’esperienza giuridica medievale. Padua, 1968.Google Scholar
Grossi, Paolo. Il dominio e le cose: Percezioni medievali e moderne dei diritti reali. Milan, 1992.Google Scholar
Grossi, Paolo. L’Ordine giuridico medievale. Bari, 1995.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco. Maxims and Reflections of a Renaissance Statesman. Trans. Mario, Domandi. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco. Ricordi, diari, memorie. Ed. Mario, Spinella. Rome, 1981.Google Scholar
Horn, Norbert. Aequitas in den Lehren des Baldus. Graz, 1968.Google Scholar
Kearns, Thomas R., and Austin, Sarat. “Legal Justice and Injustice: Toward a Situated Perspective.” In Justice and Injustice in Law and Legal Theory, ed. Austin, Sarat and Thomas R., Kearns, 1–17. Ann Arbor, 1996.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R. Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: Language, Law, and History in the French Renaissance. New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Kircher, Timothy. “The Modality of Moral Communication in the Decameron's First Day in Contrast to the Mirror of the Exemplum.” Renaissance Quarterly 54, no. 4 (2001): 1035–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirshner, Julius. “‘Ubi Est Ille?’ Franco Sacchetti on the Monte Commune of Florence.” Speculum 59 (1984): 556–8410.2307/2846300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirshner, Julius. “Wives’ Claims against Insolvent Husbands in Late Medieval Italy.” In Women of the Medieval World, ed. Julius, Kirshner and Suzanne F., Wemple, 256–303. Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
Kirshner, Julius. “Materials for a Gilded Cage: Non-Dotal Assets in Florence, 1300–1500.” In The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present, ed. David I., Kertzer and Richard P., Saller, 184–207. New Haven, 1991.Google Scholar
Kirshner, Julius. “ Consilia as Authority in Late Medieval Italy: The Case of Florence.” In Legal Consulting (1999), 107–40.Google Scholar
Kirshner, Julius. “Custom, Customary Law, and Ius Commune in Francesco Guicciardini.” In Bologna nell’età di Carlo V e Guicciardini (2002), 151–79.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. “The Griselda Complex: Dowry and Marriage Gifts in the Quattrocento.” In Women, Family, and Ritual (1985a), 213–46.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. “An Ethnology of Marriage in the Age of Humanism.” In Women, Family, and Ritual (1985b), 247–60.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. Women, Family, and Ritual in Renaissance Italy. Trans. Lydia G., Cochrane. Chicago, 1985c.Google Scholar
Krantz, Frederick. “Florentine Humanist Legal Thought, 1375–1450.” PhD diss., Cornell University, 1971.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. Law, Family, and Women: Toward a Legal Anthropology of Renaissance Italy. Chicago, 1991.10.7208/chicago/9780226457659.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. “Figlie, madri, mogli e vedove: Donne come persone giuridiche.” In Tempi e spazi di vita femminile tra medioevo ed età moderna, ed. Silvana Seidel, Menchi, Anne Jacobson, Schutte, and Thomas, Kuehn, 431–60. Bologna, 1999.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. “Conceptions (Ambiguities) of Property in Early Renaissance Florence.” Quaderni fiorentini per la storia del pensiero giuridico moderno 30 (2001): 585–609 Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. Illegitimacy in Renaissance Florence. Ann Arbor, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. “Literature Meets Law: A Consilium of Antonio Strozzi for Ludovico Ariosto.” In A Renaissance of Conflicts: Visions and Revisions of Law and Society in Italy and Spain, ed. John A., Marino and Thomas, Kuehn, 279–96. Toronto, 2004.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. “Leon Battista Alberti come ille-gittimo fiorentino.” In La vita e il mondo di Leon Battista Alberti. Mantua, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Langer, Ullrich. “The Renaissance Novella as Justice.” Renaissance Quarterly 52, no. 2 (1999): 311–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law's Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. Ed. Peter, Brooks and Paul, Gewirtz. New Haven, 1996.Google Scholar
Lefebvre-Teillard, Anne. Introduction historique au droit des personnes et de la famille. Paris, 1996.Google Scholar
Legal Consulting in the Civil Law Tradition. Ed. Mario, Ascheri, Ingrid, Baumgärtner, and Julius, Kirshner. Berkeley, 1999.Google Scholar
Leineweber, Anke. Die rechtliche Beziehung des nichtehelichen Kindes zu seinem Erzeuger in der Geschichte des Privatrechts. Königstein, 1978.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stanford. “The Rhetoric of the Judicial Opinion.” In Law's Stories (1996), 187–205.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Luigi. Saggio sul diritto giurisprudenziale. Milan, 1967.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. Interpretation and Meaning in the Renaissance. Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
Maffei, Domenico. Gli inizi dell’ umanesimo giuridico. Milan, 1956.Google Scholar
Manzin, Maurizio. Il petrarchismo giuridico: Filosofia e’logica del diritto agli inizi dellumanesimo. Padua, 1994.Google Scholar
David, Marsh. “Alberti, Scala, and Ficino: Aesop in Quattrocento Florence.” Albertiana 3 (2000): 105–18Google Scholar
Martines, Lauro. Lawyers and Statecraft in Renaissance Florence. Princeton, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, George W. The Culture of Profession in Late Renaissance Italy. Toronto, 2004.10.3138/9781442681071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molho, Anthony. Marriage Alliance in Late Medieval Florence. Cambridge, MA, 1994.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London, 1978.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. Social Facts and Fabrications: “Customary” Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980. Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar
Quaglioni, Diego. “Un’ orazione `De nobilitate utilitate et origine legum’ attribuita a Coluccio Salutati.” Pensiero politico 19 (1986): 349–65Google Scholar
Quaglioni, Diego. “Civilis sapientia”: Dottrine giuridiche e dottrine politiche fra medioevo ed età moderna. Rimini, 1989.Google Scholar
Quaglioni, Diego. “Primi appunti per un commento al De iure di Leon Battista Alberti.” Albertiana 3 (2000): 201–19Google Scholar
Quaglioni, Diego. “Politica e diritto in Guiccia-rdini.” In Bologna nell’età di Carlo V e Guicciardini (2002), 181–95.Google Scholar
Quaglioni, Diego. La Giustizia nel Medioevo e nella prima età moderna. Bologna, 2004.Google Scholar
Prodi, Paolo. Una storia della giustizia: Dal pluralismo dei fori al moderno dualismo tra coscienza e diritto. Bologna, 2000.Google Scholar
Roberts, Simon. Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Rosen, Lawrence. The Anthropology of Justice: Law as Culture in Islamic Society. Cambridge, 1989.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. “Duplex Est Ususfructus”: Ricerche sulla natura dell’usufrutto nel diritto commune. 2 vols. Milan, 1996.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. “Un umanista di fronte al diritto: a Proposito del De iure di Leon Battista Alberti.” Rivista di storia del diritto italiano 72 (1999): 77–154 Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. “Intorno al De iure di Leon Battista Alberti.” Albertiana 2 (2000): 221–48Google Scholar
Rossi, Guido. Consilium sapientis iudiciale: Studi e ricerche per la storia del processo romano-canonico. Milan, 1958.Google Scholar
Sacchetti, Franco. Il Trecentonovelle. Ed. Antonio, Lanza. Florence, 1984.Google Scholar
Salutati, Coluccio. De nobilitate legum et medicinae. De verecundia. Ed. Eugenio, Garin. Florence, 1947.Google Scholar
Scala, Bartolomeo. “Bartholomeus Scala de legibus et iudiciis dialogues.” Ed. Lamberto, Borghi. Bibliofilia 42 (1940): 256–82.Google Scholar
Scala, Bartolomeo. “Dialogue on Laws and Legal Judgments.” Trans. David, Marsh. In Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Philosophical Texts, ed. Jill, Kraye, 2: 173–99. Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
Schoeck, Richard J. “Humanism and Jurisprudence.” In Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy, ed. Rabil, Albert Jr., 3:310–26. Philadelphia, 1988.Google Scholar
Sella, Pietro. Il procedimento civile nella legislazione statutaria italiana. Milan, 1927.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. “In the Eyes of the Law: Reflections on the Authority of Legal Discourse.” In Law's Stories (1996), 225–31.Google Scholar
Starr, June. Law as Metaphor: From Islamic Courts to the Palace of Justice. Albany, 1992.Google Scholar
Vilain, Noel. “Prescription et bonne foi du Décret de Gratien (1140) à Jean d’André (d. 1348).” Traditio 14 (1958): 121–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, James Boyd. The Edge of Meaning. Chicago, 2001.Google Scholar
Zorzi, Andrea. L’Amministrazione della giustizia penale nella repubblica fiorentina: Aspetti e problemi. Florence, 1988.Google Scholar
Zorzi, Andrea. “Giusdicenti e operatori di giustizia nello Stato territoriale fiorentino del xv secolo.” Ricerche storiche 19 (1989): 517–52Google Scholar
Zorzi, Andrea. “The Florentines and Their Public Offices in the Early Fifteenth Century: Competition, Abuses of Power, and Unlawful Acts.” In History from Crime, ed. Edward, Muir and Guido, Ruggiero, 110–34. Baltimore, 1994a.Google Scholar
Zorzi, Andrea. “The Judicial System in Florence in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries.” In Crime, Society and the Law in Renaissance Italy, ed. Trevor, Dean and K. J. P., Lowe, 40–58. Cambridge, 1994b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar