Alpers, Svetlana The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago, 1983.Google Scholar

Appadurai, Arjun “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, ed. Arjun Appadurai, 3–63. Cambridge, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldasso, Renzo “The Role of Visual Representation in the Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Enquiry.” Centaurus 48.2 (2006): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldasso, Renzo “Printing for the Doge: On the First Quire of the First Edition of the Liber elementorum Euclidis.” La Bibliofilia 114.3 (2013): 525–52.Google Scholar

Baldriga, Irene L’occhio della lince: I primi Lincei tra arte, scienza e collezionismo, 1603–1630. Rome, 2002.Google Scholar

Banks, David L’image dans le texte scientifique. Paris, 2013.Google Scholar

Belting, Hans Bild und Kult: Eine Geschichte des Bildes vor dem Zeitalter der Kunst. Munich, 1990.Google Scholar

Bender, John, and Marrinan, Michael. The Culture of Diagram. Palo Alto, 2010.Google Scholar

Berger, Susanna “The Invention of Wisdom in Jean Chéron’s Illustrated Thesis Print.” In The Nature of Invention, ed. Alexander Marr and Vera Keller, special issue of Intellectual History Review 24.3 (2014): 343–66.Google Scholar

Bleichmar, Daniela, and Mancall, Peter C., eds. Collecting across Cultures: Material Exchanges in the Early Modern Atlantic World. Philadelphia, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst “A Neglected Tradition? Art History as Bildwissenschaft.” Critical Inquiry 29 (2003): 418–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst Galilei der Künstler. Der Mond. Die Sonne. Die Hand. Berlin, 2007.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst Theorie des Bildakts. Berlin, 2010.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst, ed. Galileo’s O, vols. 1–2. Berlin, 2012.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst “The Picture Act: Tradition, Horizon, Philosophy.” In Bildakt at the Warburg Institute, ed. Sabine Marienberg and Jürgen Trabant, 3–32. Berlin, 2014.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst, Brückle, Irene, and Needham, Paul, eds. Galileo’s O, vol. 3: A Galileo Forgery: Unmasking the New York Sidereus Nuncius. Berlin, 2014.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst, Dünkel, Vera, and Schneider, Birgit, eds. The Technical Image: A History of Styles in Scientific Imagery. Chicago, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cave, Roderick Impressions of Nature: A History of Nature Printing. London, 2010.Google Scholar

Clark, Stuart Vanities of the Eye: Vision in Early Modern European Culture. Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar

Cook, Harold J. Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dackerman, Susan “Dürer’s Indexical Fantasy: The Rhinoceros and Printmaking.” In Prints and the Pursuit of Knowledge (2011a), 164–71.Google Scholar

Dackerman, Susan “Introduction: Prints as Instruments.” In Prints and the Pursuit of Knowledge (2011b), 19–35.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine, ed. Things That Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science. New York, 2004.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine “Epistemic Images.” In Vision and Its Instruments: Art, Science, and Technology in Early Modern Europe, ed. Alina Payne, 13–35. University Park, 2015.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine, and Gallison, Peter. Objectivity. New York, 2007.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine, and Elizabeth Lunbeck, eds. Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago, 2011.Google Scholar

Dupré, Sven. “The Historiography of Perspective and Reflexy-Const in Netherlandish Art.” Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 61 (2011): 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elkins, James “Art History and Images That Are not Art.” Art Bulletin 77.4 (1995): 553–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fay, Isla, and Jardine, Nicholas, eds. Observing the World through Images: Diagrams and Figures in the Early-Modern Arts and Sciences. Leiden, 2014.Google Scholar

Felfe, Robert Naturform und bildnerische Prozesse: Elemente einer Wissensgeschichte in der Kunst des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts. Berlin, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrell, Lori Anne “Page Techne: Interpreting Diagrams in Early Modern English ‘How-to’ Books.” In Printed Images in Early Modern Britain: Essays in Interpretation, ed. Michael Hunter, 113–26. Farnham, 2010.Google Scholar

