Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:12:54.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Louis Le Roy’s Sympose de Platon and Three Other Renaissance Adaptions of Platonic Eros*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Marc Schachter
Marc Schachter*
Affiliation:
Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay considers commentaries on and translations of Plato’s Symposium (by Marsilio Ficino, the Henri Estienne-Jean de Serres team, and, preeminently, Louis Le Roy) as well as an influential Neoplatonic passage from Baldassar Castiglione’s Il Cortegiano to explore some of the implications of, and dynamics behind, the heterosexualization of Platonic eros in the Renaissance. Focusing on the specific work done by different texts in particular contexts rather than homogenizing the translation of pederastic eros, the essay contributes to a critical genealogy of heterosexuality. Links between Le Roy’s effort and the cultural and political ambitions of the French monarchy receive particular attention.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , Summer 2006 , pp. 406 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Maria Park Bobroff for bibliographical assistance as I completed this essay, Carla Freccero and Todd Reeser for sharing forthcoming work with me, Gerry Milligan for conversation about Castiglione, Helen Solterer and Deanna Shemek for timely and astute feedback, and several anonymous Renaissance Quarterly readers for attentive engagement and helpful suggestions. Unless otherwise noted, translations are my own. This essay is dedicated to Eric Galipo.

References

Barkan, Leonard. Transuming Passion: Ganymede and the Erotics of Humanism. Stanford, 1991.Google Scholar
Becker, Abraham Henri. Un humaniste au XVI e siècle: Loys le Roy. 1896. Reprint, Slatkine, 1969.Google Scholar
Berger, Harry. The Absence of Grace: Sprezzatura in Two Renaissance Courtesy Books. Palo Alto, 2001.Google Scholar
Boggione, Valter, and Casalegno, Giovanni. Dizionario storico del lessico erotico italiano. Milan, 1999.Google Scholar
Boswell, John. Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality. Chicago, 1980.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. “Paul and the Genealogy of Gender.” Representations 41 (1993): 1–24.10.1525/rep.1993.41.1.99p0145iCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Sarah, Runnalls, Graham. “The Entertainments at the Marriage of Mary Queen of Scots and the French Dauphin François, 1558: Paris and Edinburgh.” Medieval English Theater 22 (2000): 145–61.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassar. Il Cortegiano. Milan, 1991.Google Scholar
Chiffoleau, Jacques. “Dire l’indicible: re-marques sur la catégorie du nefandum du XIe au XVe siècle.” Annales 45: 275–96.Google Scholar
Cox, Virginia. The Renaissance Dialogue: Literary Dialogue in its Social and Political Contexts, Castiglione to Galileo. Cambridge, 1992.10.1017/CBO9780511895715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall’Orto, Giovanni. “Socratic Love as a Disguise for Same-Sex Love in the Renaissance.” In The Pursuit of Sodomy, ed. Gerard, Kent and Hekma, Gert, 22–65. New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Festugière, Jean. La Philosophie de l’amour de Marsile Ficin et son influence sur la littérature française au XVI e siècle. Paris, 1941.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentary on Plato’s Symposium on Love. Trans. Jayne, Sears. Woodstock, 1994.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentaire sur Le Banquet de Platon, De l’Amour, Commentarium in convivium Platonis, De Amore. Ed. and trans. Laurens, Pierre. Paris, 2002.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” Trans. Hurley, Robert. In The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, Paul, 76–100. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Use of Pleasure. Vol. 2 of The History of Sexuality. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Freccero, Carla. “The Other and the Same: The Image of the Hermaphrodite in Rabelais.” In Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourse of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe, ed. Ferguson, Margaret, Quilligan, Maureen, and Vickers, Nancy, 145–58. Chicago, 1986.Google Scholar
Freccero, Carla. “Politics and Aesthetics in Castiglione’s Il Cortegiano: Book III and the Discourse on Women.” In Creative Imitation: New Essays on Renaissance Literature in Honor of Thomas Greene, ed. Quint, David et al., 259–79. Binghamton, 1992.Google Scholar
Freccero, Carla. ”Queer Nation, Female Nation: Marguerite de Navarre, Incest, and the State in Early Modern France.” Modern Language Quarterly 65, no. 1 (2004): 29–47.10.1215/00267929-65-1-29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundersheimer, Werner L. The Life and Works of Louis le Roy. Geneva, 1966.Google Scholar
Halperin, David. “Why is Diotima a Woman?” In Halperin, , One Hundred Years of Homosexuality: And Other Essays on Greek Love, 113–51. New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Hampton, Timothy. Literature and Nation in the Sixteenth Century: Inventing Renaissance France. Ithaca, 2001.Google Scholar
Hankins, James. Plato in the Italian Renaissance. 2 vols. New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Hanley, Sarah. “The Monarchic State in Early Modern France: Marital Regime Government and Male Right.” In Politics, Ideology, and the Law in Early Modern Europe: Essays in Honor of J. H. M. Salmon, ed. Bakos, Adrianna, 107–26. Rochester, NY, 1994.Google Scholar
Hanley, Sarah. “La Loi salique.” In Encyclopédie politique et historique des femmes: Europe, Amérique du Nord, ed. Fauré, Christine, 11–30. Paris, 1996.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. Speculum of the Other Woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.. Ithaca, 1989.Google Scholar
Jackson, Richard A “Peers of France and Princes of the Blood.” French Historical Studies 7 (1971): 27–46.10.2307/286105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Constance. Renaissance Feminism: Literary Texts and Political Models. Ithaca, 1990.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. “The Transformation of Platonic Love in the Italian Renaissance.” In Platonism and the English Imagination, ed. Baldwin, Anna and Hutton, Sarah, 76–85. Cambridge, 1994.10.1017/CBO9780511553806.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. Studies in Renaissance Thought and Letters. Rome, 1956.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. “The First Printed Edition of Plato’s works and the Date of its Publication.” In Science and History: Studies in Honor of Edward Rosen, ed. Hilfstein, Erna, Czartoryski, Pawel, and Frank D., Grande, 23–35. Wrocław, 1979.Google Scholar
Langer, Ullrich. Vertu du discours, discours du vertu: littérature et philosophie morale au XVI e siècle en France. Geneva, 1999.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, Kenneth. “’Cest exercice de traduire…’: Humanist Hermeneutic in Louis Le Roy’s Translations of Plato.” In Recapturing the Renaissance: New Perspectives on Humanism, Dialogue and Texts, ed. Woods, Diane S. and Miller, Paul Allen, 85–106. Knoxville, 1996.Google Scholar
Marcel, Raymond. Marsile Ficin. Paris, 1958.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne. “The Image of the Androgyne: Some Uses of a Symbol in Earliest Christianity.” The History of Religions 13 (1974): 165–208.10.1086/462701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Patricia. Literary Fat Ladies: Rhetoric, Gender, Property. London, 1987.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia. “Preposterous Events.” Shakespeare Quarterly 5 (1992): 186–213.10.2307/2870881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Patricia. “Gender Ideology, Gender Change: The Case of Marie Germain.” Critical Inquiry 19 (1993): 337–64.10.1086/448677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . LE SYMPOSE DE PLATON, OV DE L’AMOVR ET DE BEAUTE’, TRADVUIT DE GREC en François, auec trois liures de Commentaires, extraictz de toute Philosophie & recueillis des meilleurs autheurs tant Grecz que Latins, & autres. Trans. Louis le Roy. Paris, 1559.Google Scholar
Plato, . “Convivio.” In Divini Platonis Opera Omnia. Trans. Ficino, Marsilio. Lyon, 1567.Google Scholar
Plato, . Convivium, sive De amore. In vol. 1 of Platonis opera quæ extant omnia. Ed. Estienne, Henri. Trans. de Serres, Jean. Geneva, 1578.Google Scholar
Plato, . Symposium. Ed. Dover, Kenneth. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
Poirier, Guy. Homosexualité dans l’imaginaire de la Renaissance. Paris, 1996.Google Scholar
Todd, Reeser. “Fracturing the Male Androgyne in the Heptaméron.” Romance Quarterly 51, no. 1 (2004): 15–28.Google Scholar
Regosin, Richard L. “Language and Nation in 16th-Century France: The Arts poétiques.” In Beginnings in French Literature, ed. Henry, Freeman G., 29–40. New York, 2002.10.1163/9789004334175_003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reverdin, Olivier. “Le Platon d’Henri Estienne.” Museum Helveticum 13 (1956): 239–50.Google Scholar
Rocke, Michael. Forbidden Friendships: Homosexuality and Male Culture in Renaissance Florence. Oxford, 1996.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Marian. “Mutations of the Androgyne: Its Functions in Early Modern French Literature.” The Sixteenth Century Journal 34 (2003): 409–37.10.2307/20061416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saslow, James. Ganymede in the Renaissance: Homosexuality in Art and Society. New Haven, 1986.Google Scholar
Saulnier, V. L. Henri Estienne. Paris, 1988.Google Scholar
Schleiner, Winfriend. “Linguistic ’Xenohomophobia’ in Sixteenth-Century France: The Case of Henri Estienne.” The Sixteenth Century Journal 34 (2003): 747–60.10.2307/20061532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Albert-Marie. “Traducteurs Français de Platon (1536–1550).” In Schmidt, , Études sur le XVI e siècle, 17–44. Paris, 1967.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Fred. The Estiennes: An Annotated Catalogue of 300 Highlights of their Various Presses. New York, 2003.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, 1990.Google Scholar
Turner, James Grantham. Schooling Sex: Libertine Literature and Erotic Education in Italy, France, and England 1534–1685. Oxford, 2003.Google Scholar
Walch, Agnès. La Spiritualité conjugale dans le catholicisme français (XVI e–XX e siècle). Paris, 2002.Google Scholar