Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:39:20.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plato’s Hermaphrodite and a Vindication of the Sense of Touch in the Sixteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Pablo Maurette
Pablo Maurette*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay considers readings of Plato’s Symposium in sixteenth-century trattati d’amore (love treatises) — especially Francesco Patrizi’s L’amorosa filosofia — that offer an alternative to Marsilio Ficino’s pervasive interpretation as presented in his De amore. Against the backdrop of a larger debate concerning the role of the lower senses (touch, in particular) and the relationship between body and soul, these alternative readings of the Symposium attempt to redeem the role of tactility in love matters. Whereas Ficino and his most influential followers — Pico della Mirandola, Pietro Bembo, and Baldassare Castiglione — center their exegesis on Diotima’s speech and privilege sight as the most noble sense, Patrizi’s reading — to a large extent preceded by those of Sperone Speroni, Agnolo Firenzuola, and Flaminio Nobili — focuses on Aristophanes’s myth and the figure of the hermaphrodite as the model for a different kind of human love that is both sensual and spiritual.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , Fall 2015 , pp. 872 - 898
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Diane. A Natural History of the Senses. New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. The Platonism of Marsilio Ficino: A Study of His Phaedrus, Commentary, Its Sources and Genesis. Berkeley, 1984.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. H. Rackham. Cambridge, 1934.Google Scholar
Beccadelli, Antonio. The Hermaphrodite. Trans. Parker, Holt. Cambridge, 2010.Google Scholar
Bembo, Pietro. Gli Asolani e le rime. Ed. Carlo Dionisotti-Casalone. Turin, 1932.Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc. Sexual Ambivalence: Androgyny and Hermaphroditism in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Trans. Janet Lloyd. Berkeley, 2002.Google Scholar
Carter, Sarah. Ovidian Myth and Sexual Deviance in Early Modern English Literature. New York, 2011.10.1057/9780230306073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. Il Libro del Cortegiano. Ed. Barberis, Walter. Turin, 1998.Google Scholar
Cavallari, Maria Giovanna. “L’insegnamento del Patrizi in alcuni madrigali di Tarquinia Molza.” In Francesco Patrizi, filosofo platónico nel crepuscolo del Rinascimento. ed. Patrizia Castelli, 128–138. Florence, 2002.Google Scholar
Clark, Stuart. Vanities of the Eye: Vision in Early Modern European Culture. Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
Clay, Diskin. “The Hangover of Plato’s Symposium in the Italian Renaissance from Bruni (1435) to Castiglione (1528).” In Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. ed. J. H. Lesher, Debra Nails, and Frisbee C. C. Sheffield, 341–59. Cambridge, 2006.Google Scholar
D’Aragona, Tullia. Dialogue on the Infinity of Love. Ed. and trans. Rinaldina Russell and Bruce Merry. Chicago, 1997.10.7208/chicago/9780226136363.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, Rosalyn. “Aesthetic Touch.” In Art and the Senses. ed. Francesca Bacci and David Melcher, 107–15. Oxford, 2011.Google Scholar
Ebreo, Leone. Dialoghi d’amore. Ed. Mannupella, Giacinto. Lisbon, 1983.Google Scholar
Egmond, Florike, and Robert Zwijnenberg, eds. Bodily Extremities: Preoccupations with the Human Body in Early Modern European Culture. London, 2003.Google Scholar
Equicola, Mario. Di natura d’amore. Venice, 1626.Google Scholar
Erasmus of Rotterdam. Praise of Folly and Letter to Maarten van Dorp 1515. Trans. Betty Radice. London, 1971.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. The Letters. Ed. Paul Oskar Kristeller. 8 vols. London, 1979.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. The Book of Life. Trans. Charles Boer. Irving, 1980.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentary on Plato’s Symposium on Love. Trans. Sears, Jayne. Dallas, 1985.Google Scholar
Firenzuola, Agnolo. Opere. Florence, 1993.Google Scholar
Ghiberti, Lorenzo. I commentarii. Naples, 1947.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Ruth. Early Modern Hermaphrodites: Sex and Other Stories. New York, 2002.10.1057/9780230510227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. Roman Elegies. Trans. David Luke. London, 1977.Google Scholar
Grendler, Paul F. The Universities of the Italian Renaissance. Baltimore, 2002.Google Scholar
Hankins, James. “Ficino’s Critique of Lucretius.” In The Rebirth of Platonic Theology. ed. James Hankins and Fabrizio Meroi, 137–54. Florence, 2013.10.2307/j.ctt1tqx8b6.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Elizabeth, ed. Sensible Flesh: On Touch in Early Modern Culture. Philadelphia, 2003.Google Scholar
Hillman, David, and Carla Mazzio, eds. The Body in Parts: Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe. New York, 1997.Google Scholar
Jütte, Robert. A History of the Senses: From Antiquity to Cyberspace. Trans. Lynn, James. Cambridge, 2005.Google Scholar
Kolsky, Stephen. The Ghost of Boccaccio: Writing on Famous Women in Renaissance Italy. Turnhout, 2005.10.1484/M.LMEMS-EB.5.112209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krautheimer, Richard. Lorenzo Ghiberti. Princeton, 1956.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. “The Transformation of Platonic Love in the Italian Renaissance.” In Platonism and the English Imagination. ed. Anna Baldwin and Sarah Hutton, 76–85. Cambridge, 1994.10.1017/CBO9780511553806.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Kathleen P. Hermaphrodites in Renaissance Europe. Hampshire, 2006.Google Scholar
Maclean, Hugh, ed. Ben Jonson and the Cavalier Poets. New York, 1974.Google Scholar
Milner, Matthew. The Senses and the English Reformation. Farnham, 2011.Google Scholar
Nelson, John C. “ L’Amorosa Filosofia di Francesco Patrizi da Cherso.” Rinascimento 13 (1962): 89–106.Google Scholar
Nobili, Flaminio. Il trattato dell’amore humano. Rome, 1895.Google Scholar
O’Rourke Boyle, Marjorie. Senses of Touch: Human Dignity and Deformity from Michelangelo to Calvin. Leiden, 1998.Google Scholar
Panizza, Letizia. “Platonic Love on the Rocks: Castiglione Counter-Currents in Renaissance Italy.” In Laus Platonici Philosophi: Marsilio Ficino and His Influence. ed. Stephen Lucas, Peter J. Forshaw, and Valery Rees, 199–226. Leiden, 2011.10.1163/ej.9789004188976.i-384.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, Mark. The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies. Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
Patrizi, Francesco. L’amorosa filosofia. Ed. John Charles Nelson. Florence, 1963.Google Scholar
Patrizi, Francesco. Lettere ed opusculi inediti. Ed. D. Aguzzi Barbagli. Florence, 1975.Google Scholar
Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni. Commento sopra una canzone d’amore. Palermo, 1994.Google Scholar
Plato, . Symposium. Trans. Tom Griffith. Berkeley, 1985.Google Scholar
Plato, . Phaedrus. Trans. Alexander Nehamas and Paul Woodruff. Indianapolis, 1995.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . The Enneads. 7 vols. Trans. A. H. Armstrong. Cambridge, 1967.Google Scholar
Robb, Nesca A. Neoplatonism of the Italian Renaissance. London, 1935.Google Scholar
Sawday, Jonathan. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London, 1995.Google Scholar
Schachter, Marc. “Le Roy’s Sympose de Platon and Three Other Renaissance Adaptions of Platonic Eros.” Renaissance Quarterly 59.2 (2006): 406–39.10.1353/ren.2008.0331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosser, Julius. Leben und Meinungen des florentinischen Bildners Lorenzo Ghiberti. Basel, 1941.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela. The Body of the Artisan. Chicago, 2004.10.7208/chicago/9780226764269.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speroni, Sperone. Dialogo d’amore. Ed. Pierre Martin. Poitiers, 1998.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. On Plato’s Symposium. Chicago, 2001.Google Scholar
Summers, David. The Judgment of Sense: Renaissance Naturalism and the Rise of Aesthetics. Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar
Vasoli, Cesare. “ L’amorosa filosofia di Francesco Patrizi e la dissoluzione del mito platonico dell’amore.” Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 43 (1988): 419–41.Google Scholar
Vasoli, Cesare. Francesco Patrizi da Cherso. Rome, 1989.Google Scholar
Vesalius, Andreas. De humani corporis fabrica. Paris, 2001.Google Scholar
Vinge, Louise. The Five Senses: Studies in a Literary Tradition. Lund, 1975.Google Scholar
Vuilleumier Laurens, Florence. “Les Basia de Jean Second et la tradition philosophique de Marsile Ficin à Francesco Patrizi.” In La poétique de Jean Second et son influence au XVI siècle. ed. Jean Balsamo and Perrine Galand-Hallyn, 25–38. Paris, 2000.Google Scholar
Wurm, Achim. Platonicus Amor: Lesarten der Liebe bei Platon, Plotin und Ficino. Berlin, 2008.10.1515/9783110210712CrossRefGoogle Scholar