Fischel, Angela Natur im Bild: Zeichnung und Naturerkenntnis bei Conrad Gessner und Ulisse Aldrovandi. Berlin, 2009.Google Scholar

Fischel, Angela “Collections, Images and Form in Sixteenth-Century Natural History: The Case of Conrad Gessner.” In Picturing Collections in Early Modern Europe, ed. Alexander Marr, special issue of Intellectual History Review 20.1 (2010): 147–64.Google Scholar

Freedberg, David The Eye of the Lynx: Galileo, His Friends, and the Beginnings of Modern Natural History. Chicago, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freybürg, Sascha, and Blühm, Katharina. “Bildakt Demystified: Remarks on Philosophical Iconology and Empirical Aesthetics.” In Bildakt at the Warburg Institute, ed. Sabine Marienberg and Jürgen Trabant, 51–67. Berlin, 2014.Google Scholar

Göttler, Christine, and Neuber, Wolfgang, eds. Spirits Unseen: The Representation of Subtle Bodies in Early Modern European Culture. Leiden, 2008.Google Scholar

Guerrini, Anita The Courtiers’ Anatomists: Animals and Humans in Louis XIV’s Paris. Chicago, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heilbron, John L. Galileo. Oxford, 2010.Google Scholar

Henderson, Felicity, Kusukawa, Sachiko, and Marr, Alexander, eds. Curiously Drawn: Early Modern Science as a Visual Pursuit. Special issue of Huntington Library Quarterly 78.1 (2015).Google Scholar

Hendrix, John Shannon, and Carman, Charles H., eds. Renaissance Theories of Vision. Farnham, 2010.Google Scholar

Heßler, Martina, and Mersch, Dieter, eds. Logik des Bildlichen: Zur Kritik der ikonischen Vernunft. Bielefeld, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, Matthew C. Wicked Intelligence: Visual Art and the Science of Experiment in Restoration London. Chicago, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, Matthew C., and Francesco Lucchini. “The Clever Object: Three Pavilions, Three Loggia, and a Planetarium.” In The Clever Object, ed. Matthew C. Hunter and Francesco Lucchini, special issue of Art History 36.3 (2015): 474–97.Google Scholar

Jordanova, Ludmilla “Image Matters.” Historical Journal 51.3 (2008): 777–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jorink, Eric Reading the Book of Nature in the Dutch Golden Age, 1515–1715. Leiden, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Ursula, and Spary, E. C.. Materials and Expertise in Early Modern Europe: Between Market and Laboratory. Chicago, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraemer, Fabian “Ulisse Aldrovandi’s Pandechion epistemonicon and the Use of Paper Technology in Renaissance Natural History.” Early Science and Medicine 19 (2014): 398–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kusukawa, Sachiko Picturing the Book of Nature: Image, Text, and Argument in Sixteenth-Century Human Anatomy and Medical Botany. Chicago, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kusukawa, Sachiko, and Maclean, Ian, eds. Transmitting Knowledge: Words, Images, and Instruments in Early Modern Europe. Oxford, 2006.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, Wolfgang, ed. Picturing Machines 1400–1700. Cambridge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lo, Melissa “Between Figure and Line: Visual Transformations of Cartesian Physics, 1620–1690.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 2014.Google Scholar

Long, Pamela O. Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Baltimore, 2001.Google Scholar

Lüthy, Christoph. “Where Logical Necessity Turns into Visual Persuasion: Descartes’ Clear and Distinct Illustrations.” In Transmitting Knowledge: Words, Images, and Instruments in Early Modern Europe, ed. Ian Maclean and Sachiko Kusukawa, 97–133. Oxford, 2006.Google Scholar

Lüthy, Christoph, and Smets, Alexis. “Words, Lines, Diagrams, Images: Towards a History of Scientific Imagery.” Early Science and Medicine 14 (2009): 398–439.Google Scholar

Marcaida López, José Ramón. Arte y Ciencia en el Barroco español: Historia natural, coleccionismo y cultura visual. Madrid, 2014.Google Scholar

Margocsy, Daniel Commercial Visions: Science, Trade, and Visual Culture in the Dutch Golden Age. Chicago, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marr, Alexander Between Raphael and Galileo: Mutio Oddi and the Mathematical Culture of Late Renaissance Italy. Chicago, 2011.Google Scholar

Murdoch, John Album of Science: Antiquity and Middle Ages. New York, 1984.Google Scholar

Nagel, Alexander, and Wood, Christopher S.. Anachronic Renaissance. New York, 2010.Google Scholar

Neri, Janice The Insect and the Image: Visualizing Nature in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1700. Minneapolis, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogilvie, Brian The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe. Chicago, 2008.Google Scholar

Panofsky, Erwin Galileo as a Critic of the Arts. The Hague, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panofsky, Erwin The Life and Art of Albrecht Dürer. Princeton, 2005.Google Scholar

Parshall, Peter “Imago contrafacta: Images and Facts in the Northern Renaissance.” Art History 16.4 (1993): 554–79.Google Scholar

Popplow, Marcus “Why Draw Pictures of Machines?” In Picturing Machines 1400–1700, ed. Wolfgang Lefèvre, 17–48. Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar

Prints and the Pursuit of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Ed. Susan Dackerman. New Haven, 2011.Google Scholar

Remmert, Volker Picturing the Scientific Revolution: Title Engravings in Early Modern Scientific Publications. Philadelphia, 2011.Google Scholar

Roos, Anna Marie Web of Nature: Martin Lister (1639–1712), the First Arachnologist. Leiden, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothstein, Bret “Visual Difficulty as a Cultural System.” Res 65–66 (2014–15): 332–47.Google Scholar

Rublack, Ulinka “Matter in the Material Renaissance.” Past and Present 219.1 (2013): 41–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8.1 (1969): 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Jeffrey Chipps, ed. Visual Acuity and the Arts of Communication in Early Modern Germany. Farnham, 2014.Google Scholar

Smith, Pamela H. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Pamela H., Amy R. W. Meyers, and Harold J. Cook, eds. Ways of Making and Knowing: The Material Culture of Empirical Knowledge. Ann Arbor, 2014.Google Scholar

Stechow, Wolfgang Northern Renaissance Art, 1400–1600: Sources and Documents. Evanston, 1989.Google Scholar

Swan, Claudia Art, Science, and Witchcraft in Early Modern Holland: Jacques de Gheyn II (1565–1629). Cambridge, 2005.Google Scholar

van Eck, Caroline Art, Agency and Living Presence : From the Animated Image to the Excessive Object. Berlin, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Netten, Djoeke Koopman in kennis: De uitgever Willem Jansz Blaeu (1571–1638) in de geleerde wereld van zijn tijd. Zutphen, 2014.Google Scholar

“Visual Culture Questionnaire.” October 77 (1996): 25–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilding, Nick “Review of Horst Bredekamp, ed., Galileo’s O vols. 1 and 2.” Renaissance Quarterly 65.1 (2012): 217–18.Google Scholar

Wilding, Nick “Review of Horst Bredekamp, Irene Brückle, and Paul Needham, eds., A Galileo Forgery: Unmasking the New York Sidereus Nuncius.” Renaissance Quarterly 67.4 (2014): 1337–40.Google Scholar

Wragge-Morley, Alexander. “The Work of Verbal Picturing for John Ray and Some of His Contemporaries.” In Picturing Collections in Early Modern Europe, ed. Alexander Marr, special issue of Intellectual History Review 20.1 (2010): 165–79.Google Scholar

Zittel, Klaus Theatrum philosophicum: Descartes und die Rolle ästhetischer Formen in der Wissenschaft. Berlin, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zorach, Rebecca The Passionate Triangle. Chicago, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar